You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023PD06-06 INSTITUTIONAL AND SURGEON VARIATION IN PRACTICE WITHIN THE PEDIATRIC KIDNEY STONE (PKIDS) CARE IMPROVEMENT NETWORK Nicolas Fernandez, Jonathan Ellison, Zi Wang, Jing Huang, David Chu, Pankaj Dangle, Renea Sturm, Andrew Stec, Ryan Hsi, Christina Ching, Wayland Wu, Caleb Nelson, Brian Augelli, Jing Karchin, and Gregory Tasian Nicolas FernandezNicolas Fernandez More articles by this author , Jonathan EllisonJonathan Ellison More articles by this author , Zi WangZi Wang More articles by this author , Jing HuangJing Huang More articles by this author , David ChuDavid Chu More articles by this author , Pankaj DanglePankaj Dangle More articles by this author , Renea SturmRenea Sturm More articles by this author , Andrew StecAndrew Stec More articles by this author , Ryan HsiRyan Hsi More articles by this author , Christina ChingChristina Ching More articles by this author , Wayland WuWayland Wu More articles by this author , Caleb NelsonCaleb Nelson More articles by this author , Brian AugelliBrian Augelli More articles by this author , Jing KarchinJing Karchin More articles by this author , and Gregory TasianGregory Tasian More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003230.06AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The strength of the evidence base supporting surgical management of urinary stone disease for pediatric patients is weak. Using data from the PKIDS Network, we aimed to describe characteristics of institutions and surgeons in PKIDS and factors associated with selection of surgical intervention modality for different clinical scenarios. METHODS: Surgeons in the PKIDS Network completed intake surveys at site activation between February 2020 and September 2022. Surgeon questionnaires collected demographics, clinical and surgical management preferences. Institutional questionnaires collected site characteristics about case volume, equipment availability, and infrastructure. Assessment of preference between surgery type (URS, SWL, PCNL) was evaluated using 4 different clinical scenarios included in the surgeon survey (A) 2 cm kidney stone, B) 9 mm proximal ureteral stone, C) 1.5 cm lower pole kidney stone, D) 1 cm non lower pole kidney stone. Four multivariable linear regression models were built to evaluate the association between surgeon and institutional characteristics and the choice of surgical intervention for each of the 4 clinical scenarios. Principal component analysis was performed to identify clusters of characteristics that influenced surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 31 sites and 148 surgeons with a mean of 9.7 years in practice (SD=8.7 years) completed surveys. There was wide variation in surgeon preferences for type of surgical intervention; equipoise was greatest for URS versus PCNL for a 1.5cm kidney stone (Figure 1). Principal component analysis identified 3 clusters of factors influencing surgeon preferences: A. Stone characteristics (size, location, and density), B. Patient characteristics (symptoms, history of urinary tract infections, comorbidities, and prior surgical history) and C. Other (complications, reimbursement, radiation exposure and number of anesthetics). CONCLUSIONS: Wide heterogeneity in the characteristics and preferences of surgeons who surgically manage pediatric patients with urinary stones was identified. A cohort of surgeons expressed preference for surgical modality driven primarily by kidney stone features, another by patient features, and a third by other variables. Source of Funding: Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PECORI) © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e157 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Nicolas Fernandez More articles by this author Jonathan Ellison More articles by this author Zi Wang More articles by this author Jing Huang More articles by this author David Chu More articles by this author Pankaj Dangle More articles by this author Renea Sturm More articles by this author Andrew Stec More articles by this author Ryan Hsi More articles by this author Christina Ching More articles by this author Wayland Wu More articles by this author Caleb Nelson More articles by this author Brian Augelli More articles by this author Jing Karchin More articles by this author Gregory Tasian More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract