Seawater splitting has garnered significant research interest recently as a method to produce green hydrogen at reduced costs1. One major limitation is the effect of naturally present impurities on all parts of an electrolyzer2– from the membranes to the catalysts. Transition metal cations with reduction potentials in the range of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) could interfere with the electrocatalytic reaction. Although this effect has been investigated in the context of underpotential deposition3, there is limited understanding of how competitive redox processes involving impurity ions can influence HER on electrocatalytic electrodes. Here, we study the effect of copper as an impurity ion in the presence of electrocatalytic (platinum) and non-electrocatalytic (gold) electrodes to understand the dynamic competition between electrodeposition and HER. We find that copper deposition competes with HER on both platinum and gold surfaces, leading to a significant decrease in current density with increasing copper concentration. The electrode surfaces are characterized with scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy to understand morphological evolution of the growing copper metal, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is used to quantify the nanoscale thickness of deposited copper. At relatively high dissolved Cu2+ concentrations, copper metal is observed to electrodeposit uniformly on gold electrodes, whereas platinum features nonuniform copper growth with pits and channels likely due to the influence of hydrogen evolution. In situ atomic force microscopy is also used to gain insight into the nucleation and growth behavior of copper on these different electrodes. Together, the results clearly show that redox competition of copper impurities can occur even at the relatively low concentrations of Cu2+ found in seawater (~1 μM)4, highlighting the importance of studying the effect of different impurities on the catalyst under consideration. This work is intended to eventually lead to robust electrolyzers that can be used to efficiently produce hydrogen under impure input stream conditions, potentially lowering costs.REFERENCES: Tong, W., et al., Nature Energy (2020) 5 (5), 367Becker, H., et al., Sustainable Energy & Fuels (2023) 7 (7), 1565Cadle, S. H., and Bruckenstein, S., Analytical Chemistry (1971) 43 (13), 1858Leal, P. P., et al., Sci Rep (2018) 8 (1), 14763
Read full abstract