Abstract Brugada syndrome (BrS) is characterized by a “coved” ST segment elevation of ≥2 mm in the right precordial electrocardiographic (ECG) leads, either spontaneously or drug–induced. Risk stratification in individuals with BrS remains challenging. Currently, miniaturized and remotely monitored implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are available, providing physicians with a diagnostic tool that can help guide intervention or therapy decisions for these patients. The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with BrS who underwent ICM insertion during routine clinical activity. This is a retrospective single center cohort study. We screened 147 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with BrS based on the presence of spontaneous or drug–induced type 1 ECG pattern between January 2009 and May 2023. Once this comprehensive diagnostic pathway was completed, we engaged in detailed counseling with patients to discuss the potential need for ICD implantation or ILR insertion, if deemed indicated. Compared to patients who did not receive a device, those who received an ILR had a higher prevalence of suspected arrhythmic syncope (43% vs. 22%, p=0.012) and tended to be younger (median age 38 years, IQR 30–52, vs. 43 years, IQR 35–55, p=0.044) and with a higher presence of SCN5A gene mutations (17% vs. 6%). On the other hand, compared to patients who received an ICD, those with an ICM underwent programmed ventricular stimulation less frequently (40% vs. 85%, p=0.010) and, as a result, had a lower frequency of positive result of this test (0% vs. 91%, p< 0.001). During a median follow–up period of 14.7 months (IQR, 4.7–44.8), no deaths occurred among the patients with ILR. Eight individuals (19%) were diagnosed with arrhythmic findings through continuous ILR monitoring. Among these findings, three patients experienced AF (including one case of new–onset AF), two patients exhibited symptomatic asystolic pauses lasting 16 seconds and 3.6 seconds respectively, two patients had non–sustained ventricular tachycardia, and one patient had episodes of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Except for a history of AF, no significant differences were observed between patients with arrhythmic findings and those without any events. In the ICD group, the median follow–up period was 32.2 months (IQR, 23.2–95.0). During this period, no deaths occurred and no appropriate or inappropriate ICD therapies were delivered.
Read full abstract