Reviewed by: Darfur Peacekeepers: The African Union Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (AMIS) from the Perspective of a Hungarian Military Advisor by János Besenyő Nina Käsehage BOOK REVIEW of Besenyő, János. 2021. Darfur Peacekeepers: The African Union Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (AMIS) from the Perspective of a Hungarian Military Advisor. Paris: Éditions L’Harmattan, 234 pp. €29 (cloth), €29 (paper). The book Darfur Peacekeepers: The African Union Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (AMIS) from the Perspective of a Hungarian Military Advisor combines two perspectives, that of an Africanist and that of a military advisor assessing the multifaceted conflicts in Sudan. It is divided into seven chapters: “Geography and History of Darfur,” “AMIS I,” “AMIS II—History, Structure and Operation,” “AMIS IIE (Enhanced) or AMIS III,” “The Support Mission of the European Union,” “Hungarian Experience,” and the author’s “Conclusion.” The first chapter takes the reader on a journey through the economic, historical, and sociopolitical dimensions of Sudan, its religions, ethnic groups, and natural environment. Chapters 2, 3, and 4 provide detail regarding the three African Union peacekeeping missions in Darfur, such as their structures, phases, and military components. Besenyő profiles the efforts made, the tasks pertaining to the different sectors, and the costs associated with these missions. Chapter 5 describes the support mission of the European Union in Darfur, its development as well as the challenges it faced, such as demands by the African Union (AU) regarding military equipment and the AU’s unwillingness to provide staff to cover other aspects of AMIS for activities such as healthcare. This imbalance, and the presence of foreign military personnel in the region, led to insecurity among the population and a wave of refugees. Additionally, the personal and local accommodation of European staff was dismal, and the African commander treated his European colleagues [End Page 138] as outsiders; further, he did not provide them with the necessary information regarding the mission. Chapter 6 offers insights into the work of Hungarian military observers in Darfur since 2004, the changing role of the position since 2005 as deputy head of field support service (a responsibility that fell to the author), the extension of this position for six months, and Hungarian withdrawal from the mission. In clear terms, the author describes the challenges he had to face during this period as deputy head of field support service: starting with insufficient food stocks for the (international) military staff in the camps, issues of hygiene and sanitation, and the food habits of local soldiers that caused various risks, as well as diseases, for and among the staff within the camps. In his conclusion, Besenyő points out that the AU “was able to achieve results only through the ongoing political and financial and the diplomatic support of the US, EU and UN” (172) because it lacked resources as well as human capacity, such as police or soldiers, lacked experience with peacekeeping missions, and had an “overburdened bureaucracy” (172). According to Besenyő, one of the major failures of the AU was due to “the military reinforcement and expansion of the mission that was supposed to be a monitoring mission originally” (173). Considerable mismanagement of the AU regarding donations and cooperation between the aforementioned international organizations and the AU’s (military) representatives led the inhabitants of the region to lose their faith in the African peacekeepers and turn to self-defense. Such mismanagement included the AU’s unwillingness to grant visas to the international peacekeepers and the lack of English skills on the part of African military partners sent to the region, despite those partners’ ongoing desire and will to lead this so-called African mission. For these reasons, the AMIS missions failed in the author’s eyes. His observations may be taken as testimony to the former failures regarding Darfur, to inform appropriate mutual approaches for this region in the future. In particular, the internal perspectives of the author’s and other experts’ diaries that are cited in chapters 4 and 6 visualize incidents, challenges, and opportunities in Darfur during the mission’s involvement in the region. They may be appropriately classified as being in the tradition of military history and give the description of seemingly anonymous military interventions...