Background Reading At the beginning of the Progressive Era, one in every five females over the age often was employed, and over a million . of these females worked in factories. By 1920, the number of working women increased to one in every four, with a significant number joining the ranks of industrial workers. These factory women were young and single, or women who had become widows, divorced, or abandoned. Seventy-five percent of them were foreign born or daughters of foreign-born parents (1). With their jobs varying as widely as their national origins, the only constant was their meager wages and poor working conditions. Paid less than men, women industrial workers were condemned to work long hours under sweatshop conditions, subjected to treatment that spoke of their inferior status in the workplace. In response to these hardships many industrial women acted collectively to challenge the conditions of their working lives. Women toiled in many industries, the breadth of their bread winning opportunities determined by their location and the availabil ity of resources. They worked among the sickly sweet smells ofthe candy factory. They rolled cigars, suffering nicotine poisoning when their hands became stained. In the artificial flower-making industry they created flowers for homes and hats while receiving one of the lowest wages of all, in 1905 less than $6 a week. Other women worked within the hot and humid climate ofthe laundries, starching men's collars and cuffs. The ethnic backgrounds of women industrial workers varied. In the Northeast, factories were filled with immigrants. In Lawrence, Massachusetts, for example, over forty languages were spoken in the mills. In the New York City garment industry, Russian Jewish women helped organize thousands of workers and spearheaded many strikes for better working conditions. Cuban women domi nated the Tampa cigar-making industry, while African-American women toiled in all seven laundries of Little Rock, Arkansas. Their distinctive experiences reflected their ethnic heritages and the particu lar nature of their factory jobs. Most factory experiences did not begin to offer the workers a sustaining wage. In 1905, an annual salary of $800 was considered the minimum necessary for survival for a family of four. The average factory salary, however, amounted to $400 a year (2). Since women earned from 25 to 67 percent less than men because of their sex, their incomes could hardly be considered a living wage. In addition, deductions for factory supplies such as needles or for seconds (those items determined imperfect by the foreman or manager) further reduced the pittances received. Over 40 percent of women industrial workers toiled in textile mills and the garment trade. Employer policies in this industry remained notorious throughout the Progressive Era. The practices of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory epitomized the frightening lack of conscience of many factory and building owners. Joseph J. Asch, owner ofthe Asch building in which the Triangle Factory was located, insisted that his building was fireproof and complied with all fire regulations. Yet on 25 March 1911, 146 workers, most of them young women, died when fire flew through the locked work space at Triangle. Those who managed to find the one rusted fire escape tumbled to their deaths when it collapsed beneath their weight. In the trial that followed this tragedy, an all-male jury acquitted the Triangle owners. The cavalier attitude about the loss of life was summed up by one juror who said, I think that the girls, who undoubtedly have not as much intelligence as others might have in other walks of life, were inclined to fly into a panic (3).