Supine Chest X-ray Research Articles

Comparison between chest ultrasound (CUS) and chest radiography (CXR) in pneumothorax diagnosis: a literature review

Thoracic injuries include 25% of mortalities in traumatic cases and are associated with a 40% mortality rate. Early diagnosis of pneumothorax in thoracic traumas can decrease the mortality rate and the resultant burden significantly. Diagnosis accuracy is crucial for the management and treatment of pneumothorax since that carries significant morbidity and mortality rates. More than 90% of injury deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where the World Health Organization recognizes injuries as a neglected epidemic with the least prepared healthcare systems to handle the trauma burden. Over the past decades, computed tomography (CT) scans have been the gold standard for pneumothorax diagnosis. Even though this diagnostic tool is highly accurate in the detection of intrathoracic injuries, patients undergoing CT scan examination receive a high radiation dose. This study aims to review and comprehend the comparison between chest ultrasound (CUS) and chest radiography (CXR) as a diagnostic tool for pneumothorax. CUS is non-invasive, affordable, and does not pose an ionizing radiation risk. It offers dynamic procedures that can be done at the patient's bedside and can also be used to guide procedures. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses showed the diagnostic accuracy of CUS was higher than supine CXR for pneumothorax detection. Patients in some health care centers undergo percutaneous transthoracic needle interventions for ongoing care, including a follow-up chest X-ray (CXR) to detect pneumothorax. In spite of the adjustment for possible sources of heterogeneity, CUS is more sensitive and specific than CXR as the detection modality of pneumothorax. Some important factors, including operator experience, patient demographics, frequency, signs, and ultrasound probes, could be associated with the accuracy of CUS in identifying and diagnosing pneumothorax.

Deep Learning-based Diagnosis and Localization of Pneumothorax on Portable Supine Chest X-ray in Intensive and Emergency Medicine: A Retrospective Study

PurposeTo develop two deep learning-based systems for diagnosing and localizing pneumothorax on portable supine chest X-rays (SCXRs).MethodsFor this retrospective study, images meeting the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) patient age ≥ 20 years; (2) portable SCXR; (3) imaging obtained in the emergency department or intensive care unit. Included images were temporally split into training (1571 images, between January 2015 and December 2019) and testing (1071 images, between January 2020 to December 2020) datasets. All images were annotated using pixel-level labels. Object detection and image segmentation were adopted to develop separate systems. For the detection-based system, EfficientNet-B2, DneseNet-121, and Inception-v3 were the architecture for the classification model; Deformable DETR, TOOD, and VFNet were the architecture for the localization model. Both classification and localization models of the segmentation-based system shared the UNet architecture.ResultsIn diagnosing pneumothorax, performance was excellent for both detection-based (Area under receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]: 0.940, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.907–0.967) and segmentation-based (AUC: 0.979, 95% CI: 0.963–0.991) systems. For images with both predicted and ground-truth pneumothorax, lesion localization was highly accurate (detection-based Dice coefficient: 0.758, 95% CI: 0.707–0.806; segmentation-based Dice coefficient: 0.681, 95% CI: 0.642–0.721). The performance of the two deep learning-based systems declined as pneumothorax size diminished. Nonetheless, both systems were similar or better than human readers in diagnosis or localization performance across all sizes of pneumothorax.ConclusionsBoth deep learning-based systems excelled when tested in a temporally different dataset with differing patient or image characteristics, showing favourable potential for external generalizability.

Occult pneumothorax in patients with blunt chest trauma: key findings on supine chest radiography.

In patients with multiple trauma, a supine chest radiography [chest X-ray (CXR)] is preferred over a erect CXR. However, this method has limitations in detecting post-traumatic pneumothorax. The use of chest computed tomography (CT) to detect traumatic pneumothorax is well known. However, pneumothorax that is not detected before a chest CT scan is known as an occult pneumothorax (OP), and it can cause serious complications in the patient. This study sought to evaluate the frequency and risk factors for OP in trauma patients. Patients who suffered thoracic trauma at the Level 1 Regional Trauma Center of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital between 2015 and 2022 were included in this study. All patients were at least 18 years old. The study reviewed all patients' supine CXR and chest CT images and classified them into five radiographic diagnoses: pneumothorax, rib fracture, subcutaneous emphysema, lung contusion, and pneumomediastinum. The study included 1,284 patients, all with diagnoses of pneumothorax, rib fracture, subcutaneous emphysema, lung contusion, and pneumomediastinum following supine CXR and chest CT. The patient's average age was 58.3±15.2 years. Pneumothorax diagnosis on supine CXR had the lowest accuracy, at 46.7%, and the lowest sensitivity, at 12.7%. In univariate analysis, rib fracture, lung contusion, and subcutaneous emphysema on supine CXR were all found to be statistically significant regarding traumatic OP. In multivariate analysis, the risk factors for OP were lung contusion [odds ratio (OR), 1.440; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.115-1.860; P=0.005] and subcutaneous emphysema (OR, 25.883; 95% CI: 13.155-50.928; P<0.001) on supine CXR. The lung contusion and subcutaneous emphysema in supine CXR of trauma patients indicate the presence of OP. Therefore, if chest CT cannot be performed immediately due to unstable vital signs or other circumstances, recognizing the above radiological findings of traumatic pneumothorax may be necessary.

Occult Pneumothorax in Blunt Thoracic Trauma: Clinical Characteristics and Results of Delayed Tube Thoracostomy in a Level 1 Trauma Center

Occult pneumothorax in blunt trauma patients is often diagnosed only after computed tomography because supine chest X-ray (CXR) is preferred as an initial evaluation. However, improperly managed preexisting occult pneumothorax could threaten the vitality of patients. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of occult pneumothorax in a single trauma center. From 2020 to 2022, patients who were admitted to the level 1 trauma center were retrospectively investigated. Inclusion criteria focused on blunt chest trauma. Variables including demographic factors, image findings, injury-related factors, tube thoracostomy timing, and treatment results were evaluated. Of the 1621 patients, 187 who met the criteria were enrolled in the study: 32 with overt pneumothorax and 81 with occult pneumothorax. Among all of the pneumothorax cases, the proportion of occult pneumothorax was 71.7% (81/113), and its incidence in all admitted trauma victims was 5.0% (81/1621). Subcutaneous emphysema and rib fractures on supine CXR were risk factors for occult pneumothorax. Six patients underwent delayed tube thoracostomy; however, none had serious complications. Given that occult pneumothorax is common in patients with blunt chest trauma, treatment plans should be established that consider the possibility of pneumothorax. However, the prognosis is generally good, and follow-up is an alternative.

Ultra-low dose computed tomography of the chest in an emergency setting: A prospective agreement study.

Ultra-low dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) assessed by non-radiologists in a medical Emergency Department (ED) has not been examined in previous studies. To (i) investigate intragroup agreement among attending physicians caring for ED patients (i.e., radiologists, senior- and junior clinicians) and medical students for the detection of acute lung conditions on ULD-CT and supine chest X-ray (sCXR), and (ii) evaluate the accuracy of interpretation compared to the reference standard. In this prospective study, non-traumatic patients presenting to the ED, who received an sCXR were included. Between February and July 2019, 91 patients who underwent 93 consecutive examinations were enrolled. Subsequently, a ULD-CT and non-contrast CT were performed. The ULD-CT and sCXR were assessed by 3 radiologists, 3 senior clinicians, 3 junior clinicians, and 3 medical students for pneumonia, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and pulmonary edema. The non-contrast CT, assessed by a chest radiologist, was used as the reference standard. The results of the assessments were compared within each group (intragroup agreement) and with the reference standard (accuracy) using kappa statistics. Accuracy and intragroup agreement improved for pneumothorax on ULD-CT compared with the sCXR for all groups. Accuracy and intragroup agreement improved for pneumonia on ULD-CT when assessed by radiologists and for pleural effusion when assessed by medical students. In patients with acute lung conditions ULD-CT offers improvement in the detection of pneumonia by radiologists and the detection of pneumothorax by radiologists as well as non-radiologists compared to sCXR. Therefore, ULD-CT may be considered as an alternative first-line imaging modality to sCXR for non-traumatic patients who present to EDs.

Ultrasound is superior to supine chest x-ray for the diagnosis of clinically relevant traumatic pneumothorax.

Ultrasound is superior to supine chest x-ray for the diagnosis of clinically relevant traumatic pneumothorax.

Comparison of occult pneumothorax and pneumothorax cases in thoracic trauma: A descriptive, cross-sectional study

Background: The emergency department usually takes a supine posteroanterior (PA) chest X-ray imaging in trauma patients. In some cases, pneumothorax is not seen in the chest X-ray because of the patient's position. These cases are called occult pneumothorax. Misdiagnosis of occult pneumothorax in the emergency department may lead to complications such as tension pneumothorax. This study aimed to update patients’ features with occult pneumothorax due to blunt or penetrating trauma. Methods: In this study, data of 615 thoracic trauma patients admitted to the emergency department between January 2008 and December 2010 were evaluated. In total, 157 patients had undergone both chest X-ray and chest computed tomography and were diagnosed with pneumothorax. Of the 157 patients, 52 were excluded due to some criteria. Data of 105 patient, including their characteristics, trauma types, accompanying traumas, etiology of the chest trauma, chest X-ray findings, and computed chest tomography results were recorded. Data obtained were compared with the results of similar studies conducted in the last 10 years. Chest computed tomography was considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumothorax. Results: The mean patient age was 36.19 ± 14.74 years. Occult pneumothorax was detected in 8 of 105 patients, giving a 7.6% overall incidence of occult pneumothorax. A traffic accident was the most common cause of etiology. All occult pneumothorax cases were caused by blunt trauma, and tube thoracostomy was performed in all of them. No significant differences were found between pneumothorax and occult pneumothorax cases concerning the etiology, accompanied trauma, intervention types, and trauma reasons (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: This study supports the incidence of occult pneumothorax reported in the literature. When a patient is admitted with thoracic trauma, a physician should carefully evaluate the patient through supine chest X-ray examination. Only one misdiagnosis in trauma patients can be lead to many unintentional clinical and forensic results.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography in an emergency department

This study examined whether ultra-low-dose chest computed tomography (ULD-CT) could improve detection of acute chest conditions. To determine (i) whether diagnostic accuracy of ULD-CT is superior to supine chest X-ray (sCXR) for acute chest conditions and (ii) the feasibility of ULD-CT in an emergency department. From 1 February to 31 July 2019, 91 non-traumatic patients from the Emergency Department were prospectively enrolled in the study if they received an sCXR. An ULD-CT and a non-contrast chest CT (NCCT) scan were then performed. Three radiologists assessed the sCXR and ULD-CT examinations for cardiogenic pulmonary edema, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and pleural effusion. Resources and effort were compared for sCXR and ULD-CT to evaluate feasibility. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for sCXR and ULD-CT using NCCT as the reference standard. The mean effective dose of ULD-CT was 0.05±0.01 mSv. For pleural effusion and cardiogenic pulmonary edema, no difference in diagnostic accuracy between ULD-CT and sCXR was observed. For pneumonia and pneumothorax, sensitivities were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 69-100) and 50% (95% CI 7-93) for ULD-CT and 60% (95% CI 26-88) and 0% (95% CI 0-0) for sCXR, respectively. Median examination time was 10 min for ULD-CT vs. 5 min for sCXR (P<0.001). For ULD-CT 1-2 more staff members were needed compared to sCXR (P<0.001). ULD-CT was rated more challenging to perform than sCXR (P<0.001). ULD-CT seems equal or better in detecting acute chest conditions compared to sCXR. However, ULD-CT examinations demand more effort and resources.

For people presenting with chest trauma in the emergency department, how does chest ultrasonography compare with supine chest X-ray for the diagnosis of pneumothorax?

For people presenting with chest trauma in the emergency department, how does chest ultrasonography compare with supine chest X-ray for the diagnosis of pneumothorax?

Finger thoracostomy in patients with chest trauma performed by paramedics on a helicopter emergency medical service.

To determine the frequency of finger thoracostomy performed by intensive care flight paramedics after the introduction of a training programme in this procedure and complications of the procedure that were diagnosed after hospital arrival. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult and paediatric trauma patients undergoing finger thoracostomy performed by paramedics on a helicopter emergency medical service between June 2015 and May 2018. Hospital data were obtained through a manual search of the medical records at each of the three receiving major trauma services. Additional data were sourced from the Victorian State Trauma Registry. The final analysis included 103 cases, of which 73.8% underwent bilateral procedures with a total of 179 finger thoracostomies performed. The mean age of patients was 42.8 (standard deviation 21.4) years and 73.8% were male. Motor vehicle collision was the most common mechanism of injury accounting for 54.4% of cases. The median Injury Severity Score was 41 (interquartile range 29-54). There were 30 patients who died pre-hospital, with most (n = 25) having finger thoracostomy performed in the setting of a traumatic cardiac arrest. A supine chest X-ray was performed prior to intercostal catheter insertion in 38 of 73 patients arriving at hospital; of these, none demonstrated a tension pneumothorax. There were three cases of potential complications related to the finger thoracostomy. Finger thoracostomy was frequently performed by intensive care flight paramedics. It was associated with a low rate of major complications and given the deficiencies of needle thoracostomy, should be the preferred approach for chest decompression.

Effectiveness and safety of conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review protocol.

This systematic review aims to synthesize the available evidence investigating the effectiveness and safety of conservative management of occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients. Occult pneumothorax is air within the pleural cavity that is diagnosed on a CT scan but was not suspected on the basis of preceding clinical examination or supine chest x-ray. Currently, there is no consensus on how to manage occult pneumothoraces, especially in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. It is common practice to place a prophylactic intercostal catheter to stop the potential development of a tension pneumothorax; however, there is a 20% risk of major complications from the intercostal catheter insertion. Recent evidence suggests that occult pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated patients can be managed conservatively, rather than using a prophylactic intercostal catheter as first-line management. This review will include studies investigating stable patients of all ages who were diagnosed with traumatic occult pneumothorax via CT scan, received mechanical ventilation, and underwent either conservative management or intercostal catheter insertion. Eligible studies will include randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective cohort studies. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched. International Clinical Trials Registry, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for unpublished studies. All included studies will be critically appraised using standardized JBI tools, with no exclusions based on methodological quality. Studies will, where possible, be pooled in statistical meta-analysis, with impact of methodological quality to be explored through sensitivity analysis.

Blunt Trauma: What Is Behind the Widened Mediastinum on Chest X-Ray (CXR)?

BackgroundIt is commonly taught that a widened mediastinum (WM) on chest X-ray (CXR) is a marker for aortic injury (AI). We sought to describe the epidemiology of injuries for all patients with WM and compare their CXR to those of patients with confirmed AI. MethodsAdults (age ≥ 18) sustaining blunt traumatic injuries from January 2017 to June 2017 with both CXR (supine, anterior-posterior) and chest CT were included. We excluded those whose CT preceded CXR and those with missing data. Basic demographics, injury characteristics, mediastinal width (MW), mediastinal-to-thoracic width ratio (MTR), and all thoracic imaging findings were analyzed. MW > 8 cm was considered WM. We also queried our registry for all AI patients over a 4-year period. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of WM on CXR for AI were calculated. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with positive traumatic findings, controlling for body mass index (BMI), sex, high-energy mechanism, MTR, and mediastinal width. ResultsOf 749 included subjects, 502 (67%) had an MW > 8 cm: mean age was 48 ± 20 y, 381 (76%) were men, and BMI was 28 ± 5 kg/m2. Mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash in 335 (67%); fall in 113 (23%); assault in 31 (6%); other (jet-ski accidents, etc.) in 17 (3%), and unknown in 6 (1%). Only 128 (26%) of patients with WM had positive findings on CT, with the most common [80 (16%)] being nontraumatic findings (pericardial infusion, lymph nodes, etc.), followed by hemomediastinum/pneumomediastinum [32 (6%)], sternal fractures [18 (4%)], multiple findings [15 (3%)], and vertebral fractures [6 (1%)]. Only 2 (1%) had AI. The sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 33%, PPV was 0.4%, NPV was 100%, and accuracy was 33%. From 2013 to 2017, 38 patients had AI: mean age was 46 ± 19 y, 26 (68%) were men, and BMI was 28 ± 4 kg/m2. Motor vehicle crash was the most common mechanism (89%), followed by “other” trauma mechanism (5%), fall (3%), and assault (3%). On univariate analysis, compared with all patients with WM, patients with AI had significantly greater MW (9.5 [8.8-10.4] versus 10.2 [9.1-11.1]; P = 0.042) and MTR (0.31 [0.28-0.34] versus 0.32 [0.31-0.37]; P = 0.001), although the actual differences were not clinically significant. The regression analysis did not identify any factors associated with traumatic CXR findings. ConclusionsMost bluntly injured adults have a WM, and the majority have either no findings or nontraumatic findings. The PPV of a WM for AI is <1%. WM on supine CXR is nonspecific and inaccurate for diagnosing traumatic injuries, especially AI.

X-ray indices of chest drain malposition after insertion for drainage of pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Chest drain (CD) migration in the pleural cavity may result in inadequate drainage of pneumothorax. The aim of this study was to assess several parameters that might help in diagnosing CD migration on chest X-ray (CXR). Patients with a CD inserted from the safe triangle with a subsequent supine CXR and CT scan performed less than 24 hours apart were assessed for CD foreshortening, angle of inclination of the CD, and CD tortuosity. CD foreshortening was expressed as a ratio between CD length measured in coronal plane only and CD length inside the pleural cavity measured on CT. The angle of inclination of the CD was measured as the angle between the horizontal line and CD at the pleural space entry on CXR. CD tortuosity was calculated as a ratio between the distance from CD pleural space entry to the tip of the CD and the length of CD from the pleural space entry to its tip on CXR. Altogether 28 patients were included in the study. The median time between the CXR and CT examinations was 5.4 hours (IQR, 3.8-6.9 hours). CD foreshortening was the best clue of a misplaced CD with AUC of 0.93, 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity for a cut-off value of 82%. The angle of CD inclination was greater in patients with misplaced CD with AUC of 0.83, 75% sensitivity and 92% specificity for a cut-off of 50 degrees. The performance of CD tortuosity was poor. Greater foreshortening of the CD and a steep angle of inclination of the CD above the horizontal at chest entry should raise suspicion of CD migration and mandate further investigation by chest ultrasound to rule out residual pneumothorax occult on CXR.

The Value of Supine Chest X-Ray in the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in the Basal Lung Zones

Basal lung opacities are frequently observed on supine chest x-ray (SCXR) of intensive care patients, causing insecurity among clinicians and radiologists. We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SCXR for basal pneumonia. We identified 172 patients who received both SCXR and computed tomography within 1 hour. Two readers examined the SCXR and rated findings in both basal zones according to the following scale: 0 = "no pneumonia," 1 = "possible pneumonia," 2 = "highly suspected pneumonia." Computed tomography served as standard of reference. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) were calculated once pooling 0 and 1 as negative and once pooling 1 and 2 as positive finding. When pooling 0 and 1 as negative, sensitivity was 0.45 (right)/0.38 (left), specificity was 0.94/0.97, PPV was 0.76/0.79, and NPV was 0.81/0.84. When pooling 1 and 2 as positive, sensitivity was 0.80/0.75, specificity was 0.62/0.58, PPV was 0.45/0.35, and NPV was 0.88/0.89. The most common findings in false-positive cases were combined pleural effusions and lower lobe atelectasis. Interpreting only highly suspicious basal opacities as pneumonia considerably increases the PPV with almost constant NPV. Clinicians and radiologists should be aware of the limitations of SCXR regarding basal pneumonia.

Association between the Hanging Chin Sign and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients, a Retrospective Observational Study

Purpose: Define a new sign called the ‘Hanging Chin Sign’ (HCS) and discuss its clinical significance by evaluating if it is associated with poor hospital outcome in critically ill patients.Methods: A retrospective observational study was performed. 331 adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) between 1 April 2011 and 31 July 2013, for which an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) physician was consulted and a supine chest X-ray was taken, were included. HCS was defined as radiological projection of the jawbone (os mandibula) over one or more ribs on the chest X-ray. In-hospital mortality, ICU admission and hospital length of stay (LOS) was compared between patients with and without a HCS.Results: In patients presenting with a HCS, mortality was significantly higher. After case mix correction for age, gender, Glascow Coma Scale and neurological pathology, there was no significant independent association between the HCS and mortality, ICU admission, hospital LOS, ICU LOS and APACHE II score.Conclusion: Critically ill patients presenting to the ED with a HCS have higher in-hospital mortality. Although there is no independent association between the HCS and severity of disease, it can be used as an additional clinical marker for mortality and frailty.

Diagnostic accuracy of oblique chest radiograph for occult pneumothorax: comparison with ultrasonography.

BackgraoundAn occult pneumothorax is a pneumothorax that is not seen on a supine chest X-ray but is detected by computed tomography scanning. However, critical patients are difficult to transport to the computed tomography suite. We previously reported a method to detect occult pneumothorax using oblique chest radiography (OXR). Several authors have also reported that ultrasonography is an effective technique for detecting occult pneumothorax. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of OXR in the diagnosis of the occult pneumothorax and to compare OXR with ultrasonography.MethodsAll consecutive blunt chest trauma patients with clinically suspected pneumothorax on arrival at the emergency department were prospectively included at our tertiary-care center. The patients underwent OXR and ultrasonography, and underwent computed tomography scans as the gold standard. Occult pneumothorax size on computed tomography was classified as minuscule, anterior, or anterolateral.ResultsOne hundred and fifty-nine patients were enrolled. Of the 70 occult pneumothoraces found in the 318 thoraces, 19 were minuscule, 32 were anterior, and 19 were anterolateral. The sensitivity and specificity of OXR for detecting occult pneumothorax was 61.4 % and 99.2 %, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of lung ultrasonography was 62.9 % and 98.8 %, respectively. Among 27 occult pneumothoraces that could not be detected by OXR, 16 were minuscule and 21 could be conservatively managed without thoracostomy.ConclusionOXR appears to be as good method as lung ultrasonography in the detection of large occult pneumothorax. In trauma patients who are difficult to transfer to computed tomography scan, OXR may be effective at detecting occult pneumothorax with a risk of progression.

TCT-198 Assessment Of Aortic Valve Location On Supine Chest X-ray. Applicability Of The Aortic Valve Location Ratio For Assessment Of Intra-cardiac Assist Device Position

The use of intra-cardiac assist devices is expanding and correct position of these devices is required for optimal functioning. The aortic valve is an important landmark for positioning intra-cardiac assist devices. It would be of great value if the device position could be determined accurately by

A wearable microwave detector for diagnosing thoracic injuries-test on a porcine pneumothorax model

In the prehospital setting, a point-of-care diagnostic test is needed to diagnose pneumothorax (PTX) and monitor its progression to prevent unnecessary patient morbidity and mortality. Ultrasonography is more sensitive than supine chest x-ray for diagnosing PTX, but the accuracy depends on the experience of the operator. Therefore, a non-operator dependent instrument would be valuable for detection and continuous monitoring of an evolving PTX.

Role of computed tomography in detection of complications of blunt chest trauma

Objective The aim of the study was to study the role of computed tomography (CT) in detection of complications of blunt chest trauma patients. Background Thoracic injuries are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Injuries to the thorax are the third most common injuries in trauma patients, next to injuries to the head and extremities. Therefore, prompt diagnosis of blunt vascular injuries is imperative. Patients and methods This study included 100 patients, 66 male patients and 34 female patients with age distribution from 2 to 65 years. This study was conducted during the period from November 2012 to December 2013 at Menofyia University Hospitals and Shebin El Kom Educational Hospital. All patients subjected to blunt chest trauma presented to Menofyia Emergency Hospital and Shebin El Kom Educational Hospital during this given period were examined clinically. Those who had findings that suspect chest trauma on clinical examination underwent plain X-ray and CT examination. Finally, we compared between X-ray and CT in detection of complications of blunt chest trauma. Results CT has been shown to be useful for the evaluation of vascular, pulmonary, airway, skeletal, and diaphragmatic injuries as well. CT has overall greater sensitivity than radiography in the detection of pulmonary lacerations and pneumothoraces. In addition, it may be indicated in cases of suspected tracheobronchial injury . Conclusion Chest radiograph serves as the principle screening test for immediate assessment of the thorax after blunt chest trauma, whereas CT scanning, particularly with spiral capability, is highly sensitive than the supine chest X-ray at detecting intrathoracic injuries.

Importance of multidetector CT imaging in multiple trauma

Diagnostic imaging of complex multiple trauma remains a challenge for any department providing modern emergency radiology (ER) service. An early and comprehensive approach for ER imaging is crucial for a priority-oriented and timely therapy concept with the aim of identifying potentially life-threatening injuries early and initiating appropriate treatment. The basic diagnostic approach still consists of focused ultrasound using focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) and conventional radiography (CR), usually limited to a single supine chest x-ray for triaging patients undergoing immediate operations. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become established as early whole body CT (WBCT) as the undisputable diagnostic method. The detection rate of injuries by WBCT is outstanding and it improves the probability of survival by 20-25% compared with all other previous methods. At the same time, the spatial and temporal resolution of MDCT was improved resulting in considerably shortened examination times but WBCT is still associated with a significant radiation exposure, even in the acute single use setting. Using modern scanner and dose reduction technology, including iterative reconstruction, a dose reduction of up to 40% could be achieved. The substantial number of images in WBCT is another challenge; images must be processed priority-oriented, read and transferred to the picture archiving and communications system (PACS). For rapid diagnosis, volume image reading (VIR) offers additional options to keep the diagnostic process on time. Modern WBCT after multiple trauma is performed early, comprehensively and personalized so that WBCT improves the probability of survival by 20-25%.