Superior Progression-free Survival Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of SOX regimen combined with inetetamab as first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

e16028 Background: Patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer have a poor prognosis. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy is the first-line standard treatment. Inetetamab is a novel anti-HER2 drug, and its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer have not been reported yet. Methods: Thirty-eight patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly divided into two groups: one group received inetetamab combined with the SOX regimen, and the other group received trastuzumab combined with the SOX regimen. After 4-6 cycles, patients with stable disease received maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty-seven patients completed the trial, with 18 patients in the inetetamab group and 19 patients in the trastuzumab group. In the inetetamab group, the median PFS was 8.5 months, compared to 7.3 months in the trastuzumab group (P = 0.046), indicating a significant difference. The median OS was 15.3 months vs. 14.3 months (P = 0.46), and the ORR was 50% vs. 42% (P = 0.63), with no significant differences between groups. Common AEs included leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting. The incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 56% in the inetetamab group and 47% in the trastuzumab group (P = 0.63), with no significant difference. Conclusions: In the first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer, the efficacy of inetetamab and trastuzumab was comparable. The inetetamab group had superior PFS benefits, and both groups had good safety.

Genomic profiling in a subgroup analysis of patients (pts) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and extranodal (EN) sites of involvement in the phase 3 Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (POLARIX) study.

7061 Background: The prognosis and survival outcomes of pts with EN involvement remain a challenge for DLBCL management. In the Phase 3 POLARIX study (NCT03274492), Pola-R-CHP demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with R-CHOP in previously untreated DLBCL (Tilly et al. 2022). This retrospective analysis assessed clinical outcomes and genomic patterns of pts with DLBCL and EN disease. Methods: POLARIX methods were previously described (Tilly et al. 2022). Using a data cutoff of June 15, 2022, this analysis assessed pts with EN involvement as determined by investigators. Additional outcomes and genomics analyses were performed on pts whose EN status was confirmed from documented radiographic lesions or bone marrow biopsy with denotation of EN disease sites. Hazard ratios (HRs) for investigator-assessed PFS were adjusted for age (≤60 vs >60) and sex. Cell of origin (COO) by NanoString, mutation analysis by whole exome sequencing, and global gene expression profiling by RNAseq were performed centrally. Results: In POLARIX, 616/879 pts (70%) had identified EN involvement. After a median follow-up of 39.7 months, pts showed improved PFS with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP (HR 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.96), with a 2-year PFS of 75% vs 66%. A total of 556 pts (Pola-R-CHP, n=279; R-CHOP, n=277) had confirmed sites of EN involvement, defined as pts with EN radiographic lesions or bone marrow disease. In these pts, PFS favored Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP but the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.63–1.13). Of pts with confirmed EN disease, 429 had COO results (activated B-cell, 145 [34%]; germinal center B-cell, 223 [52%]; unclassified DLBCL, 61 [14%]). Mutation data and frequencies of select clinically relevant mutations (Ptashkin, 2023) across EN sites were available for 364 pts (Table). Gene expression data were available for 418 pts; genes involved in proliferation (E2F or PI3K signaling targets and checkpoint genes) and regulated by IRF4, OCT2 and XBP1, were commonly upregulated in pts with EN disease. Conclusions: Results in pts with DLBCL with EN involvement suggest superior PFS with Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP. Ongoing analyses will further assess the independent impact of EN status on outcome. POLARIX represents the largest cohort of pts with annotated EN disease and systematic genomic analysis, providing new insights into the genomics of these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03274492 . [Table: see text]

The patient outcomes with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment.

e20619 Background: As a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), aumolertinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a well-tolerated toxicity profile to gefitinib in front-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the AENEAS trial. However, the real-world impact of aumolertinib in the first-line treatment on patients' HRQoL still remains unclear. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations treated with aumolertinib 110 mg daily in the first-line treatment were prospectively enrolled and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (QLQ-C30) and EORTC Quality of Life lung cancer-specific module (QLQ-LC13) information were collected. Efficacy evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 was also recorded here. Prespecified key symptoms were cough, hemoptysis, dyspnea, sore mouth or tongue, dysphagia, hair loss, tingling hands or feet, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain and pain of other sites. Results: Totally, 33 patients in the first-line treatment were included and 23 patients had efficacy information up to Jan 2024. The median follow-up time was 264 days (interval: 36-491 days). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was 65.2% and 91.3%, respectively. All the patients haven’t reached the time to deterioration and the progression free survival(PFS) and overall survival is not reach. EORTC QLQ-LC30 showed general health status scale and functional scales increased and symptom scales decreased during aumolertinib treatment. Symptom scales assessed by EORTC QLQ-LC13 showed cough, sore mouth or tongue, chest pain, arm or shoulder pain and pain of other sites, were improved significantly after aumolertinib treatment (P < 0.05). Conclusions: General health status, functional status and key symptoms improved from baseline in patients with advanced NSCLC receiving aumolertinib as first-line treatment. The ORR and DCR in our study was comparable in those showed the AENEAS trial.

HOPE: Harnessing olaparib, palbociclib, and endocrine therapy for BRCA1/2-associated HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

10616 Background: Thepoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib yields superior progression-free survival, response rates and patient-reported outcomes compared with chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2- ( BRCA1/2) associated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Fulvestrant and palbociclib improve outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) MBC. HOPE (NCT03685331) is a phase I trial to evaluate combination olaparib (O), fulvestrant (F), and palbociclib (P) in patients with BRCA1/2-associated HR+, HER2 negative MBC. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation was used to assess safety and preliminary efficacy of O, F and P. Eligible participants (pts) had HR+ MBC, a germline (g) or somatic (s) mutation in BRCA1/2, measurable/evaluable disease, any/no prior endocrine therapy, and 0-2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC. Prior PARPi and CDK4/6i were permitted but not in combination. Palbociclib was added after a 28-day safety run-in (Cycle 0) of O + F alone. Fulvestrant dose was 500mg IM on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. Dose level 0 (DL0, starting level) was F, O 300mg orally BID continuously, P 75mg orally daily on days 1-21; DL-1 was F, O 250mg orally BID, P 75mg orally daily on days 1-21. The primary endpoint was MTD (adverse events (AEs) based on CTCAE v5.0). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period included Cycles 0 and 1. A 30% DLT rate was acceptable; 6 pts had to be treated at a dose for it to be declared MTD. RECIST v1.1 was used to evaluate response. Results: Eight treated pts (s BRCA1:1 ;g BRCA2:6; s BRCA2:1 ) had median (M) age 47; M 0 (0-2) prior lines of endocrine therapy and 0 (0-1) prior chemotherapies for MBC. Three pts each had received O, F, and CDK4/6i as part of their standard of care treatment before study. At DL0, 2/2 pts had DLT with persistent grade(G) 3 neutropenia. Among 6 pts treated at DL-1, none experienced DLT, but 3 pts missed doses of study treatment due to cytopenias (G3 neutropenia, G3 leukopenia, G3 thrombocytopenia) during the DLT period. Following the DLT period, 1 pt reduced O to 200mg orally daily and 1 discontinued P based on provider discretion due to cytopenias (G3 neutropenia, G3 thrombocytopenia). Grade 3 AEs occurring in >1 pt related to study treatment were: neutrophil count decrease (G3/2, n=5/2); white blood cell decrease (G3/2/1, n=3/2/2); platelet count decrease (G3/2/1, n=2/0/1). Overall related AEs in >50% of pts were anemia (n=7), fatigue (n=6) and nausea (n=5). Best responses were CR/PR/SD/PD in 1/1/5/1 pts. Conclusions: MTDof O, F and P (DL-1) was reached and demonstrated antitumor activity. Although no AEs meeting protocol-specified DLT criteria were observed at MTD, hematologic toxicity at this dose complicated drug delivery and required close monitoring during and after the DLT period. Combinations utilizing PARP1 selective inhibitors, lower doses of therapy or sequential rather than combination therapy may improve feasibility. Clinical trial information: NCT03685331 .

Efficacy of chidamide maintenance therapy versus autologous stem cell transplantation versus observation as a post-remission choice in the survival of adult patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: Post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 study in China.

In this prospective, multicenter, Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02987244), patients with peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) who had responded to first-line chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin or epirubicin, vincristine or vindesine, etoposide, and prednisone (Chi-CHOEP) were treated by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with chidamide maintenance or observation. A total of 85 patients received one of the following interventions: ASCT (n = 15), chidamide maintenance (n = 44), and observation (n = 26). estimated 3 PFS and OS rates were 85.6%, 80.8%, and 49.4% (P = 0.001). The two-year OS rates were 85.6%, 80.8%, and 69.0% (P = 0.075).The ASCT and chidamide maintenance groups had significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) than the observation group (P = 0.001, and P = 0.01, respectively). The overall survival (OS) differed significantly between the chidamide maintenance group and the observation group ( P = 0.041). The multivariate and propensity score matching analyses for PFS revealed better outcomes in the subjects in the chidamide maintenance than observation groups (P = 0.02). The ASCT and chidamide maintenance groups had significant survival advantages over the observation group. In the post-remission stage of the untreated PTCL patients, single-agent chidamide maintenance demonstrated superior PFS and better OS than observation. Our findings highlight the potential benefit of chidamide in this patient subset, warranting further investigation through larger prospective trials. Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrial.gov, NCT02987244. Registered 8 December 2016, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02987244 .

Absolute lymphocyte count after BCMA CAR-T therapy is a predictor of response and outcomes in relapsed multiple myeloma

AbstractB-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) used in multiple myeloma (MM) are rapidly becoming a mainstay in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease, and CAR-T expansion after infusion has been shown to inform depth and duration of response (DoR), but measuring this process remains investigational. This multicenter study describes the kinetics and prognostic impact of absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) in the first 15 days after CAR-T infusion in 156 patients with relapsed MM treated with the BCMA-targeting agents ciltacabtagene autoleucel and idecabtagene vicleucel. Patients with higher maximum ALC (ALCmax) had better depth of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and DoR. Patients with ALCmax >1.0 × 103/μL had a superior PFS (30.5 months vs 6 months; P < .001) compared with those with ≤1.0 × 103/μL, whereas patients with ALCmax ≤0.5 × 103/μL represent a high-risk group with early disease progression and short PFS (hazard ratio, 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 2-5.8; P < .001). In multivariate analysis, ALCmax >1.0 × 103/μL and nonparaskeletal extramedullary disease were the only independent predictors of PFS and DoR after accounting for international staging systemic staging, age, CAR-T product, high-risk cytogenetics, and the number of previous lines. Moreover, our flow cytometry data suggest that ALC is a surrogate for BCMA CAR-T expansion and can be used as an accessible prognostic marker. We report, to our knowledge, for the first time the association of ALC after BCMA CAR-T infusion with clinical outcomes and its utility in predicting response in patients with R/R MM.

CDKN2A copy number alteration in bladder cancer: Integrative analysis in patient-derived xenografts and cancer patients

Bladder cancer (BlCa) is an extensively heterogeneous disease that leads to great variability in tumor evolution scenarios and lifelong patients’ surveillance, emphasizing the need for modern minimally-invasive precision medicine. Herein, we have explored the clinical significance of copy-number alterations (CNAs) in BlCa. CNAs profiling was performed in 15 patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) and validated in TCGA-BLCA (n=408) and Lindgren et al. (n=143) cohorts. CDKN2A copy-number loss was identified as the most frequent CNA in bladder tumors, associated with reduced CDKN2A expression, tumors of papillary phenotype and prolonged PDX survival. Study’s screening cohort consisted of 243 BlCa patients and CDKN2A copy-number was assessed in genomic DNA and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 217 tumors and 189 pre-treatment serum samples, respectively. CDKN2A copy-number loss was correlated with superior disease-free and progression-free survival of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Moreover, higher CDKN2A index (CDKN2A/LEP ratio) in pre-treatment cfDNA was associated with advanced tumor stage, grade and short-term NMIBC progression to invasive disease, while multivariate models fitted for CDKN2A index in pre-treatment cfDNA offered superior risk-stratification of T1/high grade and EORTC high-risk patients, enhancing prediction of treatment outcome. CDKN2A copy-number status could serve as minimally-invasive tool in improving risk-stratification and supporting personalized prognosis in BlCa.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for POLE or POLD1 proofreading-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer

POLE and POLD1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) define a rare subtype of ultramutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; over 100 mut/Mb). Disease-specific data about the activity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in POLE/D1pd mCRC are lacking and it is unknown whether outcomes may be different from mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRCs treated with ICIs. In this global study, we collected 27 patients with mCRC harboring POLE/D1 mutations leading to proofreading deficiency and treated with anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 alone+/- anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. We collected clinicopathological and genomic characteristics, response, and survival outcomes after ICIs of POLE/D1pd mCRC and compared them with a cohort of 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs. Further genomic analyses were carried out in an independent cohort of 7241 CRCs to define POLE and POLD1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures. POLE/D1pd was associated with younger age, male sex, fewer RAS/BRAF driver mutations, and predominance of right-sided colon cancers. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (89% versus 54%; P= 0.01). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range: 11.3-43.0 months), patients with POLE/D1pd showed a significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC [hazard ratio (HR)= 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, P= 0.01] and superior overall survival (OS) (HR= 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.18, P= 0.09). In multivariable analyses including the type of DNA repair defect, POLE/D1pd was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR= 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.69, P=0.013) and OS (HR= 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P= 0.047). Molecular profiling showed that POLE/D1pd tumors have higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). Responses were observed in both subtypes and were associated with the intensity of POLE/D1pd signature. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed more favorable outcomes compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC to treatment with ICIs in terms of tumor response and survival.

Mass spectrometry–based assessment of M protein in peripheral blood during maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma

AbstractMass spectrometry (MS) can detect multiple myeloma–derived monoclonal proteins in the peripheral blood (PB) with high sensitivity, potentially serving as a PB assay for measurable residual disease (MRD). This study evaluated the significance of PB MS MRD negativity during posttransplant therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Serum samples from 138 patients treated in the phase 3 ATLAS trial of posttransplant maintenance with either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, or with lenalidomide alone were analyzed using EXENT MS methodology. We established feasibility of measuring MRD by MS in the PB in the posttransplant setting, despite unavailability of pretreatment calibration samples. There was high agreement between MRD by MS in the PB and paired bone marrow (BM) MRD results at the 10–5 threshold, assessed by either next-generation sequencing (NGS) or multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) (70% and 67%, respectively). Agreement between PB MS and both BM MRD methods was lowest early after transplant and increased with time. MS negativity was associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS), which, in landmark analysis, reached statistical significance after 18 cycles after transplant. Combined PB/BM MRD negativity by MFC or NGS was associated with superior PFS compared with MRD negativity by only 1 modality. Sustained MS negativity carried similar prognostic performance to sustained BM MRD negativity at the 10–5 threshold. Overall, posttransplant MS assessment was feasible and provided additional prognostic information to BM MRD negativity. Further studies are needed to confirm the role and optimal timing of MS in disease evaluation algorithms. The ATLAS trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02659293.

Abstract PO1-06-01: Clinical Efficacy of Tumor Organoid-Guided Cancer Therapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract Purpose: Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) may facilitate treatment selection, but the feasibility of using breast cancer PDOs to guide personalized treatment in clinical practice has not been fully investigated. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of treatment guided by PDO drug sensitivity tests (OGT) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and to explore the potential of PDOs to reveal mechanisms underlying treatment resistance. Methods: Patients diagnosed with MBC were recruited between January 2020 and August 2022. PDOs were established from biopsies specimens or malignant effusion samples. The efficacy of customized drug panels was determined by measuring cell mortality after drug exposure. Patients receiving OGT were matched 1:2 by nearest neighbor propensity scores with patients receiving TPC. The primary clinical outcome was progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate and disease control rate. Targeted gene sequencing and pathway enrichment analysis were performed. Results: 46 PDOs (46 of 51, 90.2%) were generated from 45 MBC patients. PDO drug screening showed an accuracy of 81.1% (95% CI 67.6%-91.9%) in predicting patients' clinical responses. 36 OGT patients were matched to 69 TPC patients. OGT was associated with prolonged median progression-free survival (11.0 months vs 5.0 months; unadjusted hazard ratio 0.53 [95% CI 0.33-0.85]; P=0.01) and improved disease control (88.9% vs 63.8%; unadjusted odd ratio 4.26 [1.44-18.62]) compared with TPC. The objective response rate of both groups was similar. Pathway enrichment analysis uncovered differentially modulated pathways implicated in DNA repair and transcriptional regulation in patients less sensitive to capecitabine/gemcitabine, and pathways associated with cell cycle regulation in patients less sensitive to palbociclib. Conclusions: MBC patients treated with OGT were associated with superior progression-free survival and disease control compared with TPC. PDO-based functional precision medicine is a feasible strategy for treatment optimization and customization in MBC and may enhance our understanding of therapeutic resistance. Citation Format: Ying-Yi Lin, Hong-Fei Gao, Hong Li, Bo-Lei Du, Min-Yi Cheng, Jia-Chen Zou, Xing-xing Zheng, Teng Zhu, Ting-Ting Li, Sheng Li, Kun Wang. Clinical Efficacy of Tumor Organoid-Guided Cancer Therapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-06-01.

Clinical outcomes of pomalidomide-based and daratumumab-based therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A real-world cohort study in China.

Comparative investigations evaluating the efficacy of pomalidomide-based (Pom-based) versus daratumumab-based (Dara-based) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remain scarce, both in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. This retrospective cohort study included 140 RRMM patients treated with Pom-based or Dara-based or a combination of pomalidomide and daratumumab (DPd) regimens in a Chinese tertiary hospital between December 2018 and July 2023. The overall response rates (ORR) for Pom-based (n = 48), Dara-based (n = 68), and DPd (n = 24) groups were 57.8%, 84.6%, and 75.0%, respectively (p = 0.007). At data cutoff on August 1, 2023, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0-6.5) for the Pom-based group, 10.5 months (5.2-15.8) for the Dara-based group, and 6.7 months (4.0-9.3) for the DPd group (p = 0.056). Multivariate analysis identified treatment regimens (Dara-based vs. Pom-based, DPd vs. Pom-based) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) as independent prognostic factors for PFS. In the subgroups of patients aged >65 years, with ECOG PS ≥2, lines of therapy ≥2, extramedullary disease or double-refractory disease (refractory to both lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors), the superiority of Dara-based regimens over Pom-based regimens was not evident. A higher incidence of infections was observed in patients receiving Dara-based and DPd regimens (Pom-based 39.6% vs. Dara-based 64.7% vs. DPd 70.8%, p = 0.009). In real-world settings, Pom-based, Dara-based, and DPd therapies exhibited favorable efficacy in patients with RRMM. Dara-based therapy yielded superior clinical response and PFS compared to Pom-based therapy.

Deciphering the Prognostic Significance of MYD88 and CD79B Mutations in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Insights into Treatment Outcomes.

The clinical and genetic characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes, of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with different MYD88 and CD79B mutation status merit further investigation. This study aims to investigate the distinctions in clinical manifestations, genetic characteristics, and treatment outcomes among MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut, and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt DLBCL patients. Clinical and genetic characteristics, along with treatment outcomes among 2696 DLBCL patients bearing MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut, and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like regimens from the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College and six external cohorts were analyzed. Potential molecular mechanisms were investigated through Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and xCell methodology. In the MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut showed comparable progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt. However, in the non-MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut exhibited significantly inferior OS than MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt, while there was no significant OS difference between MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut and MYD88-CD79Bco-wt (median OS: 68.8 [95% CI 22-NA] vs NA [95% CI 112-NA] vs 177.7 [95% CI 159-NA]months; MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut: p=0.02; MYD88-CD79Bco-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt: p=0.03; MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut vs MYD88-CD79Bco-wt: p=0.33). Regarding patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. Within the MYD88-CD79Bco-mut group, patients with PIM1mut had better PFS than PIM1wt (median PFS: 8.34 [95% CI 5.56-NA] vs 43.8 [95% CI 26.4-NA] months; p=0.02). Possible mechanisms contributing to the superior PFS of PIM1mut patients may include activated lymphocyte-mediated immunity and interferon response, a higher proportion of natural killer T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as well as suppressed angiogenesis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, along with lower fibroblast and stromal score. In the MCD subtype, patients with MYD88-CD79Bco-mut showed comparable PFS and OS compared to MYD88/CD79Bsingle-mut or MYD88-CD79Bco-wt, while in the non-MCD subtype, they exhibited significantly inferior OS. There was no significant disparity in PFS and OS of MYD88-CD79Bco-mut between the MCD and non-MCD subtypes. The presence of PIM1mut within the MYD88-CD79Bco-mut group correlated with better PFS, which may result from an intricate interplay of immune processes and tumor microenvironment alterations.

"ACHILLES" Heel No More? Afatinib at 40 Mg Once Daily is Superior to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in EGFR Uncommon (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) Mutations (ACHILLES/TORG1834).

Afatinib, a second-generation covalent EGFR TKI, has been approved for the treatment of the three "uncommon" EGFR mutations (G719X, S768I, and L861Q) based on one pooled retrospective analysis of three prospective trials (LUX-Lung 2, 3 and 6). The confirmed overall response rate, as assessed by independent radiology review, was 66% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). Among the 21 responders, the proportion of patients with response duration of ≥12 months was 52% and the proportion with response durations of ≥18 months was 33%. Of note, all patients received afatinib at 40 or 50 mg once daily which is higher than the approved dose of 40 mg once daily and the usual 30 mg once daily starting dose by most thoracic oncologists. Given the approval of afatinib for "uncommon" EGFR mutations was based on the limited number of patients analyzed, the retrospective nature of the analysis, lack of randomized phase 2 or 3 trial, there remains uncertainty as to whether afatinib, chemotherapy or other next-generation EGFR TKIs is the optimal treatment. This uncertainty also hinders the development of future treatment of these "uncommon" mutations because of the uncertainty that afatinib is the optimal treatment and hence should be the standard of care control arm in future randomized trials. Finally, the ACHILLES/TORG1834 provided us with the first randomized trial result that afatinib achieved superior progression-free survival over platinum-based chemotherapy (10.6 months vs 5.7 months, HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.256-0.694; P = 0.0007). However, ACHILLES should mostly be considered as phase 2 trial given the limited number (N = 109) of patients enrolled. Furthermore, the PFS benefit seemed to be with the 40 mg daily dose (HR = 0.128; 95% CI: 0.050-0.327) and not with the 30 mg daily dose (HR = 0.704; 95% CI: 0.352-1.406). Further investigation of the 30 once daily dosing for the treatment of uncommon EGFR mutations is needed.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast02): patient-reported outcomes from a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

In DESTINY-Breast02, patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer who received trastuzumab deruxtecan demonstrated superior progression-free and overall survival compared with those receiving treatment of physician's choice. We present the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and hospitalisation data. In this randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial conducted at 227 clinical sites globally, enrolled patients had to be aged 18 years or older with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on trastuzumab emtansine and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using block randomisation (block size of 3) to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan (5·4 mg/kg intravenously once every 21 days) or treatment of physician's choice by an independent biostatistician using an interactive web-based system. Patients and investigators remained unmasked to treatment. Treatment of physician's choice was either capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 orally twice per day on days 1-14) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 then 6 mg/kg once per day) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2) plus lapatinib (1250 mg orally once per day on days 1-21), with a 21-day schedule. The primary endpoint, which was progression-free survival based on blinded independent central review, has previously been reported. PROs were assessed in the full analysis set (all patients randomly assigned to the study) using the oncology-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), breast cancer-specific EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast 45 (QLQ-BR45), and the generic HRQoL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Analyses included change from baseline and time to definitive deterioration for PRO variables of interest and hospitalisation-related endpoints. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03523585, and is closed to recruitment. Between Sept 6, 2018, and Dec 31, 2020, 608 patients were randomly assigned to receive either trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=406; two did not receive treatment) or treatment of physician's choice (n=202; seven did not receive treatment). Overall, 603 patients (99%) were female and five (<1%) were male. The median follow-up was 21·5 months (IQR 15·2-28·4) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and 18·6 months (IQR 8·8-26·0) in the treatment of physician's choice group. Median treatment duration was 11·3 months (IQR 6·2-20·5) in the trastuzumab deruxtecan group and approximately 4·5 months in the treatment of physician's choice group (4·4 months [IQR 2·5-8·7] with trastuzumab; 4·6 months [2·1-8·9] with capecitabine; and 4·5 months [2·1-10·6] with lapatinib). Baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS) scores were similar with trastuzumab deruxtecan (n=393) and treatment of physician's choice (n=187), and remained stable with no clinically meaningful change (defined as ≥10-point change from baseline) over time. Median time to definitive deterioration was delayed with trastuzumab deruxtecan compared with treatment of physician's choice for the primary PRO variable EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS (14·1 months [95% CI 10·4-18·7] vs 5·9 months [4·3-7·9]; HR 0·5573 [0·4376-0·7099], p<0·0001) and all other prespecified PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, EORTC QLQ-BR45 arm and breast symptoms, and EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale). Patient hospitalisation rates were similar in the trastuzumab deruxtecan (92 [23%] of 406) and treatment of physician's choice (41 [20%] of 202) groups; however, median time to hospitalisation was 133 days (IQR 56-237) with trastuzumab deruxtecan versus 83 days (30-152) with treatment of physician's choice. Overall, GHS and quality of life were maintained for both treatment groups, with prespecified PRO variables favouring trastuzumab deruxtecan over treatment of physician's choice, suggesting that despite a longer treatment duration, there was no detrimental impact on patient health-related quality of life with trastuzumab deruxtecan. When considered with efficacy and safety data from DESTINY-Breast02, these results support the overall benefit of trastuzumab deruxtecan for patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab emtansine. Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca.

Clinical difference on the variants and co-mutation in a Chinese cohort with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Despite the generally favourable prognoses observed in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there remains significant variability in clinical outcomes. The objective of this study is to enhance patient stratification by examining both the specific sites of gene fusion and the presence of co-occurring mutations. We collected retrospective clinical and pathological data on ALK-positive patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. ALK fusion variants and concomitant mutations were identified through next-generation sequencing technology. We then assessed treatment efficacy via tumor response and survival metrics. This study included a total of 59 patients, with 49 harboring echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusions and 10 presenting with rare fusions. The median follow-up period was 33 months. Clinical outcomes between non-EML4-ALK and EML4-ALK patients were comparable. Among the EML4-ALK cohort, patients with longer variants (v1, v2, v8) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS: 34 months vs. 11 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.28; P = 0.05) compared to those with shorter variants (v3, v5). Furthermore, patients treated with second-generation ALK inhibitors (ALKi) displayed a progression-free survival advantage (median PFS: not reached [NR] vs. 9 months; HR: 5.37; P = 0.013). Baseline TP53 co-mutation were linked with a substantially shorter OS (median OS,37 months vs. NR; HR 2.74; P = 0.047). In ALK+ NSCLC, longer EML4-ALK variants correlate with improved prognosis and enhanced response to second-generation ALKi, while TP53 co-mutations indicate a negative prognosis.

Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have rarely been evaluated and it is unknown which factors are related to efficacy. To evaluate the efficacy and independent predictive factors of TACE combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for unresectable HCC. This study retrospectively enrolled patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment between March 2019 and April 2022. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in accordance with the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Additionally, the prognostic factors affecting the clinical outcome were assessed. One hundred and two patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 12.63 months. The median OS was 26.43 months (95%CI: 17.00-35.87), and the median PFS was 10.07 months (95%CI: 8.50-11.65). The ORR and DCR were 61.76% and 81.37%, respectively. The patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) B stage, early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) response (decrease), or early alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response (decrease > 20%) had superior OS and PFS than their counterparts. This study showed that TACE/lenvatinib/PD-1 treatment was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy in patients with unresectable HCC. The patients with BCLC B-stage disease with early NLR response (decrease) and early AFP response (decrease > 20%) may achieve better clinical outcomes with this triple therapy.

Comparison of Cabozantinib and Axitinib as Second-line Therapy After Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Retrospective Real-world Data

BackgroundTo date, no studies have compared the treatment outcomes of second-line therapies in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of cabozantinib and axitinib as second-line treatments in patients with metastatic ccRCC who previously received immune-oncology combination therapy. Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic ccRCC treated with cabozantinib and axitinib as second-line therapy after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment were identified among 243 patients with RCC treated between August 1, 2018 and January 31, 2022 at 34 institutions belonging to the Japanese Urological Oncology Group. Patients were assessed for treatment outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), and incidence rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). ResultsForty-eight patients treated with cabozantinib and 60 treated with axitinib as second-line therapy after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment for metastatic ccRCC were identified. The median PFS (95% confidence interval) was 11.0 months (9.0–16.0) with cabozantinib and 9.5 months (6.0–13.0) with axitinib. The ORRs were 37.5% (cabozantinib) and 38.3% (axitinib). The rates of any-grade AEs and grade ≥3 AEs were 79.2% (cabozantinib) versus 63.3% (axitinib; P = .091) and 35.4% (cabozantinib) versus 23.3% (axitinib; P = .202), respectively. In the poor-risk group, PFS was longer in the cabozantinib group than in the axitinib group (P = .033). ConclusionThe efficacy and safety of cabozantinib and axitinib were comparable. In the poor-risk group, cabozantinib was more effective than axitinib. These findings provide valuable insights into the selection of second-line treatment options after nivolumab-ipilimumab treatment in patients with metastatic ccRCC.

Real-world evidence of efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus chemotherapy as initial treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), combination therapies including a PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy or a PD-1 inhibitor, CTLA-4 inhibitor, and chemotherapy are standard first-line options. However, data directly comparing these regimens are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (CP) against nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy (CNI) in a real-world setting. In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of CP and CNI as first-line therapies in 182 patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the response rate (RR) and safety profiles. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models were utilized for data analysis, adjusting for confounding factors such as age, gender, and PD-L1 expression. In this study, 160 patients received CP, while 22 received CNI. The CP group was associated with significantly better PFS than the CNI group (median 11.7 vs. 6.6 months, HR 0.56, p = 0.03). This PFS advantage persisted after propensity score matching to adjust for imbalances. No significant OS differences were observed. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred comparably, but immune-related adverse events were numerically more frequent in the CNI group. In real-world practice, CP demonstrated superior PFS compared with CNI. These findings can inform treatment selection in advanced NSCLC.

Comparison of chemotherapy and chidamide combined with chemotherapy in patients with untreated angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is characterized by high recurrence rates and poor prognosis, and effective first-line treatment is lacking. Recently, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as chidamide, have been found to induce durable remissions in AITL patients. Patients with untreated AITL from March 2015 to March 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into chemotherapy (ChT) group and chidamide combined with chemotherapy (C-ChT) group based on the first-line treatment received. The comparison of efficacy and safety between the two groups was conducted. 86 patients with newly diagnosed AITL were enrolled, in which 35 patients were in the ChT group and 51 in the C-ChT group. The objective response rate (ORR) of C-ChT group was significantly higher than that of ChT group (84.3% vs. 60%, P= 0.011), and had superior progression-free survival (PFS) (27 months vs. 12 months, P= 0.025). However, no significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the two groups (P= 0.225). In addition, the responding patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) had superior PFS compared to those who did not (P= 0.015). Compared with ChT regimen, C-ChT regimen was well tolerated and had superior ORR and PFS in patients with untreated AITL. ASCT may contribute to longer PFS in remission patients.

The Efficacy of Carfilzomib Treatment in Bortezomib-Refractory Patients-Real Life Experience in a Tertiary Romanian Hospital.

Background: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) represent one of the most effective classes of therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and are incorporated in many of the current treatment regimens. The first-generation PI, bortezomib, has shown impressive results in patients with either newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM, but once patients become resistant, treatment is increasingly challenging. Although the existing data show that the second-generation PI, carfilzomib, is highly efficient, there is still limited knowledge regarding the response to carfilzomib-based therapy in bortezomib-resistant patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate carfilzomib treatment performance in bortezomib-sensitive versus -refractory patients, in a real-life eastern European country setting. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 127 adult patients exposed to bortezomib with relapsed or refractory MM, that subsequently received a carfilzomib-based therapy. We investigated the differences in the overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after carfilzomib-based therapy between the two patient groups. Results: The ORR in the bortezomib-sensitive group was significantly higher than that in the refractory group, leading to a superior PFS in this category of patients. For patients presenting with a high cytogenetic risk, we observed a significant difference in PFS between the bortezomib-sensitive and -refractory group, while standard cytogenetic risk patients presented a similar PFS regardless of the bortezomib sensitivity status. In addition, in patients with ISS (International Staging System) stage I or II, the previous sensitivity to bortezomib correlated with an improved PFS, while for patients with ISS stage III, both groups had a comparable PFS. No significant differences in OS were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: In countries where novel or experimental therapies are not readily available, carfilzomib-based therapy can still be a viable therapy option for patients presenting with bortezomib-refractory status, an ISS stage III, and standard cytogenetic risk.