Superior Labrum Anterior And Posterior Lesions Research Articles

Lesion Prevalence and Patient Outcome Comparison Between Primary and Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.

To compare lesion prevalence and treatment outcomes in patients with primary and recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Patients who were admitted to the institution with a diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability and who underwent arthroscopic surgery between July 2006 and February 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Minimum follow-up duration of the patients was 24 months. The recorded data and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the patients were examined. Patients over 40 years of age, with a history of shoulder region fracture, inflammatory arthritis, a history of epilepsy, multi-directional instability, non-traumatic dislocation, and off-track lesions were excluded from the study. Shoulder lesions were documented and patient outcome evaluation was made with the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A total of 340 patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 25.6 (±6.49). Recurrent instability group had significantly higher rate of Anterior Labroligamentous Periosteal Sleeve Avulsion (ALPSA) lesions compared to primary instability group (40.6% vs 24.6% respectively) (p=0.033). 25 patients (43.9%) had Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) lesions in primary instability group and 81 patients (28.6%) had SLAP lesions in recurrent instability group (p=0.035). OSS increased for both primary (from 35 (16-44) to 46 (36-48)) (p=0.001) and recurrent instability groups (from 33 (6-45) to 47 (19-48)) (p=0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative VAS and Oxford scores (p>0.05). Successful results were obtained in patients younger than 40 years old with both primary and recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic treatment. ALPSA lesion prevalence was higher while SLAP lesion prevalence was lower regarding the patients with recurrent instability. Postoperative OSS was comparable between the patient groups however failure rate was higher in the recurrent instability patients.

SLAP Repair Versus Biceps Tenodesis in Patients Younger Than 40 Years: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

The surgical management of type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears in patients younger than 40 years is controversial, but growing evidence suggests comparable outcomes between primary SLAP repair and primary biceps tenodesis, with lower rates of reoperations after primary biceps tenodesis. Given the relatively similar patient-reported outcomes, cost-effectiveness analyses of direct and indirect costs associated with the two procedures propound a valuable comparative technique. In this value-based comparison of SLAP repair versus biceps tenodesis, we hypothesized that biceps tenodesis would be more cost-effective than SLAP repair in patients younger than 40 years. Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 4. A 1-month Markov cycle was simulated to reflect 10 years of health outcomes. Health states were selected based on outcomes that are especially important in assessing indirect costs for a younger, active patient population: return-to-sport rates, which demonstrate a return to baseline function, and reoperation rates. Transition state probabilities were obtained through an index systematic review and meta-analysis comparing labral repair and biceps tenodesis for the treatment of type II SLAP lesions in patients younger than 40 years. Health state utility and cost values were obtained from accepted values denoted in existing literature. Both primary SLAP repair and primary biceps tenodesis yielded an average expected 8.1 quality-adjusted life years over the 10-year period. The average cost (in 2021 US$) was $16,619 for biceps tenodesis and $19,388 for SLAP repair. In a younger patient population, SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis had comparable quality-adjusted life years and utility in the treatment of type II SLAP tears; however, SLAP repair cost $19,388, while biceps tenodesis cost $16,619, reflecting a 14% cost savings with biceps tenodesis. These findings can be extrapolated to further establish the role for these procedures in treating SLAP tears.

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Superior Labral Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) Lesion Repair for the Treatment of SLAP Lesion in Overhead Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions are common injuries in overhead athletes. As a surgical treatment for SLAP lesions, SLAP repair has been traditionally performed. Recently, biceps tenodesis has been performed as an alternative treatment option; however, there is no review for outcome comparisons between these 2 procedures in overhead athletes. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of SLAP repair versus biceps tenodesis, especially in overhead athletes with SLAP lesions. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: An electronic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The studies were appraised using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. Studies that had a minimum follow-up of 2 years, included only patients with SLAP lesions without other major shoulder pathologies, and included only patients who engaged in overhead sports were included. The functional outcomes of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, rate of return to sport, rate of return to preinjury level of sport, and complication rate were subjected to meta-analysis. Results: A total of 332 articles were identified, and 13 were included in the systematic review. Even though the postoperative ASES scores were slightly higher in the biceps tenodesis group than in the SLAP repair group, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (biceps tenodesis, 95% CI = 91.71-96.75, I2 = 0.00; SLAP repair, 95% CI = 85.47-94.46, I2 = 16.3; P = .085) The rate of return to sport and the return to preinjury level of sport were slightly higher in the biceps tenodesis group than in the SLAP repair group; however, in meta-analysis these factors did not reach statistical significance (return to sport: biceps tenodesis, 95% CI = 0.66-0.91, I2 = 0.00; SLAP repair, 95% CI = 0.68-0.93, I2 = 70.23; P = .94) (return to preinjury level of sport: biceps tenodesis, 95% CI = 0.61-0.89, I2 = 17.78; SLAP repair, 95% CI = 0.53-0.82, I2 = 58.07; P = .37). The biceps tenodesis group showed a lower complication rate compared with the SLAP repair group without statistical significance (biceps tenodesis, 95% CI = 0.013-0.145, I2 = 0.00; SLAP repair, 95% CI = 0.049-0.143, I2 = 0.00; P = .25). Conclusion: The results of biceps tenodesis, compared with SLAP repair, were not inferior in the surgical treatment of overhead athletes with SLAP lesions with regard to the ASES score, rate of return to sport, rate of return to preinjury level of sport, and complication rate. Further high-level, randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm this result.

Superior Labral Anterior Posterior Repair and Biceps Tenodesis Surgery: Trends of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database

Objectives:Recent evidence has specified indications for performing Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) repair and biceps tenodesis (BT) for the treatment of bicipital-labral lesions in the shoulder. Trends in performance of these procedures are expected to reflect the growing body of research regarding this topic. The purpose of this study was to report practice trends for the surgical treatment of SLAP lesions, particularly in older patients, as the management of isolated SLAP lesions remains controversial.Methods:The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) database was retrospectively queried between 2012-2017 by Current Procedural Terminology for SLAP repair (29807), open BT (23430), and arthroscopic BT (29828). The patient population was excluded if any concomitant open shoulder procedure was performed. Trends over time were evaluated with respect to case volume, patient age, surgeon subspecialty. Separate trends were evaluated with and without concomitant arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR, CPT: 29827).Results:A total of 9,908 cases met inclusion/exclusion criteria: 4,632 performed with RCR and 5,276 performed without. Mean age of patients without RCR was 40.8 +/- 13.8, while those receiving RCR was 55.0 +/- 9.9 years . In patients without RCR, there was a significant decline in rate of SLAP repairs performed over this period (p < 0.001). No significant change was noted in mean age of patients receiving arthroscopic BT, open BT, SLAP repair, and BT + SLAP. A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving open and arthroscopic BT were over 35 years old, compared to those receiving SLAP repair (p < 0.001). Within the RCR cohort, there was also a significant decline in concomitant SLAP repairs performed (p < 0.001) over the study period. With respect to biceps tenodesis, in the RCR cohort, open was performed in 52.2% of cases while arthroscopic was performed in 47.8%, while in the cohort without RCR open was performed in 74.9% and arthroscopic was performed in 25.9%.Conclusion:The ABOS database reveals significantly reduced rates of SLAP repairs being performed. Trends with age remain consistent over time, in that SLAP repairs were predominantly performed in younger patients. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis was performed much more frequently with RCR than without.

SLAP lesions: current controversies.

Knowledge of the pertinent anatomy, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment of the spectrum of injuries involving the superior glenoid labrum and biceps origin is required in treating the patient with a superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tear.Despite the plethora of literature regarding SLAP lesions, their clinical diagnosis remains challenging for a number of reasons.First, the diagnostic value of many of the available physical examination tests is inconsistent and ambiguous.Second, SLAP lesions most commonly occur concomitantly with other shoulder injuries.Third, SLAP lesions have no specific associated pain pattern.Outcomes following surgical treatment of SLAP tears vary depending on the method of treatment, associated pathology and patient characteristics.Biceps tenodesis has been receiving increasing attention as a possible treatment for SLAP tears.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:25-32. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180033.

Magnetic Resonance Arthrographic Demonstration of Association of Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions With Extended Anterior Labral Tears

The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the full extent of anterior labral tear and associated other labral tears on magnetic resonance arthrographic images in patients with anterior shoulder instability. One hundred ten magnetic resonance arthrography images with anterior labral tear were retrieved from the database of the Radiology Department. Two skeletal radiologists, one with 15 years of experience and the other with 5 years of experience analyzed the images in random order. Approval for the study was granted by the Ethics Committee. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. The most common localization of the labral lesions was at the anterior-inferior part of the glenoid labrum (22.7%). The anterior labral tears were commonly associate with superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions (45%). The most common type of SLAP lesion was type V (23.6%). Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior type V lesion was more often detected in patients with Bankart lesion (27.7%, P = 0.043). Isolated anterior labral tears are less than expected. In majority of the cases, a distinct tear at a different site of the labrum accompanies the anterior labral tear. Massive anterior labral tears are mostly seen together with SLAP lesions.

Effectiveness of biceps tenodesis versus SLAP repair for surgical treatment of isolated SLAP lesions: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundType II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions could induce chronic shoulder pain and impaired movement. Current management of Type II SLAP lesions consists of two well-established surgical procedures: arthroscopic biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair. However, which technique is preferred over the other is still a controversy. MethodsWe performed a systematic electronic database search on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles equating superior labral repair with biceps tenodesis, which were reported before August 2017 which included the phrase “superior labral anterior posterior” or “SLAP.” The randomised controlled clinical trials that met our criteria were evaluated for quality of methodology. The results obtained were further analysed and correlated to present the benefits and drawbacks comparing the two SLAP repair surgical procedures. ResultBased on our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified five articles (204 patients) that were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicate that prevalence of patients return to preinjury sports level and the patients satisfaction were found to be significantly better in tenodesis group than in the SLAP repair group (p < 0.05). As for the patient age, VAS score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California at Los Angeles score, postoperative stiffness and reoperation rates, no significant differences were evident among the two groups, thus supporting the results reported in the current literatures (p > 0.05). ConclusionsBoth the surgical treatments, SLAP repair and the biceps tenodesis, are efficacious in pain alleviation and recovery of shoulder function. But, compared with SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis showed higher rate of patient satisfaction and return to preinjury sports participation. The translational potential of this articleImpart better understanding regarding discrepancies in the outcomes between biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair in treating patients with isolated Type II SLAP lesions.

Treatment of SLAP Lesions.

Background:The surgical treatment of a Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) lesion becomes more and more frequent as the surgical techniques, the implants and the postoperative rehabilitation of the patient are improved and provide in most cases an excellent outcome.Objective:However, a standard therapy of SLAP lesions in the shoulder surgery has not been established yet. An algorithm on how to treat SLAP lesions according to their type and data on the factors that influence the surgical outcome is essential for the everyday clinical practice.Method:In this article, a retrospective evaluation of patients with SLAP lesion, treated surgically in our orthopaedic clinic was conducted.Results:According to the clinical outcome and our experience with the surgical therapy of SLAP lesions we demonstrate an algorithm on the proper therapeutic approach.Conclusion:SLAP I lesions are treated with debridement. Most controversies concern patients with SLAP II lesions, whose therapy is either fixation of the superior labrum or tenotomy/tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. For patients with SLAP III or IV lesions the most commonly accepted approach is tenotomy or tenodesis of the long head of biceps tendon.

Current trends in the evaluation and treatment of SLAP lesions: analysis of a survey of specialist shoulder surgeons

BackgroundControversies exist in the classification and management of superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Our aims were to assess the concordance rate of a group of specialist shoulder surgeons on the diagnosis of SLAP types and to assess the current trends in treatment preferences for different SLAP types.MethodsShoulder surgeons (N = 103) who are members of the Shoulder and Elbow Society of Australia were invited to participate in a multimedia survey on the classification and management of SLAP lesions. Response rate was 36%. The survey included 10 cases, each containing a short clinical vignette followed by an arthroscopic video depicting varying types of SLAP lesions. Surgeons were asked to classify the lesions and to recommend treatment.ResultsThere is low interobserver agreement in classifying SLAP lesions. The most common misdiagnosis of type I lesion was as a type II, and vice versa. Surgeons preferred to treat type II SLAP lesions in younger patients (<35 years) with labral repair and in older patients with biceps tenodesis. The most commonly preferred repair technique for type II lesion was with suture anchors placed both anterior and posterior to the biceps tendon. For all lesion types, biceps tenotomy was a far less commonly preferred procedure than biceps tenodesis.ConclusionThere is poor agreement between contemporary surgeons in the classification and treatment of SLAP lesions. The age of the patient appears to play a significant factor in the surgeons' deciding to treat a SLAP lesion with repair vs. biceps tenodesis.

The Effect of Type II Slap Lesions Repair Technique on the Length of Intratendinous Vascular Supply in Long Head of Biceps Tendon: A Cadaveric Injection Study

Reapiring techniques of SLAP lesion effect the vascular supply of long head of biceps tendon. Type II superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions are usually treated with arthroscopic SLAP repair. A vascular supply of proximal long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) passes through soft tissue nearby SLAP repair site. To evaluate intratendinous vascular supply of proximal LHBT resulting from SLAP repair and compare between each SLAP repair techniques. Forty-five fresh cadaveric shoulders were divided into 3 major groups: normal, created SLAP and repaired SLAP group. SLAP lesions were repaired using 3 common techniques: two-anchors with simple sutures, one-anchor with double sutures and one-anchor with horizontal mattress suture. Each group had 9 shoulders. India-ink was injected into acromial branch of thoracoacromial artery. Proximal LHBT was resected for histological cross-sectional study. Intratendinous vascular distance was measured and compared between each groups. The vascular supply of proximal LHBT was seen macroscopically at anterodorsal surface. It derived from soft tissue lying anterior to LHBT origin. In normal shoulder, intratendinous vascular distance was 16.92 ± 1.49 mm (95%CI: 15.78-18.06). There was no significant difference between normal shoulder and created SLAP group (P=0.503). By comparing non-repaired SLAP to each repair technique, the technique using two-anchors with simple sutures showed no significant difference (P=0.716), while the others showed significant difference disruption of blood supply (P=0.0002). There was significant difference between each techniques (P=0.0001). Main vascular supply of proximal LHBT comes from anterior direction. Some techniques of SLAP repair might disrupt the vascularization. The technique using two-anchors with simple sutures, one anchor at 3-mm anterior to anterior boarder and one at posterior boarder of tendon, can preserve vascularization of LHBT.

Clinical Assessment of the Dynamic Labral Shear Test for Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions

Background: Diagnosing superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions through physical examination remains challenging. The dynamic labral shear test (DLST) has been shown to have likelihood ratios (LRs) of 31.6 and 1.1 for diagnosing SLAP lesions. Purpose: To determine the clinical utility of the DLST for diagnosing SLAP lesions. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: This prospective, consecutive case series included 774 patients who underwent diagnostic arthroscopy and a preoperative DLST between 2007 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 610 control patients with no SLAP lesion but with other abnormalities, 9 patients with isolated SLAP lesion (ISL), and 155 patients with concomitant SLAP lesion (CSL), who had a SLAP lesion and another shoulder abnormality. We determined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), odds ratio (OR), and diagnostic accuracy (DA) of the DLST with and without other tests. Results: The DLST was positive for 242 of 610 controls (40%), 7 of 9 patients (78%) in the ISL group, and 88 of 155 patients (57%) in the CSL group. In the ISL group, the DLST had a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 51%, PPV of 2%, NPV of 100%, OR of 3.58, and DA of 51%. In comparison, the ORs were 1.09 for the active compression test, 1.30 for the lift-off test, and 1.53 for the relocation test, which were not significantly different from each other. For diagnosing a SLAP lesion existing in a joint with other associated injury, the DLST had a sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 52%, PPV of 23%, NPV of 83%, OR of 1.4, and DA of 53%. Combining all 4 tests did not improve the OR for detecting ISLs or CSLs. Conclusion: The DLST is sensitive but not specific for detecting ISLs. With an OR of 3.58, the DLST is useful for diagnosing ISLs. However, in patients who have CSLs, the DLST is not as useful for diagnosing SLAP lesions.

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for the Treatment of Type II and IV Superior Labral Anterior and Posterior Lesions

Background: Surgical repair remains the gold standard for most type II and type IV superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions that fail nonoperative management. However, most recently, there have been data demonstrating unacceptably high failure rates with primary repair of type II SLAP lesions. Biceps tenodesis may offer an acceptable, if not better, alternative to primary repair of SLAP lesions. Hypothesis: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis provides satisfactory, reproducible outcomes for the treatment of type II and type IV SLAP lesions. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent subpectoral biceps tenodesis and labral debridement for type II and type IV SLAP lesions by a single board-certified shoulder surgeon from 2006 to 2012 were evaluated. Exclusion criteria included those patients who underwent biceps tenodesis with an associated rotator cuff repair, anterior labral repair, or posterior labral repair. Outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and demographic data. Results: Between 2006 and 2012, a total of 36 subpectoral biceps tenodesis procedures were performed in 33 patients for type II or IV SLAP lesions. Twenty-six patients with 29 shoulder surgeries were available for follow-up. The average age was 46.7 years, with 16 male and 10 female patients participating in the study. The average follow-up was 40.17 months. There was a significant improvement in ASES and VAS scores: 48.1 and 6.4 preoperatively compared with 87.5 and 1.5 postoperatively, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference based on SLAP lesion type, patient age, or patient sex. Of 29 shoulders, 26 (89.66%) were able to return to the previous level of activity. Conclusion: This study adds to the evolving literature supporting biceps tenodesis as a viable treatment for type II and IV SLAP lesions. Patient age had no effect on the outcomes. Based on these results, biceps tenodesis is a safe, effective, and technically straightforward alternative to primary SLAP repair in patients with type II and IV SLAP tears.

Surgical Trends in the Treatment of Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior (SLAP) Lesions of the Shoulder. Analysis of Data from the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification Examination Database

Objectives:After failure of conservative treatment, surgical repair has long been the primary treatment option for unstable superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions of the shoulder. There is growing evidence supporting both biceps tenotomy and tenodesis as effective alternative treatments for SLAP lesions. The surgical trends among recent graduates, however, have not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to determine the rates of SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, and biceps tenotomy for patients with isolated SLAP tears. As a secondary goal, we aimed to determine the rates of SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, and biceps tenotomy for patients with SLAP tears undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair.Methods:A query of the American board of orthopaedic surgery (ABOS) certification examination database was performed from 2002-2011. The database was searched for patients with isolated SLAP lesions undergoing SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy. The database was then queried a second time for patients with SLAP lesions undergoing concomitant arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, to determine the rates of SLAP repair, biceps tenodesis, or biceps tenotomy.Results:From 2002-2011 there were 8,963 cases reported for treatment of an isolated SLAP lesion, and 1540 cases reported for the treatment of SLAP lesion with concomitant rotator cuff repair. Over the study period, for patients with isolated SLAP lesions the proportion of SLAP repairs decreased from 69.3% to 44.8% (p<0.0001), while the proportion of biceps tenodesis increased from 0.2% to 9.3% (p<0.0001) and the proportion of biceps tenotomy increased from 0.4% to 1.7% (p=0.018). For patients undergoing concomitant rotator cuff repair, similar trends were observed as the proportion of SLAP repairs decreased from 60.2% to 15.3% (p<0.0001), while the proportion of those undergoing biceps tenodesis or tenotomy increased from 1.2% to 20.3% (p<0.0001). There was also a significant difference in the mean age of patients undergoing SLAP repair (37.1 years of age) vs biceps tenodesis (48.7 years of age) vs biceps tenotomy (55.7 years of age) (p <0.0001). Surgeons with a declared subspecialty in Shoulder and Elbow surgery performed biceps tenodesis for 17% of isolated SLAP tears, whereas candidates with a declared subspecialty in Hand and Upper Extremity, Sports Medicine, and General Orthopaedics utilized biceps tenodesis in 2-3% of cases involving isolated SLAP tears (p<0.05).Conclusion:Practice trends for orthopaedic board candidates indicate the proportion of SLAP repairs has decreased over time with an expected increase in biceps tenodesis and tenotomy. Increased patient age correlates with likelihood of treatment with biceps tenodesis or tenotomy versus SLAP repair. Candidate surgeons with subspecialty training in Shoulder and Elbow surgery perform more biceps tenodesis for isolated SLAP tears as compared to other subspecialty trained surgeons.

Moderate value of non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging after non-dislocating shoulder trauma.

The purpose of the present study was to determine the value of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained in the community setting interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists in patients with shoulder pain initiated by a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma. In 56 of 61 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy due to pain after a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma, the data sets of non-contrast MRI were complete. These were retrospectively interpreted by three radiologists specialized on musculoskeletal MRI who were blinded for patients' history and who did not have access to the reports of arthroscopy. Standard evaluation forms were used to assess the MRIs for superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, anterior or posterior labrum lesions, lesions of the long head of biceps tendon (LHB) and for partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon and the upper quarter of the subscapularis tendon. Quality of the MRI was assessed by each radiologist on a four-point scale. The pooled sensitivity for the three radiologists for the detection of SLAP lesions was 45.0%, for anterior or posterior labrum tears 77.8 and 66.7%, for lesions of the LHB 63.2% and for partial tears of the supraspinatus or subscapularis tendon tears 84.8 and 33.3%. Corresponding inter-rater reliabilities were poor (SLAP lesions) to substantial (anterior labrum tears). Quality of MRI only influenced the accuracy for the detection of posterior labrum tears. A non-contrast shoulder MRI obtained in the community setting after non-dislocating shoulder trauma has a moderate sensitivity for most intraarticular pathologies when interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists. Accuracy is dependent on the observer and not on the assessed quality. Case series, Level IV.

Responsiveness of outcome measures in patients with superior labral anterior and posterior lesions.

Evaluation of patients with superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions requires outcome measures validated for the purpose. The present study aimed to evaluate the responsiveness of the Rowe score, Oxford Instability Shoulder Score (OISS), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and EuroQol (EQ-5D and EQ-VAS) in patients treated for SLAP lesions. Eighty-nine patients were included: 34 had arthroscopic labral repair, 28 had mini-open biceps tenodesis and 27 had physical treatment. The outcome measures were administrated before treatment and after 6 months. Responsiveness was evaluated using standardized response mean (SRM), area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC), reliable chance proportion (RCP) statistics and hypothesis testing. Minimal clinically important change (MCIC) estimates were reported. All outcome measures had high values of SRM (0.86-1.92). RCPs for the improved group were 68% to 79% for OISS, WOSI and Rowe score, and 15% to 49% for EuroQol. ROCAUC was >0.70 for all outcomes. MCIC estimates were 8 and 10 for OISS; 451 and 569 for WOSI; 17 and 18 for Rowe score; 0.39 and 0.53 for EQ-5D; and 35 and 41 for EQ-VAS. Responsiveness tested with hypotheses favours the shoulder-specific outcomes. OISS, WOSI and Rowe score are more responsive than EuroQol in evaluation of patients with SLAP lesions.

The Clinical Outcomes and Assessment of Quality of Life in Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Type II Superior Labral Anterior and Posterior Lesion Caused by Sports Injuries from Public

The purpose of this study was to morphologically classify the superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion in people with athletic injuries and further research into the clinical result of arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions. January 2005 to June 2012 occurred after sports activity in patients with shoulder pain diagnosed with isolated SLAP lesion by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy were classified according to the tear type. Of these patients, 40 cases of type II SLAP patients were evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) questionnaire and range of motion. Also satisfaction of surgery was evaluated by following up through phone calls using translated short form-36 (SF-36). At average of 35 months postoperatively, external rotation decreased slightly from 60.4 degrees to 56.2 degrees, forward elevation and internal rotation were both recovered to a range of pre-surgery but no significant changes were noticed statistically (p>0.05). Visual analogue scale, ASES scores, physical component summary, and mental component summary of SF-36 improved from 5, 1 to 1.2 (p=0.01), from 65.4 to 91.5 (p=0.017), 42.6 to 52.5 (p=0.047), and from 48.5 52.6 to (p=0.036), respectively. In comparison of a group of patients over forty years and less than forty, both groups showed good results, but group of patients less than forty years showed more improvement in pain relief, functional test, and postoperational satisfaction (p=0.004). Arthroscopic repair showed good results in patients with type II SLAP lesion due to athletic injuries especially when they were less than 40 years and it can be regarded as a good treatment with high satisfaction.

Arthroscopic Repair of Concomitant Type II SLAP Lesions in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: There are no studies examining superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair combined with repair of large to massive rotator cuff tears, and it is unclear whether a combined SLAP repair would lead to better outcomes than biceps tenotomy. Hypothesis: Tenotomy and rotator cuff repair would lead to better outcomes compared with those of combined SLAP and rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Our study population consisted of 36 patients who had undergone either combined SLAP and rotator cuff repair (when the biceps was too healthy to cut; group R = 16 patients) or tenotomy and rotator cuff repair (when any fraying or partial tear existed in the biceps tendon; group T = 20 patients) for concomitant type II SLAP lesions and large to massive rotator cuff tears. The cuff repair was performed in a single row for both groups. Outcomes were assessed by comparing range of motion as well as Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores between the 2 groups. Results: At the 2-year follow-up, both groups demonstrated significant improvements in functional shoulder scores and range of motion. However, group T had better SST scores (group T, 9.3 ± 1.6; group R, 7.8 ± 1.9; P = .012), ASES scores (group T, 88.6 ± 8.9; group R, 80.4 ±8.9; P = .009), UCLA scores (group T, 29.6 ± 3.0; group R, 26.0 ± 4.2; P = .007), and forward flexion (group T, 145.9° ± 13.0°; group R, 132.5° ± 15.3°; P = .008). The mean tear size and the degree of preoperative muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration on magnetic resonance imaging were similar between the groups. Conclusion: For patients with concomitant type II SLAP lesions and large to massive rotator cuff tears, the outcomes of simultaneous arthroscopic SLAP and rotator cuff repair were inferior to those of arthroscopic biceps tenotomy and cuff repair in terms of functional shoulder scores and range of motion. Biceps tenotomy and rotator cuff repair may be a more reliable method to address concomitant type II SLAP lesions and large to massive rotator cuff tears in patients, although a randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm the results.

Ganglion cyst of the spinoglenoid notch: comparison between SLAP repair alone and SLAP repair with cyst decompression

Some authors have described the ganglion cyst of the spinoglenoidal notch as related to repetitive overhead activities and labral tear caused by trauma, while others have explained lesions of the capsulolabral complex and ganglion cysts to have separate pathologies. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between 2 groups: 1 with superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair only and the other with SLAP repair and cyst decompression prospectively. From August 2000 to March 2007, 28 patients matching the inclusion criteria were selected for the study. They were divided into 2 groups: 1 who received SLAP repair and the other with concomitant SLAP repair and cyst decompression. A visual analogue scale (VAS) and Rowe and Constant scores were used to make evaluation. Preoperative magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of 2 patient groups were compared with 2 follow-up MRIs taken 3 months after the operation and at final follow-up. Mean VAS and Constant and Rowe scores in groups I and II improved significantly from mean preoperative score compared to last follow-up score; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P > .05). Preoperative MRI and arthroscopy revealed type II SLAP lesions and a type V lesion, respectively, as accompanying lesions in 24 cases. The hypothesis stating 1-way valve mechanism of SLAP lesion as an initial cause of ganglion cysts has been proved indirectly in this study. Furthermore, direct decompression of the cyst does not lead to different results.

Traumatic Shoulder Instability Involving Anterior, Inferior, and Posterior Labral Injury

Background Traumatic labral tears involving the anterior, inferior, and posterior aspects of the glenoid fossa represent a unique subpopulation of shoulder instability. Purpose This study was undertaken to evaluate prospectively the clinical results of patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of 270° labral tears. Study Design Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods This was a prospective outcomes analysis of patients who underwent arthroscopic stabilization of a 270° labral tear. Inclusion criteria included patients with traumatic injury and primarily anteroinferior instability but several had posterior instability as well. Imaging revealed extensive labral injury in all patients. Indications for repair included symptomatic instability, 2+ anterior-inferior and posterior-inferior load-shift testing, and arthroscopic confirmation of labral lesions that extended anteriorly, inferiorly, and with extension to the midglenoid posteriorly. Exclusion criteria were SLAP (superior labrum anterior and posterior) lesions, revisions, and nontraumatic injuries. All patients underwent an arthroscopic repair utilizing modern suture anchor technique. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Constant Murley scores. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores were collected postoperatively. Failure was defined as any days missed from sport activity or work due to an instability event. Results Twenty-three 270° labral repairs were performed in 21 patients by a single surgeon. Twenty shoulders in 19 patients (92%) were followed for a mean of 28 months (range, 14-47 months) postoperatively. The mean preoperative and postoperative outcome scores showed statistically significant improvements (P ≤ .001): Rowe (59 to 92), ASES (76 to 93), SST (9 to 11), and Constant scores (73 to 95). The mean SANE score was 91 of 100 and the mean WOSI score was 302. Three of the 20 shoulders (in 19 patients) had subsequent episodes of instability for a failure rate of 15%. One required a second procedure for continued instability for a revision rate of 5%. Two patients developed adhesive capsulitis postoperatively of which one required an arthroscopic arthrolysis. Conclusion Arthroscopic repair of these extensive labral injuries involving 270° of the glenoid fossa was an effective surgical treatment and restored mechanical stability of the shoulder. The arthroscopic approach allowed for complete visualization and repair of all labral pathology.

Reproducibility and Reliability of the Snyder Classification of Superior Labral Anterior Posterior Lesions Among Shoulder Surgeons

Background: Previous studies of the reliability of classifications for superior labral anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions suggest that intraobserver/interobserver reliability is poor. Purpose: The goals were to (1) evaluate intraobserver/interobserver reliability of the Snyder classification of labrum tears among experienced surgeons, (2) determine the effect of simplifying that classification into normal versus abnormal labrums, (3) determine the reliability of subdividing type II SLAP lesions, and (4) evaluate the effect of videotape quality on diagnostic confidence. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: At 2 separate times, 5 experienced shoulder surgeons (all >10 years of practice) evaluated 90 videotapes of shoulder arthroscopy performed for SLAP lesions to identify lesion type, to grade video quality, and to determine degree of confidence in diagnosis. The results were compared for intraobserver reliability (κ analysis) and interobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients) and effect of video quality on diagnostic confidence. Significance was set at P < .05. Results: When the choices were normal labrum or the 4 types of SLAP lesions, the intraobserver agreements (mean κ, 0.670) and interobserver agreements (mean correlation, 0.804) were substantial. When the labrums were divided into normal (normal and type I) and abnormal (types II-IV), the intraobserver agreements (mean κ, 0.792) and interobserver agreements (mean correlation, 0.648) were substantial. When the 3 type II SLAP lesion subvariants were evaluated, the intraobserver agreement (mean κ, 0.598) was moderate, and the interobserver agreement (mean correlation, 0.804) was substantial. The confidence of the diagnosis was highly correlated with the perceived video quality (average Pearson correlation, 0.718; P < .01). Repeated measures analysis showed a significant relationship between confidence and quality (parameter estimate, 0.732; standard error, 0.021; P < .01) adjusting for rater and review. Conclusion: For experienced shoulder surgeons, the Snyder classification is a reliable system for identifying SLAP lesions.