Superior Capsule Research Articles

Lateral Graft Failure Resulted In Graft Volume Loss And Poor Clinical Outcomes Compared With Medial Failure After Superior Capsule Reconstruction

Lateral Graft Failure Resulted In Graft Volume Loss And Poor Clinical Outcomes Compared With Medial Failure After Superior Capsule Reconstruction

Effect of Medial or Lateral Graft Failure on Graft Volume and Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Background: Graft failure is a common complication after superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). The graft in SCR is fixed on the greater tuberosity and superior glenoid, and graft failure has been reported on both sides. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical manifestations of patients with graft failure after SCR and identify the clinical and radiological differences between medial and lateral graft failure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent SCR with a dermal allograft for symptomatic irreparable rotator cuff tears between March 2018 and September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months postoperatively. Patients with graft failure were divided into 2 groups: those with lateral graft failure on the greater tuberosity side (group I) and those with medial graft failure on the glenoid side (group II). Patients with intact grafts were included in group III as a control group. Intergroup differences in clinical and radiological characteristics were analyzed, and multiple regression analysis was performed. Results: Among the 93 patients included, there were 18 patients in group I, 15 in group II, and 60 in group III. Overall, 11 patients (61.1%) in group I and 9 patients (60.0%) in group II had a partial graft rupture at one anchor. The postoperative graft volume was significantly lower in group I than in groups II and III (2514.0 ± 564.3 mm3, 3183.5 ± 547.1 mm3, and 3198.0 ± 584.8 mm3, respectively; P = .002 for group I vs II; P < .001 for group I vs III). The acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was significantly increased at 6 months postoperatively compared with before surgery in group I (6.6 ± 1.6 mm vs 4.3 ± 1.9 mm, respectively; P < .001) and group II (7.4 ± 1.3 mm vs 5.7 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; P = .002). However, group I exhibited a significantly greater decrease in the AHD over time than group II (P < .001) and a significantly lower AHD at the final follow-up than the other groups (P < .001). The postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was significantly lower in group I than in the other groups (P < .001). On multiple regression analysis, fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle, Hamada grade, and graft width were independent factors for lateral graft failure. Conclusion: Patients with lateral graft failure had inferior clinical outcomes and lower postoperative graft volumes than those with medial graft failure after SCR using a dermal allograft. The AHD of patients with lateral graft failure improved postoperatively; however, it deteriorated over time.

Biceps tendon autograft augmentation for rotator cuff and instability procedures: a narrative review.

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies. The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries. The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs. Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed. There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears. In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results. The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Reinforcement Techniques in Arthroscopic Repair of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study of Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Patch Graft Augmentation.

Background: Large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) present challenges in achieving successful repair due to factors such as muscle atrophy and tendon retraction. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with reinforcement techniques like superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) or patch graft augmentation (PGA) has emerged as a less invasive option to improve shoulder joint stability and prevent retear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR and PGA as reinforcement techniques for the arthroscopic repair of LMRCTs. Methods: A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LMRCT repair between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving SCR (Group 1) and those receiving PGA (Group 2). Various clinical parameters including range of motion, functional scores, and radiological assessments were evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Results: Both SCR and PGA techniques demonstrated significant improvements in the range of motion and clinical scores postoperatively. However, Group 2 showed higher postoperative SST and UCLA scores compared to Group 1. Radiologically, there was a slightly higher retear rate in Group 2, although this was not statistically significant. Group 2 also had a shorter mean duration of surgery compared to Group 1. Conclusions: In the arthroscopic repair of LMRCTs, both SCR and PGA techniques exhibit favorable clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite the simplicity of PGA compared to SCR, it offers comparable results with a shorter surgical duration, making it a feasible reinforcement option for surgeons.

Investigation of the pressure value while performing biceps tenodesis for superior capsuler reconstruction

BackgroundTo compare the histopathological results of biceps tenodesis (BT) performed with normal, low, and high pressures for superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in rabbits with massive rotator cuff tears.Materials and methodsThirty rabbits were divided into three groups. Rabbits 1–10 underwent SCR with BT at the same pressure (Group 1), value measured in the groove; 50% lower (Group 2); 50% higher (Group 3). After the 4-week follow-up, shoulder were en-bloc excised and histopathological evaluation was performed with modified Bonar’s scale. Results were compared between the groups, statistically.ResultsExtracellular matrix were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Cellularity levels were significantly lower in group 2 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 2 had no difference between the sides (p > 0.05). Group 2 had lower vascularity levels compared to the other groups (p = 0.01).DicsussionWhen the biceps tendon was in the bicipital groove and in a more mobile state with lower pressure exposure. BT performed with a tension that creates less pressure than the biceps in the groove is more successful in SCR.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction in patients aged over 70 with irreparable rotator cuff tears

BackgroundArthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed to restore superior shoulder stability, muscle balance, and function after irreparable posterior–superior rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether favorable clinical outcomes after SCR for irreparable rotator cuff tears would be obtained in patients older than 70 years. MethodsA total of 173 consecutive shoulders in 162 patients who underwent arthroscopic SCR using autografts of fascia lata for irreparable rotator cuff tears were allocated to three groups according to patient age at the time of surgery: Group 1, <55 years old (11 shoulders); Group 2, 55 to 70 years old (85 shoulders); and Group 3, >70 years old (77 shoulders). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, active shoulder range of motion (ROM), and visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated before surgery and at the final follow-up. Postoperative complications, including graft tears in MRI and donor-site morbidity, were assessed. ResultsThe mean follow-up was 3 years and 9 months. Both ASES and JOA scores and active ROM (elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation) increased significantly after arthroscopic SCR in all three groups (P < .001), and VAS decreased significantly. All three groups had low graft tear (6%–10%) and donor site morbidity (0%–1%) rates, with no significant difference among the groups. ConclusionArthroscopic SCR can lead to functional improvement and pain relief with a low rate of complications regardless of patient age.

Surgical Management of Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Rotator Cable Reconstruction.

Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) present treatment challenges. Recently, superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) and anterior cable reconstruction have emerged as surgical options, but no single approach is superior. This review provides an overview of SCR and cable reconstruction techniques, including biomechanical studies, clinical outcomes, and surgical considerations. Biomechanical studies show SCR with autografts or allografts improves glenohumeral stability and mechanics. Clinical outcomes of SCR demonstrate improved range of motion, function scores, and pain relief in short-term studies. Anterior cable reconstruction reduces superior humeral head translation and subacromial pressures in biomechanical models. Early clinical studies report improved rotator cuff healing and outcomes for cable reconstruction in specific irreparable tear patterns. SCR and cable reconstruction are viable surgical options for MIRCTs based on early encouraging results. However, higher-level comparative studies with long-term follow-up are still needed. Careful consideration of tear pattern, patient factors, and surgical goals is required to optimize treatment of MIRCTs. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal role for these procedures.

Lower Trapezius Transfer for Irreparable Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears.

Functionally irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears (FIRCT) represent a substantial source of morbidity for many patients. Several surgical options can be considered for the salvage of FICRTs. Transfer of the tendon of the lower trapezius to the greater tuberosity, originally described for surgical management of the paralytic shoulder, has emerged as an attractive option, particularly for patients with external rotation lag and those looking for strength restoration. The purpose of this publication is to review the indications, surgical technique, and reported outcomes of this procedure. Lower trapezius transfer (LTT) to the greater tuberosity in patients with irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears has been reported to be associated with satisfactory outcomes and low reoperation rates. It seems to be particularly effective in improving external rotation motion and strength, even when the teres minor is involved. In patients with a reparable infraspinatus, minimal fatty infiltration, and an intact teres minor, the outcome of LTT may be similar to that of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR), but LTT is more beneficial otherwise. The hospital cost of LTT has been reported to be less than the cost of SCR and equivalent to the cost of reverse arthroplasty. When reverse arthroplasty has been performed after a failed LTT, the outcome and complication rates do not seem to increase. LTT provides satisfactory outcomes for many patients with a posterosuperior FIRCT, particularly when they present preoperatively with an external rotation lag sign, involvement of the teres minor, or a desire to improve strength.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Supraspinatus Tears

Background: Irreparable rotator cuff tears represent approximately 12% of all presenting cuff tears, and multiple surgical techniques have been described for treatment, including allograft/bridge augmentation, debridement, partial repair, subacromial balloon, tendon transfer, and superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). SCR has demonstrated durable improvement in range of motion (ROM) and outcome scores at 2 and 5 years. Indications: Surgical indications for SCR include an irreparable tear of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus with a preserved or reparable subscapularis and preserved glenohumeral joint cartilage. Technique Description: Diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to identify and characterize the rotator cuff tear. Thorough debridement of the greater tuberosity is performed. Two all-suture FiberTak anchors are placed in the superior aspect of the glenoid. Two 2.6-mm FiberTak suture anchors are placed in the humeral head at the chondral margin. After measuring, the dermal allograft is cut to size with 15-mm overhang left on the far lateral edge. A 12-mm passport cannula is inserted laterally and the sutures from the glenoid and humeral head anchors are brought out through the cannula maintaining their position and orientation. The sutures are passed through the graft outside the cannula. The graft is introduced into the shoulder via the passport cannula with a back grasper. A cannula-in-cannula technique is used to tie the glenoid anchors first and then the medial row anchors. Two lateral row swivel lock anchors are used to complete a standard double row repair. Margin convergence is performed between the dermal allograft and remaining rotator cuff anterior and posterior. Postoperatively, patients are kept in a sling for 6 weeks, with no shoulder ROM. From weeks 6 to 12, patients discontinue sling and begin passive progression to active ROM. Strengthening is initiated at 12 weeks, and return-to-sport or work is at approximately 6 months. Results: Irreparable rotator cuff tears treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and SCR show durable improvement in patient-reported outcomes at 2 and 5 years. Re-tear rates did not differ between athletes and non-athletes. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with SCR is a durable and reliable surgical option for patients presenting with preserved glenohumeral joint and irreparable supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tear. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Clinical and radiological outcomes between superior capsule reconstruction using allografts or xenografts: a 2-year retrospective comparison study

BackgroundTreating symptomatic, massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears remains challenging and controversial. Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using the tensor fascia lata has shown promising clinical results; however, due to donor site morbidity, interest in SCR using other grafts has increased. Yet, no studies have compared allografts with xenografts. In addition, the clinical results of graft tears remain controversial. This study compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR between those with allografts and xenografts. MethodsSixty-seven patients who had undergone SCR with allografts or xenografts between January 2016 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Furthermore, 62 patients were evaluated 2 years postsurgery, with five patients excluded due to loss to follow-up or conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores, range of motion, and radiological outcomes were evaluated before the surgery and at 6 and 24 months after surgery. ResultsThe graft tear rate was 23.08% in the allograft group and 42.86% in the xenograft group at 6 months after surgery; at 2 years postsurgery, the gap further widened to 32.43% and 64.00%, respectively, showing a significant difference. The graft in the allograft group was thicker than that in the xenograft group, and there were significant differences on the humeral side and in the midsubstance area. The allograft group showed significantly better VAS, Constant, and ASES scores than the xenograft group 2 years postsurgery. However, the difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups did not surpass minimal clinically important differences (MCID). ConclusionAlthough ASCR using xenografts had significantly lower clinical outcome than allografts, this difference did not reach MCID. ASCR using xenografts showed higher graft tear rates than allografts. Even with partial tears, better results were obtained if the graft continuity was maintained. Additionally, after surgery, the xenograft showed less thickness than the allograft and resulted in more tears, specifically in the midsubstance area.

My Approach to Failed Rotator Cuff Repair.

Failed rotator cuff repairs pose several challenges due to the high incidence rate, complexity, and range of symptoms. We propose an overview for assessing and treating failed rotator cuff repairs. For active young patients, attempt revision repair with patch augmentation if possible. When anatomic revision is not viable, but muscle is retained, consider partial repair with interposition bridging. Isolated, irreparable supraspinatus tears may benefit from superior capsule reconstruction. Tendon transfer is suitable for patients with significant atrophy and multiple irreparable cuff tears. Low-demand elderly patients or those with substantial glenohumeral arthritis may consider reverse total shoulder arthroplasty if conservative management fails. There are a variety of reported outcomes in the literature but long-term studies with larger cohorts are needed to improve the management of failed rotator cuff repair.

Clinical effectiveness of supraspinatus tendon reconstruction using autogenous fascia latas for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears: study protocol for a randomized, controlled clinical trial

BackgroundSupraspinatus tendon reconstruction (STR) was recently introduced as a new treatment option for irreparable posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears (IPMRCT). STR was thought to be more advantageous than superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) for restoring supraspinatus (SSP) dynamics. However, there has been no prospective randomized controlled study on the early clinical efficacy of STR.MethodsA single-site, prospective, observers and patients double-blinding randomized controlled trial was designed. Fifty-eight patients aged 50–85 years with IPMRCT will be randomized 1:1 to receive either STR or SCR. The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the American Society for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (ASES) score, range of motion (ROM), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), Goutlliar grade for fatty infiltration in the SSP, Sugaya grade for the autogenous fascia latas, isokinetic muscle strength testing and surface electromyography (EMG) testing for shoulder abduction muscle strength and complications.DiscussionThe results of this study will contribute to the treatment algorithm of IPMRCT and assist surgeons in making treatment decisions. This is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of STR and SCR for the treatment of IPMRCT.Trial registrationWe registered the trial in chictr.org.cn on July 17, 2023 (register number: ChiCTR2300073716). Items from the WHO trial registry were found within the protocol.

An Algorithmic Approach to the Surgical Management of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Based on Imaging, Function, and Repairability

Massive rotator cuff tears are one the most challenging conditions to treat in the shoulder. A variety of surgical approaches have been used to manage massive rotator cuff tears, such as repair with or without augmentation, superior capsule reconstruction, tendon transfer, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The choice between joint preservation or reverse shoulder arthroplasty is first considered based on preoperative imaging and functional status, as well as patient factors. When joint preservation is the goal of treatment, a combination of repairability, patient function, and age can be used to provide an algorithmic approach to treatment. Level of EvidenceLevel V, expert opinion.

Evaluation of a New MRI-Based Classification of Graft Status After Superior Capsule Reconstruction.

A classification system for the graft state after superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has not been described previously. To introduce a new, MRI-based classification system for graft integrity after SCR and to evaluate the system according to postoperative outcomes. Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Included were 62 consecutive patients who underwent SCR using autologous fascia lata graft between January 2013 and April 2021. Postoperative outcomes were assessed (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, Constant score, pain visual analog scale [pVAS], range of motion [ROM], acromiohumeral distance [AHD], Hamada grade). Graft status was classified by 2 orthopaedic surgeons on postoperative MRI in accordance with the signal intensity and the presence or extent of the tear, as follows: type 1 (hypointense signal without tear), type 2 (hyperintense signal without tear), type 3 (partial-thickness tear), type 4 (full-thickness tear with partial continuity), and type 5 (full-thickness tear with complete discontinuity). Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed using Cohen kappa. The correlation between postoperative outcomes (ASES score, Constant score, pVAS, ROM, AHD, and Hamada grade) and the SCR graft classification system was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the outcomes were compared according to classification type. Patients were classified according to the new system as follows: type 1 (n = 15), type 2 (n = 20), type 3 (n = 7), type 4 (n = 8), and type 5 (n = 12). There was excellent interobserver agreement (κ = 0.819) and intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.937 and 0.919). The classification system showed a moderate to high correlation with the ASES score (r = -0.451; P = .001), pVAS (r = 0.359; P = .005), AHD (r = -0.642; P < .001), and Hamada grade (r = 0.414; P < .001). Patients classified as having types 1 and 2 showed better outcomes in terms of ASES score, pVAS, ROM, and AHD compared with type 5 patients (P ≤ .021 for all). The new classification system was highly reproducible and showed clinical utility for both radiological and clinical evaluation after SCR.

Scaffold- and graft-based biological augmentation of rotator cuff repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies for 2010-2022.

Despite advancements in the surgical techniques of rotator cuff repair (RCR), there remains a high retear rate. Biological augmentation of repairs with overlaying grafts and scaffolds may enhance healing and strengthen the repair construct. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of scaffold-based (nonstructural) and overlay graft-based (structural) biological augmentation in RCR (excluding superior capsule reconstruction and bridging techniques) in both preclinical and clinical studies. This systematic review was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, as well as guidelines outlined by The Cochrane Collaboration. A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from 2010 until 2022 was conducted to identify studies reporting the clinical, functional, and/or patient-reported outcomes of ≥1 biological augmentation method in either animal models or humans. The methodologic quality of included primary studies was appraised using the Checklist to Evaluate a Report of a Non-pharmacological Trial (CLEAR-NPT) for randomized controlled trials and using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) for nonrandomized studies. A total of 62 studies (Level I-IV evidence) were included, comprising 47 studies reporting outcomes in animal models and 15 clinical studies. Of the 47 animal-model studies, 41 (87.2%) demonstrated biomechanical and histologic enhancement with improved RCR load to failure, stiffness, and strength. Of the 15 clinical studies, 10 (66.7%) illustrated improvement in postoperative clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes (eg, retear rate, radiographic thickness and footprint, and patient functional scores). No study reported a significant detriment to repair with augmentation, and all studies endorsed low complication rates. A meta-analysis of pooled retear rates demonstrated significantly lower odds of retear after treatment with biological augmentation of RCR compared with treatment with non-augmented RCR (odds ratio, 0.28; P<.00001), with low heterogeneity (I2=0.11). Graft and scaffold augmentations have shown favorable results in both preclinical and clinical studies. Of the investigated clinical grafts and scaffolds, acellular human dermal allograft and bovine collagen demonstrate the most promising preliminary evidence in the graft and scaffold categories, respectively. With a low risk of bias, meta-analysis revealed that biological augmentation significantly lowered the odds of retear. Although further investigation is warranted, these findings suggest graft and scaffold biological augmentation of RCR to be safe.

Postoperative results of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using fascia lata: a retrospective cohort study

Superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) was developed to improve shoulder function and alleviate pain in patients with primary irreparable rotator cuff tears. Although suitable clinical results of SCR have been reported, only a few studies have investigated the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction (ASCR) using tensor fascia at a minimum follow-up period of 2years after surgery. Among 100 consecutive patients who underwent ASCR since April 2010, this retrospective cohort study included 49 patients with a Hamada classification of ≤3 who were available for at least 2-year follow-up after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 34.5 (24-74) months. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scores, preoperative and postoperative active elevation angles, external and internal rotations with the arms in the anatomical position, manual muscle test (MMT) scores, preoperative and postoperative acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and cuff integrity on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging using the Hasegawa classification. We compared 27 pseudoparalyzed (elevation of <90°) shoulders with 22 nonpseudoparalyzed shoulders. We also evaluated the treatment of patients with subscapularis tendon tears and compared the outcomes of patients with good graft repair and those with graft retear. The JOA score, UCLA score, active elevation angle, internal and external rotation angles, and muscle strength (MMT) significantly improved at the time of investigation preoperatively and 2years postoperatively. The mean AHD also improved from 5±2.6mm preoperatively to 9±2.8mm postoperatively. No significant difference in graft tear rate was observed between pseudoparalyzed shoulder and nonpseudoparalyzed shoulder groups. The subscapularis tendon was torn in 26 of 49 (53%) patients, and all patients underwent repair. The graft repair group showed a significant improvement in JOA scores, UCLA shoulder scores, joint range of motion, MMT, and AHD postoperatively, but not in internal rotation strength. In contrast, the graft tear group did not show any significant improvement. All patients could return to work, except for those performing heavy labor. Complications included graft tear in five patients, postoperative infection in two patients, and progressive postoperative arthropathic changes in one patient. Good clinical results of ASCR were obtained using tensor fascia lata at 2years after surgery, with few complications and low graft tear rates.

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon to Reinforce the Repair of a Supraspinatus Tear and Increase Healing

Rotator cuff tears continue to be a challenge for the shoulder surgeon since there is still a high rate of retears. To increase the rate of repair and decrease the number of retears, we present a technique, in which we reinforce a tension-free double-row repair of the supraspinatus with reconstruction of the superior capsule with the long head of the biceps (LHB). With this reinforcement of the cuff suture using the LHB, we increase both the biomechanics and biology of the repair and decrease the rate of reruptures.

High degree of consensus on diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears: a Delphi approach.

To develop a consensus on diagnosis and treatment of rotator cuff tears. The study focused on selected areas: imaging, prognostic factors, treatment options, surgical techniques. Panel was composed of all members of the shoulder committee of the Italian Society of Arthroscopy, Knee, Upper arm, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopedic techniques (SIAGASCOT). Four rounds were performed. The first round consisted of gathering questions which were then divided into seven blocks referring to: imaging, patient-related prognostic factors, treatment options, surgical steps, reparative techniques, surgical predictive factors, advanced techniques. Subsequent rounds consisted of condensation by means of online questionnaire and debates. Consensus was defined as two-thirds agreement on one answer. Descriptive statistic was used to summarize the data. Forty-one shoulder experts were involved. Fifty-six statements were finally formulated. A consensus could be achieved on 51. Experts agreed that preoperative magnetic resonance imaging is strongly recommended because it allows a careful evaluation of tear characteristics, while the role of US remains debatable. Controversial patient-related factors such as age, comorbidities, smoking and stiffness do not contraindicate the repair. From a surgical standpoint, the experts highlighted that pseudo-paralysis is not a contraindication to rotator cuff repair. Consensus on specific surgical steps was also achieved: capsular release should be performed only in stiff shoulders; footprint preparation is mandatory, while debridement of tendon edges is not essential. If necessary, a rotator interval release could be performed without interrupting the continuity between subscapularis and supraspinatus tendon; posterior delamination should be always included in the repair. Advanced techniques such as tendon transfers should be selected based on the main clinical deficit, while the superior capsule reconstruction plays a role only in combination with a functional repair. A consensus was achieved almost on every topic of controversy explored. Particularly, MRI was deemed necessary to determine tear characteristics, while radiographs remain important for differential diagnosis; age should not be considered a contraindication to surgery; pseudo-paralysis does not represent a contraindication to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, but superior capsule reconstruction plays a role only in combination with a functional repair. Latissimus dorsi transfer plays a role when the main functional deficit is in elevation, while the lower trapezius transfer plays a role when the main functional deficit is the external-rotation. V.

Biceps-based 3-layer reconstruction of the irreparable rotator cuff: a technical note on biceps tendon as a common local graft for in-situ superior capsular reconstruction, partial cuff repair, and middle trapezius tendon transfer

BackgroundFor irreparable rotator cuff tears, 3-layer tendon reconstruction (in which in-situ superior capsular reconstruction-reinforced partial rotator cuff repair was augmented with hamstring-sheet-lengthened middle trapezius tendon transfer) was recently reported to achieve satisfactory postoperative outcomes. To avoid hamstring graft-related drawbacks, the current note describes a technical modification of that reconstruct; wherein long head of biceps tendon is used as a cornerstone structure for simultaneously reconstructing the superior capsule; lengthening the transferred middle trapezius tendon; and augmenting the partially-repaired rotator cuff.MethodsVia sub-pectoral approach, long head of biceps tendon is distally-tenotomized. Through McKenzie approach, proximal stump of the tenotomized long head of biceps is retrieved to the sub-acromial space where double-row biceps tenodesis (into a trough at the greater tuberosity) is performed for reconstructing the superior capsule. Next, postero-superior rotator cuff is partially repaired, and side-to-side sutured to the reconstructed capsule. Through a 7–8-cm skin incision over the medial scapular spine, middle trapezius tendon is released. Portion of long head of biceps tendon distal to the tenodesis site is retrieved via a sub-trapezius/sub-acromial corridor to the scapular wound where it is re-attached to the released middle trapezius tendon.ResultsUse of long head of biceps tendon as a common local graft (for simultaneously reconstructing the superior capsule, lengthening the transferred middle trapezius tendon, and augmenting the partially-repaired rotator cuff) is technically feasible provided that the harvested tendon stump is at least 10 cm in length.ConclusionWhile avoiding hamstring graft-related complications, the currently-reported biceps-based 3-layer rotator cuff tendon reconstruction might offer the advantages of reproducibility, safety, simplicity and quickness; however, it should be validated via further studies.Trial registration The present study was approved by the Institutional Committee of Scientific Research and Ethics (3-2023Orth10-1).

Postoperative graft integrity affects clinical outcomes after superior capsule reconstruction using fascia lata autograft in posterior-superior rotator cuff tears: a multicenter study.

Previous studies have postulated that graft thickness and graft healing may be important factors for optimizing clinical outcomes of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs). However, the relationship between postoperative graft integrity and clinical outcomes after SCR remains unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between postoperative graft integrity, including graft thickness and size of graft tear, and clinical outcomes after SCR in patients with irreparable RCTs. This retrospective multicenter study included 188 patients (86 women, 102 men; mean age, 69.2years; range, 49-87years) with irreparable RCTs who underwent arthroscopic SCR using fascia lata autografts. Using magnetic resonance imaging, the graft integrity was evaluated postoperatively at or after 1year and was classified, according to Hasegawa's classification, into 4 categories: type I-II, intact graft of sufficient thickness; type III, thinned graft without discontinuity; type IV, presence of a minor discontinuity; and type V, presence of a major discontinuity. We compared (1) baseline characteristics, (2) visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, (3) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, (4) active shoulder range of motion, and (5) acromiohumeral distance (AHD) among 4 groups based on postoperative graft integrity. Magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed 152 shoulders (80.9%) with type I-II graft, 13 (6.9%) with type III graft, 13 (6.9%) with type IV graft, and 10 (5.3%) with type V graft. VAS and ASES scores significantly improved after SCR in all graft types (P<.0001 to P=.02). However, shoulders with type V grafts had significantly inferior postoperative VAS and ASES scores compared to those with type I-II grafts (P=.001 and P<.0001, respectively). Shoulders without graft tears (types I-II and III) showed significant improvements in shoulder elevation and internal rotation after SCR (P<.0001 to P=.02). In contrast, shoulders with large graft tears (type V) showed no significant improvement in shoulder range of motion. Postoperative acromiohumeral distance significantly increased only in shoulders with type I-II grafts (P<.0001). Postoperative graft thickness and size of graft tear affected clinical and radiographic outcomes after SCR using a fascia lata autograft. Patients with large graft tears had significantly inferior postoperative clinical scores compared to those with intact grafts of sufficient thickness, although arthroscopic SCR provided pain relief even in patients with graft tears. Shoulders with intact grafts of sufficient thickness restored glenohumeral stability and showed better clinical outcomes than those with graft thinning or tears.