The difference between the phase diagrams of La2−x(Ba,Sr)xCuO4 and Nd2−xCexCuO4 is discussed. It is proposed that the discrepancy of x-values corresponding to the transition from antiferromagnetic dielectric state to conducting one (respectively, x≈0.06 in La2−x(Ba,Sr)xCuO4 and x≈0.125 in Nd2−xCexCuO4) results from non-homogeneous doping of La2−x(Ba,Sr)xCuO4 over the range 0.06<x<0.125, when localized holes are added to each second CuO2 layer. Therefore the actual phase diagram of the “holedoped” superconductor La2−x(Ba,Sr)xCuO4 coincides with one for the “electron-doped” superconductor Nd2−xCexCuO4. It is shown that all features observed in La2−x(Ba,Sr)xCuO4 around x=0.125 are clarified on this basis.
Read full abstract