Supera Stent Research Articles

Efficacy of Supera Stent in the Treatment of Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: A Short-Term Result Analysis of Real-World Evidence

When dealing with complex femoropopliteal lesions, there is a growing preference for the utilization of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) or stents. However, in real-world scenarios, a greater number of elderly patients with longer lesion lengths are encountered. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different interventional strategies, including the utilization of Supera stent and DCB, in a real-world setting. This was a retrospective study that collected treatment and follow-up data of patients with complex femoropopliteal artery lesions treated between January 2019 and March 2022. All patients were categorized into 3 groups: "non-Supera stent group," "Supera stent group," and "Supera stent+DCB group." The primary effectiveness outcome was primary patency at 12months, defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio < 2.5 at the 12-month visit. Other outcomes included improvements in Rutherford categories and safety. A total of 162 patients were enrolled in this study. Compared with non-Supera group (47.6%) in the primary patency rate at 12months, Supera group (58.7%) or Supera+DCB group (60.0%) showed no significant difference. There were no significant differences in all-cause death, major amputation of the target limb, and target lesion revascularization between the groups. Supera group showed a significant improvement in Rutherford category without target lesion revascularization at 12months compared with non-Supera group (73.3% vs. 54.8%, P=0.041). In 12-month follow-up, more than 65% of patients maintained a Rutherford category of 3 or in the following, particularly in Supera group where 74.7% of patients had mild symptoms. The Supera stent has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in treating complex peripheral artery disease. However, combining Supera stent with DCB did not provide a significant advantage. Furthermore research is necessary to validate these findings in a larger patient population.

Navigating complexity: The Supera's triumph in femoropopliteal lesions.

The femoropopliteal sector endovascular treatment is particularly challenging due to its high tortuosity and torsional forces. Better results are still needed to ensure the long-term patency of stenting in this area. The Supera stent appears to change this paradigm. This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of femoropopliteal stenting with Supera in a real-world population. Seventy-nine patients were treated between January 2015 and December 2020, and the results are reported with a median follow-up of 28 months. Indications for revascularization were chronic limb-threatening ischemia with tissue loss (73.6%) or ischemic rest pain (17.7%) and claudication (7.6%). Thirty-six patients (45.6%) were classified as GLASS stage III according to the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System, with 65.8% and 30.4% in grades 3 and 4 of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal sectors, respectively. The 36-month primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 68.6%, 72.0%, and 79.0%, respectively, with an amputation-free survival rate of 86.6%. There was no significant difference between primary patency rates in GLASS stages I-II compared with GLASS stage III (36-month primary patency rates of 72% vs 63% respectively, p = 0.342) nor in amputation-free survival (88% vs 84%, p = 0.877). After adjusting for potential confounders, only the stent conformation significantly affected the primary patency rates, with a higher hazard of reintervention for the elongated (HR = 3.179; p = 0.36; CI 1.081-9.347) and the compressed (HR = 3.014; p = 0.42; CI 1.039-8.746) forms. The 36-month patency of the Supera stents in our real-world cohort was similar to other reported series. The GLASS stage did not interfere with the stent patency, proving it is a good choice even in the most adverse anatomy patients. Only the non-nominal stent conformation affected the primary patency rates in our patients.

Evaluation of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis Characteristics Stratified by Stent Design

Purpose: To evaluate the potential differences in characteristics of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR) stratified by stent design with a focus on the swirling flow-inducing BioMimics 3D helical centerline stent. Methods: Patients with ISR of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries undergoing reintervention were included in this study. The primary endpoint was the angiographic localization and extent of restenosis or reocclusion with the following five different stent systems: SMART Control stent, Supera peripheral stent, GORE® VIABAHN® endoprosthesis, BioMimics 3D stent, and Zilver® PTX® stent. Results: 414 ISR lesions were analyzed, affecting 236 Supera stents, 67 BioMimics 3D stents, 48 Zilver® PTX® stents, 38 SMART Control stents, and 25 VIABAHN® endoprostheses. The mean stent diameter and length were 5.7 ± 0.77 mm and 121.4 ± 94.8 mm, respectively. ISR included 310 (74.9%) lesions with 1 stent, 89 (21.5%) lesions with 2 stents, 14 (3.4%) lesions with 3 stents, and 1 lesion (0.2%) with 4 stents. Most lesions presented as reocclusions (67.4%) rather than focal (13.3%) or diffuse restenoses (19.3%). No significant differences in ISR lesion morphology were found. By trend, BioMimics 3D stent lesion extension was more focal (16.4% versus 12.7%, p = 0.258), with the highest proportion of lesions in which only the proximal stent third was affected (9.0% versus 5.8%, p = 0.230), as compared to the average of the other four devices. The occlusion rate was the second lowest for the BioMimics 3D stent (64.2 vs. 68.0%, p = 0.316). Risk factors for restenosis or occlusion were active smoking, pre-interventional occlusion, and popliteal intervention. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the helical centerline stent design of the BioMimics 3D stent, which results in a swirling flow with increased wall shear stress, may offer protective properties over straight stent designs, including DES and endoprosthesis, regarding localization and extension of restenosis. Prospective, randomized studies are warranted.

Directional Atherectomy With Antirestenotic Therapy Versus PTA/Supera Stenting for Popliteal Artery Lesions: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

This study examines the use and impact of directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) versus angioplasty plus Supera stent implantation on the outcomes during endovascular treatment of popliteal lesions in clinical practice. Overall 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75.0±12.2 years, 72% male), with isolated atherosclerotic disease of the popliteal artery who underwent endovascular treatment using DAART therapy or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/Supera stenting of the popliteal artery between January 2016 and December 2021 were identified from a retrospectively database. Patient and plaque characteristics were collected. A propensity-score matched, case-control analysis was conducted to balance covariates between the group of patients who underwent DAART and the one treated by PTA/Supera stenting. A total of 51 patients (35.7%) showed severe claudication and 92 (64.3%) critical limb ischemia. There was a trend toward longer treated lesions (90.4±81 vs 72.5±5.3 mm, p=0.089) and more chronic total occlusions (60.5% vs 46.8%, p=0.058) in the PTA/Supera stenting group, although not reaching statistically significance. Moderate-to-severe calcification was present in most lesions treated (75.8% of DAART group, 80.2% of PTA/Supera stenting group, and 78.3% of total cohort). Among the 53 case-matched pairs of patients treated with DAART or PTA/Supera stenting, there were no significant differences in short-term outcomes, including rate of technical success (96.2% vs 98.1%, p=0.232), procedural success (88.7% vs 90.1%, p=0.251), distal embolization (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.178), dissection (5.7% vs 1.9%, p=0.268), perforation (3.8% vs 5.6%, p=0.163), hospital discharge (1.2±0.1 vs 1.0±0.1, p=0.325), 30 day minor (28.3% vs 32.1%, p=0.264) or major amputation rates (7.5% vs 3.8%, p=0.107), and 30 day mortality (1.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.173). At 1 year, there was no difference in primary patency (73.6% vs 77.4%, p=0.233), primary assisted patency (81.3% vs 84.9%, p=0.167), secondary patency (86.8% vs 92.5%, p=0.094), ipsilateral minor (35.8% vs 39.6%, p=0.472) or major amputation (9.4% vs 7.5%, p=0.186), ankle brachial index improvement (0.32±0.12 vs 0.37±0.37, p=0.401), or mortality (5.7% vs 5.7%, p=0.121) rate between patients who underwent DAART or PTA/Supera stenting for popliteal lesions. Twelve-month results following DAART technique or PTA/Supera stenting of atherosclerotic lesions of the popliteal artery are not different, regardless of patient and plaque characteristics. The DAART technique for the treatment of popliteal artery atherosclerotic disease is presented as a "leave nothing behind" strategy with on-year clinical outcomes similar to ATP/Supera stenting.

Three-Year Real-World Outcomes of Interwoven Nitinol Supera Stent Implantation in Long and Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains a major issue in modern societies and affects more than 200 million people around the world. Endovascular methods have been evaluated to be safe and effective in limb salvage. The Supera is able to withstand increased compression, biomechanical stress and to have higher radial force. The objective of this study is to evaluate performance, durability and 3-year patency of Supera stent implantation in severe femoropopliteal disease. A retrospective real-world analysis was performed with consideration of 77 patients that had a Supera stent implanted with femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease at a single center. Among the 77 individuals, 92 Supera stents were implanted. Analysis of patients' demographics, lesions characteristics, reintervention rates and patency rates was performed. The median follow-up was 33 months and ranged from 0 to 84 months. Chronic limb-threatening ischemia was observed among 43 patients. Mean lesion length was 152.8 ± 94.6 mm. Chronic total occlusions were observed in a majority of lesions. Overall, primary patency rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 85.0%, 73.6%, 59.2% and 53.2%, respectively. The Supera stent is effective in the management of long and complex lesions. The results of patency rates were evaluated to be worse among lesions extending to the popliteal artery.

IVUS Improves Outcomes With SUPERA Stents for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Artery Disease.

Nitinol interwoven bare metal stents represent an advancement in stent technology; however, nominal deployment remains an area of focus. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been shown to improve outcomes in both the coronary and peripheral vasculature by providing the operator with greater vessel detail; however, the use of adjunctive IVUS with nitinol bare metal stents has not been widely studied. This studies aims to determine the effect of IVUS when used adjunctively with nitinol interwoven bare metal stents in the management of femoropopliteal lesions. Retrospective study. This study included a cohort of 200 consecutive patients with peripheral artery disease. All patients were treated with ≥1 Supera bare metal stent, and 91 received adjunctive IVUS imaging prior to stent deployment. Deployment conditions of nominal, compressed, and elongated were measured, and the primary clinical outcomes included target lesion reintervention, amputation, and mortality. This study also showed that 8.3 number needed to treat (NNT) patients must be treated with IVUS to avoid an additional revascularization event. The patients who received IVUS had a significantly greater number of nominally deployed stents (p<0.001). Patients who had IVUS imaging also had significantly lower reintervention rates compared with those who did not receive IVUS imaging (p=0.047). The IVUS and angiography decreases clinically-driven target lesion reintervention and increases nominal deployment compared with angiography alone in femoropopliteal lesions treated with interwoven bare metal nitinol stents. Endovascular surgones may conisder the adjuctive use of IVUS when using the Supera stent for the treatment of infra inguinal superficial femoral artery lesions. The adjunct use of IVUS may lead to improved sizing, vessel prep, deployment, and ultiamtely reduction in CD-TLR.

Transcarotid artery revascularization for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries-is it a game changer?

In their 10 patient case series, Walker et al, describe excellent outcomes from the use of transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) for the treatment of patients with severe blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI).1Dr. Patrick Walker et al. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Blunt Carotid Injury. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 20XX, 1(1), XX-XX. doi: XXXX.Google Scholar. For a single center over only 2 years this is a large cohort for a relatively rare problem. It is important to note that the primary treatment for BCVI is antithrombotic therapy with antiplatelets and/or anticoagulation. It has been shown that transfemoral carotid artery stenting for BCVI is rarely necessary or beneficial over antithrombotic therapy and the EAST guidelines recommend against routine stenting of grade II or III BCVI.(2)Burlew C.C. Biffl W.L. Moore E.E. Pieracci F.M. Beauchamp K.M. Stovall R. Wagenaar A.E. Jurkovich G.J. Endovascular stenting is rarely necessary for the management of blunt cerebrovascular injuries.J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1012-1017https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.042Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar,(3)Kim D.Y. Biffl W. Bokhari F. Brakenridge S. Chao E. Claridge J.A. Fraser D. Jawa R. Kasotakis G. Kerwin A. et al.Evaluation and management of blunt cerebrovascular injury: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020; 88: 875-887https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002668Crossref PubMed Scopus (32) Google Scholar The Denver group found an alarmingly high 45% occlusion rate in patients treated with stenting vs. only 5% in those treated with antithrombotic therapy and concluded that stenting for BCVI had an unacceptable risk profile.(4)Cothren C.C. Moore E.E. Ray C.E. Ciesla D.J. Johnson J.L. Moore J.B. Burch J.M. Carotid artery stents for blunt cerebrovascular injury: risks exceed benefits.Arch Surg. 2005; 140 (; discussion 485-486): 480-485https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.5.480Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar It seems clear that stenting is rarely indicated for BCVI and this is consistent with the experience of the Maryland Shock Trauma study, as the authors point out that their center diagnoses approximately 300 carotid BCVIs per year, of which only 2-3% were selected for TCAR. It's possible that TCAR may be associated with a lower stroke and complication rate in BCVI patients in a similar manner to its benefits for carotid occlusive disease. Namely, by the use of dynamic flow reversal, which was found by Naazie, et al. in their Vascular Quality Initiative study to be the primary mechanism for stroke protection in TCAR.(5)Naazie I.N. Magee G.A. Mathlouthi A. Elsayed N. Dakour-Aridi H. Malas M.B. Primary mechanism of stroke reduction in transcarotid artery revascularization is dynamic flow reversal.J Vasc Surg. 2021; 74: 187-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2020.10.082Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (8) Google Scholar Although the focus of this series is on the novel use of TCAR in the setting of BCVI requiring stenting, the authors describe another innovation, which is the use of Supera stents (Abbott, Plymouth, MN). The authors state that they prefer Supera stents for this application because of its flexibility and length, as they often stent up to the skull base to treat the entirety of the injury. At first glance, this seems to be an usual choice, but their results suggest that the authors may be on to something. Further study is necessary to determine if TCAR is a gamechanger for the management of BCVI and which of these two innovations is the primary reason for improved outcomes. Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Blunt Carotid InjuryJournal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and TechniquesPreviewTranscarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) with flow reversal has substantially changed the management of carotid artery stenosis, enabling an endovascular approach with a periprocedural stroke rate as low or lower than that of open carotid surgery. The use of TCAR in blunt carotid injury has not yet been described. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Treatment of Long Femoropopliteal Occlusive Lesions With Self-expanding Interwoven Nitinol Stent: 24 Month Outcomes of the STELLA-SUPERA-SIBERIA Register Trial.

The efficacy and safety of the Supera stent in superficial femoral artery (SFA) have been reported mostly in shorter lesions with relatively low proportion of occlusions. There are little data on the effectiveness of the Supera stent in long lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical safety and efficiency of the Supera stent in the treatment of long femoropopliteal occlusive lesions (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus [TASC] C/D) in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease. The STELLA-SUPERA-SIBERIA is a prospective, single-center, single-arm study. Patients with symptomatic (Rutherford stages 3-6) de novo and TASC C/D occlusive lesions of the femoropopliteal segment were treated with Supera stent. The primary endpoint was the 12 month rate of primary sustained clinical improvement (upward shift on the Rutherford classification to a one level without the need for repeated target lesion revascularization (TLR) in surviving patients without the need for unplanned amputation). Secondary endpoints were the 24 month of primary sustained clinical improvement, MALE, limb salvage, the primary patency, the secondary patency, 24 month MACE. Follow-up included clinical examination, duplex scan, and biplane x-ray up to 24 months. Between April 2019 and January 2020, 52 symptomatic patients with 55 long femoropopliteal occlusive lesions (52.7% TASC D lesions and 47.3% TASC C lesions) were treated. The mean target lesion length was 205±72 mm. All patients had total occlusions. The mean lesion length of the implanted Supera stents was 198±82 mm. At 12 and 24 months, the primary sustained clinical improvement rate was 80.2% and 63.6%, respectively. The Rutherford category assessment was significantly improved at 24 months compared with baseline (p=0.02). The primary patency rate at 12 and 24 months was 78.1% and 60.0%, respectively. At 12 and 24 months, freedom from TLR was 83.5% and 81.8%, respectively. There were no stent fractures at 24 months. Supera Stent implantation for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions revascularization appears to be a safe and efficient implant given the complexity of the treated lesions. Head-to-head studies are mandatory to establish Supera Stent as an alternative tool to open surgery for long femoropopliteal lesions. Our study indicated, that using self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent for TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions revascularization appears to be a safe and efficient implant given the complexity of the treated lesions. Although bypass grafting is recommended for prolonged femoropopliteal lesions, open surgery is more traumatic and is associated with greater risks than endovascular procedures. Our findings suggest that the use of interwoven nitinol stents can overcome the disadvantages of traditional stents in such cases, which may help to improve patients' outcomes and reduce the risk of adverse events.

SUPERA stent placement for salvaging early recurrent arteriovenous graft thrombosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: A single-center study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the patency of the helical interwoven SUPERA stent for salvaging prosthetic arteriovenous (AV) grafts with rapidly recurrent thrombotic occlusion developed within a short time period after successful percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. From December 2019 to September 2021, the data of 20 patients with AV graft who had the SUPERA stent inserted satisfying the following conditions were consecutively collected. (1) More than 1 year has passed since the AV access operation; (2) Thrombotic re-occlusion of AV graft occurred within 3 months after previous successful endovascular treatment; (3) Residual stenosis is greater than 30% after full effacement of balloon angioplasty in the primary lesion. Post-interventional target lesion primary patency (TLPP), access circuit primary patency (ACPP), and secondary patency (SP) were calculated. Primary lesions of early recurrent arteriovenous graft thrombosis were found in 13 patients with graft-vein anastomosis, six patients with intra-graft stenosis, and one patient with outflow vein complications. The lesions showed residual stenosis in 47.4% (interquartile range: 44.1%-55.3%) of patients despite full-effacement balloon angioplasty. Clinical success was achieved in all patients with full-expansion of the stents at the 1-month follow-up. The TLPP was 70.7% and 32% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and ACPP was 47.5% and 6.8% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The SP was 76.1% and 57.1% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. No cannulation complications occurred in the six patients with installation inside the graft. No hemodialysis or stent fracture occurred in any patient during the follow-up period. The SUPERA stent may have a role in salvaging AV grafts with early recurrent thrombosis due to its greater radial force and its conformability and can be useful in treating stenosis involving the elbow or axilla, with fair patency and low complication rates.

Abstract No. 505 SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Extended Early Experience and Practical Considerations

Abstract No. 505 SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Extended Early Experience and Practical Considerations

Drug coated balloon improves outcomes of sub-optimal Supera deployment in the intermediate term

Sub-Optimal deployment of Self expanding interwoven stents (Supera) has been shown to increase the rate of Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR). Meanwhile, drug coated balloons (DCB) have been shown to reduce CD-TLR in the femoral-popliteal segment in de- novo and restenotic lesions. However, the clinical effects of vessel preparation with DCB in nominal, compressed, and elongated Supera has not been widely studied. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of clinically driven re-intervention, major amputations, and mortality in relation to the use of DCB as vessel preparation in different deployment conditions (nominal, compressed, elongated) of the Supera stent. Patient chart data was collected at a single center hospital between March 2015 and May 2020. All patients were adults (≥ 18years old) and were treated with at least one (≥ 1) Supera stent. Deployment status was extrapolated from anonymized angiograms. The primary endpoint of this study was CD-TLR. Secondary endpoints included amputation and mortality rates associated with each deployment condition. A total of 670 limbs were treated and patients were followed for 36months. Nominal stent deployment was observed in 337 limbs, followed by elongated condition (n = 176), then by compressed conditions (n = 159). CD-TLR was observed most frequently with elongated deployment. Drug coated balloons were used as vessel prep prior to stenting and showed a protective effect regardless of deployment status; O.R = 0.44 (CI 0.30-0.66, p < .05).

A method of assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness under cyclic deformations experienced during limb movement

Poor outcomes of peripheral arterial disease stenting are often attributed to the inability of stents to accommodate the complex biomechanics of the flexed lower limb. Abrasion damage caused by rubbing of the stent against the artery wall during limb movement plays a significant role in reconstruction failure but has not been characterized. Our goals were to develop a method of assessing the abrasiveness of peripheral nitinol stents and apply it to several commercial devices. Misago, AbsolutePro, Innova, Zilver, SmartControl, SmartFlex, and Supera stents were deployed inside electrospun nanofibrillar tubes with femoropopliteal artery-mimicking mechanical properties and subjected to cyclic axial compression (25%), bending (90°), and torsion (26°/cm) equivalent to five life-years of severe limb flexions. Abrasion was assessed using an abrasion damage score (ADS, range 1–7) for each deformation mode. Misago produced the least abrasion and no stent fractures (ADS 3). Innova caused small abrasion under compression and torsion but large damage under bending (ADS 7). Supera performed well under bending and compression but caused damage under torsion (ADS 8). AbsolutePro produced significant abrasion under bending and compression but less damage under torsion (ADS 12). Zilver fractured under all three deformations and severely abraded the tube under bending and compression (ADS 15). SmartControl and SmartFlex fractured under all three deformations and produced significant abrasion due to strut penetration (ADS 20 and 21). ADS strongly correlated with clinical 12-month primary patency and target lesion revascularization rates, and the described method of assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness can guide device selection and development. Statement of significancePoor outcomes of peripheral arterial disease stenting are related to the inability of stents to accommodate the complex biomechanics of the flexed lower limb. Abrasion damage caused by rubbing of the stent against the artery wall during limb movement plays a significant role in reconstruction failure but has not been characterized. Our study presents the first attempt at assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness, and the proposed method is applied to compare the abrasion damage caused by Misago, AbsolutePro, Innova, Zilver, SmartControl, SmartFlex, and Supera peripheral stents using artery-mimicking synthetic tubes and cyclic deformations equivalent to five life-years of severe limb flexions. The abrasion damage caused by stents strongly correlates with their clinical 12-month primary patency and target lesion revascularization rates, and the described methodology can be used as a cost-effective and controlled way of assessing stent performance, which can guide device selection and development.

Pure Endovascular versus Hybrid Approach for Management of Iliofemoral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Common femoral artery (CFA) atherosclerotic lesions currently remain one of the last limitations for adoption of endovascular repair as the first-line treatment, easy surgical accessibility, and, last but not least, favorable long-term outcomes, still making CFA disease treatment part of the surgical domain. In the last 5 years, improvement of the endovascular equipment and technical skills of the operators have led to an increase in percutaneous CFA procedures. A single-center randomized prospective study of 36 symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) CFA stenotic or occlusive lesions were included, and patients were randomized over two groups based on the management approach SUPERA versus hybrid technique. Patients had a mean age 60.8 ± 8.2 years. Thirty-two (88.9%) patients reported improvement of the clinical symptoms, 28 (87.5%) patients had intact pulse postoperatively, and 28 (87.5%) had patent vessels. Follow-up showed that none developed reocclusion or restenosis during the period of follow-up. Comparison of difference in peak systolic velocity ratio (PSVR) among study groups showed that the hybrid technique had more reduction of PSVR postintervention compared to the SUPERA group with a p -value of < 0.0001. Safety and feasibility of endovascular approach with the SUPERA stent to the CFA (no stent zone) has low incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality in well experienced surgical hands.

Superficial Femoral Artery Rupture "Bailed Out" Using Novel Design of Supera Stent.

Peripheral artery disease is a condition that occurs due to narrowing or occlusion of arterial lumen usually secondary to atherosclerosis. Endovascular treatments are minimally invasive procedures that have become popular for recanalization of such calcified/sclerosed arteries. However, heavily calcified arteries make these procedures challenging and are more prone to complications like balloon rupture and bleeding. Herein, we report a novel case of rupture of superficial femoral artery and its management using self-expanding Supera stent.

Supera stent implantation for the treatment of isolated popliteal artery disease systematic review and evaluation of current endovascular strategies.

&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; The anatomical location of the popliteal artery is one of the greatest challenges for percutaneous interventions. The biomechanical attributes of the vessel lead to higher rates of restenosis, stent fracture, and occlusion. Some surgeons consider the popliteal artery as a no stenting zone. Many specialists favor percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to be the first line of endovascular treatment in the popliteal artery with bail-out stent implantation if the results are suboptimal. The Supera peripheral stent system is a novel stent that has been manufactured with a high degree of flexibility and supposedly might be appropriate for implantation in the popliteal artery. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; Evaluation of the performance of Supera stent in isolated popliteal artery disease in comparison to other methods of treatment. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; As many as 92 articles were found in the databases and after full-text review, 4 studies matched the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; Primary patency rates of Supera implantation in an isolated popliteal artery at 12 months ranged from 68% to 90%. In all four studies, no stent fractures were observed. Only one study provided longer follow-up than 12 months and evaluated the performance of the Supera stent 36 months after implantation. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/b&gt; In conclusion, mentioned studies show promising and superior to other stent patency rates of the Supera stent regarding popliteal artery lesions. What is more, no stent fracture is promising regarding longer follow-up. However, more studies with longer follow-ups and direct comparison to other methods are required to fully evaluate Supera&apos;s performance in the popliteal artery.

Endovascular retrieval of an elongated Supera stent

Stenting is used to achieve artery patency, and the Supera stent, a self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent, has produced good clinical outcomes. A 70-year-old woman with peripheral artery disease had experienced intermittent claudication (Fontaine stage IIb). Endovascular treatment was performed for a chronic total occlusion TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus class II type B lesion. A Supera stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) was used. However, it had become severely elongated to the proximal end in the superficial femoral artery and was removed using a balloon inserted from the side and trapped to the guide sheath with the distal end of the stent outside the sheath. After this bailout, an alternate stent could be placed through an antegrade approach to the contralateral common femoral artery.

Midterm Results of the Supera Stent for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease

The Supera (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) stent is an interwoven nitinol, shape-memory stent with high strength and flexibility characteristics which are purported to increase resistance to kinking and compression. The purpose of this study was to review single-center outcomes of the use of this stent in the femoropopliteal segment. We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent Supera stent placement for femoropopliteal occlusive disease from 2016-2019. Data was collected on patient demographics and procedural details. Follow-up imaging data, including duplex imaging and ankle-brachial indices, and clinical data were abstracted from encounter notes. Sixty-two patients with 72 unique Supera stent placements were identified. Mean age was 76 and 69% were male. 56% of patients had severe calcification and 11% had moderate calcification. 48% of lesions were Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document C or D lesions. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36months were 85%, 82%, and 75%, respectively. Primary patency was not affected significantly by lesion length, degree of calcification, number of outflow vessels, concomitant interventions, or stent size. These results demonstrate sustained primary patency with the Supera stent over a 3-year interval in treatment of patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease, including in the setting of severely calcified vessels.

SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Early Experience and Practical Considerations

SUPERA Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery: Early Experience and Practical Considerations

Treatment of intragraft stenosis in hemodialysis grafts with Supera stents: A retrospective study.

To report the patency rates after implantation of an interwoven nitinol stent to salvage failing arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) caused by intragraft stenoses. Between May 2018 and May 2020, 21 Supera stents were placed in 20 patients (18 women; mean age: 79.9 years) who had a failing AVG due to repeat intragraft stenoses. Recurrent AVG dysfunction with same intragraft stenosis within 3 months after first time angioplasty was a criterion for stenting. Those with concurrent treatment for other lesions were excluded. The technical success rate was 100%. Intragraft stenoses were treated at a median of 19.7 (interquartile range: 6-36) months after graft creation. Access circuit primary patency rates after stent placement were 84% and 35% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Access circuit secondary patency rates were 100% at 6 and 12 months and 89% at 18 months. Only one patient presented with graft failure due to proximal drainage vein occlusion. The target lesion patency rates were 100% at 6 months and 75% at 12 months. The rate of reintervention for intragraft lesion was 0.15 procedures per year. Stent distortion did not occur under regular cannulation. The interwoven nitinol stent is a promising treatment for failing AVGs with recurrent intragraft stenoses. The 1-year access circuit primary, secondary, and target lesion patency rates were acceptable, with a low reintervention rate. Stent fracture does not occur in areas of needle puncture.

Self-expanding interwoven nitinol stent in severe femoropopliteal arterial disease. Real life results of the Supera Peripheral Stent System®

Purpose The excellent performance of the Supera Peripheral Stent System ® by Abbott Vascular in femoropopliteal interventions has already been proven through several trials. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the durability and long-term patency of the Supera stent for the treatment of severe femoropopliteal lesions in a real-world population. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 136 consecutive limbs from 128 patients with atherosclerotic disease in the femoropopliteal region, treated with Supera stents between September 2010 and September 2017. As primary endpoints patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) were calculated and presented using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Fifty-five percent were treated for claudication (IC), 45% for chronical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). The mean treated lesion length was 143 mm (±77.8). The majority of lesions (63%) were Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Criteria II (TASC II) C/D lesions. The overall primary patency rates at 12 and 24 months of follow-up were 72.6% and 60.8% respectively. The primary patency at 12 and 24 months for TASC II A/B lesions was respectively 86% and 75.4%. For TASC II C/D lesions primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 64% and 51.1% respectively (p = 0.001). Overall freedom from TLR after 12 and 24 months was 73.8% and 62.8% respectively. No significant patency differences were observed based on calcification rate. Conclusion Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease with Supera Stent is safe, even in extensive, highly calcified lesions. Patency rates and freedom from TLR are acceptable in a real-life population.