Genes to CellsVolume 9, Issue 2 p. 175-178 Free Access Erratum First published: 13 February 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1356-9597.2004.00713.x Correspondence: Dr Y. Nakamura, E-mail: nak@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Due to an oversight in the correction of these figures at the proof stage, a few minor errors were reproduced in 1-5 of the paper by Hara et al. (2003). They are reproduced correctly below. Figure 1Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Conserved structure of Sup35 proteins and the experimental rationale for interspecies transmission of yeast [PSI+] prions. (A) Three-domain structure of Sup35 and N-terminal subdomains. Numbers represent amino acid positions of S. cerevisiae Sup35. (B) Amino acid sequence of heterotypic NQ peptides rich in Gln and Asn residues (bold face). The NQ region ends at Pro (bold face), which is conserved in Sup35s. Figure 2Open in figure viewerPowerPoint S. cerevisiae[PSI+] transmission to chimeric Sup35 fusions between S. cerevisiae and K. lactis under the control of the native SUP35 promoter. (A–C) Plasmid-shuffled His+ Ura− transformants were plated on (A) YPD, (B) synthetic media without adenine and (C) YPD after three consecutive passages with 3 mm GuHCl. (D) hsp104 disruptants (Δhsp104::URA3) of these shuffled transformants were plated on YPD. (E) Centrifugation assay to examine the solubility of chimeric Sup35s by Western blotting using antibody specific to the C-domain of Sup35sc (see Experimental procedures). Supernatants (S) and pellets (P) from centrifuged lysates of plasmid-shuffled His+ Ura− transformants are shown. The same amount (15 µg) of each whole cell lysate was subjected to the analysis. Figure 3Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Interspecies transmission of [PSI+] between heterotypic or chimeric Sup35s that share the NQ sequence by plasmid shuffling. The indicated chimeric or wild-type Sup35s are expressed from the TPI promoter and their susceptibility to [PSI+] was monitored: +, transmission; −, no transmission. (A, B) Sup35 from S. cerevisiae[PSI+] was replaced with chimeric Sup35s by plasmid shuffling and examined for transmission of [PSI+] as shown in Fig. 2. (C) Sup35 from chimeric SKK [PSI+] (referred to as [PSI+SKK]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (D) Chimeric Sup35 SCC ([PSI+SCC]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (E) Chimeric SDD [PSI+] ([PSI+SDD]) was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for transmission of [PSI+]. (F) S. cerevisiae[PSI+] was replaced with the indicated chimeric Sup35s and examined for the transmission of [PSI+]. Figure 5Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Analysis of aggregation of chimeric or truncated Sup35 variants in [PSI+] cells of 74-D694 (ade1-14Δsup35::TRP1). (A) State of Sup35SC-BFP and Sup35SC-segment-GFP aggregation visualized by double fluorescence microscopy. [PSI+] cells doubly transformed with pRS313 (HIS3 marker) and pRS316 (URA3 marker) derivatives carrying the indicated fusions were examined. Both fusions were constitutively expressed from the TPI promoter. (B) In vivo kinetics of homotypic and heterotypic Sup35 aggregation. [PSI+] cells were doubly transformed with pRS313 carrying NMSSS-BFP (under the control of the TPI promoter) and pRS316 carrying chimeric NM fusions to GFP (under the control of the CUP1 promoter): a, NMSSS; b, NMSKK; c, NMKSK; d, NMKKK. Upon induction by adding CuSO4 to the growing culture, cells were subjected at 1 h intervals to fluorescent microscopic and immunoblotting analyses. The curves represent the fraction (%) of BFP-foci cells that possessed GFP foci. In these cells, GFP foci were always colocalized with BFP foci. Inserts show the immunoblots of GFP fusion proteins synthesized at given times. The same amount (15 µg) of each whole cell lysate was subjected to the analysis. Experiments were performed independently at least three times and the values are expressed with standard deviations. (C) A ‘quasi-prion’ state induced by coaggregation. [PSI+] cells carrying a maintainer Sup35SC plasmid were transformed with plasmids expressing the indicated chimeras (a), and transformants with (b) or without (c) the maintainer Sup35SC plasmid were plated on SC-His-Ura (b) or SC-His (c) supplemented with low adenine (LA). The publisher apologises to the authors for this error. Reference Hara, H., Nakayashiki, T., Grist, C.G. & Nakamura, Y. (2003) Prion domain interaction responsible for species discrimination in yeast [PSI+] transmission. Genes Cells 8, 925– 939. Volume9, Issue2February 2004Pages 175-178 FiguresReferencesRelatedInformation
Read full abstract