Edited by Donald Maddox and Sara Sturm-Maddox. (SUNY Series in Medieval Studies). Albany, SUNY, 2002. xi+293 pp., 6 b&w ills. Hb $75.50. Pb $25.95. This volume, declared to be the ‘first systematic collective study of the medieval French Alexander tradition and its background’, presents sixteen essays from some of the most respected figures in current medieval French studies. The twelfth century saw a resurgence of the ‘multicultural and transhistorical’ legend of Alexander the Great in French vernacular literature, spawning a vast poetic output that reached its apex with Alexander de Paris's 16,000 line dodecasyllabic (hence, Alexandrine) poem known as the Vulgate Alexandre (c. 1185). The tradition flourished until the fifteenth century; the various redactions of the Alexander legend during this period reveal not only the shaping of contemporary attitudes towards history, but also become a vehicle for expression of the age's aspirations and anxieties. The volume's essays fall into two broad groups, the first dealing with the formative twelfth-century ‘golden age’ of French Alexander literature, the second exploring new approaches to the legend in the thirteenth century and beyond. Michel Zink's short opening essay, somewhat overcrowded by quotation, attempts within an impossibly restricted space to address the issue of reading pagan authors, and from there to consider how Chrétien de Troyes's comparison of Philip of Flanders to Alexander might be reinterpreted. The coexistence of romance and epic characteristics in the Vulgate Alexandre is then explored by Emmanuèle Baumgartner, who argues that the poem presents thematic and technical characteristics of epic, whilst simultaneously questioning the ideological worldview of the chansons de geste. Alexander's biography is beset by ambiguities, from uncertainty surrounding his filiation to doubt over the benefits of his education and the destructive or civilizing outcome of his influence. These and other matters pertaining to Alexander's character and upbringing are addressed by several contributors: Michelle Szkilnik considers the fourteenth-century Perceforest's claim that Alexander is an ancestor of King Arthur, whilst Catherine Gaullier-Bougassas sets out the role of Aristotle in Alexander's education. Amongst those exploring new attitudes to the legend heralded in by the thirteenth century, Michelle R. Warren argues, with a nod to modern postcolonial theory, that the prose Roman d'Alexandre promotes an expansionist ideology giving rise to ‘relations of unequal power’. Indeed, the Alexander legend frequently portrays ‘engagements with geographical and cultural alterities’, as Laurence Harf-Lancner's illustrated essay shows, contrasting approaches to the Orient in the Alexander romances and in Marco Polo's writings. Keith Busby's concluding essay on the codicological features of the Alexander manuscripts begins with what might become a watchword for the volume itself. Despite an apparent sense of order, the manuscripts are enormously varied in terms of content: ‘the textual history of Le Roman d'Alexandre is’, Busby laments, ‘frankly, a mess’. The collation of a large number of essays on diverse aspects of a broad topic within a relatively short volume surely risks a similar fate. Although individually stimulating, the great variety of texts, chronologies, perspectives and conclusions presented by the essays here could jeopardize the collection's overall cohesiveness, were it not for some adept and welcome guidance offered by the editors' introduction.