The accelerated advancement of industrialization, urbanization, and technology produces an enormous amount of waste materials that are channelled into the environment, contaminating the soil, water and air. This exceedingly large volume of waste in the planet’s environment has made it challenging and difficult to handle; thus, it is urgent to facilitate alternative methods of waste disposal. Moreover, the consumption of concrete raw materials increases as a consequence of a sudden increase in concrete usage. In this study, printed circuit boards (PCB), cutting waste (e-waste) (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%) and recycled concrete aggregate (construction and demolition waste) (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 100%) replace the fine and coarse aggregate; this is utilised in the making of self-compacting concrete (SCC). To mitigate the impact of shrinkage and micro-cracks produced during loading, synthetic fibres (polypropylene fibres) (0%, 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1%) are incorporated into the dense matrix of concrete. Based on the experiments conducted, it is concluded that the optimum percentages of e-waste, recycled aggregate and synthetic fibres are 10%, 60% and 0.5%, respectively. It is proposed to use response surface methodology for the statistical modelling of fibre-reinforced self-compacting concrete (FRSCC) ingredients, which will diminish the number of experiments conducted during optimisation. Experimental optimisation of ingredients was carried out by determining the workability properties (slump flow, L-Box, V-Funnel and Sieve test), strength properties (compressive, split tensile, flexural at 7, 14, 28 days of curing) and durability properties against chemical exposure (sulphuric and hydrochloric acid attack, sulphate attack at 29 and 90 days of immersion). In the statistical optimisation process, the central composite design (CCD) is utilised, and it is concluded that the optimum percentages of e-waste, recycled aggregate and synthetic fibres are 9.90%, 51.35% and 0.503%, respectively, as these produce a compressive strength (CS) of 47.02 MPa at the end of the 28th day of curing, whereas FRSCC created with experimentally optimised ingredients shows a strength of 46.79 MPa with the use of 60% of recycled aggregate, 10% of e-waste and 0.5% polypropylene fibre. Hence, it is observed that the CCD-optimised ingredients were the optimum dosage of ingredients based on the compressive strength values at 28 days. It is concluded that the FRSCC specimens created with CCD-optimised parameters show better resistance against loading and chemical exposure, as these show minimum weight and strength loss when compared to FRSCC with experimentally optimised parameters.