Use Of Sulfonylureas Research Articles

Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a decreased risk of incident gout: a population-based case-control study

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to explore the risk of incident gout in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in association with diabetes duration, diabetes severity and antidiabetic...

Long-term tolerance and efficacy of adjunctive exenatide therapy on glycaemic control and bodyweight in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study from a specialist diabetes outpatient clinic.

Weight gain and hypoglycaemia are common adverse effects associated with anti-diabetic treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effects of adjunctive exenatide therapy on weight loss and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. A review of medical records in a specialist diabetes clinic over 5 years identified 446 patients who were prescribed exenatide therapy. We examined change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, albumin-creatinine ratio and hypoglycaemic medication during 24 months follow up. Subjects were aged 59 ± 10 years (49% women) and received exenatide in combination with oral agents and insulin (47%). During an average of 17 ± 14 months follow up, 51% (more women than men; odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.14–2.49) remained on treatment. Lack of efficacy (33%) and/or gastrointestinal (27%) side-effects were the main reasons for treatment cessation. At 24 months, there was a reduction in HbA1c of 0.7 ± 1.2% and weight loss of 4.3 ± 5.2 kg. Change in HbA1c was similar regardless of concurrent insulin therapy, yet insulin was associated with greater weight reduction (4.8 ± 5.3 vs 3.8 ± 5.1 kg, P = 0.016). Independent predictors of HbA1c response were higher baseline HbA1c, longer duration of diabetes and use of insulin or sulfonylureas at study end. Predictors of weight response were baseline use of insulin or thiazolidinediones, increased age, female sex and sulfonylurea or thiazolidinediones at study end. Longer exenatide treatment duration was favourable for reducing HbA1c and weight. Exenatide is effective in reducing HbA1c and weight, regardless of concurrent insulin, and in a specialist diabetes outpatient clinic, is recommended for use in clinical practice.

Ambulatory Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the U.S., 1997–2012

OBJECTIVEType 2 diabetes is increasingly common and associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study examines trends in the patterns and costs of drug treatment of type 2 diabetes from 1997 to 2012.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe conducted descriptive analyses of cross-sectional data using the IMS Health National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative audit of ambulatory physician practices in the U.S. We focused on visits for diabetes among patients 35 years of age or older. We used the IMS Health National Prescription Audit of pharmacy dispensing to derive information about drug expenditures.RESULTSAmbulatory diabetes visits increased from 23 million treatment visits in 1997 (95% CI 21–25) to 35 million (32–37) in 2007 and declined to 31 million visits by 2012 (27–31). Between 1997 and 2012 biguanide use increased, from 23% (20–26) to 53% (50–56) of treatment visits. Glitazone use grew from 6% (4–8) in 1997 (41% [39–43] of all visits in 2005), but declined to 16% (14–18) by 2012. Since 2005, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use increased steadily, representing 21% (18–23) of treatment visits by 2012. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists accounted for 4% of treatment visits in 2012. Visits where two or more drug compounds were used increased nearly 40% from 1997 to 2012. Between 2008 and 2012, drug expenditures increased 61%, driven primarily by use of insulin glargine and DPP-4 inhibitors.CONCLUSIONSDeclining sulfonylurea and glitazone use has been offset by increases in DPP-4 inhibitor use and, to a lesser degree, use of GLP-1 agonists. Treatment of diabetes has grown in complexity while older treatments continue to be replaced or supplemented by newer therapies.

Clinical factors associated with absolute and relative measures of glycemic variability determined by continuous glucose monitoring: An analysis of 480 subjects

AimFactors associated with absolute and relative measures of glycemic variability have not been determined by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and concurrent measurement of fasting C-peptide levels. MethodsWe analyzed CGM data for subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D; n=81) and type 2 diabetes (T2D; insulin-treated, n=168; not insulin-treated, n=231) who underwent CGM between October 2009 and September 2011 at Samsung Medical Center. Correlations between clinical factors and both standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variance (CV) in CGM were analyzed by multiple regression. ResultsRegardless of the type of diabetes and insulin therapy, higher CV, but not SD, was significantly associated with a minimum glucose level of <70mg/dL (3.9mmol/l) in CGM (p<0.001). In T1D, fasting C-peptide levels inversely correlated with SD while BMI inversely correlated with CV, and duration of diabetes, and HDL levels positively correlated with CV. Use of pre-mixed insulin increased both SD and CV. In insulin-treated T2D, fasting C-peptide levels inversely correlated with both SD and CV while HbA1c correlated with SD, and duration of diabetes positively correlated with CV. In T2D without insulin therapy, age, BMI, HbA1c, HDL, triglyceride levels and use of sulfonylurea positively correlated with SD while HDL levels and use of sulfonylurea positively correlated with CV, and LDL levels inversely correlated with CV. ConclusionsRelative glycemic variability (CV) was determined by factors different from those that affect absolute glycemic variability (SD). Some of these factors were indicators of higher insulin sensitivity and residual insulin secretion.

Safety of Sitagliptin in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of 25 Clinical Studies

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of sitagliptin 100 mg/day in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. A post hoc pooled analysis of 25 randomized, double-blind, parallel group clinical studies with results available as of 1 December 2011. Multicenter, international clinical trials. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 65 years or older. Patients were randomized to sitagliptin 100 mg/day (n = 1,261) or a comparator (n = 1,185) for 12 weeks to 2 years. In each study, investigators reported serious and non-serious adverse events that occurred during the study, and serious adverse events occurring within 14 days following the last dose of study drug. This analysis used patient-level data from each study to assess the exposure-adjusted incidence rates of specific adverse events that occurred following initiation of study drug. Summary measures of adverse events overall were similar between the sitagliptin and non-exposed (active comparator or placebo) groups, except for higher incidences of deaths and drug-related adverse events in the non-exposed group. Incidence rates of specific adverse events were generally similar between the two groups, with the exception of hypoglycemia. A lower incidence rate of hypoglycemia was observed in the sitagliptin group compared with the non-exposed group [7.0 vs. 14.3 per 100 patient-years; difference -7.6 (95 % CI -11.2 to -4.3]), primarily due to greater use of sulfonylureas in the non-exposed group. In this pooled safety analysis of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, treatment with sitagliptin 100 mg/day was generally well tolerated for up to 2 years.

Anti-diabetic drug utilization of pregnant diabetic women in us managed care

BackgroundWith the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes in young adulthood, treatment of diabetes in pregnancy faces new challenges. Anti-diabetic drug utilization patterns of pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes are poorly described. We aim to describe anti-diabetic (AD) agent utilization among diabetic pregnant women.MethodsWe utilized IMS LifeLink, including administrative claims data of patients in US managed care plans, to establish a retrospective cohort of women, age 18–46 years (N = 96,740) with billed procedures for a live birth, and a 12 month eligibility period before and 3 month after delivery. Diabetes mellitus was identified from ≥2 in- or outpatient claims with diagnoses (ICD-9-CM 250.XX) before pregnancy. We estimated the prevalence of AD drugs before, during and after pregnancy, and secular trends across the study period (1999–2009), using linear regression. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the extent of misclassification of trimesters.ResultsAlmost six percent (n = 5,581) of the live birth cohort had diabetes mellitus. Throughout the study, 48% (1999) and 78% (2009) (p < 0.0001) of diabetic women received AD drugs during pregnancy. The most common AD drugs during pregnancy were insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones (TZD), and combination AD. The annual prevalence of insulin use increased by only 1% from 39% (1999) to 40% (2009) (p = 0.589) during pregnancy, while use of sulfonylureas and metformin increased from 2.5% and 4.2% (1999) to 17.3% and 15.3% (2009) (p < 0.0001), respectively. Insulin and sulfonylurea use steadily increased in prevalence from the 1st to 3rd trimester (16.5% and 3.3% to 33.0% and 7.5%), while metformin and TZD use decreased (11.4% and 1.6% to 3.8% and 0.2%).ConclusionsAD use during pregnancy demonstrates the need for additional investigation regarding safety and efficacy of AD drugs on maternal outcomes.

Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin, Sulfonylurea and Advanced Fibrosis in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background & aims: Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. However, not all non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetes develop advanced fibrosis. We hypothesised that prescription medications used by these patients influence the development of advanced fibrosis. We investigated the association of commonly used medications and advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetes. Methods: Clinical information including demographics, medical history, medication history, biochemical and histologic variables were ascertained in 459 patients with biopsy proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. We compared characteristics of patients with and without diabetes and explored potential associations between classes of drugs as risk factors and advanced fibrosis among the diabetic patients with NAFLD. Results: Presence of diabetes was an independent risk factor for advanced fibrosis. In diabetic patients, age (OR 1.09; 95%CI 1.04-1.15, p=0.000) and grade of ballooning (OR 5.59; 95%CI 2.69-11.61, p=0.000) had a positive relationship with advanced fibrosis. The use of insulin (OR 4.95; 95%CI 1.65-14.88, p=0.004) and sulfonylurea (OR 5.07; 95%CI 1.87-13.75, p=0.001) were positively associated while statin use (OR 0.31; 95%CI 0.12-0.78, p=0.013) was negatively associated with advanced fibrosis. Conclusion: Among non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetes, the prevalence of advanced fibrosis was higher in patients treated with insulin and sulfonylurea, but lower in patients on statins. These findings provide support for a greater role of statin use in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients with diabetes while limiting the use of insulin and sulfonylurea.

Reborn the Controversy Related with the use of Sulfonylureas

It is generally believed that the initial management of people with type 2 diabetes is based on the acceptance of a change in the life style which includes avoid overweight and regular physical activity

Diabetes treatment in patients with renal disease: Is the landscape clear enough?

Diabetes is the most important risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD). The risk of CKD attributable to diabetes continues to rise worldwide. Diabetic patients with CKD need complicated treatment for their metabolic disorders as well as for related comorbidities. They have to treat, often intensively, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, bone disease, anaemia, and frequently established cardiovascular disease. The treatment of hypoglycaemia in diabetic persons with CKD must tie their individual goals of glycaemia (usually less tight glycaemic control) and knowledge on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs available to a person with kidney disease. The problem is complicated from the fact that in many efficacy studies patients with CKD are excluded so data of safety and efficacy for these patients are missing. This results in fear of use by lack of evidence. Metformin is globally accepted as the first choice in practically all therapeutic algorithms for diabetic subjects. The advantages of metformin are low risk of hypoglycaemia, modest weight loss, effectiveness and low cost. Data of UKPDS indicate that treatment based on metformin results in less total as well cardiovascular mortality. Metformin remains the drug of choice for patients with diabetes and CKD provided that their estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) remains above 30 mL/min per square meter. For diabetic patients with eGFR between 30-60 mL/min per square meter more frequent monitoring of renal function and dose reduction of metformin is needed. The use of sulfonylureas, glinides and insulin carry a higher risk of hypoglycemia in these patients and must be very careful. Lower doses and slower titration of the dose is needed. Is better to avoid sulfonylureas with active hepatic metabolites, which are renally excreted. Very useful drugs for this group of patients emerge dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors. These drugs do not cause hypoglycemia and most of them (linagliptin is an exception) require dose reduction in various stages of renal disease.

Effect of Management of Sulfonylurea Resistant Stellaria media on Barley Yield

Sulfonylureas represent one of the largest herbicide groups that have been widely used since 1980s. Their continuous use has resulted in development of sulfonylurea resistance in weeds. The aim of this research was to investigate options to manage putative sulfonylurea-resistant chickweed in barley stands and to evaluate the effect of chickweed and its management on barley yield. A field experiment was arranged as a randomized complete block design and included 14 herbicide treatments applied at two different times. Tribenuron-methyl (sulfonylurea) affected minimal control of chickweed. A bromoxynil-ioxynil (photosystem II inhibitor) mix did not control chickweed efficiently. However, nearly total control was achieved with fluroxypyr, mecoprop, and their mixtures (synthetic auxins and photosystem II inhibitors). Chickweed had no effect on barley yield whether controlled or uncontrolled. Therefore, further evaluation of the chickweed management threshold would be needed. It seems that even in the boreal region, typified by a cold climate, limited solar radiation, a very short growing season, and relatively low-intensity cropping systems, unilateral use of sulfonylureas might lead to herbicide resistance. Although resistant weed populations can be controlled with herbicides of groups other than the sulfonylureas, this represents an increasing problem when planning weed management, especially when including sulfonylurea-resistant crops.

Antidiabetic Medications and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Antidiabetic medications (ADM) may modify colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, evaluating the effect of metformin, thiazolidinediones (TZD), sulfonylureas, and insulin on colorectal cancer risk in diabetic patients. We conducted a systematic search of multiple bibliographic databases, up to September 2012, for articles that evaluated exposure to metformin, TZD, sulfonylureas, and insulin, reported colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus, and reported OR or provided data for their estimation. Summary OR estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the random-effects model. Fifteen studies reporting 13,871 cases of colorectal cancer in 840,787 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. Meta-analysis of observational studies showed an 11% reduction in colorectal cancer risk associated with metformin use (n = 9 studies; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99), whereas TZD use was not associated with colorectal cancer risk (n = 5 studies; OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87-1.05). Conversely, a trend toward higher colorectal cancer risk was observed with sulfonylurea (n = 7 studies; OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.97-1.26) and insulin (n = 9 studies; OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.91-1.94) use, although these associations were not statistically significant. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies, partly explained by study location and adjustment for concomitant use of other ADMs. Post-hoc analysis of randomized controlled trials did not reveal any significant association between ADM and colorectal cancer risk. Meta-analysis of published studies supports a protective association between metformin use and colorectal cancer risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials on the chemopreventive effect of metformin against colorectal cancer are warranted.

Limitaciones de los fármacos dependientes de insulina para el tratamiento de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2

In this study, we review the efficacy and safety limitations of insulin-dependent oral antidiabetic agents. In terms of efficiency, the main drawback of metformin, sulfonylureas, gliptins and –to a lesser extent–glitazones is durability. No drug per se is able to maintain stable blood glucose control for years.Metformin, sulfonylureas and gliptins have demonstrated safety. Experience with the first two drug groups is more extensive. The main adverse effect of metformin is gastrointestinal discomfort. Major concerns related to the use of sulfonylureas are hypoglycemia and weight gain. The use of pioglitazone has been associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer, edema, heart failure, weight gain, and distal bone fractures in postmenopausal women. The most common adverse reactions associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists are gastrointestinal discomfort that sometimes leads to treatment discontinuation.

Ethnic Variation in the Correlation Between Fasting Glucose Concentration and Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1C)

We aimed to determine the relationship between fasting serum glucose (FSG) concentration and glycated hemoglobin-A1c (HbA1c) in the 3 ethnicities in Singapore after adjustment for demographic and therapeutic variables. Fasting serum glucose (FSG), HbA1c, and serum creatinine levels were simultaneously sampled from 575 patients with diabetes (389 Chinese, 97 Indians, 89 Malays) in this cross-sectional study between January and May 2008, and the results were subjected to multivariate linear regression analysis. We found a significant interaction between FSG and ethnicity on HbA1c. The correlation between FSG and HbA1c among Chinese subjects was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.2-0.3) relative to the Malays (0.38, 95% CI: 0.30-0.45) after adjustment for age; gender; serum creatinine concentrations; body mass index (BMI); duration of diabetes; use of sulfonylureas, metformin, and insulin; and hemoglobin (Hb) and red cell indices (P = .005). Hence, for a given FSG, the predicted HbA1c will be higher in Malays compared to Chinese subjects. We did not observe a statistically significant difference between Indians and Malays with respect to the correlation between FSG and HbA1c. We showed a higher correlation between HbA1c and FSG in Malay subjects relative to the Chinese in this cohort. The ethnic variation in the HbA1c-FSG relationship may be related to differences in percentage contribution by the FSG to overall HbA1c among ethnic groups. Future studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to elucidate the relative contributions by FSG and postprandial glucose (PPG) to the daily blood glucose profile and the overall HbA1c by ethnicity are required.

Severe Hypoglycemia Associated with Levofloxacin in a Healthy Older Woman

Severe Hypoglycemia Associated with Levofloxacin in a Healthy Older Woman

Prognostic implications of DPP-4 inhibitor vs. sulfonylurea use on top of metformin in a real world setting - results of the 1 year follow-up of the prospective DiaRegis registry

DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP4-I) have been shown to provide non-inferior glycaemic control compared with sulfonylureas (SU), but result in a reduction of body weight and a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to validate these results in a large real-world sample of patients participating in the prospective DiaRegis registry and to assess prognostic implications. DiaRegis included 3810 patients with type 2 diabetes in which antidiabetic therapy was intensified. We defined two patient subgroups, the first receiving either a DPP4-I or SU on top of prior metformin monotherapy and the second containing patients out of subgroup 1 with unaltered treatment for 1 year. After enrolment 884 patients with prior metformin monotherapy received a dual combination of metformin with either DPP4-I (n = 628; 71%) or SU (n = 256; 29%). Patient characteristics, blood glucose and blood pressure control as well as comorbidity burden were virtually identical. There were neither significant differences in the change of HbA1c over the 12 months treatment period nor in the reduction of body weight, but fasting (p = 0.033) and postprandial glucose levels (p = 0.01) were significantly lower in those receiving DPP4-I. Hypoglycaemia was significantly less frequent in patients receiving DPP4-I (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.19-0.54). Qualitative changes were robust for subgroup 2 (except of fasting plasma glucose). Patients receiving DPP4-I had significantly less stroke/transitory ischaemic attack (0.2 vs. 2.0; p < 0.05) during the 1 year follow-up, whereas other vascular events (coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention) were borderline significant. The present results confirm prior randomised controlled trial results in patients with type 2 diabetes from real world clinical practice demonstrating that DPP4-I on top of prior metformin monotherapy result in similar HbA1c reductions within 12 months but a significant reduction in hypoglycaemia compared with sulfonylurea added to metformin. The reduction in vascular events observed has to be verified in larger cohorts.

Risk of acute coronary events associated with glyburide compared with gliclazide use in patients with type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study

Sulfonylureas might increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular events; however, emerging evidence suggests there may be important differences amongst these drugs. Some, like glyburide, inhibit KATP channels in the heart and pancreas, while others, like gliclazide, are more likely to selectively inhibit KATP channels in the pancreas. We hypothesized that the risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events would be higher in patients using glyburide compared with gliclazide. This nested case-control study used administrative health data from Alberta, Canada. New users of glyburide or gliclazide aged ≥66 years between 1998 and 2010 were included. Cases were individuals with an ACS-related hospitalization or death. Up to four controls were matched based on birth year, sex, cohort-entry year and follow-up time. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR), controlling for baseline drug use and co-morbidities. Our cohort included 7441 gliclazide and 13 884 glyburide users; 51.4% men, mean (s.d.) age 75.5 (6.6) years and mean (s.d.) duration of follow-up 5.5 (4.0) years. A total of 4239 patients had an ACS-related hospitalization or death and were matched to 16 723 controls. Compared with gliclazide use, glyburide use was associated with a higher risk (adjusted OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.23) of ACS-related hospitalization or death over 5.5 years (number needed to harm: 50). In this observational study, glyburide use was associated with a 14% higher risk of ACS events compared with gliclazide use. Although the difference is small and probably to have implications at the population level rather than the individual patient or clinician, any causal inferences regarding sulfonylurea use and adverse cardiovascular risk should be tested in a large-scale randomized controlled trial.

Case–control analysis on metformin and cancer of the esophagus

Metformin use has been associated with decreased cancer risks, though data on esophageal cancer are scarce. We explored the relation between use of metformin or other anti-diabetic drugs and the risk of esophageal cancer. We conducted a case-control analysis in the UK-based general practice research database (GPRD, now clinical practice research datalink, CPRD). Cases were individuals with an incident diagnosis of esophageal cancer between 1994 and 2010 at age 40-89 years. Ten controls per case were matched on age, sex, calendar time, general practice, and number of years of active history in the GPRD prior to the index date. Various potential confounders including diabetes mellitus, gastro-esophageal reflux, and use of proton-pump inhibitors were evaluated in univariate models, and the final results were adjusted for BMI and smoking. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Long-term use (≥30 prescriptions) of metformin was not associated with a materially altered risk of esophageal cancer (adj. OR 1.23, 95 % CI 0.92-1.65), nor was long-term use of sulfonylureas (adj. OR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.70-1.23), insulin (adj. OR 0.87, 95 % CI 0.60-1.25), or of thiazolidinediones (adj. OR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.37-1.36). In our population-based study, use of metformin was not associated with an altered risk of esophageal cancer.

The role of statins for primary prevention in non-elderly colorectal cancer patients.

1513 Background: There is conflicting evidence for the effect of statins in primary prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a case control study (N=357,702) in non-elderly adult US population (age 18-64 years) to investigate the role of statins in primary prevention of CRC. Methods: We used MarketScan claims database to identify patients with CRC using ICD-9 codes. A case was defined as having an incident diagnosis of CRC. Up to ten controls (matched for age, sex, and geographical region) were selected per case. Statins exposure was assessed from prescriptions in the 12 months prior to the earliest date of CRC diagnosis. The primary objective was to assess the incidence of CRC in statin users and nonusers. Conditional logistic regression was used to adjust for multiple potential confounders and calculate adjusted odds ratios (AOR). Results: The mean age of CRC patients was 54 years, 52% were males.Statins were prescribed to 19.1% (68,461/357,702) patients.A total of 8.3% (5,704/68,461) patients developed CRC in statin exposed group compared to 9.3% (26,912/289,241) patients in non-statin exposed group. In a multivariate model, any statin use was associated with 25% reduced risk of CRC (AOR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.73-0.78, p&lt;0.001). An age-stratified analysis showed more benefit in patients aged 55 years or less than those above age 56 years (AOR 0.68 and AOR 0.79 respectively; p&lt;0.001 for interaction between age group and statin exposure). Variables associated with increased incidence of CRC in the multivariate model were obesity (AOR 1.3, 95% CI, 1.2-1.4, p&lt;0.001); DM (AOR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2, p&lt;0.001); IBD (AOR 3.1, 95% CI, 2.8-3.5, p&lt;0.001); use of insulin (AOR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, p&lt;0.001) and sulfonylureas (AOR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, p&lt;0.001). Prescribed NSAIDs showed modest reduction in CRC incidence (AOR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.91-0.97, p=0.002). There was no significant relationship between CRC incidence and other oral hypoglycemic drugs. Conclusions: Statins appears to reduce the incidence of CRC in non-elderly adult US population. A randomized controlled trial is needed to validate this finding.

Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials

Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylurea has been questioned by some authors. This article aims at collecting all available data on this issue from randomized trials. A meta-analysis was performed including all trials with a duration of at least 6 months, comparing a sulfonylurea with a non-sulfonylurea agent in type 2 diabetes. Major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality were retrieved and combined to calculate Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio (MH-OR). Of the 115 selected trials, 62 reported information on MACE, and 30 reported at least one event. MH-OR for sulfonylurea was 1.08 [0.86-1.36], p = 0.52 (1.85 [1.20-2.87], p = 0.005, in the five trials vs. DPP4 inhibitors, no significant differences vs. other comparators). The MH-OR for myocardial infarction and stroke was 0.88 [0.75-1.04], p = 0.13 and 1.28 [1.03-1.60], p = 0.026, respectively. Mortality was significantly increased with sulfonylureas (MH-OR: 1.22 [1.01-1.49], p = 0.047). In type 2 diabetes, the use of sulfonylureas is associated with increased mortality and a higher risk of stroke, whereas the overall incidence of MACE appears to be unaffected. Significant differences in cardiovascular risk could be present in direct comparisons with specific classes of glucose-lowering agents, such as DPP4 inhibitors, but this hypothesis needs to be confirmed in long-term cardiovascular outcomes trials. The results of this meta-analysis need to be interpreted with caution, mainly because of limitations in trial quality and under-reporting of information on cardiovascular events and mortality. However, the cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas cannot be considered established unless it is evaluated in long-term cardiovascular outcomes trials.

PDB97 - Health Care Costs And Clinical Outcomes Associated With Rates Of Sulfonylurea Use By Physicians

PDB97 - Health Care Costs And Clinical Outcomes Associated With Rates Of Sulfonylurea Use By Physicians