SulA Protein Research Articles

SulA does not sequester FtsZ in Escherichia coli cells during the SOS response

In Escherichia coli, the SulA protein is synthesized during the SOS response to arrest cell division. Two possible models of SulA action were proposed: the sequestration and the capping. In current paper, to clarify which model better reflects the SulA effect on cell division upon the SOS response, the FtsZ/SulA ratio was estimated inside cells based on fusion of both FtsZ and SulA to fluorescent protein mNeonGreen. This allowed to quantify this ratio by fluorescence microscopy as well as western blotting; moreover, the effect of SulA on FtsZ distribution patterns in cells was analyzed based on fluorescence microscopy images. The SulA concentration in cells under the SOS response was shown to be several times (about 10) lower than that of FtsZ. The effect of SulA was unequal to corresponding decrease in FtsZ concentration. These results are supported by uneven FtsZ distribution in cells under the SOS response. Together the results of current work indicate that the division arrest by SulA protein in E. coli cells could not be explained by the sequestration model.

Direct evidence of the ability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and E. coli SulA to dimerize

The SulA protein of Escherichia coli and related bacteria interacts directly with FtsZ, blocking cell division by disrupting Z-ring formation, yet the precise mechanism remains not fully understood. Previous demonstrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa SulA's dimerization capability were confined to X-ray crystallography and lacked confirmation under in vivo conditions. Additionally, uncertainty persisted regarding the dimerization potential of E. coli's SulA protein. This paper employs a bacterial two-hybrid system to establish that both P. aeruginosa and E. coli SulA proteins indeed possess the capacity for dimerization.

SulA is able to block cell division in Escherichia coli by a mechanism different from sequestration

The SOS response is considered to be an extremely important feature of bacterial cells. It helps them to survive bad times, including helping to develop resistance to antibiotics. The SOS response blocks the cell division. For Escherichia coli it is well known that the SulA protein directly interacts with FtsZ – a key division protein. Now it is believed that fission blocking is based on FtsZ sequestration by the SulA protein, which leads to decrease in effective concentration of FtsZ in the cell below a critical value, which in vitro leads to dismantling of FtsZ polymers. In this work, we demonstrate that in order to block the division of E. coli, it is sufficient to have a relatively small amount of SulA in the cell. Moreover, the analysis of structures formed by FtsZ in E. coli cells under the conditions of SulA protein expression or the SOS response showed that there is no complete disassembly of FtsZ polymers, although Z-rings indeed are not formed. The results of the work indicate that the well-known sequestration mechanism is not comprehensive to explain blocking of the division process by SulA in vivo.

SosA in Staphylococci: an addition to the paradigm of membrane-localized, SOS-induced cell division inhibition in bacteria

In all living organisms, genome replication and cell division must be coordinated to produce viable offspring. In the event of DNA damage, bacterial cells employ the SOS response to simultaneously express damage repair systems and halt cell division. Extensive characterization of SOS-controlled cell division inhibition in Escherichia coli has laid the ground for a long-standing paradigm where the cytosolic SulA protein inhibits polymerization of the central division protein, FtsZ, and thereby prevents recruitment of the division machinery at the future division site. Within the last decade, it has become clear that another, likely more general, paradigm exists, at least within the broad group of Gram-positive bacterial species, namely membrane-localized, SOS-induced cell division inhibition. We recently identified such an inhibitor in Staphylococci, SosA, and established a model for SosA-mediated cell division inhibition in Staphylococcus aureus in response to DNA damage. SosA arrests cell division subsequent to the septal localization of FtsZ and later membrane-bound division proteins, while preventing progression to septum closure, leading to synchronization of cells at this particular stage. A membrane-associated protease, CtpA negatively regulates SosA activity and likely allows growth to resume once conditions are favorable. Here, we provide a brief summary of our findings in the context of what already is known for other membrane cell division inhibitors and we emphasize how poorly characterized these intriguing processes are mechanistically. Furthermore, we put some perspective on the relevance of our findings and future developments within the field.

Specific regions of the SulA protein recognized and degraded by the ATP-dependent ClpYQ (HslUV) protease in Escherichia coli

In Escherichia coli, ClpYQ (HslUV) is a two-component ATP-dependent protease, in which ClpQ is the peptidase subunit and ClpY is the ATPase and unfoldase. ClpY functions to recognize protein substrates, and denature and translocate the unfolded polypeptides into the proteolytic site of ClpQ for degradation. However, it is not clear how the natural substrates are recognized by the ClpYQ protease and the mechanism by which the substrates are selected, unfolded and translocated by ClpY into the interior site of ClpQ hexamers. Both Lon and ClpYQ proteases can degrade SulA, a cell division inhibitor, in bacterial cells. In this study, using yeast two-hybrid and in vivo degradation analyses, we first demonstrated that the C-terminal internal hydrophobic region (139th∼149th aa) of SulA is necessary for binding and degradation by ClpYQ. A conserved region, GFIMRP, between 142th and 147th residues of SulA, were identified among various Gram-negative bacteria. By using MBP-SulA(F143Y) (phenylalanine substituted with tyrosine) as a substrate, our results showed that this conserved residue of SulA is necessary for recognition and degradation by ClpYQ. Supporting these data, MBP-SulA(F143Y), MBP-SulA(F143N) (phenylalanine substituted with asparagine) led to a longer half-life with ClpYQ protease in vivo. In contrast, MBP-SulA(F143D) and MBP-SulA(F143S) both have shorter half-lives. Therefore, in the E. coli ClpYQ protease complex, ClpY recognizes the C-terminal region of SulA, and F143 of SulA plays an important role for the recognition and degradation by ClpYQ protease.

Recovery of division process in bacterial cells after induction of SulA protein which is responsible for cytokinesis arrest during SOS-response

SOS-response is an important tool of bacteria intended to protect their genome and thereby allow them to survive under adverse conditions. Recently SOS-response is considered to enhance mutagenesis and thus help bacteria acquire antibiotic resistance. Due to high significance of this phenomena it seems to be important to investigate processes that allow bacteria to survive after SOS-response activation. In current work the recovery of division process of Escherichia coli cells after division arrest due to expression of SOS-response protein SulA was studied. Data indicate that cells are able to rapidly restore normal division; also nucleoid occlusion seems to be the main septum positioning mechanism during the process. In the course of recovery FtsZ forms helix-like structures, which then transformate into Z-rings.

MadR1, a Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell cycle stress response protein that is a member of a widely conserved protein class of prokaryotic, eukaryotic and archeal origin

Stress-induced molecular programs designed to stall division progression are nearly ubiquitous in bacteria, with one well-known example being the participation of the SulA septum inhibiting protein in the SOS DNA damage repair response. Mycobacteria similarly demonstrate stress-altered growth kinetics, however no such regulators have been found in these organisms. We therefore set out to identify SulA-like regulatory proteins in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A bioinformatics modeling-based approach led to the identification of rv2216 as encoding for a protein with weak similarity to SulA, further analysis distinguished this protein as belonging to a group of uncharacterized growth promoting proteins. We have named the mycobacterial protein encoded by rv2216 morphology altering division regulator protein 1, MadR1. Overexpression of madR1 modulated cell length while maintaining growth kinetics similar to wild-type, and increased the proportion of bent or V-form cells in the population. The presence of MadR1-GFP at regions of cellular elongation (poles) and morphological differentiation (V-form) suggests MadR1 involvement in phenotypic heterogeneity and longitudinal cellular growth. Global transcriptional analysis indicated that MadR1 functionality is linked to lipid editing programs required for growth and persistence. This is the first report to differentiate the larger class of these conserved proteins from SulA proteins and characterizes MadR1 effects on the mycobacterial cell.

Characterization of the HslU chaperone affinity for HslV protease

The HslVU complex is a bacterial two-component ATP-dependent protease, consisting of HslU chaperone and HslV peptidase. Investigation of protein-protein interactions using SPR in Escherichia coli HslVU and the protein substrates demonstrates that HslU and HslV have moderate affinity (Kd = 1 microM) for each other. However, the affinity of HslU for HslV fivefold increased (Kd approximately 0.2 microM) after binding with the MBP approximately SulA protein indicating the formation of a "ternary complex" of HslV-HslU-MBP approximately SulA. The molecular interaction studies also revealed that HslU strongly binds to MBP approximately SulA with 10(-9) M affinity but does not associate with nonstructured casein. Conversely, HslV does not interact with the MBP-SulA whereas it strongly binds with casein (Kd = 0.2 microM) requiring an intact active site of HslV. These findings provide evidence for "substrate-induced" stable HslVU complex formation. Presumably, the binding of HslU to MBP approximately SulA stimulates a conformational change in HslU to a high-affinity form for HslV.

Effects of disruption of heat shock genes on susceptibility of Escherichia coli to fluoroquinolones

BackgroundIt is well known that expression of certain bacterial genes responds rapidly to such stimuli as exposure to toxic chemicals and physical agents. It is generally believed that the proteins encoded in these genes are important for successful survival of the organism under the hostile conditions. Analogously, the proteins induced in bacterial cells exposed to antibiotics are believed to affect the organisms' susceptibility to these agents.ResultsWe demonstrated that Escherichia coli cells exposed to levofloxacin (LVFX), a fluoroquinolone (FQ), induce the syntheses of heat shock proteins and RecA. To examine whether the heat shock proteins affect the bactericidal action of FQs, we constructed E. coli strains with mutations in various heat shock genes and tested their susceptibility to FQs. Mutations in dnaK, groEL, and lon increased this susceptibility; the lon mutant exhibited the greatest effects. The increased susceptibility of the lon mutant was corroborated by experiments in which the gene encoding the cell division inhibitor, SulA, was subsequently disrupted. SulA is induced by the SOS response and degraded by the Lon protease. The findings suggest that the hypersusceptibility of the lon mutant to FQs could be due to abnormally high levels of SulA protein resulting from the depletion of Lon and the continuous induction of the SOS response in the presence of FQs.ConclusionThe present results show that the bactericidal action of FQs is moderately affected by the DnaK and GroEL chaperones and strongly affected by the Lon protease. FQs have contributed successfully to the treatment of various bacterial infections, but their widespread use and often misuse, coupled with emerging resistance, have gradually compromised their utility. Our results suggest that agents capable of inhibiting the Lon protease have potential for combination therapy with FQs.

Fluorescent assay for polymerization of purified bacterial FtsZ cell-division protein

Septum formation in Escherichia coli is a complex cascade of interactions among cell-division proteins. The tubulin-like FtsZ division protein localizes to the division site and serves a cytoskeletal role during septum formation. A novel fluorescent-based 96-well format filter assay has been developed to measure the polymerization of FtsZ. A mixture of monomers and aggregates (38 to ∼200 KDa in range) of purified wild-type FtsZ and a fluorescently tagged derivative of FtsZ protein in stoichiometric ratio passes through a 0.2-μm filter membrane, while polymerized FtsZ is retained on the filter. Addition of the SulA protein to the assay leads to rapid disassembly of existing FtsZ polymers, demonstrating its natural regulatory effect on FtsZ under the assay conditions. This assay is sensitive (requiring 2 μM FtsZ or less) and facilitates high-throughput screening of factors affecting FtsZ polymerization.

The unique sites in SulA protein preferentially cleaved by ATP-dependent Lon protease from Escherichia coli.

SulA protein is known to be one of the physiological substrates of Lon protease, an ATP-dependent protease from Escherichia coli. In this study, we investigated the cleavage specificity of Lon protease toward SulA protein. The enzyme was shown to cleave approximately 27 peptide bonds in the presence of ATP. Among them, six peptide bonds were cleaved preferentially in the early stage of digestion, which represented an apparently unique cleavage sites with mainly Leu and Ser residues at the P1, and P1' positions, respectively, and one or two Gln residues in positions P2-P5. They were located in the central region and partly in the C-terminal region, both of which are known to be important for the function of SulA, such as inhibition of cell growth and interaction with Lon protease, respectively. The other cleavage sites did not represent such consensus sequences, though hydrophobic or noncharged residues appeared to be relatively preferred at the P1 sites. On the other hand, the cleavage in the absence of ATP was very much slower, especially in the central region, than in the presence of ATP. The central region was predicted to be rich in alpha helix and beta sheet structures, suggesting that the enzyme required ATP for disrupting such structures prior to cleavage. Taken together, SulA is thought to contain such unique cleavage sites in its functionally and structurally important regions whose preferential cleavage accelerates the ATP-dependent degradation of the protein by Lon protease.

Regulation of SulA cleavage by Lon protease by the C-terminal amino acid of SulA, histidine

SulA protein, a cell division inhibitor in Escherichia coli, is degraded by Lon protease. The C-terminal eight residues of SulA have been shown to be recognized by Lon; however, it remains to be elucidated which amino acid in the C-terminus of SulA is critical for the recognition of SulA by Lon. To clarify this point, we constructed mutants of SulA with changes in the C-terminal residues, and examined the accumulation and stability of the resulting mutant SulA proteins in vivo. Substitution of the extreme C-terminal histidine residue with another amino acid led to marked accumulation and high stability of SulA in lon+ cells. A SulA mutant in which the C-terminal eight residues were deleted (SulAC161) showed high accumulation and stability, but the addition of histidine to the C-terminus of SulAC161 (SulAC161+H) made it labile. Similarly, SulAC161+H fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP–SulAC161+H) formed a tight complex with and was degraded rapidly by Lon in vitro. Histidine competitively inhibited the degradation of MBP–SulA by Lon, while other amino acids did not. These results suggest that the histidine residue at the extreme C-terminus of SulA is recognized specifically by Lon, leading to a high-affinity interaction between SulA and Lon.

Regulation of SulA cleavage by Lon protease by the C-terminal amino acid of SulA, histidine.

SulA protein, a cell division inhibitor in Escherichia coli, is degraded by Lon protease. The C-terminal eight residues of SulA have been shown to be recognized by Lon; however, it remains to be elucidated which amino acid in the C-terminus of SulA is critical for the recognition of SulA by Lon. To clarify this point, we constructed mutants of SulA with changes in the C-terminal residues, and examined the accumulation and stability of the resulting mutant SulA proteins in vivo. Substitution of the extreme C-terminal histidine residue with another amino acid led to marked accumulation and high stability of SulA in lon(+) cells. A SulA mutant in which the C-terminal eight residues were deleted (SulAC161) showed high accumulation and stability, but the addition of histidine to the C-terminus of SulAC161 (SulAC161+H) made it labile. Similarly, SulAC161+H fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP-SulAC161+H) formed a tight complex with and was degraded rapidly by Lon in vitro. Histidine competitively inhibited the degradation of MBP-SulA by Lon, while other amino acids did not. These results suggest that the histidine residue at the extreme C-terminus of SulA is recognized specifically by Lon, leading to a high-affinity interaction between SulA and Lon.

Regulatory Role of C-Terminal Residues of SulA in Its Degradation by Lon Protease in Escherichia coli

The SulA protein is a cell division inhibitor in Escherichia coli, and is specifically degraded by Lon protease. To study the recognition site of SulA for Lon, we prepared a mutant SulA protein lacking the C-terminal 8 amino acid residues (SA8). This deletion protein was accumulated and stabilized more than native SulA in lon(+) cells in vivo. Moreover, the deletion SulA fused to maltose binding protein was not degraded by Lon protease, and did not stimulate the ATPase or peptidase activity of Lon in vitro, probably due to the much reduced interaction with Lon. A BIAcore study showed that SA8 directly interacts with Lon. These results suggest that SA8 of SulA was recognized by Lon protease. The SA8 peptide, KIHSNLYH, specifically inhibited the degradation of native SulA by Lon protease in vitro, but not that of casein. A mutant SA8, KAHSNLYH, KIASNLYH, or KIHSNAYH, also inhibited the degradation of SulA, while such peptides as KIHSNLYA did not. These results show that SulA has the specified rows of C-terminal 8 residues recognized by Lon, leading to facilitated binding and subsequent cleavage by Lon protease both in vivo and in vitro.

A conserved domain in Escherichia coli Lon protease is involved in substrate discriminator activity.

Lon protease of Escherichia coli regulates a diverse set of physiological responses including cell division, capsule production, plasmid stability, and phage replication. Little is known about the mechanism of substrate recognition by Lon. To examine the interaction of Lon with two of its substrates, RcsA and SulA, we generated point mutations in lon which affected its substrate specificity. The most informative lon mutant overproduced capsular polysaccharide (RcsA stabilized) yet was resistant to DNA-damaging agents (SulA degraded). Immunoblots revealed that RcsA protein persisted in this mutant whereas SulA protein was rapidly degraded. The mutant contains a single-base change within lon leading to a single amino acid change of glutamate 240 to lysine. E240 is conserved among all Lon isolates and resides in a charged domain that has a high probability of adopting a coiled-coil conformation. This conformation, implicated in mediating protein-protein interactions, appears to confer substrate discriminator activity on Lon. We propose a model suggesting that this coiled-coil domain represents the discriminator site of Lon.

Induction of the SOS Response in Ultraviolet-Irradiated Escherichia coli Analyzed by Dynamics of LexA, RecA and SulA Proteins.

The SOS response in Escherichia coli is induced after DNA-damaging treatments including ultraviolet light. Regulation of the SOS response is accomplished through specific interaction of the two SOS regulator proteins, LexA and RecA. In ultraviolet light-treated cells, nucleotide excision repair is the major system that removes the induced lesions from the DNA. Here, induction of the SOS response in Escherichia coli with normal and impaired excision repair function is studied by simulation of intracellular levels of regulatory LexA and RecA proteins, and SulA protein. SulA protein is responsible for SOS-inducible cell division inhibition. Results of the simulations show that nucleotide excision repair influences time-courses of LexA, RecA and SulA induction by modulating the dynamics of RecA protein distribution between its normal and SOS-activated forms.

Bacterial SOS checkpoint protein SulA inhibits polymerization of purified FtsZ cell division protein.

Cell division of Escherichia coli is inhibited when the SulA protein is induced in response to DNA damage as part of the SOS checkpoint control system. The SulA protein interacts with the tubulin-like FtsZ division protein. We investigated the effects of purified SulA upon FtsZ. SulA protein inhibits the polymerization and the GTPase activity of FtsZ, while point mutant SulA proteins show little effect on either of these FtsZ activities. SulA did not inhibit the polymerization of purified FtsZ2 mutant protein, which was originally isolated as insensitive to SulA. These studies define polymerization assays for FtsZ which respond to an authentic cellular regulator. The observations presented here support the notion that polymerization of FtsZ is central to its cellular role and that direct, reversible inhibition of FtsZ polymerization by SulA may account for division inhibition.

Functional dissection of a cell-division inhibitor, SulA, of Escherichia coli and its negative regulation by Lon.

SulA is induced in Escherichia coli by the SOS response and inhibits cell division through interaction with FtsZ. To determine which region of SulA is essential for the inhibition of cell division, we constructed a series of N-terminal and C-terminal deletions of SulA and a series of alanine substitution mutants. Arginine at position 62, leucine at 67, tryptophan at 77 and lysine at 87, in the central region of SulA, were all essential for the inhibitory activity. Residues 3-27 and the C-terminal 21 residues were dispensable for the activity. The mutant protein lacking N-terminal residues 3-47 was inactive, as was that lacking the C-terminal 34 residues. C-terminal deletions of 8 and 21 residues increased the growth-inhibiting activity in lon+ cells, but not in lon- cells. The wild-type and mutant SulA proteins were isolated in a form fused to E. coli maltose-binding protein, and tested in vitro for sensitivity to Lon protease. Lon degraded wild-type SulA and a deletion mutant lacking the N-terminal 93 amino acids, but did not degrade the derivative lacking 21 residues at the C-terminus. Furthermore, the wild-type SulA and the N-terminal deletion mutant formed a stable complex with Lon, while the C-terminal deletion did not. MBP fused to the C-terminal 20 residues of SulA formed a stable complex with, but was not degraded by Lon. When LacZ protein was fused at its C-terminus to 8 or 20 amin acid residues from the C-terminal region of SulA the protein was stable in lon+ cells. These results indicate that the C-terminal 20 residues of SulA permit recognition by, and complex formation with, Lon, and are necessary, but not sufficient, for degradation by Lon.

Overproduction and purification of SulA fusion protein in Escherichia coli and its degradation by Lon protease in vitro.

To overproduce extremely unstable SulA protein, which is the cell-division inhibitor of Escherichia coli, we fused the sulA gene to the maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion vectors with or without the signal sequence (plasmids pMAL-p-SulA and pMAL-c-SulA respectively). The amount of the full-length fusion protein expressed from the plasmid pMAL-p-SulA (pre-MBP-SulA) in E. coli was much larger than that expressed from the plasmid pMAL-c-SulA (MBP-SulA). A major amount of the pre-MBP-SulA fusion protein was expressed in a soluble form and affinity-purified by amylose resin. Since site-specific cleavage of the fusion protein with factor Xa resulted in the precipitation of SulA protein, the pre-MBP-SulA fusion protein was used to study the degradation of SulA protein by E. coli Lon protease in vitro. It was found that only the SulA portion of the fusion protein was degraded by Lon protease in an ATP-dependent manner. This result provides direct evidence that Lon protease plays an important role in the rapid degradation of SulA protein in cells.

A Cell Division Inhibitor Sul A of Escherichia coli Directly Interacts with FtsZ Through GTP Hydrolysis

E. coli SulA is an SOS-inducible protein that inhibits cell division. FtsZ is a protein that plays a central role in bacterial cell division. Using purified SulA protein that was fused to the maltose binding protein, we demonstrate in vitro that SulA interacts with FtsZ to form a stable complex. The reaction requires GTP and Mg ion. GDP and GTPγS cannot substitute for GTP, which suggests that hydrolysis of GTP is required for the reaction. The complex is formed in a molar ratio of approximately one to one of the two proteins. It is likely that the complex formation represents the in vivo mechanism by which SulA inhibits cell division.