Mycorrhizal synthesis was successful between Pinus resinosa and Suillus americanus, S. brevipes (two isolates), S. luteus, and S. neoalbidipes, and between Pinus strobus and Suillus americanus, S. brevipes (two isolates), S. granulatus, S. pictus, and S. punctipes. Mycorrhizae formed by all combinations were similar in that all had multiple dichotomous branches, hyphae and hyphal strands with microscopic, pigmented, surface incrustations surrounding the mycorrhizae and roots, and in the mantle organization. Mycorrhizae differed in the macroscopic color ofthe mantle and surrounding hyphae and hyphal strands, the amount of hyphal surface incrustation present, the organization of individual hyphae in the mantle layers, the width ofthe mantle, the presence of clamp connections, and the amount of radial elongation of cortical cells. Data on additional diagnostic characters must be collected and evaluated for value in the identification of mycobionts of field-collected mycorrhizae. Numerous reports of putative mycorrhizal associations exist in the literature. Evidence for many of these reports is restricted to field observations of fungusplant occurrences or less frequently by tracing hyphae from the base of sporomata to adjoining plant roots. A more recent trend has been to confirm field observations experimentally by use of in vitro mycorrhizal syntheses. In vitro mycorrhizal synthesis studies provide the most direct and scientifically rigorous means of determining the ability of a fungal isolate to form mycorrhizae while providing much needed anatomical and morphological data on selected plant + fungus com? binations produced under controlled conditions. Morphology and anatomy, combined with other distinctive characters, provide essential data for identifying mycobionts from field collections. Assessment of ability to form mycorrhizae in vitro should provide a basis for furthering our understanding of the complexities of the mycorrhizal relationship, including the apparent specificity exhibited by some mycobionts or its absence in others in nature. The objectives of this study were to assess the ability of seven Minnesotacollected Suillus spp. to form mycorrhizae in vitro with either Pinus resinosa Ait. or Pinus strobus L., or both, and to characterize the resultant mycorrhizae. Suillus americanus (Pk.) Snell in Slipp & Snell, two isolates of Suillus brevipes (Pk.) Kuntze, Suillus luteus (L.: Fr.) S. F. Gray, Suillus neoalbidipes Palm & Stewart, and Suillus punctipes (Pk.) Sing. were paired with P. resinosa; S. americanus, two isolates of S. brevipes, Suillus granulatus (L.:Fr.) Kuntze, Suillus pictus (Pk.) Smith & Thiers, and S. punctipes were paired with P. strobus.