Abstract:Pyrophosphate serves as an alternative energy donor to ATP for sucrose mobilisation via sucrose synthase, for glycolysis via pyrophosphate: fructose‐6‐phosphate phosphotransferase, and for tonoplast energisation via the tonoplast proton‐pumping pyrophosphatase. This review considers the possible roles of these pyrophosphate‐driven reactions. Correlative evidence based on expression patterns, the distribution of proteins and activities in various tissues, and comparisons of the in vitro properties of the enzymes with the in vivo metabolite levels indicates an important role in young growing tissues and in stress conditions including anaerobiosis, but interpretation is complicated by the reversibility of the pyrophosphate‐driven reactions and by their duplication by ATP‐dependent reactions. The review then considers the evidence emerging from experiments using reversed genetics to alter expression of sucrose synthase, the pyrophosphate: fructose‐6‐phosphate phosphotransferase, and the tonoplast proton‐pumping pyrophosphatase. This approach has revealed that sucrose synthase plays an essential role in sucrose breakdown in potato tubers, and that pyrophosphate: fructose‐6‐phosphate phosphotransferase catalyses a near‐equilibrium reaction with a net flux in the direction of glycolysis. However, it does not support a special role of the latter enzymes in stress responses. Interpretation is complicated by compensation, which can include expression of other members of a gene family, use of alternative pathways, and relaxation of the feed back regulation in response to decreased expression of the enzyme. In an alternative approach, ectopic overexpression of soluble pyrophosphatase from E. coli has been used as a tool to decrease the levels of pyrophosphate in the cytosol. Constitutive overexpression leads to dramatic changes in sucrose and starch synthesis, sink‐source relations and plant growth, phloem‐specific overexpression of soluble pyrophosphatase leads to an inhibition of phloem transport, leaf mesophyll‐specific overexpression leads to a small stimulation of sucrose synthesis, and potato tuber‐specific overexpression leads to an inhibition of starch accumulation.