SUCRA Values Research Articles

Different surgical methods of hysterectomy for the management of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BackgroundEmerging surgical methods are utilized to treat endometrial cancer. The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of four common surgical methods of hysterectomy.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science from their inception until April 30, 2024. We used hazard ratios (HR) for overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS), odds ratios (OR) for categorical outcomes, and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. These were pooled in Bayesian network meta-analysis models. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to illuminate the probability that each method would be the best for each outcome.ResultsThirty studies comprising 13446 patients were included. Robotic hysterectomy (RH) retrieved fewer pelvic lymph nodes than open hysterectomy (OH). OH showed a significantly higher postoperative complication rate than laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and RH. LH had a higher intraoperative complication rate than OH. According to SUCRA values, OH ranked the highest in the number of retrieved pelvic lymph nodes (0.89), intraoperative complications (0.73), and operative time (0.97). LH ranked the highest in DFS (0.81) and overall survival (OS) (0.87). RH ranked the highest in the postoperative complications (0.95). Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) ranked the highest in number of retrieved para-aortic lymph nodes (0.72).ConclusionsThere are no significant differences among the four surgical methods in DFS or OS. The use of uterine manipulators does not affect prognosis. OH is the best method for shortening operative time, dissecting the pelvic lymph nodes and controlling intraoperative complications. LH and LAVH have an advantage in para-aortic lymph node dissection. Besides, LH has the best advantage in DFS and OS. RH has advantages in controlling surgical complications.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024529974.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiation Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy (NACT + CCRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy following CCRT (CCRT + ACT) have inconsistent effects on the survival of women with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) compared to CCRT. Moreover, the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT have not been clearly compared. This study compared the effects of NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT on survival using a network meta-analysis to select the optimal treatment in women with LACC. Methods: The PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched, and six randomized controlled trials assessing the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with newly diagnosed LACC treated with NACT + CCRT, CCRT + ACT, or CCRT alone (controls) were identified. A network meta-analysis was conducted. Results: Indirect comparisons showed no significant differences in PFS and OS between NACT + CCRT and CCRT + ACT. Direct comparisons also showed similar PFS and OS between NACT + CCRT and CCRT and between CCRT + ACT and CCRT. CCRT + ACT exhibited the highest surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value as a better treatment option for the PFS and OS (CCRT + ACT vs. NACT + CCRT vs. CCRT: 72% vs. 26.8% vs. 51.2% in PFS and 64.3% vs. 45.1% vs. 40.7% in OS). Conclusions: In women with LACC, NACT + CCRT had no different effects on the PFS and OS compared to CCRT + ACT, despite the relatively higher SUCRA value observed for CCRT + ACT. Further studies are warranted to clarify the effects of these strategies.

Second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on RCT.

The optimal second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is inconclusive. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing second-line systemic treatments for mCRC from the inception of each database up to February 3, 2024. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique was used in this network meta-analysis (NMA) to generate the direct and indirect comparison results among multiple treatments in progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), grade 3 and above adverse events (Grade ≥ 3AE), and any adverse events (Any AE). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was adopted to evaluate the probability of each treatment being the optimum intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the RAS gene status. A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 16,925 patients and 44 second-line systemic treatments. In improving OS, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab + Erlotinib exhibited significant superiority (SUCRA:92.7%). In improving PFS, Irinotecan + CMAB009 (SUCRA:86.4%) had advantages over other treatments. FOLFIRI + Trebananib (SUCRA:88.1%) had a significant advantage in improving ORR. Among multiple second-line treatments, the SUCRA values of FOLFOX + Bevacizumab in PFS, OS, ORR, and PR were 83.4%, 74.0%, 81.1%, and 86.1%, respectively, and the safety was not significantly different from other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + panitumumab ranked among the top in survival outcomes in the RAS-mutant population (OS SUCRA: 87.9%; PFS SUCRA: 70.2%); whereas in the RAS-wild-type population, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab significantly improved survival outcomes (OS SUCRA: 73.2%; PFS SUCRA: 65.1%). For most people, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab may be the best second-line systemic treatment regimen for mCRC. For RAS-mutant populations, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + Panitumumab is recommended. However, the therapeutic effect may be affected by the patient's physiological state, and clinicians should apply it based on actual conditions.

The Impact of Different Types of Exercise on Executive Functions in Overweight/Obese Individuals: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

To compare the effects of different exercise training on executive function (EF) in obese or overweight individuals. PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, and CINAHL. The included articles, in English, should have been published from January 2000 to February 2024. All included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise intervention in overweight or obese populations. The primary outcomes are EFs, which encompass core functions (e.g., inhibitory control, working memory (WM), and cognitive flexibility (CF)) and higher-level functions (e.g., responding, planning, and problem-solving). Therefore, the primary outcomes should include at least one of the above indicators. Additionally, given the focus of many exercise intervention studies on academic performance (AP) in obese adolescents, a secondary outcome includes AP. This meta-analysis synthesizes findings from 20 RCTs published between 2010 and 2023, encompassing a total of 1183 overweight or obese participants. Interventions were categorized into seven types: control training (CT), aerobic exercise (AE), resistance training (RT), coordinated physical activity (CPA), prolonged time of exercise (PTE), high-intensity interval training (HIIT), and AE combined with RT (mix mode, MIX). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) results demonstrated the preferable effects of various interventions on EF improvement. SUCRA values indicate that CPA performs best in improving the accuracy and reaction speed of CF, as well as the reaction speed of inhibitory control in children and adolescents. AE shows significant effects in enhancing AP in this population. Additionally, PTE excels in improving CF and inhibitory control in middle-aged and older adults. Through subgroup analysis based on age and intervention duration, we found AE exhibited a significant effect on interventions for the 0-17 age group (SMD = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.31~1.38, p = 0.002) and interventions lasting 8-16 weeks showed significant improvement in EFs (SMD = 0.53, 95%CI = 0.00~1.05, p = 0.048). There was also a significant difference between CPA intervention and CT (SMD = 1.12, 95%CI = 0.45~1.80, p = 0.001) in children and adolescents. Additionally, PTE showed significant effects for middle-aged adults aged 17-59 (SMD = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.11~1.96, p < 0.027). Conclusions: This NMA found that CPA and AE have significant benefits for CF, inhibitory control, and AP in children and adolescents. Furthermore, PTE improves EFs in adults and older adults. Combining the findings of this study with previous related research, we recommend that OW/OB begin by interrupting prolonged sedentary behavior and increasing fragmented physical activity, gradually incorporating AE, RT, and CPA (such as jump rope).

Different medications for seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND While the efficacy of medications such as fluticasone furoate (FF), fluticasone propionate (FP), and azelastine-fluticasone (AF) has been substantiated in comparison to their respective placebo controls, uncertainties persist regarding the comparative effectiveness of different intranasal agents. AIM To evaluate the efficacy of FP, FF, and AF in the treatment of adult patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS A computer search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness and safety of FF, FP, and AF in treating SAR. Data on treatment safety and efficacy were extracted and analyzed through meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 20 studies were included, comprising 10590 participants. The results of the direct meta-analysis indicated that, compared to placebo, both relative Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) and relative Total Ocular Symptom Score (rTOSS) significantly decreased post-intervention [mean difference (MD) = -1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.73 to -1.22; MD = -0.66, 95%CI: -0.82 to -0.49], with similar findings observed across the FF, FP, and AF subgroups. The network meta-analysis results showed that for improving rTNSS and rTOSS, the SUCRA values ranking from highest to lowest were AF, FP, FF, and placebo. Improvements in rTNSS and rTOSS with FP, FF, and AF were all significantly greater than those observed with placebo, with AF demonstrating superior efficacy compared to both FP and FF. No statistically significant difference in rTNSS improvement was found between FP and FF, although FP exhibited significantly greater improvement in rTOSS compared to FF. CONCLUSION In adult patients with SAR, the combination of azelastine and fluticasone shows a significant effect in improving nasal and ocular symptoms, with FP demonstrating marked improvement in ocular symptoms compared to FF.

Acupuncture and moxibustion as adjunctive therapy for postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction in gastric cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of different acupuncture and moxibustion techniques as adjunctive therapy in addressing Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (PGD) associated with gastric cancer (GC). Eight medical databases were comprehensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as of October 2024. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed using frequency models, combining all available direct and indirect evidence from RCTs. Time of first bowel sounds (TFBS) was set as the primary outcome, and time to first defecation (TFD) and time to first flatus (TFF) were set as the secondary outcomes. All outcomes were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities to determine a hierarchy of treatments, and the probability that the intervention will be in one of the top ranks increases with a higher SUCRA value. With 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2,459 patients, 18 of which involved adjuvant acupuncture treatments. NMA based on SUCRA rankings showed that routine care (RC) with acupuncture (ACU), with acupressure (ACUP), with moxibustion (MOX) and acupoint injection (AI) were the top-ranked therapies for shortening TFBS and TFF in patients with GC compared with RC; additionally, RC + MOX + CUP and RC + MOX were the relatively best therapies for TFD. No serious adverse events were reported in the studies assessing the safety of adjunctive acupuncture therapy. Our study found that ST36, ST37, ST39, and PC6 were the most commonly used acupoints for adjuvant acupuncture treatments in treating PGD associated with GC. Acupuncture and moxibustion, when used as supplementary therapies, demonstrated efficacy and relative safety in managing PGD associated with GC. The recommended order for adjunctive acupuncture- and moxibustion-related therapies for PGD in patients with GC, in terms of conservativeness, is as follows: RC + ACU, RC + MOX + AI, RC + ACUP, RC + MOX + CUP and RC + MOX. Despite their inclusion, the overall methodological quality of the studies was poor, which need for further high-quality randomized controlled trials to support existing results. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.

Comparative impact of exercise variants on depressive symptoms in cancer patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to conduct a network meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of various forms of exercise as an intervention for post-cancer depression and to provide a guiding program based on evidence-based medicine for subsequent clinical practice. This review was registered on the PROSPERO website with ID CRD42023485407. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched to obtain published articles from the establishment of the database until October 7, 2023. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Statistical analysis was conducted using R4.3.2 and Stata 15.1. This study ultimately included 51 articles and 4956 samples. Aerobic exercise (SMD=-0.33, 95%CI: 0.58, -0.08), combined exercise (SMD=-0.48, 95%CI: 0.71, -0.26), and mind-body exercise (SMD=-0.35, 95%CI: 0.6, -0.09) significantly improved depression compared with usual care (UC). According to the SUCRA value and cumulative probability, the rank of depression improvement effect of various sports interventions is as follows: combined exercise (90.71%), mind-body exercise (69.64%), aerobic exercise (65.81%), resistance training (35.86%). Exercise intervention can significantly improve post-cancer depression, but there is no significant difference in the effectiveness of various forms of exercise in improving post-cancer depression.

A097: Comparative Efficacy of Exercise Interventions for Chinese University Students with Smartphone Addiction

Purpose: Exercise is a promising therapy for smartphone addiction, but it is unclear which type of exercise is most effective. This study aimed to compare the effects of nine different exercise intervention modalities and to determine the optimal duration, frequency, and cycle for each intervention. By comparing the effectiveness of these exercise interventions, our goal was to provide practical recommendations for addressing smartphone addiction among university students of China. Methods: A systematic search was conducted on databases including CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, China Biomedical Literature Database, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, up to October 12, 2023. From among 11,155 papers, 17 articles were selected and included for a network meta-analysis to compare intervention effects. Subgroup analysis and network meta-analysis were performed using Stata 17.0. Pairwise comparisons and network meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 40 trials from 17 articles with 1774 participants were included. All types of exercise were effective in reducing smartphone addiction among college students of China. The Preferred Probability Ranking SUCRA values were as follows: Multi-Sport program (97.1%) &gt; Sports Games (84.4%) &gt; Badminton (66.8%) &gt; Basketball (46.8%) &gt; Eight Brocades (44.2%) &gt; Aerobics Exercise (40.1%) &gt; Aerobic Mixed Exercise (39.7%) &gt; Tai Chi Chuan (38.0%) &gt; Volleyball (34.0%) &gt; No Intervention (8.8%). Subgroup analysis indicated that interventions with a duration of less than 1 hour per session, a duration of more than 8 weeks but less than 12 weeks, and a frequency of 3 sessions per week exhibited more significant effects. Conclusion: Multi-sport program and sports games are considered the most effective exercise interventions for alleviating smartphone addiction among Chinese university students. Optimal intervention scheduling involves sessions lasting less than 1 hour, a period of 8 to 12 weeks, and a frequency of 3 sessions per week.

Comparative efficacy of Chinese tonic medicines for treating sepsis or septic shock: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundSepsis or septic shock is a life-threatening medical emergency with a poor prognosis and a high economic burden for both individuals and healthcare resources. Evidence suggests that Chinese tonic medicines (CTMs), as adjuvant treatments, are effective in treating this disease. Nevertheless, the ongoing discourse regarding the optimal CTMs persists. This study was conducted to further explore the comparative effectiveness of CTMs for patients with sepsis or septic shock. MethodsWe systematically searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, VIP database from inception to November 15, 2023. Primary outcomes encompassed the delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (ΔSOFA) score at day 7 after interventions and 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included delta serum lactate (ΔLac) and delta mean arterial pressure (ΔMAP) levels at day 7 after interventions, as well as the duration of vasoactive drug administration. The safety outcome was adverse drug reactions or adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs). The risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) were selected as effect measures. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by R version 4.2.2 software. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank each treatment. The Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2.0 tool was employed to assess the within-study risk of bias. The CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis) web application was utilized to assess the quality of evidence. This protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202348572). ResultsA total of 45 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3433 patients were identified in this study. Seven CTMs including Shenfu injection (SF), Shenmai injection (SM), Sini decoction (SN), Shenfu and Shengmai granules (SF+SGM), Shengmai injection (SGM), Yiqifumai injection (YQFM), and Shenqifuzheng injection (SQFZ) were involved. Regarding the ΔSOFA score, interventions combining SM with Western medicine (WM) (MD, −2.77; 95 %CI, −3.28 to −2.27), YQFM+WM (MD, −1.76; 95 %CI, −2.73 to −0.79), SGM+WM (MD, −1.11; 95 %CI, −1.88 to −0.34), and SF+WM (MD, −0.98; 95 %CI, −1.17 to −0.78) demonstrated superiority over WM alone. According to the SUCRA values, SM+WM (99.28 %) achieved the highest ranking for the ΔSOFA score. Concerning 28-day mortality, SM+WM (RR, 0.51; 95 %CI, 0.35 to 0.72) and SF+WM (RR, 0.73; 95 %CI, 0.65 to 0.83) exhibited a superior effect in reducing 28-day mortality. Based on the SUCRA values, SM+WM (82.49 %) secured the top ranking for 28-day mortality. Among the secondary outcomes, SM+WM (MD, −2.50; 95 %CI, −4.15 to −0.83; SUCRA, 94.27 %) emerged as the most favorable in reducing serum lactate levels. SF+WM (MD, 10.78; 95 %CI, 3.11 to 18.71; SCURA, 78.3 %) exhibited superior effectiveness compared to other treatments in improving mean arterial pressure (MAP). The certainty of evidence for these outcomes was assessed as low. ConclusionCTMs combined with WM led to a significant improvement in ΔSOFA score and MAP, as well as a reduction in 28-day mortality and serum lactate levels. SM+WM emerged as the optimal treatment regimen for enhancing ΔSOFA, reducing 28-day mortality, and lowering serum lactate levels. Additionally, SF+WM exhibited superiority in improving MAP. Nevertheless, there is a need for large-scale, multicenter, and direct comparative RCTs to generate higher-quality evidence.

Effects of using wearable devices on reducing sedentary time and prolonged sitting in healthy adults: a network meta-analysis

ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different wearable intervention strategies in reducing sedentary time (ST) and prolonged sitting (PS) on healthy adults.DesignA network meta-analysis (NMA).Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, ProQuest, Opengrey, Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to 1 June 2024.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of wearable device interventions on ST and PS among healthy adults were included.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Bias risks were assessed using Cochrane tools (Risk of Bias 2.0). Data were analysed using a frequentist framework NMA to directly and indirectly compare the effects of the five different intervention strategies (comparators). The results were reported as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CI and surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the best interventions. The five comparators were as follows: (1) wearable-only intervention (only using wearable devices for self-monitoring); (2) wearable combined with online intervention (ie, online coaching and social media support); (3) wearable combined with offline intervention (ie, face-to-face seminars and courses); (4) comparison group (ie, traditional, non-wearable interventions); (5) control group (ie, maintaining daily routine, waitlist).Results12 RCTs with a total of 2957 participants were included. Results of NMA showed that the ‘wearable+online’ has significantly better effects in reducing ST compared with control group, comparison group and ‘wearable only’, with moderate to large effect sizes (SMD=0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27; SMD=0.87, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.53; SMD=0.78, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.42, respectively). However, no significant differences were identified between the groups in reducing PS. The SUCRA values were ranked as wearable+online (98.1%), wearable+offline (64.4%,), ‘wearable only’ (40.5%), comparison group (25.9%) and control group (21.1%) for ST reduction. Similar rankings were observed for PS reduction, with probabilities of 69.9%, 61.1%, 59.7%, 37.1% and 22.1%, respectively.ConclusionsWearable+online is the best intervention strategy for reducing ST in healthy adults. Additionally, none of the wearable-based interventions effectively reduced PS in healthy adults, but as there is little research on PS, it should receive more attention in the future.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42021290017.

Radiofrequency treatments for lumbar facet joint syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Lumbar facet joint syndrome (FJS) is a common cause of chronic low back pain (LBP). Radiofrequency treatments are commonly used to treat chronic LBP-related FJS that is refractory to conservative treatment, although evidence supporting this treatment is controversial. We explored the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency on FJS using a network meta-analysis (NMA). A comprehensive systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared radiofrequency with other treatments (sham procedures, facet joint corticosteroid injection, and conservative treatment) for FJS. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database, and handsearching. The primary outcomes were pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Statistical analysis included conventional pairwise meta-analysis and NMA using the frequentist method. The treatments were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. The search yielded 25 RCTs (1969 patients) and a mixed quality regarding the risk of bias, with most studies exhibiting a low risk of bias for most domains. Endoscopic neurotomy consistently ranked highest in terms of pain reduction and ODI score improvement at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. At 1 and 6 months, endoscopic neurotomy had the highest SUCRA value for pain reduction (0.833 and 0.860, respectively), followed by medial branch thermal radiofrequency. This NMA demonstrates that endoscopic neurotomy is the most effective treatment for lumbar FJS, providing superior and sustained pain relief and functional improvement compared with other treatments. Further, high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and address the existing limitations. CRD42024524657.

Effect of antidepressants on ejaculation dysfunction in patients with depression and anxiety: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Antidepressants may lead to a series of sexual adverse effects (SAEs), among which ejaculation dysfunction (EjD) is often overlooked by clinicians. The purpose of the present network meta-analysis was to assist drug adjustment by comparing and ranking the incidence of EjD among various antidepressants. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and other additional records. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessed the rate of EjD in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder after taking anti-depressants. The incidences of EjD, erectile dysfunction (ED), decreased libido (DL), adverse events (AE), withdrawal due to adverse events (WDAE) and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy (WDLE) were pooled using odds ratio (OR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The values of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) helped to rank the risk of each outcome in different antidepressants. Thirty RCTs comprising 18,157 patients were included. Results of all node-splitting analysis demonstrated no statistical inconsistency (all P>0.05). Clomipramine (OR 42.11, 95% CI [9.90, 179.08]), WS5570 (OR 28.99, 95% CI [1.48, 568.97]) and paroxetine (OR 18.63, 95% CI [9.33, 37.23]) had significant risk of EjD comparing to placebo. Additionally, duloxetine (OR 7.37, 95% CI [2.61, 20.78]), clomipramine (OR 5.29, 95% CI [1.72, 16.25]), paroxetine (OR 3.75, 95% CI [1.37, 10.26]) and escitalopram (OR 3.04, 95% CI [1.20, 7.71]) presented higher risk of ED comparing to placebo. Agomelatine, levomilnacipran, vortioxetine, trazodone, vilazodone, fluvoxamine and imipramine exhibited similar incidence of EjD with placebo (all P>0.05). Besides, trazodone, vilazodone and vortioxetine had the top-five SUCRA values in each of SAEs (EjD, ED and DL), and agomelatine might be alternative in EjD and DL. Considering about AE, WDAE and WDLE, vilazodone appeared to offer more satisfactory performance across all these aspects. For patients undergoing SAEs following the administration of antidepressants, trazodone, vortioxetine, vilazodone and agomelatine are alternative antidepressants.

Intra-lesional Corticosteroids Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a potentially malignant disorder affecting the oral mucosa. Platelet concentrates, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), have emerged as promising alternative treatments to corticosteroids. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of PRP and PRF in the management of patients with OLP. We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients withOLPcomparing intralesional PRP or PRF with corticosteroidsup to August 2024. The primary outcomes assessed were changes in lesion size, pain scores, and Thongprasom scores. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was used. Data were pooled using summary effect sizes with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in a random-effects model based on the DerSimonian-Laird method. Eight studies comprising 157 patients and 250 lesions were included in the final analysis. Compared to corticosteroids, no significant differences were observed among PRF and PRP in terms of changes in lesion size, pain scores, clinical severity scores, and adverse events. NMA ranking showed that PRF was the best-ranking treatment in reducing lesion sizes (SUCRA values: 72.6%, 75.8%, 66.2%, 80.8%, and 77.5% at first, second, third, fourth, and eighth weeks of assessment), followed by corticosteroids, and PRP. Moreover, PRF was the best-ranking treatment in reducing pain score at the first, third, and eighthweeks of assessment (SUCRA values: 91.8%, 86%, and 85.9%), while PRP was the best intervention at the second and fourth weeks of assessment (SUCRA values: 61.3%, and 90.2%). Also, PRF was the best intervention in terms of Thongprasom scores at eightweeks of assessment (SUCRA value: 77.3%), while PRP was the best intervention at the fourth week of assessment with value of 78.1%. PRF and PRP showed comparable results with intralesional corticosteroids in all studied parameters. Considering treatments ranking, PRF was the best intervention. The optimal treatment modality for OLP varies on different clinical conditions.

Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data

OBJECTIVEThis study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data. METHODSFor the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021. RESULTSThe network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy , with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a SUCRA value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve (AUC) for SEP's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's AUC of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P=1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2=22.863, with P<0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2=2.005 (P=0.157) and χˆ2=0.069 (P=0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2=22.742, with P<0.001. CONCLUSIONSDuring CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.

Updated therapeutic options for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In clinical practice guidelines, there is no consensus about the medications that should be initially offered to patients with brucellosis. To provide informative evidence, we compared and ranked brucellosis medications based on their efficacy and safety. For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched 4 English databases and 3 Chinese databases, from the date of database inception to December 13, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents with brucellosis, comparing different antibiotic regimens. We excluded studies explicitly targeting patients with spondylitis brucellosis, endocarditis brucellosis, and neuro-brucellosis. The primary outcomes were overall failure (efficacy) and side effects (safety). Secondary outcomes were relapse and therapeutic failure. Pairwise meta-analysis was first examined. Data were analyzed using random effects network meta-analysis, with subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed. The Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The protocol was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42023491331). Of the 11,747 records identified through the database search, 43 RCTs were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with standard therapy (Doxycycline + Rifampicin), Rifampicin + Tetracyclines (RR 4.96; 95% CI 1.47 to 16.70; very low certainty of evidence), Doxycycline + TMP/SMX (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.52; low certainty of evidence), Doxycycline + Quinolones (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.71; low certainty of evidence), Streptomycin + Tetracyclines (RR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.16; low certainty of evidence), and Single (RR 0.05; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.16; moderate certainty of evidence) were less efficacious. Doxycycline + Gentamicin ranked the best in efficacy (SUCRA values: 0.94), the second is Triple (SUCRA values: 0.87), and the third is Doxycycline + Streptomycin (SUCRA values: 0.78). Brucellosis medications differ in efficacy and safety. Doxycycline + Gentamicin, Triple, and Doxycycline + Streptomycin have superior efficacy and safety. Treatment of brucellosis should strike a balance between efficacy, safety, and cost.

The effect of different edible oils on body weight: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundObesity is a major public health issue with no definitive treatment. The first-line approach for obesity is lifestyle modification, including a healthy diet. Although the amount of fat has been considered, there is no network meta-analysis (NMA) study investigating the effect of edible oils on body weight. Therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of different edible oils on body weight using a systematic review and NMA study of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).MethodPubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to April 2019. RCTs of different edible oils for body weight were included. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted to appraise the efficacy of different types of edible oils, and the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) was estimated. The GRADE framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence.ResultsForty-two eligible studies were included. Most of the included trials examined the effect of olive oil compared to canola oil (n = 7 studies), followed by canola oil compared to sunflower oil (n = 6 studies), and olive oil compared to sunflower oil (n = 4 studies). Sesame oil had the highest SUCRA value for reducing weight (SUCRA value = 0.9), followed by the mixture of canola and sesame oil (0.8). Palm oil and soy oil were ranked the lowest (SUCRA value = 0.2).ConclusionThere is low to moderate certainty of evidence showing that soybean, palm, and sunflower oils were associated with weight gain, while sesame oil produced beneficial anti-obesity effects.

Effects of five types of exercise on vascular function in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis and systematic review of 32 randomized controlled trials.

As women age, especially after menopause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevalence rises, posing a significant global health concern. Regular exercise can mitigate CVD risks by improving blood pressure and lipid levels in postmenopausal women. Yet, the optimal exercise modality for enhancing vascular structure and function in this demographic remains uncertain. This study aims to compare five exercise forms to discern the most effective interventions for reducing cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women. The study searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EBSCO, and Embase databases. It conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on five exercise interventions: continuous endurance training (CET), interval training (INT), resistance training (RT), aerobic combined with resistance training (CT), and hybrid-type training (HYB). Outcome measures included carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT), nitric oxide (NO), augmentation index (AIx), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) of the brachial artery. Eligible studies were assessed for bias using the Cochrane tool. A frequentist random-effects NMA was employed to rank exercise effects, calculating standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis of 32 studies (n = 1,427) indicates significant increases in FMD with CET, INT, RT, and HYB in postmenopausal women. Reductions in PWV were significant with CET, INT, RT, CT, and HYB. AIx decreased significantly with INT and HYB. CET, INT, and CT significantly increased NO levels. However, no significant reduction in IMT was observed. SUCRA probabilities show INT as most effective for increasing FMD, CT for reducing PWV, INT for decreasing AIx, CT for lowering IMT, and INT for increasing NO in postmenopausal women. The study demonstrates that CET, INT, RT, and HYB have a significant positive impact on FMD in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, all five forms of exercise significantly enhance PWV in this population. INT and HYB were found to have a significant positive effect on AIx in postmenopausal women, while CET, INT, and CT were found to significantly improve NO levels. For improving vascular function in postmenopausal women, it is recommended to prioritize INT and CT exercise modalities. On the other hand, as CET and RT were not ranked at the top of the Sucra value ranking in this study and were less effective than INT and CT as exercise interventions to improve vascular function in postmenopausal women, it is not recommended that CET and RT be considered the preferred exercise modality.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Omalizumab and Mepolizumab in Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Introduction: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is heterogeneous in both phenotypes and endotypes. Due to insufficient head-to-head comparison studies, it is hard to decide which biological to initiate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of omalizumab and mepolizumab which can be used in the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma diagnosed with N-ERD. Methods: The population of this observational, cross-sectional study comprised of N-ERD patients who received omalizumab or mepolizumab for at least 6 months for severe asthma. Outcomes included the asthma control test (ACT), and sino-nasal outcome test scores (SNOT-22), blood eosinophil counts at initiation of biological treatment (T0, baseline) and at the end of 6th months (T6). Adverse effects related to biological treatment and changes of oral corticosteroids dose was recorded. Results: The study included a total of 22 patients, of whom 11 received mepolizumab and 11 received omalizumab. The change in ACT, SNOT-22, eosinophil counts, and adverse effects related to biologicals were similar at T6 (p = 0.606, p = 0.168, p = 0.05, p = 0.053, respectively). However, when examining the SNOT-22 and ACT based on the cumulative distribution curve (SUCRA), mepolizumab (SUCRA value: 0.61, 0.72, respectively) demonstrated greater efficacy compared to omalizumab (SUCRA value: 0.19, 0.35, respectively). The oral corticosteroids discontinuation rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.05). Conclusion: We found both omalizumab and mepolizumab to be effective in treatment; however, we determined that mepolizumab may have a potential superiority in efficacy.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of hydrosalpinx treatment before in vitro fertilization.

To compare different methods to treat hydrosalpinx, based on both ablative and non-ablative approaches, in infertile patients before undergoing IVF-ET. Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of comparisons between different treatments of hydrosalpinx in infertile patients undergoing IVF. structured searches in common citation databases. Study inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed randomized trials (RCT) or cohort studies comparing effects of salpingectomy, laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion (LTO), insertion of intratubal device (ITD), sclerotherapy, ultrasound-guided aspiration and no treatment, on live birth, ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy as main outcomes, considering also miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy and complications as secondary outcomes. Principal NMA included RCT, and aggregated NMA of RCT and observational studies was carried out. Pooled effects have been estimated by Odds Ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for direct and indirect-mixed comparisons, derived from random-effects models. Imprecision and heterogeneity of NMA estimations was assessed by comparison of its 95% CI with predefined intervals for clinically relevant size of effect (OR <0.9 or >1.1). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were used to predict treatment rankings for each outcome. Nine RCT were included in main analysis, plus 17 additional observational studies in additional analysis. NMA of RCT did not identify significant differences in the effect of compared treatments on live birth rate, and LTO was the option with the highest value of SUCRA (0.92, mean rank: 1.2). Salpingectomy and US-aspiration associated to a significant increase of ongoing pregnancy rate compared to no treatment, according to NMA results (NMA OR: 4.35; 95% CI: 1.7, 11.14 and 2.8; 95% CI: 1.03, 7.58 respectively). Salpingectomy had the highest SUCRA value (0.88, mean rank: 1.4). NMA estimated significant increase of clinical pregnancy rate for salpingectomy compared with no treatment (NMA OR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.3, 3.86) as well as for LTO versus no treatment (NMA OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.2, 5.41). Both comparisons were affected by a high grade of heterogeneity. For clinical pregnancy, LTO was the intervention with highest SUCRA (0.85; mean rank: 1.6). Regarding secondary outcomes, feasible NMA estimates did not support significant differences between treatments effects. According to aggregated NMA including randomized and observational studies, sclerotherapy showed significant beneficial effects on live birth rate compared to no treatment (NMA (OR: 4.6; 95% CI: 1.21, 17.46). Compared with untreated patients, the aggregated NMA estimates a higher ongoing pregnancy rate in patients treated with salpingectomy (NMA OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 2.12, 5.12), US-aspiration (NMA OR: 2.16; 95% CI: 1.28, 3.65) and LTO (NMA OR: 2.46; 95% CI: 1.11, 5.43). Salpingectomy and LTO produced a higher beneficial effect compared to ITD, based on both direct and indirect comparisons. Salpingectomy obtained the highest SUCRA value in rank of effects on ongoing pregnancy (0.94; mean rank: 1.2). NMA found significant effects on clinical pregnancy for comparisons between the different active management procedures compared with no treatments, with the exception of ITD insertion. LTO had more increasing effect on clinical pregnancy rate compared with US-aspiration (NMA OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.05, 3.97), while for the rest of the comparisons between procedures no significant differences were identified. NMA ranked LTO as the treatment with a highest SUCRA value (0.91; mean rank: 1.5). NMA prediction models identified LTO as best intervention to reduce miscarriage (SUCRA value: 0.84; mean rank: 1.8), as sclerotherapy as safer option in terms of ovarian response to IVF stimulation. The present NMA fails to support the effectiveness of any option to treat hydrosalpinx before IVF in order to improve live birth rates, although the beneficial effect of salpingectomy and US aspirations on ongoing pregnancy rates and of both salpingectomy and LTO on clinical pregnancy rates emerges from our analysis, which reinforces current recommendations. Based on the aggregated analyses, sclerotherapy could be a promising alternative to conventional laparoscopic techniques, combined with a favorable safety profile. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Assessing the relative effectiveness of various ultrasound-guided ablation techniques for treating benign thyroid nodules: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) represent a prevalent clinical challenge globally, with various ultrasound-guided ablation techniques developed for their management. Despite the availability of these methods, a comprehensive evaluation to identify the most effective technique remains absent. This study endeavors to bridge this knowledge gap through a network meta-analysis (NMA), aiming to enhance the understanding of the comparative effectiveness of different ultrasound-guided ablation methods in treating BTNs. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Ovid, SCOPUS, and ProQuest for studies involving 16 ablation methods, control groups, and head-to-head trials. NMA was utilized to evaluate methods based on the percentage change in nodule volume, symptom score, and cosmetic score. This study is registered in INPLASY (registration number 202260061). Among 35 eligible studies involving 5655 patients, NMA indicated that RFA2 (radiofrequency ablation, 2 sessions) exhibited the best outcomes at 6 months for percentage change in BTN volume (SUCRA value 74.6), closely followed by RFA (SUCRA value 73.7). At 12 months, RFA was identified as the most effective (SUCRA value 81.3). Subgroup analysis showed RFA2 as the most effective for solid nodule volume reduction at 6 months (SUCRA value 75.6), and polidocanol ablation for cystic nodules (SUCRA value 66.5). Various ablation methods are effective in treating BTNs, with RFA showing notable advantages. RFA with 2 sessions is particularly optimal for solid BTNs, while polidocanol ablation stands out for cystic nodules.