Successful Adrenal Venous Sampling Research Articles

Visualization of Right Adrenal Vein in Non-Contrast-Enhanced MDCT and Its Guiding Role for Right Adrenal Venous Sampling.

This study aimed to evaluate the visualization of right adrenal vein (RAV) in non-contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and its guiding role for right adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). A total of 237 patients diagnosed with PA who underwent successful AVS procedures from January 2020 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The non-contrast-enhanced MDCT image features of RAV included the degree of visualization and the position of RAV orifice. Subsequently, the concordance degree between RAV in non-contrast-enhanced MDCT and AVS images was calculated to evaluate its guiding effect for right AVS. The visualization rate of RAV in non-contrast-enhanced MDCT was 81.9% (n=194), with 73.7% (n=143) clearly displayed and 26.3% (n=51) generally displayed. In 6.2% (n=12) of patients who can display RAV, RAV formed a common trunk with the accessory hepatic vein and then merged into the inferior vena cava. Non-contrast-enhanced MDCT revealed that RAV orifice was located between the 10th thoracic vertebra (T10) and the 1st lumbar vertebra (L1), with 85.1% (n=165) located from the lower 1/3 of T11 to the lower 1/3 of T12. The concordance of imaging anatomy of RAV between non-contrast-enhanced MDCT and AVS image was found to be at a high rate of 94.3% (n=183). Non-contrast-enhanced MDCT provides excellent visualization of RAV and clearly depicts its anatomical characteristics. Furthermore, RAV images obtained from non-contrast-enhanced MDCT are highly consistent with those from AVS, indicating that interpretation of non-contrast-enhanced MDCT before AVS can reduce the failure rate of RAV cannulation.

Calculated Right Adrenal Vein Aldosterone Levels in Patients Undergoing Adrenal Vein Sampling: The Potential to Lateralize Despite Unsuccessful Selection of the Right Adrenal Vein

PurposeThe aim of this study was to use calculated aldosterone level in the right adrenal vein (RAV) (cAldoRAV) rather than measured level for identifying the dominant side of aldosterone secretion in patients with primary aldosteronism undergoing adrenocorticotropic hormone–stimulated adrenal venous sampling (AVS). Materials and MethodsPatients with primary aldosteronism who had successful AVS (selectivity index, >3) were studied. Based on the assumption that cortisol production from both adrenal glands is equal, aldosterone level in the RAV was calculated using the data from the left adrenal vein and inferior vena cava. The aldosterone level in the left adrenal vein (AldoLAV) compared with the cAldoRAV (AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio) was then used to determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion compared with standard AVS interpretation using lateralization index (LI). LI ≥4 indicated unilateral disease, and LI ≤3 indicated bilateral disease. The LI between 3 and 4 was diagnosed as indeterminate. ResultsSixty-eight patients with concordant results between AVS and adrenal imaging study (32 were left-sided, 22 were right-sided, and 14 were bilateral) were selected for studying diagnostic performance. The AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio with the cutoff values of ≥3 and ≤0.33 could identify unilateral diseases (left-sided and right-sided disease, respectively) with 92.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity. ConclusionsThe calculated AldoLAV:cAldoRAV ratio can determine the dominant side of aldosterone secretion with high sensitivity and specificity when compared with standard AVS interpretation of measured levels. It provides an option for identification of unilateral and bilateral disease in select patients in whom right adrenal vein selection is unsuccessful.

Application value of adrenal venous sampling in the surgical treatment of primary aldosteronism.

The diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is critical for determining treatment strategies. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical value of preoperative adrenal venous sampling (AVS) for determining the benefit of PA surgery. Patients diagnosed with PA at Liaocheng People's Hospital (Liaocheng, China) between January 2015 and December 2020 were selected and divided into two groups: Group A underwent adrenal computed tomography (CT) only, whereas Group B underwent adrenal CT and successful AVS. Subsequently, the improvement rate of adrenal CT and adrenal CT + AVS in the treatment of PA was compared. A total of 164 patients were included, with an average age of 46.69±13.64 years. There were 62 patients in Group A and 102 in Group B. Among the patients diagnosed with unilateral lesions on adrenal CT scan, 82.61% of patients in group A and 87.72% in group B showed improvement; however, the difference was not significant (χ2=0.534, P=0.465). Among the patients diagnosed with bilateral lesions on adrenal CT images, 62.50% of patients in Group A and 91.11% of patients in Group B showed improvement (P=0.019). In conclusion, unilateral adrenal lesions detected by CT did not benefit significantly from surgical decision-making after AVS. AVS should be advised for all patients with bilateral adrenal PA who are willing to undergo adrenal surgery, which is conducive to correct lateral segmentation and improve treatment choices.

Pre-procedural and intra-procedural computerized tomography: providing a roadmap for successful adrenal venous sampling procedures

Background and purposeAdrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used for the diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism. Technical difficulties with right adrenal vein (RAV) catheterization can lead to erroneous results. Our purpose was to delineate the location of the RAV on pre-procedural CT imaging in relation to the location identified during AVS and to report on the impact of successful RAV cannulation with and without the use of intra-procedural CT scanning.MethodsRetrospective case series including patients who underwent AVS from October 2000 to September 2022. Clinical and laboratory values were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Successful cannulation of the RAV was defined as a selectivity index > 3.Results110 patients underwent 124 AVS procedures. Pre-AVS CT imaging was available for 118 AVS procedures. The RAV was identified in 61 (51.7%) CT datasets. Biochemical confirmation of successful RAV cannulation occurred in 98 (79.0%) of 124 AVS procedures. There were 52 (85.2%) procedures in which the RAV was identified on pre-AVS CT and there was biochemical confirmation of successful RAV sampling. Among these 52 procedures, the RAV was localized during AVS at the same anatomic level or within 1 vertebral body level cranial to the level identified on pre-AVS CT in 98.1% of cases. The rate of successful RAV cannulation was higher in patients who underwent intra-procedural CT (93.8% versus 63.9%), P < 0.01.ConclusionsPre-AVS and intra-procedural CT images provide an invaluable roadmap that resulted in a higher rate of accurate identification of the RAV and successful AVS procedures; in particular, search for the RAV orifice during AVS can be limited to 1 vertebral body cranial to the level identified on pre-AVS CT imaging and successful cannulation can be confidently verified with intra-procedural CT.

Clinical Value of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in Subtype Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism Patients with Adrenal Micronodules.

Our objective was to investigate the clinical value of 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT in subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) patients with adrenal micronodules less than 1 cm in diameter and compare it with the routine clinical methods. Methods: We used prospective enrollment of PA patients with adrenal micronodules identified by adrenal CT scans to undergo 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT. Patients were divided into surgically eligible and ineligible groups based on surgical pathology and postoperative follow-up or adrenal venous sampling (AVS) results. Patient management was discussed by a multidisciplinary team. The semiquantitative parameters of PET/CT included SUVmax for adrenal lesion and SUV ratios for lesion to liver and lesion to normal adrenal gland. Results: In total, 123 PA patients with adrenal micronodules were examined using 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT, and 104 patients who underwent surgery or successful AVS were included in the analysis (48 ± 10 y old). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of visual analysis using 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT to identify surgically eligible patients were 90.2%, 72.7%, and 86.5%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of adrenal CT (73.1%, 53.8%, and 68.3%, respectively) and yielded consistent results in different CT morphologic or age subgroups. In 36 patients who had both AVS and 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT, the tests showed a 66.7% concordance rate. However, PET/CT was significantly more concordant with surgical outcomes than was AVS in 17 patients who underwent adrenalectomy (82.4% vs. 68.86%). Among the 183 adrenal micronodules included in the study, the semiquantitative diagnostic thresholds for 92 lesions eligible for surgical treatment were an SUVmax of at least 4.55, an SUV ratio of at least 2.17 for lesion to liver, and an SUV ratio of at least 1.90 for lesion to normal adrenal gland. All patients benefited from surgical removal of 68Ga-pentixafor-avid microlesions. Conclusion: In PA patients with adrenal micronodules, 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT demonstrated promising diagnostic accuracy in classification and appeared to perform better than adrenal CT. Furthermore, there was also a suggestion of some potential in predicting postoperative efficacy compared with AVS, although these observations require further investigation and verification in larger cohorts.

Sex modifies the predictive value of computed tomography combined with serum potassium for primary aldosteronism subtype diagnosis.

We aimed to investigate the predictive value of the CT findings combined with serum potassium levels for primary aldosteronism (PA) subtype diagnosis, with a particular interest in sex differences. In this retrospective study, we eventually included 482 PA patients who underwent successful adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and had available data. We diagnosed the subjects as having either unilateral (n = 289) or bilateral PA (n = 193) based on AVS. We analyzed the concordance rate between AVS and adrenal CT combined with serum potassium and performed a logistic regression analysis to assess the prevalence of unilateral PA on AVS. The total diagnostic concordance rate between CT findings and AVS was 51.5% (248/482). The prevalence of hypokalemia in men and women was 47.96% (129/269) and 40.85% (87/213), respectively. The occurrence of unilateral lesions on CT and hypokalemia was significantly associated with an increased prevalence of unilateral PA [odds ratio (OR) 1.537; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.364-1.731; p < 0.001]. In male participants, G2 (bilateral lesion on CT and normokalemia), G3 (unilateral lesion on CT and normokalemia), G4 (bilateral normal on CT and hypokalemia), G5 (bilateral lesion on CT and hypokalemia), and G6 (unilateral lesion on CT and hypokalemia) were significantly increased for the prevalence of unilateral PA on AVS (G2: OR 4.620, 95% CI 1.408-15.153; G3: OR 6.275, 95% CI 2.490-15.814; G4: OR 3.793, 95% CI 1.191-12.082; G5: OR 16.476, 95% CI 4.531-59.905; G6: OR 20.101, 95% CI 7.481-54.009; all p < 0.05), compared with G1 (patients with bilateral normal on CT and normokalemia). However, among female participants, we found an increased likelihood for unilateral PA in patients with unilateral lesions on CT and hypokalemia alone (OR 10.266, 95% CI 3.602-29.259, p < 0.001), while no associations were found in other groups (all p > 0.05). Sex had a significant effect on modifying the relationship between unilateral PA and the combination of CT findings and serum potassium (p for interaction <0.001). In conclusion, our results indicated that CT findings combined with serum potassium levels have a great value for predicting the subtype of PA and are stronger in men.

Treatment decision based on unilateral index from nonadrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated and adrenocorticotropic hormone-stimulated adrenal vein sampling in primary aldosteronism.

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended for identifying the subtype of primary aldosteronism before making a surgical treatment decision, but failed cannulation of one adrenal vein is common. To evaluate whether using results of one adrenal vein during AVS could accurately predict unilateral primary aldosteronism. A retrospective study was conducted in primary aldosteronism patients receiving bilaterally or unilaterally successful AVS. The aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the adrenal vein divided by the aldosterone-cortisol ratio from the inferior vena cava (IVC) was calculated as the AV/IVC index. The study examined 455 patients with primary aldosteronism, including 347 patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. Among them, 250 and 125 patients received non- adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and ACTH-stimulated AVS, respectively, and 80 patients received both forms of AVS. Under non-ACTH-stimulated AVS, AUC of the AV/IVC index to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism were 0.778 and 0.924, respectively. The specificity was 100% for both, with sensitivities of 5 and 26%, respectively, when using cutoffs of 17.05 to diagnose ipsilateral primary aldosteronism and 0.15 to diagnose contralateral primary aldosteronism. When using cutoffs of 3.60 and 0.70, the specificity decreased, but if combined with CT results (ipsilateral or contralateral adrenal nodules larger than 10 mm), the specificity could be maintained at 99%, with sensitivities of 33 and 45%, respectively. Under ACTH-stimulated AVS, the AV/IVC index showed similar accuracy to diagnose ipsilateral and contralateral primary aldosteronism. The unilateral AV/IVC index can be used to diagnose unilateral primary aldosteronism during AVS. Combining CT results can increase the accuracy further.

The left adrenal vein: An important direction for right adrenal venous sampling.

This study aimed to evaluate the guiding role of left adrenal vein (LAV) for right adrenal venous sampling (AVS). A total of 347 patients who were diagnosed with primary aldosteronism (PA) and underwent successful AVS procedures from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different quadrant position of the orifice of right adrenal vein (RAV), the area where the orifice of RAV is located is divided into three areas: A, B, and C and the area A is further subdivided into A1, A2, and A3 areas. By counting the area where the orifice of RAV is located, the guiding role of the LAV on the RAV is determined. Most of the orifice of RAV are located in area A, and the proportions of areas A, B, and C was 96.8%, 1.4%, and 1.7%, respectively. In area A, areas A1, A2, and A3 account for 80.9%, 17.0%, and 2.1%, respectively. High body mass index, female and smaller the angle between the LAV and horizontal line was associated with the closer positional relationship between the LAV on the RAV. These findings suggest that most of the horizontal position of the RAV orifice is close to the horizontal position of the most distal end of the LAV, which indicate that the LAV location can play an important role on the guiding for right AVS. Additionally, body mass index, sex, and the angle of the LAV was largely related to location of the orifice of the RAV.

Corticotropin Stimulation in Adrenal Venous Sampling for Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is usually recommended to distinguish between unilateral and bilateral primary aldosteronism (PA) before definitive surgical or medical treatment is offered. Whether a treatment decision based on AVS with or without corticotropin (ACTH) stimulation leads to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA remains unclear. To evaluate whether treatment decisions based on AVS with or without ACTH stimulation lead to different biochemical and clinical remission rates in patients with PA. This randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted at a tertiary hospital in China from July 8, 2020, to February 20, 2023, among patients with PA aged 18 to 70 years. Patients were followed up for 12 months after the initiation of treatment. An intention-to-diagnose analysis was conducted. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either ACTH-stimulated or non-ACTH-stimulated AVS. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission after 12 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission after 12 months of follow-up, dosages of antihypertensive agents, rate of successful bilateral AVS, and adverse events. Of 228 patients with PA, 115 were randomized to the non-ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 41.0-57.0 years]; 70 males [60.9%]) and 113 to the ACTH-stimulated group (median age, 50.0 years [IQR, 43.5-56.5 years]; 63 males [55.8%]). A total of 68 patients (59.1%) underwent adrenalectomy in the non-ACTH group and 65 (57.5%) in the ACTH group. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with complete biochemical remission who were managed on the basis of AVS with vs without ACTH stimulation (with: 56 of 113 [49.6%]; without: 59 of 115 [51.3%]; P = .79). There also was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical remission between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups (26 of 115 [22.6%] and 31 of 113 [27.4%], respectively; P = .40). The intensity of therapy with antihypertensives, successful catheterization of bilateral adrenal veins, and incidence of adverse events did not significantly differ between the non-ACTH and ACTH groups. In this RCT, treatment of PA on the basis of non-ACTH-stimulated or ACTH-stimulated AVS did not lead to significant differences in clinical outcomes for the patients. These results suggest that ACTH stimulation during AVS may not have clinical benefit, at least in the Chinese population. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04461535.

Differences between left adrenal vein sampling sites revealed with segmental sampling in primary aldosteronism.

To clarify the differences between two left sampling sites (left adrenal central vein [LCV] and common trunk [CMT], conjunction with LCV and inferior phrenic vein) and their impact on adrenal venous sampling (AVS) in primary aldosteronism by analyzing the results of segmental AVS (sAVS). We retrospectively analyzed a final cohort of 432 patients who underwent cosyntropin-stimulated sAVS from 2017 to 2020. Hormone levels in the LCV and the CMT were compared. Subtype diagnosis was based on the lateralization index with LCV and CMT sampling (a cutoff value of 4) and sAVS after excluding patients with a selectivity index (SI) <3. Compared with the LCV, CMT sampling showed significantly lower aldosterone and cortisol levels and a higher proportion of cases with an SI of <3 (2.8% vs 0.5%, p = 0.025) and <5 (6.9% vs 0.5%, p < 0.001), while the aldosterone to cortisol ratio and the lateralization index were not significantly different. Subtyping of both sites was concordant in 94.7% (393/415) and discordant in the remainder, which included left and right aldosterone-producing adenoma and idiopathic hyperaldosteronism cases referring to the sAVS. There was no significant difference between the concordance rate of the two sampling sites based on the sAVS diagnosis. LCV sampling meets the SI criteria for successful AVS more frequently compared with CMT sampling, but neither was better than the other in terms of diagnosis under conditions of meeting the criteria. LCV sampling would decrease the number of cases judged as AVS failure.

Success Rate of Adrenal Venous Sampling and its Determining Factors: Experience of a Single Center in Malaysia

Primary hyperaldosteronism has been regarded as the commonest and potentially curable cause of secondary hypertension in up to 80% of cases if this condition is detected early. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy proved to be a promising curable method for primary hyperaldosteronism secondary to aldosterone producing adenoma (APA), while primary hyperaldosteronism secondary to bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH) requires optimization of medical treatment. Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) has been recommended by the Endocrine Society's guideline in addressing the subtypes of primary hyperaldosteronism. Therefore, determining success rate of AVS in our centre is crucial in the management of primary hyperaldosteronism and to prevent redundant procedures. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the success rate of AVS in our centre and the associated factors that correlate with the success rate. A retrospective study in a single centre, all adult patients who were diagnosed with primary hyperaldosteronism and underwent AVS in our centre between 2014 until 2022 were included. Successful samples defined by a selectivity index (SI) of ≥ 2, that is, the ratio of adrenal vein cortisol level to the peripheral vein cortisol level, were evaluated. The baseline demographic characteristics of each patient, technical parameters of AVS, and anatomical parameters of right adrenal vein from the venographic images were evaluated and analysed to correlate with the outcome of AVS. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The overall success rate of AVS in our centre was 61.3%. The success rate significantly increased to 80.6% in the trained IR group, which represents a single IR who had completed specific training in adrenal venous sampling (AVS), compared to non-trained IR group which consisted of a total of 10 IRs without specific AVS training (p=0.046). The right AVS had lower success rate than the left AVS (64% vs 94.6%). The type of right adrenal vein pattern showed significant association with the outcome of AVS (p=0.014). There were 6 types of right adrenal vein patterns observed in our study; Type 1 - gland-like pattern with numerous branches, Type 2 - delta pattern, Type 3 - triangular pattern with central "blush", Type 4 - no discernible pattern and Type 5 - spidery or stellate pattern. The sixth pattern was the hepatic radicles blush with hepatic drainage, for which blood sampling were also collected due to its appearance was frequently indistinguishable from the Type 1 pattern. The results showed Type 2 pattern had the highest incidence (30.5%; 32/105 samples) and Type 5 had the highest success rate (100%; 11/11 samples), while the hepatic radicles blush pattern had the highest incidence in fail samples resulting in the highest failure rate (94.7%; 18/19 samples). The visualisation of the inferior emissary vein from the venographic images during right AVS had a significant association with the successful AVS (97.5% success rate; 39/40 samples; p=0.003). Contrariwise, blood sampling withdrawn from the right adrenal vein in the presence of hepatic drainage communication associated with the failure AVS (86.7% failure rate; 26/30 samples; p=0.001). The overall success rate of both AVS in our centre was 61.3%, and the success rate was higher in the trained IR group than the non-trained IR group. The visualisation of inferior emissary vein and the type of right adrenal vein patterns were the key determining factors with significant association to the successful right AVS. Conversely, blood sampling withdrawn from the hepatic radicles and hepatic drainage had significant association with the failure right AVS.

Prevalence of Cortisol Cosecretion in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism: Role of Metanephrine in Adrenal Vein Sampling.

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard procedure for subtype diagnosis in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA). Cortisol is usually adopted for the normalization of aldosterone levels in peripheral and adrenal samples. However, asymmetrical cortisol secretion can potentially affect the lateralization index, leading to subtype misdiagnosis. We aimed to assess the prevalence of asymmetrical cortisol secretion in patients undergoing AVS and whether variations in adrenal vein cortisol might influence AVS interpretations. We then evaluated the use of metanephrines for the normalization of aldosterone levels for lateralization index. We retrospectively included 101 patients with PA who underwent AVS: 49 patients underwent unstimulated AVS, while 52 patients underwent both unstimulated and cosyntropin-stimulated AVS. Eighty-eight patients had bilateral successful AVS according to metanephrine ratio. We assessed the prevalence of asymmetrical cortisol secretion through the cortisol to metanephrine (C/M) lateralization index (LI). We then evaluated whether the use of aldosterone to metanephrine (A/M) LI can improve the diagnostic accuracy of AVS compared with aldosterone to cortisol (A/C) LI. Asymmetrical cortisol secretion is present in 18% of patients with PA. Diagnosis with A/M LI and A/C LI is discordant in 14% of patients: 9% had a diagnosis of unilateral PA with A/M LI instead of bilateral PA with A/C LI and 5% had a diagnosis of bilateral PA with A/M LI instead of unilateral PA. The assessment of metanephrine levels in AVS is useful for the determination of selectivity and lateralization, allowing an accurate diagnosis, especially in patients with asymmetrical cortisol secretion.

Utility of Epinephrine Levels in Determining Adrenal Vein Cannulation During Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism

ObjectiveIn patients with primary aldosteronism, adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is performed to determine the presence of unilateral or bilateral adrenal disease. During AVS, verification of catheter positioning within the left adrenal vein (AV) and the right AV by comparison of AV and inferior vena cava (IVC) cortisol levels can be variable. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of AV epinephrine levels in assessing successful AV cannulation. MethodsThis was a single institution, retrospective review of patients who underwent AVS with cosyntropin stimulation for primary aldosteronism between 2009 and 2018. Successful cannulation of the AV was defined by an AV/IVC cortisol ratio selectivity index (SI) ≥3:1. Epinephrine thresholds to predict catheter placement in the AV were determined using logistic regression. The calculated epinephrine thresholds were compared with previously published thresholds. ResultsAVS was performed on 101 consecutive patients and, based on the SI, successful cannulation of the left AV and right AV occurred in 98 (97%) and 91(90%) patients, respectively. The calculated optimal epinephrine threshold to predict AV cannulation was 364 pg/mL (sensitivity, 92.1%; specificity, 94.6%) and the calculated optimal AV/IVC epinephrine ratio threshold was 27.4, (sensitivity, 92.1%; specificity, 91.3%). Among the 14 patients with failed AV cannulation, 3 patients would have been considered to have successful AVS using AV epinephrine levels >364 pg/mL and AV/IVC epinephrine ratio >27.4 thresholds. ConclusionObtaining 2 right AV samples routinely as well as AV and IVC epinephrine levels during AVS could prevent unnecessary repeat AVS in patients with failed AV cannulation based on cortisol-based SI <3:1.

Imaging Analysis During Adrenal Venous Sampling Operations

Abstract Background To investigate the imaging anatomy and variations of bilateral adrenal veins to improve the success rate during adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and reduce the incidence of complications. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent AVS from June 2017 to January 2019 were collected. RadiAnt Viewer software was used to retrospectively analyze the intraoperative imaging data, intraoperative anatomical variation data, the success rate, and complications of AVS. Results The ostium of the right adrenal vein was located mainly between the lower 1/3 of the 11th thoracic vertebra and the middle 1/3 of the 12th thoracic vertebra, accounting for 75.5% of the cases. Most of the ostium (83.3%) was transversely distributed between 9 o’clock and 12 o’clock. The main morphology of the right adrenal venography was a triangular pattern (48.2%). As the body mass index increased, the ostium was higher, and the distance between the ostium and the spine was greater (P &amp;lt; 0.05). The success rate of the right AVS, the left AVS, and the bilateral AVS was 95.0%, 97.5%, and 92.5%, respectively. The anatomical variation rate of the right adrenal vein was 5.3%. All cases showed that the right adrenal vein entered the accessory right hepatic vein and then into the inferior vena cava. The anatomical variation rate of the left adrenal vein was 4.3%. Conclusions Body mass index can be used to predict the location of the right adrenal vein ostium. Understanding of the anatomy and variation of the adrenal vein and right adrenal venography is essential to a successful AVS.

Contralateral Suppression Index Does Not Predict Clinical Cure in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Aldosteronism.

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is recommended before adrenalectomy for patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) over 35 years old. The literature examining contralateral suppression (CoS) on AVS in predicting surgical outcomes is conflicting. We examined the presence of CoS in patients who underwent adrenalectomy while adjusting for clinical and biochemical factors associated with a clinical cure of hypertension (ccHTN). We performed a retrospective review of patients with successful AVS who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy for PA at a quaternary referral center. Patients were excluded if they had overt cortisol co-secretion, or inadequate follow-up. We first evaluated the aldosterone resolution score (ARS) in predicting ccHTN in our cohort. Next, the receiver-operator characteristic analysis (ROC) was used to determine the optimal contralateral suppression index (CSI) cutoff to define CoS. We performed univariable and multivariable analyses of factors associated with ccHTN. The primary outcome was ccHTN defined as blood pressure less than 140/90 mmHg, and off blood pressure medications. Of the 102 patients on bivariable analysis, age, sex, duration of HTN, number of medications, preoperative systolic blood pressure, and creatinine level were associated with ccHTN. ROC analysis of ARS had an AUC of 0.850 (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, only ARS remained associated with ccHTN (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.20-9.61, p = 0.021). CSI was not significantly associated with ccHTN on ROC, bivariable, or multivariable analyses. The presence of CoS was not useful in predicting ccHTN following unilateral adrenalectomy for PA in our cohort. After adjusting for clinical and biochemical factors, ARS remains a useful predictor for ccHTN.

Abstract No. 182 Evaluation of adjunctive collimated C-arm computed tomography in adrenal venous sampling and its effect on successful selective catheterization

Evaluation of feasibility and effect of a novel approach to adrenal venous sampling (AVS) analysis by combination of established selective cortisol and aldosterone indices with acquisition of a collimated C-arm CT (CACTColl). Overall, 100 AVS procedures in 97 consecutive patients (38f, 59m; 53 ± 8 years), performed from January 2014 to February 2020 in a single institution, were included in this retrospective study. Sequential samples of cortisol and aldosterone levels of the suspected adrenal veins and the right iliac vein were obtained and selectivity indices (SI) for both hormones computed, by dividing the central plasma cortisol/aldosterone concentration in the adrenal vein by the peripheral value in the iliac vein. Successful AVS procedures were defined either by stand-alone SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone≥2.0 as well as SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone≥1.1 in combination with positive right-sided CACTColl of the adrenals (n = 79). Radiation exposure of CACT was measured via dose area product (DAP) and weighed against an age- and weight-matched cohort of 66 patients receiving liver-directed therapy at our center. The preliminary success rate measured by either a SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone≥ 2.0 lay at 99.3% on the left and 72.6% on the right side, corresponding to sensitivity rates of 0.99 and 0.73, respectively, and could be significantly improved by addition of a positive CACTColl, adding up to a 91% success rate on the right. Sensitivity for stand-alone collimated CACT (CACTColl) could be computed at 0.93, with a total of 74 of 79 acquired CACTColl confirming selective cannulation by adrenal vein opacification. Mean DAPColl_CACT measured 2400 ± 940 μGy × m2, while mean DAPFull-FOV_CACT in the matched cohort measured 8700 ± 1900 μGy × m2 (P< 0.001). Significantly increased success rates in (right-sided) selective cannulation of AVS procedures could be achieved by combining established hormone indices with collimated CACT. This offers a successful alternative to previously published AVS analysis algorithms with lower radiation exposure as compared to a full-FOV CACT. Significantly increased success rates in (right-sided) selective cannulation of AVS procedures could be achieved by combining established hormone indices with collimated CACT. This offers a successful alternative to previously published AVS analysis algorithms with lower radiation exposure as compared to a full-FOV CACT.

Adrenal venous sampling in primary hyperaldosteronism: correlation of hormone indices and collimated C-arm CT findings

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and effect of an approach to adrenal venous sampling (AVS) analysis by combining established selective cortisol and aldosterone indices with the acquisition of a collimated C-arm CT(CACTColl).MethodsOverall, 107 consecutive patients (45f,62 m; 54 ± 10 years) undergoing 111 AVS procedures without hormonal stimulation from 7/13 to 2/20 in a single institution were retrospectively analysed. Hormone levels were measured in sequential samples of the suspected adrenal veins and right iliac vein, and selectivity indices (SI) computed. Stand-alone SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone ≥ 2.0 as well as SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone ≥ 1.1 combined with positive right-sided CACTColl of the adrenals (n = 80; opacified right adrenal vein) were defined as a successful AVS procedure. Radiation exposure of CACT was measured via dose area product (DAP) and weighed against an age-/weight-matched cohort (n = 66).ResultsPreliminary success rates (SICortisol and/or SIAldosterone ≥ 2.0) were 99.1% (left) and 72.1% (right). These could be significantly increased to a 90.1% success rate on the right, by combining an adjusted SI of 1.1 with a positive CACTColl proving the correct sampling position. Sensitivity for stand-alone collimated CACT (CACTColl) was 0.93, with 74/80 acquired CACTColl confirming selective cannulation by adrenal vein enhancement. Mean DAPColl_CACT measured 2414 ± 958 μGyxm2, while mean DAPFull-FOV_CACT in the matched cohort measured 8766 ± 1956 μGyxm2 (p < 0.001).ConclusionCollimated CACT in AVS procedures is feasible and leads to a significant increase in success rates of (right-sided) selective cannulation and may in combination with adapted hormone indices, offer a successful alternative to previously published AVS analysis algorithms with lower radiation exposure compared to a full-FOV CACT.

Adrenal Venous Sampling in Young Patients with Primary Aldosteronism. Extravagance or Irreplaceable?

Current clinical guidelines suggest that adrenal venous sampling (AVS) may not be mandatory in young patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) and a solitary adrenal adenoma on imaging. The aim of this study was to further elucidate whether conventional imaging alone is sufficient to distinguish unilateral from bilateral PA among patients aged 40 years or younger. This was a retrospective study where data from 45 patients with PA, aged between 26 and 40 years, who underwent successful AVS between 2005 and 2019, were analyzed. Results concerning laterality on imaging studies and AVS were recorded. Outcome in surgically treated patients was assessed according to the Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcomes criteria. In 4 of 25 patients with unilateral aldosterone production according to AVS, computed tomography inaccurately suggested bilateral disease. Following unilateral adrenalectomy, all 4 patients showed complete clinical success. Five of 20 patients with bilateral aldosterone production according to AVS had a solitary adrenal nodule (8-19 mm) on imaging. Two of these 5 patients were treated with unilateral adrenalectomy, neither having complete biochemical and/or clinical success postoperatively. Two of 16 patients younger than 35 years had discordant results, 1 with unilateral and 1 with bilateral aldosterone production, according to AVS. Imaging studies inaccurately predicted laterality in a significant number of young patients with PA. In contrast to current clinical guidelines, our results support AVS for subtype evaluation in young adults with PA, including patients 35 years or younger.

OR34-04 Efficiency of Adrenal Venous Sampling in the Treatment Choice of Primary Aldosteronism (AVSTAT Study)

BACKGROUND: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is strongly recommended for a subtype diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) if adrenalectomy (ADX) is desired by the patient. Given various issues related to AVS such as technical demand, invasive nature, expensive cost and radiation exposure, AVS is expected to lead efficiently to the subtype diagnosis and ADX. Aim: Primary objective was to assess the performance of AVS to determine treatment of PA by investigating the ratio of unilateral disease and rate of ADX following AVS in patients with unilateral disease. Methods: Sixteen major referral centers in ENS@T (n=10) and Japan (n=6) participated in the study. Study period was from 2006 to 2018. Data on total number of PA patients, AVS (total number and number of successful procedures), number of patients with unilateral diseases, and number of patients that underwent ADX were collected by a questionnaire-based survey. In addition, reasons for not proceeding to ADX in patients with a unilateral diagnosis were investigated. The diagnosis of PA was based on the positive case detection and at least one positive result in confirmatory testing. Results: Total number of confirmed PA patients and conducted AVS showed a dramatic increase during the past decade (PA: 1061 pts/ 2006–2011 to 3718 pts/ 2012–2018; AVS: 720/ 2006–2011 to 2448/ 2012–2018). Success rate of AVS was improved from 79.0% (2006–2011) to 92.5% (2012–2018). Both rate of unilateral PA and ADX of successful procedures decreased from 42.7% (2006–2011) to 37.3% (2012–2018) and from 40.8% (2006–2011) to 34.9% (2012–2018), respectively. Of the patients with successful AVS, bilateral disease was diagnosed in 63.5% (1812/2854 pts). Of the unilateral PA patients, 11.9% (125/ 1054 pts) were not subjected to ADX. The rate of the patients not subjected to ADX was significantly higher in Japan than in ENS@T centers both in patients with successful AVS (75.8% vs. 53.4%) and with unilateral disease (19.9% vs. 8.6%). Clinical decision against ADX in unilateral disease was made by the physicians in 33.3%, the patients in 33.3%, and both in 33.3%. Medical factors for Dr.’s decision against ADX in unilateral disease included good blood pressure control, normokalemia, comorbidities (e.g. DM, CKD), non-lateralized CT findings (e.g. no tumor, contralateral tumor), and discordant results among different criteria of AVS.Conclusions: High prevalence of bilateral disease and change of treatment policy after implementation affected the efficiency of AVS as an essential diagnostic procedure prior to ADX. Development of non-invasive procedures to exclude bilateral PA and more strict indication of AVS are warranted.

Left-versus-right-adrenal-volume ratio as a screening index before adrenal venous sampling to identify unilateral primary aldosteronism patients.

The current study aimed to investigate the value of the computed tomography-based left-versus-right adrenal gland volume ratio (L/Rv) in screening patients with unilateral primary aldosteronism. The current study recruited 114 patients who underwent successful adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and adrenal computed tomography at West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The patients were divided into three groups according to the AVS results: AVS-left, AVS-bilateral, and AVS-right primary aldosteronism. The volumes of the left and right adrenal glands were semiautomatically calculated. The L/Rv of each patient was computed, and its value in identifying unilateral primary aldosteronism was analyzed. The mean value of the L/Rv was larger in AVS-left patients and smaller in AVS-right patients than that in AVS-bilateral patients. In AVS-left primary aldosteronism patients, the cutoff value of the L/Rv with the highest Youden index was 1.344 [area under the curve (AUC) 0.851, sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 78.1%]. The optimal cutoff value was 1.908, of which 46.0% (23/50) of AVS-left primary aldosteronism patients could be identified (specificity 100.0%). In AVS-right primary aldosteronism patients, the cutoff value of the L/Rv with the highest Youden index was 1.267 (AUC 0.868, specificity 72.8%, sensitivity 87.9%). The optimal cutoff value was 0.765, of which 27.3% (9/33) of AVS-right primary aldosteronism patients could be identified (specificity 100.0%). Patients with L/Rv more than 1.908 or less than 0.765 had higher complete success rate postsurgery. Although not perfect, the L/Rv is an applicable index to screen unilateral primary aldosteronism patients for surgery. Primary aldosteronism patients, even those aged more than 35 years, with an L/Rv more than 1.908 or less than 0.765 can be spared AVS before surgery.