Successful Partnerships Research Articles

Respect, reciprocity, and responsibility: Principles for successful partnerships and sustainable communities

Respect, reciprocity, and responsibility: Principles for successful partnerships and sustainable communities

The Hard-to-Reach Data (HaRD) Framework: a Case Study in Humanitarian Mine Action

Introduction:Following humanitarian crises (e.g. armed conflict), reliable population health metrics are vital to establish health needs and priorities. However, the challenges associated with accurate health information and research in conflict zones are well documented. Often working within conflict settings are authorities and non-government organizations (NGOs) who frequently collect data under the context of operations. This operational data is a potentially untapped source of hard-to-reach data that could be utilized to provide a better insight into conflict affected populations. The Hard to Reach Data (HaRD) framework highlights the process of identifying and engaging with these stakeholders collaboratively to develop research capacity.Method:The HaRD framework was developed from literature searches of health and social sciences databases. The framework which provides a structure to gain access to data in hard-to-reach settings was applied to humanitarian mine action to identify and collect existing but underutilized data.Results:Guided by the HaRD framework we compiled the world’s first global casualty dataset for casualties of landmines and explosive remnants of war. The framework provided a structured approach to identify and engage with key stakeholders. An adaptive approach was needed for stakeholder engagement with trust building and transparency important factors in developing a collaborative partnership. Appropriate communication of research findings is important to ensure reciprocity.Conclusion:The HaRD framework can identify potential data sources and guide access in hard-to-reach data settings. Operational data is often available but hidden; a systematic approach to identifying and engaging with stakeholders can assist in developing successful research partnerships between academia and humanitarian organizations.

Systems of Care Approach to Improve Care for Children During Public Health Emergencies

Introduction:During public health emergencies, like COVID-19 or natural disasters, care for the pediatric population can become fragmented. Communication between systems may be challenged due to lack of relationships or infrastructure barriers such as incompatible electronic health record (EHR) systems. This can create critical, life-threatening situations for pregnant patients, infants, and children with exposures to threats. A systems-level approach was developed to guide planning efforts to improve and enhance communication and data sharing along the spectrum of care for children during public health emergencies.Method:The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) gathered subject matter experts to discuss how healthcare systems and community partners could strengthen the communication within the pediatric system of care. Three primary challenges emerged: Communication, Screening and Data, and Preparedness and Planning. Action steps were identified to address these challenge areas and meet the goals of reaching diverse populations, addressing health disparities, improving collaboration between health systems and public health, implementing effective screening practices that are guided by data, and strengthening infrastructure.Results:As a result of the in-depth discussions a graphic was developed to help guide those working to improve the system of care in their communities by implementing the activities described above. Selected multidisciplinary state teams will test strategies to address these goals.Conclusion:Improving communication and data sharing in the pediatric system of care will improve care and better inform the response during public health emergencies. Building successful partnerships, such as those between health care and public health, will be critical to success. The example of the Surveillance for Emerging Threats to Mothers and Babies Network (SET-NET) program, which collects and analyzes data related to public health threats, demonstrates the strength of this approach.

Dejerine and Klumpke: An Homage to Relationship and Partnership in Neurology (P4-3.009)

<h3>Objective:</h3> Provide historical homage to Drs. Jule Dejerine and Augusta Klumpke by outlining their neurologic contributions, and revealing how their unique partnership fostered neurologic discovery, community, and inclusivity. <h3>Background:</h3> Augusta Dejerine Klumpke (1859–1927) and Jules Joseph Dejerine (1849–1917) represent a powerful partnership, brought together by neuroscience, solidified in marriage, and cemented in their legacy of neurologic contributions. This paper summarizes the history of Dejerine and Klumpke’s serendipitous relationship developed at work and how their partnership catalyzed advances to the field of neurology. We then raise the larger question of whether workplace relationships should remain taboo or even become more encouraged in medicine. We bring to light other successful neurologic partnerships for comparison. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> Not applicable. <h3>Results:</h3> Drs. Jules Dejerine and Augusta Klumpke were a married couple who both significantly contributed to the history of medicine and neurology beyond the commonly used eponyms related to their discoveries. Dejerine rose to the highest prominence in the field of neurology during his time and contributed to establishing the foundation of our current understanding of clinical neurology with the likes of Charcot, and Klumpke was the first female intern in a Paris hospital. Dr. Klumpke and Dejerine used to host neurologists and research collaborators at their home regularly. Their partnership and the way in which it promoted discovery and community enabled synergistic and exponential impact. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Drs. Dejerine and Klumpke relationship and collaborations have no doubt made a positive impact on the future of neurology, and through historical review may serve as a healthy model for scientific collaboration within relationships. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Crissinger has nothing to disclose. Dr. Dobson has nothing to disclose.

Evaluating Collaborative Public–Private Partnerships

Problem, research strategy, and findings Public–private partnership models designed to facilitate greater collaboration have become increasingly popular. Scholarship on these partnerships has shown that they rely less on contracts and more on trust between partners, engage private partners early to allow for participation in project visioning, and prioritize shared decision making. However, there is a need to further define collaborative partnerships and distinguish them from more conventional models. In addition, research into the impacts of collaborative partnerships within planning processes is limited, and additional insights into their administrative structures, management, and internal dynamics is needed. I respond to these gaps by analyzing the collaborative co-creation public–private partnership formed to plan a smart city in the Quayside district of Toronto (Canada). Drawing on interviews (N = 35), participant observation, and document analysis, I found that those qualities of the Quayside partnership typical of collaborative partnership models reduced governmental oversight, facilitated conflicts of interest, and afforded the private partner substantial power. The challenges precipitated by the partnership structure were amplified through its application in a smart city context, where the private partner was a technology corporation with expansive resources and ambitions. Based on these findings, I argue that collaborative partnerships pose significant risks of privatizing planning processes and that these risks are heightened when asymmetries between partners are particularly stark. Takeaway for practice Planners should not allow a desire for greater collaboration to overshadow the necessity of divisions between public and private roles, because tension between the two is vital to partnership success. If seeking deeper collaboration, planners should ensure that responsibilities are clearly detailed in contracts to avoid ambiguities or conflicts of interest. This is especially important in projects where power differentials between partners are too significant to rely solely on trust instead of contracts.

The road to incorporating Scottish pelagic industry data in science for stock assessments

Fisheries data collection through industry-science partnerships have significant potential to support stock assessments and sustainable management, but few studies have described the steps taken en route to a successful partnership. This paper describes the development of the Scottish Pelagic Industry-Science Data Collection Programme; why and how it started, and what it has taken to develop a routine and consistent voluntary sampling regime of sufficient quality to become the main source of biological data on pelagic fish catches in Scotland. Using our experience, we emphasise the importance of establishing procedures that ensure the quality of methods and results, of working with institutions responsible for provision of national data, and of actively engaging with the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) workshops and working groups on data quality, stock assessment and stakeholder engagement. The development of the programme has been, and remains to be, a mutual learning process which is reflected upon from our different institutional perspectives. The experience gained during this work has built knowledge useful for practitioners in other situations. Specifically, we identify five transferable design principles that we believe have been essential to success so far. Finally, we look at the steps ahead in our efforts toward continuous improvements.

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES IN THE FAST-MOVING CONSUMER GOODS (FMCG) SECTOR: A QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT IN THE BANGLADESH MARKET

This study seeks to investigate the intricacies of strategic partnerships in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) industry in Bangladesh. The research aims to explore the motivations, challenges, critical success factors, and implications of alliances in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) industry. This will be done through 40 in-depth interviews with industry experts, managers, and executives from various FMCG companies. The study focuses on the rapidly changing and competitive market environment. The study utilizes qualitative analysis to reveal a notable transformation in the objectives and extent of strategic relationships. Originally centered on resolving issues related to distribution, alliances have progressed to include other goals such as innovation, market growth, and operational effectiveness. The motivations behind these agreements encompass risk reduction, consolidation of resources, market entry, and obtaining a competitive advantage. Nevertheless, fundamental difficulties were recognized, such as cultural gaps and opposing objectives among collaborating companies. To overcome these obstacles, it is necessary to implement strategic initiatives such as cultural integration programs, efficient communication techniques, and well-defined governance frameworks. The study’s conclusions are primarily constrained by its qualitative nature, which may impact its generalizability. Moreover, the emphasis on the Bangladeshi Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector could restrict the wider repercussions for the industry. However, the results provide practical advice for FMCG companies, including solutions to overcome difficulties and improve the efficiency of strategic partnerships. Furthermore, the incorporation of sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities into these partnerships signifies a transition towards ethical corporate practices, which not only benefits business objectives but also contributes to the well-being of society. This study enhances the current body of knowledge by offering empirical observations on the changing characteristics, difficulties, and key determinants for success in strategic partnerships within Bangladesh’s FMCG industry. Nevertheless, the limitations encompass potential biases from participants and the inherent subjectivity in the qualitative research methodology.

Educating radical practitioners: A case study of regenerative design on a UK High Street

This paper analyses a live project collaboration between the Birmingham School of Architecture &amp; Design and CoLab Dudley, a social innovation lab based on Dudley High Street. The project developed students’ sustainability competencies while contributing to social, environmental, and economic progression and regeneration of local communities, and explored regenerative futures for Dudley High Street 2030 through engaging students, academics, collaborators, and a wider network of local people in a two-way collaborative learning process. Using Tilbury and Mulà’s five principles of Education for Sustainable Development as a model, the collaboration was analysed to tease out how the work might impact the education of future practitioners. The research identifies a positive impact of real-life collaboration for students, academics, and collaborators in nurturing the conditions for radicality and reveals the conditions necessary for successful partnerships to develop. In going beyond technological solutions, the research reveals the potential of engaging students with real-world communities, participation, and future thinking to create radical practitioners ready to rise to the sustainability challenge

Finding Mutual Benefit in Urban Development

Problem, research strategy, and findings Public and nonprofit agencies struggle to compete for space in cities as development pressures and unaffordability intensify. We have identified a potential solution in creative mixed-use projects: ad hoc, cross-sectoral partnerships to develop mixed-use buildings involving a public or nonprofit use. We built our analysis on a census of 54 projects in Toronto (Canada), interviews with 24 stakeholders, and a rich data set of secondary sources. We traced the emergence of this approach in Toronto over 2 decades, mapping its geographical expansion, stakeholder diversification, and the various mutually beneficial spatial arrangements of buildings. Building on the theory of collaborative advantage, we analyzed the motivations behind cross-sector partnered ventures, finding a gradual shift from resorting to partnership in reaction to obstacles to partnerships strategically designed to pool together land, resources, and support for development. Third, we highlight here the role of champions in underwriting risks and the limits of relying on market solutions for social purposes. We conclude by discussing the relevance of collaborative city-building in land-constrained North American planning contexts. Takeaway for practice Government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and developers alike can benefit from creative mixed-use partnerships, which unlock access to land, resources, development capacities, and community support. Contrary to popular perceptions, intentional separation of nonprofit and for-profit uses can be mutually beneficial. Despite the one-off nature of creative mixed-use development, it can be propelled by an initial cohort of successful partnerships and landmark projects. Limited-time leases, insufficient organizational capacity, and low market demand hinder its implementation.

The Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership: Bridging Academic and Community Networks in a Collaborative Approach to Sarcoma.

The treatment of sarcoma necessitates a collaborative approach, given its rarity and complex management. At a single institution, multidisciplinary teams of specialists determine and execute treatment plans involving surgical, radiation, and medical management. Treatment guidelines for systemic therapies in advanced or nonresectable soft tissue sarcoma have advanced in recent years as new immunotherapies and targeted therapies become available. Collaboration between institutions is necessary to facilitate accrual to clinical trials. Here, we describe the success of the Midwest Sarcoma Trials Partnership (MWSTP) in creating a network encompassing large academic centers and local community sites. We propose a new model utilizing online platforms to expand the reach of clinical expertise for the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

The Role of Parent-Teacher Partnership in Promoting Numeracy Skills Among Primary School Students

This study aimed to explore the perspectives of teachers and parents regarding parent-teacher partnerships in promoting numeracy skills. A qualitative research design was used, and data were collected through focus group discussions with ten teachers and ten parents from a primary school in the Division of Toledo City. The data were analyzed thematically, and five themes emerged: the importance of parent-teacher partnerships, communication, parental involvement, teacher support, and resources. The findings indicated that parent-teacher partnerships were crucial in promoting numeracy skills, and effective communication was essential for building trust and collaboration. Participants emphasized the need for parental involvement, including regular attendance at parent-teacher meetings and supporting numeracy development at home. Teacher support was also identified as crucial, including the provision of clear explanations of numeracy concepts and strategies. Finally, participants highlighted the importance of having access to resources, including instructional materials and professional development opportunities for teachers and parents. These findings provide insights into the factors that contribute to successful parent-teacher partnerships in promoting numeracy skills and highlight the importance of collaboration and communication between parents and teachers.

Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey.

A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons' perceptions of the library's digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Developed by the library's DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks. Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library's strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces. The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance library services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. These improvements include looking into providing a space for patrons with families, expanding services for individuals whose first language is not English, assessing library accessibility for people with physical disabilities, and enhancing the physical space with quiet areas, improved lighting, and meditation spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing, using results from a training needs survey to identify knowledge gaps. The library has a history of successful partnerships with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to move forward with their work.

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AS A CATALYST FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT: MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL COOPERATION FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH

Public-private partnership (PPP) is considered one of the effective instruments for collaboration between the government and the private sector in stimulating economic development. PPP can catalyze entrepreneurial growth, foster a favorable business environment, and accelerate infrastructure and socio-economic projects. This research aims to develop theoretical and methodological approaches to ensure public-private entrepreneurial development partnerships. Public-private partnership (PPP) is recognized as a driving force for entrepreneurial development, as it opens new prospects and opportunities for creating a favorable business environment. Ukraine's public-private partnership's entrepreneurial development principles have been formulated. The objectives and tasks of the program for the development of public-private partnerships for entrepreneurial development have been systematized, including goals and studies aimed at supporting and stimulating entrepreneurship through public-private partnerships: creating a favorable investment climate; supporting small and medium enterprises; fostering innovative entrepreneurship; expanding export potential; promoting sectoral collaboration. The main directions for establishing public-private partnerships in Ukraine for entrepreneurial development have been proposed. The following methodological approach is suggested to ensure a successful public-private partnership for entrepreneurial development, which includes the following stages: analysis of needs and goals, development of a strategy for public-private partnership for entrepreneurial development, improvement of the legislative framework, the establishment of communication mechanisms, financial support, creation of a favorable regulatory environment, support for education and training, monitoring and evaluation of joint PPP projects. This methodological approach will help create a conducive platform for public-private partnerships and contribute to entrepreneurial development. Research on the principles, methods, and directions for implementing public-private partnership mechanisms has allowed the construction of an organizational and economic model for its functioning with the aim of entrepreneurial development, enabling effective coordination among enterprises, market institutions, and government bodies for joint entrepreneurial development and the achievement of positive socio-economic results. Recommendations have been developed to ensure public-private partnerships for entrepreneurial development, which will contribute to economic growth. Keywords: public-private partnership, entrepreneurship, socio-economic development, business.

Process development of a SARS-CoV-2 nanoparticle vaccine

One of the outcomes from the global COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has been an acceleration of development timelines to provide treatments in a timely manner. For example, it has recently been demonstrated that the development of monoclonal antibody therapeutics from vector construction to IND submission can be achieved in five to six months rather than the traditional ten-to-twelve-month timeline using CHO cells [1,2]. This timeline is predicated on leveraging existing, robust platforms for upstream and downstream processes, analytical methods, and formulation. These platforms also reduce; the requirement for ancillary studies such as cell line stability, or long-term product stability studies. Timeline duration was further reduced by employing a transient cell line for early material supply and using a stable cell pool to manufacture toxicology study materials. The development of non-antibody biologics utilizing traditional biomanufacturing processes in CHO cells within a similar timeline presents additional challenges, such as the lack of platform processes and additional analytical assay development. In this manuscript, we describe the rapid development of a robust and reproducible process for a two-component self-assembling protein nanoparticle vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. Our work has demonstrated a successful academia-industry partnership model that responded to the COVID-19 global pandemic quickly and efficiently and could improve our preparedness for future pandemic threats.

An assessment of facilitative leadership, communication quality and trust on public-private partnership success

PurposeThis study aims to test a public–private partnership (PPP) success model by examining the direct effects of two input factors (facilitative leadership and communication quality) on an outcome factor, namely, PPP success (PPP project success and PPP relational success), as well as the mediating effect of trust as a process factor on these relationships.Design/methodology/approachThe present research uses the sociotechnical systems theory as the guiding framework. This is a quantitative study that uses a questionnaire survey and purposive sampling. The respondents comprise 266 public and private sector employees who have been involved in various PPP projects. The data gathered from the survey are analysed using SPSS and structural equation modelling (AMOS version 23.0).FindingsThe findings of this study indicate that facilitative leadership, communication quality and trust are positively correlated with PPP success, that is, PPP relational and PPP project success. Trust is found to mediate the relationship between facilitative leadership and communication quality with PPP success.Practical implicationsThis paper upholds the importance of facilitative leadership, communication quality and trust in a PPP setting.Originality/valueThis study enriches the knowledge of PPP projects regarding facilitative leadership, communication quality and trust. It also discusses the vital role of these variables in ensuring PPP success.

Evaluation of Global Cleft Care Initiatives Among the Top Searched Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

International outreach for cleft lip and/or palate care has traditionally been characterized by foreign groups and individuals holding surgical outreach trips in low- and middle-income countries. However, this "magic bullet" approach has often been criticized for prioritizing short-term results that may disrupt local workflow. The presence and impact of local organizations that support cleft care and take on capacity building initiatives has not been well explored. Eight countries previously studied as having the highest Google search demand for CL/P were chosen for the scope of the study. Local NGOs in regions were identified through a web search, and information was collected regarding the location, objectives, partnerships, and work conducted thus far. Countries with a strong combination of local and international organizations included Ghana, Philippines, Nepal, Kenya, Pakistan, India, and Nigeria. The country with minimal to no local NGO presence included Zimbabwe. Local NGOs often supported education and research, training of providers and staff, spreading community awareness, offering interdisciplinary care, and opening cleft clinics and hospitals. Unique initiatives included starting the first school for children with CL/P, enrolling patients in the national healthcare to cover CL/P care, and monitoring the referral system to improve efficiencies in the healthcare system. Moving towards a mindset of capacity building not only involves bilateral partnerships between international host sites and visiting organizations, but also collaboration with local NGOs that have a deep understanding of local communities. Successful partnerships may help address the complex challenges regarding CL/P care faced by LMICs.

Filariasis research - from basic research to drug development and novel diagnostics, over a decade of research at the Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, Bonn, Germany.

Filariae are vector borne parasitic nematodes, endemic in tropical and subtropical regions causing avoidable infections ranging from asymptomatic to stigmatizing and disfiguring disease. The filarial species that are the major focus of our institution's research are Onchocerca volvulus causing onchocerciasis (river blindness), Wuchereria bancrofti and Brugia spp. causing lymphatic filariasis (elephantiasis), Loa loa causing loiasis (African eye worm), and Mansonella spp causing mansonellosis. This paper aims to showcase the contribution of our institution and our collaborating partners to filarial research and covers decades of long research spanning basic research using the Litomosoides sigmodontis animal model to development of drugs and novel diagnostics. Research with the L. sigmodontis model has been extensively useful in elucidating protective immune responses against filariae as well as in identifying the mechanisms of filarial immunomodulation during metabolic, autoimmune and infectious diseases. The institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (IMMIP), University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany has also been actively involved in translational research in contributing to the identification of new drug targets and pre-clinical drug research with successful and ongoing partnership with sub-Saharan Africa, mainly Ghana (the Kumasi Centre for Collaborative Research (KCCR)), Cameroon (University of Buea (UB)) and Togo (Laboratoire de Microbiologie et de Contrôle de Qualité des Denrées Alimentaires (LAMICODA)), Asia and industry partners. Further, in the direction of developing novel diagnostics that are sensitive, time, and labour saving, we have developed sensitive qPCRs as well as LAMP assays and are currently working on artificial intelligence based histology analysis for onchocerciasis. The article also highlights our ongoing research and the need for novel animal models and new drug targets.

Supporting Antiracism Through the Thoughtful Conduct, Evaluation, and Use of Research

Supporting Antiracism Through the Thoughtful Conduct, Evaluation, and Use of Research

Assessing the Readiness of Rural Public Health Agencies for Facilitating a School-based Intervention.

Assessing the Readiness of Rural Public Health Agencies for Facilitating a School-based Intervention Benjamin C. Ingman, PhD, Carla Loecke, MEd, and Elaine S. Belansky, PhD What Is the Purpose of this Study? • The purpose of the study was to better understand the role of a readiness assessment in a partnership between local public health agencies (LPHA) and a university. What Is the Problem? • Partnerships are often initiated without an intentional approach to assessing the readiness of those involved for executing partnership. Failure to discuss and attend to an organization's readiness for partnership may endanger the success of a partnership and initiative. What Are the Findings? • A readiness assessment revealed initial perspectives of LPHA directors on the following categories of readiness: mission, community climate, leadership, communication, personnel, change efficacy, and change commitment. • These dimensions of readiness operationalized in different ways and informed the actions of both LPHA and University personnel to facilitate the success of the partnership. • A retrospective interview of LPHA readiness for partnership supports the importance of a readiness assessment to promote successful partnerships. Who Should Care Most? • Those interested in engaging in partnerships stand to benefit from the perspectives raised in this study. Those working in LPHA–university partnerships may find other lessons particularly applicable. Recommendations for Action • A more nuanced approach to readiness for partnership may be an emerging area of research and interest in partnership communities. • Those interested in facilitating partnerships should consider assessing the readiness for partnership of all who may be engaged and use the results of those assessments to inform the rollout of the partnership. [End Page e7] Benjamin C. Ingman Center for Rural School Health & Education, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver Carla Loecke Center for Rural School Health & Education, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver Elaine S. Belansky Center for Rural School Health & Education, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver Copyright © 2023 Johns Hopkins University Press

Smartly Packaged

Smartly Packaged