OBJECTIVE: Male surgical sterilization (MSS) is considered to be permanent but can be reversed in some cases. High failure rates of the reversal have been reported in various studies - reasons include impaired sperm transport and the presence of antibodies in sperm. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been used to overcome these difficulties for men to restore fertility after MSS. We studied outcomes of this clinical application.DESIGN: Retrospective cohort studyMATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on IVF procedures were collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention using the U.S. National ART Surveillance System. We included IVF fresh non-donor cycles performed during 2004-2007, for couples with male-factor as the only infertility indicator. With adjustment for factors of female partners (such as age and reproductive history), a stratified logistic regression model by sperm collection methods was used to compare IVF outcomes between two study groups: MSS treated with ICSI (Group A), and non-MSS treated with donor sperm (Group B). Semen quality was assumed comparable between the two study groups.RESULTS: We analyzed 215 IVF cycles in Group A, and 884 in Group B. Among Group A, sperm was collected using epididymal aspiration (EA) - 55%, or testicular biopsy (TB) - 45%. All sperm was obtained through ejaculation in Group B. Favorable IVF outcomes were observed in Group A with sperm collected using EA – clinic pregnancy: 59.0 % (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.43, 95% CI: 0.95-2.16) and live-birth delivery: 52.1 % (AOR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.99-2.22), compared to 45.9% and 38.5%, respectively in Group B. Results of these two treatment outcomes were similar between Group A with sperm collected using TB and Group B.CONCLUSIONS: ICSI can successfully retore fertility for men with previoius surgical sterilization, especially if sperm was collected through epididymal aspiration, to achieve intrauterine pregnancy and live-birth rates comparable to those resulting from IVF cycles using donor sperm for male-factor infertility. OBJECTIVE: Male surgical sterilization (MSS) is considered to be permanent but can be reversed in some cases. High failure rates of the reversal have been reported in various studies - reasons include impaired sperm transport and the presence of antibodies in sperm. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been used to overcome these difficulties for men to restore fertility after MSS. We studied outcomes of this clinical application. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on IVF procedures were collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention using the U.S. National ART Surveillance System. We included IVF fresh non-donor cycles performed during 2004-2007, for couples with male-factor as the only infertility indicator. With adjustment for factors of female partners (such as age and reproductive history), a stratified logistic regression model by sperm collection methods was used to compare IVF outcomes between two study groups: MSS treated with ICSI (Group A), and non-MSS treated with donor sperm (Group B). Semen quality was assumed comparable between the two study groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 215 IVF cycles in Group A, and 884 in Group B. Among Group A, sperm was collected using epididymal aspiration (EA) - 55%, or testicular biopsy (TB) - 45%. All sperm was obtained through ejaculation in Group B. Favorable IVF outcomes were observed in Group A with sperm collected using EA – clinic pregnancy: 59.0 % (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 1.43, 95% CI: 0.95-2.16) and live-birth delivery: 52.1 % (AOR: 1.48, 95% CI: 0.99-2.22), compared to 45.9% and 38.5%, respectively in Group B. Results of these two treatment outcomes were similar between Group A with sperm collected using TB and Group B. CONCLUSIONS: ICSI can successfully retore fertility for men with previoius surgical sterilization, especially if sperm was collected through epididymal aspiration, to achieve intrauterine pregnancy and live-birth rates comparable to those resulting from IVF cycles using donor sperm for male-factor infertility.
Read full abstract