ABSTRACT Giant trees reflect site environmental conditions and to elucidate the distribution pattern of the giant trees, we investigated relationships between giant tree locations and landforms. On the basis of elevation, the landforms of Tokyo were divided into four types (lowland, plateau, hill, and mountain), and tree distribution patterns were divided into five groups, including three sub-types, with occurrence patterns of representative species [I: Frequently lowlands, often plateaux and mountain type (Machilus thunbergi); II: Frequently plateaux, often lowland, hill, or mountain type (Quercus acuta, Prunus speciosa, Taxodium distichum, Liriodendron tulipifera, Cedrus deodara, Aphananthe aspera, and Prunus × yedoensis “Somei-yoshino”) with two subtypes, II-1: Typically plateaux (Cinnamomum camphora, Castanopsis sieboldii, and Ginkgo biloba) and II-2: Frequently plateaux and hills (Zelkova serrata); III: Typically plateaux and hill type (Certis sinensis var. japonica, Torreya nucifera, Carpinus tschonoskii, Quercus myrsinifolia, and Quercus serrata) with one subtype, Frequently plateaux (Prunus jamasakura); IV: Mountains often with plateaux or hill type (Acer pictum subsp. mono, Aesculus turbinate, Abies firma, Cryptomeria japonica, and Cercidiphyllum japonicum); and V: Mountain-limited type (Castanea crenata, Pterocarya rhoifolia, and Fraxinus platypoda)]. Some giant trees, including Quercus crispula, Fagus japonica, Fagus crenata, and Tsuga sieboldii, were distributed in mountainous areas but not on plateaux, hills, or in lowlands. Some unique giant trees (Aphananthe aspera, Certis sinensis var. japonica, and Carpinus tschonoskii) are self-seeding in the wild and found in plateau areas but not mountainous or hilly areas. These results suggest that the distribution of giant trees is influenced by site ecological characteristics, tree physiology, and human management and land-use.
Read full abstract