Subtenon Injection Of Triamcinolone Acetonide Research Articles

Efficacy of Anti-VEGF and Subtenon Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Choroidal Neovascularization Associated with Multifocal Choroiditis

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF (Lucentis) and sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with multifocal choroiditis (MC). Methods: Eight eyes of 8 patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF and posterior sub-tenon injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) for subfoveal or juxtafoveal CNV associated with MC were retrospectively reviewed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), results of fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA)/indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) at baseline and 3, 6 months after treatment were compared. Results: All of the 8 patients showed significant improvement in BCVA at 3 and 6 months after treatment (P < 0.05). FFA/ICGA showed decrease or cessation of inflammation in 8 patients (100%). 7 patients (87.5%) had no significant active leakage while 1 patient (12.5%) had persistent leakage from the neovascular lesion at 3-month follow up. 6 months after treatment, no recurrence of inflammation occurred and no active leakage in all 8 patients. OCT showed reduced CNV area and alleviated edema. There are no severe treatment-related side effects expect slight eye pain during infusion in one patient. Intraocular pressure was all normal in follow up. Conclusion: Although the follow-up time and the number of patients in this study were limited, the use of intravitreal anti-VEGF combined with sub-tenon injection of TA was associated with improvement of visual acuity in patients with CNV secondary to MC. Further studies including a greater number of patients with longer follow up time are needed.

Intravitreal versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in treatment of diabetic macular edema

Purpose: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSBTA) for diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: The study design was a prospective, interventional, randomized controlled study. Participants: The study participants were 26 patients (Thirty eyes) with DME and central subfield thickness (CST) >250 μm. Intervention: Eyes were randomly assigned to two equal groups; Group A received a single 4 mg IVTA and Group B received a 40 mg PSBTA. Four patients had bilateral DME; they received IVTA in one eye and PSBTA in another eye. Main Outcome Measures: Changes in visual acuity (VA) and CST obtained using optical coherence tomography were measured during a 3-month follow-up. Potential treatment complications were monitored including change in intraocular pressure (IOP). Results: The mean preoperative CST was 393.7 ± 93.0 μm and 351.5 ± 56.4 μm in Group A and B, respectively. Both groups showed comparable significant improvement in CST and VA at 1 and 3 months postinjection compared to preoperative values. The mean CST in Group A was 282.2 ± 65.0 μm compared to 284.0 ± 59.0 μm in Group B at 1 month (P = 0.910) and 276.3 μm ± 71.1 compared to 260.2 μm ± 63.3 at 3 months (P = 0.519). The mean VA in LogMAR in both groups at 3 months was 0.47 ± 0.23 and 0.32 ± 0.29, respectively (P = 0.142), compared to preoperative VA of 0.80 ± 0.19 and 0.68 ± 0.23, respectively. The preoperative IOP was 13.80 ± 2.07 in the IVTA group and 13.07 ± 1.83 in the PSBTA group. IOP showed significantly higher elevation in the IVTA group at 1 and 3 months (19.4 mmHg ± 1.35 and 19.0 mmHg ± 1.36) compared to the PSBTA (16.5 mmHg ± 1.40 and 16.2 mmHg ± 1.50) (P = 0.000). No eyes had IOPs >21 mmHg. Conclusions: Posterior subtenon injection of TA is a safe and valid alternative to the intravitreal injection for the treatment of DME having a comparable effect on VA and CST, yet a lower risk of IOP elevation.

Quantitative Analysis of Uveitis Macular Edema in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Receiving Deep Posterior Sub-Tenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection

Aim: We aimed to analyze the effects of adjunctive posterior sub-Tenon capsule triamcinolone acetonide injection in the treatment of intermediate uveitis macular edema in multiple sclerosis patients that could not be controlled by systemic corticosteroid medications and immunomodulators. Methods: The study included 30 eyes of 25 patients with multiple sclerosis who received a posterior sub-Tenon injection of 40 mg/mL triamcinolone acetonide. Parameters monitored for therapy efficiency were best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, central foveal thickness (CFT), and fluorescein angiography (FA) scores. Results: Mean best-corrected visual acuity was significantly improved at the control visit 0.15 ± 0.10 versus baseline 0.40 ± 0.20 logMAR (p < 0.05). Six eyes showed intraocular pressure spikes requiring topical antiglaucomatous treatment. Mean CFT and FA scores were significantly decreased versus baseline (CFT: 345 ± 50 μm; FA score: 3.4 ± 1.0) compared with the 12-week control visit (CFT: 219 ± 35 μm; FA score: 1.6 ± 1.1; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide significantly improved visual acuity and decrease macular edema in patients with intermediate uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis.

Bevacizumab and Panretinal photocoagulation protect against ocular hypertension after posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide for diabetic macular edema.

To analyze the prognostic factors for ocular hypertension after posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Patients who received PSTA for DME from January 2006 to December 2011 were enrolled retrospectively and were followed until December 2012 in one hospital. Modified Cox regression models were used to analyze the factors associated with ocular hypertension, which was defined as an intraocular pressure>21mmHg after PSTA. A total of 180 PSTA injections were given to 114 eyes from 73 adults with DME. During a mean follow-up of 50.4 weeks after each injection, ocular hypertension occurred in 20.6% of injections (28.1% of eyes). Treatment-naïve patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) had a higher risk of ocular hypertension after PSTA than those with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) [hazard ratio (HR)=3.255, p=0.030]. Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (IVB) before PSTA had a significant effect in lowering the risk of ocular hypertension after PSTA in patients with PDR who had received panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) (HR=0.107, p=0.035). Both prompt PRP and IVB following PSTA had a protective effect against ocular hypertension in treatment-naïve patients with PDR (HR=0.086, p=0.0002 and HR=0.155, p=0.049, respectively). Treatment-naïve patients with PDR had a higher risk of ocular hypertension after PSTA than those with NPDR. Bevacizumab and prompt PRP both had a protective effect against ocular hypertension after PSTA in patients with PDR.

Adjunctive triamcinolone acetonide for Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation: a randomized clinical trial.

To evaluate the effect of intraoperative sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) as an adjunct to Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation. In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial, 104 eyes with refractory glaucoma were randomly assigned to conventional AGV (non-TA group) or AGV with adjunctive triamcinolone (TA group). In the TA group, 10 mg TA was injected in the sub-Tenon space around the AGV plate intraoperatively. Patients were followed for 1 year. The main outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP). Other outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), occurrence of hypertensive phase (HP), peak IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, and complications. A total of 90 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean IOP was lower in the TA group at most follow-up visits; however, the difference was statistically significant only at the first month (p = 0.004). Linear mixed model showed that mean IOP was 1.5 mm Hg lower in the TA group throughout the study period (p = 0.006). Peak postoperative IOP was significantly lower in the TA group (19.3 ± 4.8 mm Hg versus 29 ± 9.2 mm Hg, p = 0.032). Rates of success (defined as 6 < IOP <21 mm Hg) were similar in both groups at 12 months. There was no difference in the occurrence of the HP between the 2 groups (p = 0.123). Loss of BCVA >2 lines was more common in the non-TA group (p = 0.032). Adjunctive intraoperative TA injection during AGV implantation can blunt peak IOP levels and reduce mean IOP up to 1 year. Visual outcomes also seem to be superior to standard surgery.

Effect of intraocular pressure (IOP) and choroidal circulation on controlled episcleral drug delivery to retina/vitreous

Transscleral drug delivery may become a safe alternative to the intravitreal injection for chronic retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration or diabetic macular edema. However, the drug delivered onto the sclera subjects to vigorous clearance by episcleral and choroidal circulation; in addition, the penetration from episclera to retina needs to overcome counter-directional ocular fluid current driven by intraocular pressure (IOP) as well as unfavorable drug disposition exerted by drug transporters before the drug reach retina. It is imperative to understand these processes and quantitate their influence for efficient designing of a sustained formulation or device to achieve efficient transscleral drug delivery. The current study was focused on the effects of intraocular pressure (IOP) and choroidal circulation on transscleral drug delivery using triamcinolone acetonide (TA) as a model drug. Rabbit eye IOP was modulated through cannulation in ex vivo study or through cryopexy of ciliary body in vivo studies before subtenon TA injection or episcleral TA-film implantation. In a subgroup of the rabbit eyes, localized choroid atrophy was induced by cryopexy before TA-film implantation. Each condition had a concurrent control group. The vitreous TA concentration was quantitated by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC/MS/MS). The vitreous TA concentration was compared between the study and control groups for effect of IOP or choroid circulation. For ex vivo studies, higher IOP was a significant effect against TA penetration from episclera towards vitreous. TA was 8.5±5ng/mL in receptor chamber with a cross pressure of 50mmHg versus 15.9±10ng/mL with the cross pressure of 5mmHg; p=0.001, t-test. A multivariate regression demonstrated each mmHg of IOP increase would result in 3ng/mL lower concentration in the receptor chamber. Similar IOP effect was also identified in a 3-hour study using euthanized rabbit eyes whose IOP was controlled at 10 or 40mmHg by cannulation (3261±1821ng/mL vs. 755±763ng/mL; p=0.013, Wilcoxon test). However, the effect of IOP was not significant in alive animal with the same IOP setting. In vivo chronic study using low IOP (7.7mmHg) versus normal IOP (14.4mmHg), vitreous TA was not statistically significant (154±200ng/mL vs. 80±130ng/mL, p=0.17, Wilcoxon test). However, removing of choroidal circulation by local cryopexy significantly enhanced the TA penetration from episclera to vitreous (mean 163±129.8ng/mL for choroidal cryopexy vs. 81.8±37.2ng/mL for ciliary cryopexy or 75.5±36ng/mL for control group, p=0.007, regression analysis). In conclusion, the effect of IOP on transscleral drug delivery was not a significant effect in alive rabbit eyes; however, choroidal circulation seems to be a significant effect to affect TA penetration from episclera towards retina and vitreous.

Short-term efficacy of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in macular edema due to ischemic retinal vein occlusions

Objective To observe the short-term efficacy of posterior sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) in the treatment of macular edema due to ischemic retinal vein occlusions (RVO). Methods A retrospective clinical study. A total of 53 eyes of 53 patients with RVO macular edema diagnosed by fundus color photography, fundus fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were included in the study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was detected by the international standard visual acuity chart, and the results were converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT. Among 53 eyes, there were 27 eyes with ischemic RVO macular edema (ischemic group) and 26 eyes with non-ischemic RVO macular edema (non-ischemic group). The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.82±0.37, mean CMT was (662.1±216.7) μm in ischemic group. The mean logMAR BCVA was 0.41±0.23, mean CMT was (548.0±161.9) μm. The differences of logMAR BCVA and CMT between the two groups were both statistically significant (t=4.745, 2.258; P<0.05). All eyes were treated with a single sub-Tenon injection of 0.4 ml triamcinolone acetonide suspension (100 mg/ml). The mean logMAR BCVA, CMT before and 1, 3 months after the treatment between the two groups were observed and compared. Results On 1 and 3 months after treatment, the mean logMAR BCVA in the non-ischemic group (0.32±0.25 and 0.27±0.29) were improved compared with ischemic group (0.76±0.37 and 0.41±0.79), the difference was statistically significant (t=5.052, 5.240; P 0.05), but had a statistically significant difference in non-ischemic group (F=7.685, P 0.05). On 1 month after the treatment, there were 3 and 5 eyes had a higher intraocular pressure than 21 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in ischemic and non-ischemic group, respectively; but all of them returned to normal after drug treatment. There were no drugs and ocular injection related complications. Conclusion PSTA of ischemic RVO macular edema can lower the CMT in the short term, but can′t significant improve the visual acuity. Key words: Retinal vein occlusion/drug therapy; Macular edema /drug therapy; Triamcinolone acetonide/therapeutic use

Injectable Fluocinolone Acetonide Long-Acting Implant for Noninfectious Intermediate Uveitis, Posterior Uveitis, and Panuveitis: Two-Year Results

To determine the effect of an injectable fluocinolone acetonide implant (FAi) in eyes with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis. Noncomparative, interventional, dose-randomized, dose-masked, prospective, individual, investigator-sponsored investigational new drug study. Eleven eyes of 11 participants with a history of recurrent noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior, or panuveitis. Participants were randomized to receive either a low- or a high-dose FAi. Eyes were observed on day 0 (day the implant was injected) and then at regular intervals through 2 years. Ocular inflammation, visual acuity, anti-inflammatory medication use, and safety parameters before and after FAi implantation. All participants were followed up for 2 years. At baseline, mean study eye visual acuity was 0.56 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; standard deviation [SD], 0.43 logMAR). These values improved significantly to+0.25 logMAR (SD, 0.14 logMAR) and+0.17 logMAR (SD, 0.14 logMAR) at 12 and 24 months after implantation, respectively (P= 0.041 and P= 0.016, respectively). The average number of inflammation recurrences in the 12 months before implantation was 1.54 episodes per eye. None of the study eyes experienced a recurrence during the follow-up period. Of the 6 participants who continued receiving systemic medication after implantation, the dosage was reduced in 4 participants. Five of 11 eyes received an average of 1.6 posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) injections in the 12 months preceding implantation. None required a PSTA injection after FAi implantation. The most common adverse event was intraocular pressure (IOP) rise. At baseline, 1 study eye (9%) required pressure-lowering drops; 2 additional study eyes (18%) required them during the follow-up period. Filtering procedures were performed in 2 of these eyes (18.1%). No FAi explantations were required, nor were any participants lost to follow-up during the investigation. It is feasible to place a long-acting FAi in an outpatient setting, without prolonged adverse events attributed to the implant injection procedure. The FAi effectively controlled intraocular inflammation in all eyes in the study, and at the last follow-up, all implanted eyes demonstrated an improvement in visual acuity. Elevated IOP that occurred in 18% of FAi-implanted eyes was managed by standard means. The FAi implant is a promising approach for patients with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis who do not respond to, or are intolerant to, conventional therapy.

Reduction in the frequency of intravitreal bevacizumab administrations achieved by posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema

To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior subtenon injections of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) during treatment with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) in eyes with diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). Forty eyes of 20 patients with bilateral DDME with foveal thickness (FT) greater than 400μm were studied. Initially, both eyes of each patient received 1.25mg/0.05ml of IVB. One eye then received 20mg/0.5ml of STTA at the onset and at 16, 32, and 48weeks. For the control, the other eye was not treated with STTA. Patients were treated with additional IVB when DDME recurred during the study to maintain the FT at <350μm. The FT, logMAR visual acuity (VA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were monitored monthly for 56weeks. The total number of IVB injections during the 1-year follow-up was also calculated. STTA-treated eyes had significantly more regression of FT and improvement of VA at several time points during the study than did the controls. The mean (SD) required number of IVB injections in the STTA-treated eyes during the study was 5.00±1.75, which was significantly less than the 7.95±1.57 in the control eyes. Adjunctive STTA therapy to IVB for the treatment of DDME not only improved the morphological and functional regressions but also reduced the frequency of IVB treatments.

Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in eyes with transscleral-sutured intraocular lenses

To compare the clinical outcomes and complications of Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with a transscleral-sutured intraocular lens (IOL) and solitary DSAEK. Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan. Retrospective case series. Cases with simultaneous transscleral-sutured IOLs or post-transscleral-sutured IOLs and solitary DSAEK cases were studied. The logMAR acuity, astigmatism, endothelial cell density (ECD), graft survival rate, and complications (eg, IOL dislocation, cystoid macular edema [CME]) were analyzed. Thirty-seven DSAEK cases with simultaneous transscleral-sutured IOLs or post-transscleral-sutured IOLs and 147 solitary DSAEK cases were evaluated. The logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved significantly at 24months, from 1.34±0.49 (SD) to 0.48±0.38 after DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs and from 1.17±0.69 to 0.17±0.25 after solitary DSAEK. The logMAR CDVA after DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs was significantly worse than that with solitary DSAEK at 6, 12, and 24months (P<.01). The postoperative astigmatism with DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs was significantly higher than with solitary DSAEK because of the larger sclerocorneal incision (P<.02). There were no significant differences in ECD or graft survival rates between DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs and solitary DSAEK. The incidence of CME in DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs (4/37 eyes [11%]) was higher than with solitary DSAEK (2/147 [1.4%]) (P=.02). The CME resolved with topical diclofenac and sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in all eyes. The graft survival rates after DSAEK with transscleral-sutured IOLs were equivalent to those after solitary DSAEK, although the incidence of CME was higher than after solitary DSAEK. None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Combined Intravitreal Ranibizumab and Sub-Tenon Injection of Triamcinolone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Retinal Detachment.

To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) combined with posterior sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) with serous retinal detachment (SRD). Eighty-five eyes of 65 patients with DME and SRD were enrolled in this retrospective study. Fifty-eight eyes were treated with IVR and STTA (combined group), whereas 27 eyes were treated with pro re nata (PRN) IVR (control group). The combined group patients received a single and the control group patients received mean 1.29 ± 0.46 injections and followed for 3 months. The primary outcome measures were change in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary outcome measure was the complication rate. In the combined group, mean initial CMT was 543.9 ± 133.5 μm. Macular thickness was significantly reduced both after 1 month (334 ± 88 μm; P < 0.001) and after 3 months (387.6 ± 131.9 μm; P < 0.001) of treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, BCVA improved in 37.2% of the eyes. Complications were drug reflux at the time of STTA injection, elevation of intraocular pressure, and migration of hard exudates to the fovea. The decrease in CMT was statistically significant in the combined group in the first month, but not in the third month compared with the control group. The improvement in BCVA was not statistically significant between the 2 groups both after the first and third months. SRD disappeared with a higher rate with the combined therapy in the first month. IVR and STTA seem to be effective in improving BCVA in DME with SRD.

Comparison of Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection with Topical Nepafenac for the Treatment of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema

ABSTRACTPurpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection with topical nepafenac 0.1% for the treatment of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (CME).Methods: In this prospective study, the TA group comprised 24 eyes and the nepafenac group 24 eyes. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), intraocular pressure measurements, and slit-lamp fundoscopy were performed in all subjects at baseline, 1, 2, 3, and 6 months.Results: Changes in BCVA and CRT over four follow-up visits were statistically significant (p<0.001). The mean CRT decreased from 513.3 to 318.9 μm in the TA group and from 483.7 to 278.0 μm in the nepafenac group. This reduction was statistically significant (p<0.001 for both groups).Conclusions: Our visual and OCT results suggest that both treatment modalities are effective with few side-effects. However, nepafenac is more efficacious than subtenon TA in terms of visual gain and its correlation with the reduction in CRT.

Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Removal for Uncontrolled Ocular Hypertension After Posterior Subtenon Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide

To report the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) after removal of subtenon triamcinolone acetonide (TA) plaques in patients with uncontrolled ocular hypertension after posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) and to evaluate the factors associated with rapid IOP normalization after subtenon TA removal. Data from 8 eyes of 7 patients receiving excision of subtenon TA plaques for uncontrolled ocular hypertension after PSTA in 1 hospital from June 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively collected. The percentage of IOP lowering on postoperative day 1 and the time to IOP normalization after subtenon TA removal were reported. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the factors for rapid IOP normalization after subtenon TA removal. The IOP lowering on postoperative day 1 ranged from 12% to 75%. All cases achieved IOP normalization within a mean of 2.5±1.9 days (range, 1 to 5 d) after subtenon TA removal. Fewer kinds of antiglaucoma agents used before subtenon TA removal was associated with greater IOP lowering on postoperative day 1 (P=0.01) and more rapid return to normal IOP (P=0.01). Older age and more time from PSTA to ocular hypertension were both correlated with shorter time to achieve IOP normalization after operation (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively). In medically uncontrolled ocular hypertension after PSTA, excision of subtenon TA plaques provided IOP normalization as rapidly as 1 to 5 days. Fewer preoperative antiglaucoma agents, older age, and more time from PSTA to ocular hypertension were correlated with more rapid IOP normalization after subtenon TA removal.

Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide versus Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide for the Treatment of Diabetic Cystoid Macular Edema

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy of the posterior subtenon (SBT) capsule injection of TA as compared to intravitreal (IVT) injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide (TA) for the management of cystoid diabetic macular edema in pseudophakic patients. Methods: This prospective randomized comparative study included 100 pseudophakic eyes with cystoid macular edema. They were divided into two equal groups; IVT group, treated with 2 mg IVT injection of TA and SBT group, treated with 40 mg SBT injection of TA. Central Subfield thickness SFT, best corrected visual acuity BCVA and intraocular pressure IOP were measured before and after one and three months of treatment Results: There was statistically significant improvement in visual acuity in IVT and SBT groups. The SFT was significantly reduced both after one month and after three months when compared to the baseline values in both IVT and SBT groups. The SFT was comparable between the two groups especially after three months of treatment. The IOP of the eyes treated with IVT and SBT injection was significantly increased when compared to baseline value, but well controlled with glaucoma medication. There was insignificant difference between the IVT and SBT groups as regard to the mean IOP. Conclusion: The subtenon approach of triamcinolone injection can be considered a valid safe and effective alternative to the intravitreal injection; however larger and longer multicenter studies are needed.

Intravitreal versus posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in diabetic macular edema

Objectives: In this study, intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) was compared with posterior subtenon injection of TA for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). Materials and Methods: In this prospective, open, randomized, parallel group, comparative study, 60 patients of diabetic macular oedema visiting the Department of Ophthalmology, Govt. Medical College, Patiala were included. The patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria and having none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were then randomized into two groups (group I, II) and received intravitreal and posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide, respectively. The comparison was based on change in best corrected visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT). The results were subjected to statistical analysis and observations thus made in both groups were compared. Results: With intravitreal TA, the mean pre-treatment CMT, mean post-treatment CMT and mean reduction in CMT were 395.53 ± 15.31 ?m, 221.2 ± 10.71 ?m and 174.33 ?m (44.08 %) while the mean pre-treatment VA, mean post-treatment VA and mean improvement in VA were 0.79 ± 0.16, 0.51 ± 0.15 and 0.28 (36.11 %) logMAR units. With posterior subtenon TA, the mean pre-treatment CMT, mean post-treatment CMT and mean reduction in CMT were 394.43 ± 15.03 ?m, 247.3 ± 11.82 ?m and 147.13 ?m (37.3 %) while the mean pre-treatment VA, mean post-treatment VA and mean improvement in VA were 0.81 ± 0.15, 0.58 ± 0.14 and 0.23 (28.24 %) logMAR units. The mean pre-treatment IOP, mean post-treatment IOP and mean rise in IOP with intravitreal TA were 16.67 ± 1.92 mm Hg, 18.87 ± 1.81 mm Hg and 2.2 mm Hg (13.19 %), whereas with posterior subtenon TA were 16.87 ± 1.85 mm Hg, 17.4 ± 1.59 mm Hg and 0.53 (3.14 %). Conclusions: When used in diabetic macular edema, intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide is more effective than posterior subtenon

Effect of Posterior Subtenon Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection on Diabetic Macular Edema Refractory to Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection.

PurposeTo evaluate the effects of posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection on refractory diabetic macular edema (DME) after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection failure.MethodsPatients with DME and central subfield thickness (CST) >300 µm who did not respond to IVB injections were retrospectively included. Specifically, we enrolled patients who were diagnosed with refractory DME and who experienced an increase in CST after 1 to 2 IVB injections or no decrease after ≥3 consecutive IVB injections. One clinician injected 20 mg of triamcinolone acetonide into the posterior subtenon space. All patients received ophthalmic examinations at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months post-baseline. Examinations included Snellen visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.ResultsForty eyes of 34 patients were included. The average baseline CST was 476 µm. The average CST decreased to 368 µm at 2 months, 374 µm at 4 months, and 427 µm at 6 months (p < 0.001 for all results, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The average intraocular pressure increased from 15.50 to 16.92 mmHg at 2 months but decreased to 16.30 mmHg at 4 months and 15.65 mmHg at 6 months. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity improved from 0.56 to 0.50 at 2 months (p = 0.023), 0.50 at 4 months (p = 0.083), and 0.48 at 6 months (p = 0.133, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). No complications were detected.ConclusionsPosterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide is an effective and safe treatment for reducing CST in DME refractory to IVB.

Indocyanine Green Angiography-Guided Focal Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to detect leaking spots and the effectiveness of ICGA-guided focal laser photocoagulation in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Ten eyes (8 patients) with diffuse DME diagnosed using fluorescein angiography (FA) and refractory to a sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (STTA), grid laser photocoagulation, or both were enrolled. FA and ICGA were performed using the Heidelberg Retina Angiograph 2. Hyperfluorescent spots on early-phase FA and on early- and late-phase ICGA were superimposed onto the macular thickness map measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and counted to calculate the spot density in the area with or without macular edema (ME). ICGA-guided focal laser photocoagulation was carried out. In 7 eyes, STTA was simultaneously performed. The central macular thickness (CRT) and macular volume (MV) were measured by OCT. Results: On early-phase FA, 4.8 ± 2.3 and 2.3 ± 1.5 hyperfluorescent spots/disk area were observed inside and outside the ME, respectively. In contrast, the spot density was significantly decreased to 1.8 ± 0.9 inside the ME and was only 0.3 ± 0.4 outside the ME on late-phase ICGA (p < 0.01). The mean follow-up period after ICGA-guided photocoagulation was 19.0 months. The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly from 0.77 ± 0.34 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution at baseline to 0.52 ± 0.37 at the last visit (p < 0.01). Both CRT and MV significantly decreased (p < 0.01). Recurrence of DME was observed in 4 eyes: 3 eyes were treatable only with STTA and 1 required additional ICGA-guided laser photocoagulation. Conclusions: ICGA may be useful to detect leaking spots responsible for DME, enabling less invasive focal laser photocoagulation even in some of the eyes with diffuse DME.

The effectiveness and reliability of posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide injection in branch retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and reliability of posterior sub-Tenon triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) application in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-related macular edema.Methods: Patients with confirmed BRVO-related macular edema were enrolled in the study. Patients were injected with a single, therapeutic dose of 40 mg PSTA. Detailed ophthalmic examination was performed at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the treatment. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), cataractogenic change (CC) and macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis results were evaluated. The results were compared statistically.Results: Forty-one eyes of 41 patients with a mean age of 63.49 ± 10.99 (55–86) years, 15 (36.6%) females, were included in the study. BCVA in LogMAR values at 1 and 3 months were significantly better than at baseline, while no significant difference from baseline was observed in sixth month values (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.846, respectively). Central macular thickness values obtained using OCT were significantly lower at the first, third and sixth months compared to baseline (p < 0.001 for all). IOP elevation was determined in only two eyes (4.8%) at the end of the study period, and no CC was detected in any case.Conclusion: PSTA application is an effective and safe option in BRVO-related macular edema.

Posterior Subtenon's Capsule Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of posterior subtenon's triamcinolone injections versus grid laser photocoagulation (GLP) combined with posterior subtenon's triamcinolone injection in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME). In this prospective clinical study, 42 eyes with DME that showed a decrease in visual acuity (VA) were included. The first group consisted of 22 eyes that received a posterior subtenon's injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide under topical anesthesia. The second group of 20 eyes received macular GLP applied 1 month after subtenon's triamcinolone acetonide (STTA) injection. All patients were evaluated at baseline and 1 day; 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks; and 3 and 6 months after injection. In some patients, injections were repeated after 3 months. The main outcome measures were VA, central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular pressure, cataract progression, and frequency of complications. The mean baseline CMT for Group I was 456.85 ± 56.90 μm. The mean baseline CMT for Group II was 455.66 ± 57 μm. In the first group, mean CMTs for second week, 8th week, 12th week, and 6th month were 258.15, 276.50, 280.05, and 433.30 μm, respectively. In the second group, mean CMTs for second week, 8th week, 12th week, and 6th month were 261.42, 272.76, 284.71, and 291.76 μm, respectively. Before treatment, in the first group, the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured using a Snellen chart was 0.19, while the first week, third, and sixth month BCVA means were 0.59, 0.57, and 0.41, respectively. Before treatment, BCVA in the second group was 0.17, while the first week, third, and sixth month means were 0.61, 0.64, and 0.60, respectively. Treatment complications included cataracts in 4 eyes and glaucoma in 1 eye. There is a temporary therapeutic effect of posterior subtenon's triamcinolone injection without laser photocoagulation. GLP improves VA and reduces the risk of recurrent macular edema after posterior STTA injection.

Posterior subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection as a primary treatment in eyes with acute Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease.

To investigate the effectiveness of isolated subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection (STI) as a primary treatment in eyes with acute Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease. Retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. The data from 27 eyes in 14 patients with acute VKH treated with STI therapy were analysed retrospectively. The time course change in ocular inflammation, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and numbers of recurrences were examined. STI led to prompt improvement of BCVA within a week after the primary treatment. After completing therapy, patients with VKH had improved BCVA compared with baseline. In six eyes of three patients (22.2%) treated with STI, ocular inflammation was refractory, or VKH was recurrent despite the treatment. There was significant difference between groups with and without recurrences of inflammation in the frequency of headaches before treatment. In the present study, 21 eyes of 11 patients (77.8%) achieved complete resolution of VKH without recurrence after STI therapy alone. This study demonstrated that isolated STI therapy is a useful, minimally invasive, primary treatment option for patients with acute VKH without systemic disorders.