SummarySoil‐surface heat flux (G0), an important component of the surface energy balance, is often determined by summing soil heat flux (Gz) at a depth (z) below the surface and the rate of change in soil heat storage (ΔS) in the layer above z. The soil heat flux Gz is commonly measured with passive heat flux plates, but self‐calibrating plates or additional corrections are required to obtain accurate data. In some cases, ΔS is neglected because of the difficulty of monitoring the dynamics of volumetric heat capacity (C), which might lead to erroneous estimates of G0. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the heat‐pulse method for measuring G0 with a multi‐needle heat‐pulse probe (HPP). Soil temperature (T) distribution, thermal conductivity (λ) and C of the 0–52‐mm layer were measured hourly on five consecutive days with an 11‐needle HPP, and Gz at 50‐mm depth (G50) and ΔS of the 0–50‐mm layer (ΔS0–50) were determined by the gradient and calorimetric methods, respectively. Independent measurements of G50 with a self‐calibrating heat flux plate and ΔS0–50 calculated with the de Vries model C were used to evaluate the HPP data. With reliable G50 and ΔS0–50 measurements, the HPP‐based G0 data agreed well with those estimated from the independent method (with a mean absolute difference of 4.5 W m−2). Supporting measurements showed that determining Gz at the 50‐mm depth minimized the likelihood of errors from evaporation below the measurement depth. The multi‐needle HPP provides a reliable way to determine G0 in situ. Additional analysis demonstrated that by reducing the number of needles from 11 to 5, the datalogging requirement was reduced by half and G0 was still determined with acceptable accuracy.HighlightsHeat flux at the soil surface (G0) was monitored by the heat‐pulse technique. A multi‐needle heat‐pulse probe (HPP) was used to measure subsurface soil heat flux (Gz) and heat storage concurrently. Appropriate measurement depths of Gz were determined to minimize the effects of subsurface latent heat sink on G0. A simplified calculation reduced the datalogging requirement of the multi‐needle HPP.
Read full abstract