Substance Related Harms Research Articles

Validity, reliability and clinical utility of ASSIST-Y in assessing risk of substance-related harm and dependence in Spanish male adolescents

BackgroundSubstance use among adolescents is strongly associated with adverse physical, mental health, and social outcomes. Prevention and early intervention can reduce the likelihood of future problems, but requires valid and reliable screening tools capable of assessing risk across a range of substances. This study assessed the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST-Y) for adolescents aged 15–17 years.MethodsA sample of adolescent males (N = 101), aged 15–17 years, held in a juvenile detention facility on substance-related offences in Barcelona, Spain were eligible. Participants were administered a battery of standardized substance-use screening tools by a clinical psychologist, and underwent a diagnostic interview assessing DSM-IV-TR substance abuse and dependence by an addiction medicine specialist. Scores on the various assessments were compared to establish validity (concurrent with interview, convergent with other measures), reliability, and clinical utility of ASSIST-Y.ResultsMajority of participants (n = 77) completed assessments. While tobacco was not assessed as part of the interview, concurrent validity in detecting substance abuse was established for all remaining substances. Concurrent validity for detecting dependence was established for alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, stimulants and sedatives. Fewer numbers in higher-risk groups for inhalants, opioids and hallucinogen use limited confirmation of validity for those substances. ASSIST-Y also demonstrated good convergent validity with the other screening tools for all substances, except hallucinogens. Reliability for each subscale was established, except for tobacco (too few items), sedatives, and hallucinogens. Finally, clinical utility indices were significant for most substances (except sedatives and opioids); whilst clinical utility indices were significant for ruling out cases of non-dependence (all substances).ConclusionsAs a screening tool, the purpose of ASSIST-Y is designed to help identify adolescents who may be at-risk of substance-related harm. While the instrument was found to be valid and reliable in identifying risky use across a variety of substances, further research is needed to validate the instrument in other population groups, and for other substances. Future research should investigate the effect of the linked brief intervention to reduce risk of harm, especially for non-specialist clinicians.

Addressing data needs crucial for improving infant, child and youth mental health and substance-related harms in Aotearoa New Zealand: key design and ethical considerations for future research.

To evaluate the available data on mental health and substance-related harm among infants, children and young people (ICY) in Aotearoa New Zealand. A scoping review was undertaken to take stock of current data and identify gaps. Although there are quality studies, there is a lack of comprehensive, contemporary population-based data to monitor the prevalence and magnitude of mental health conditions and substance use-related harm for children and young people. Existing data are inconsistently measured and are not centrally located or available for all age groups, particularly infants and children. Whānau/family units are seldom considered or prioritised. Aotearoa New Zealand lacks accurate, up-to-date, comprehensive ICY mental health and substance use data to inform investment, service delivery and evidence-based policy. We advocate for enhanced surveillance and monitoring through population-based mental health and addiction studies with Indigenous and other locally designed measures, and propose key design and ethical considerations for future research. Future research must prioritise Māori and other priority groups, with non-stigmatising, strengths-based approaches. Addressing these data gaps presents a critical opportunity to improve outcomes for children, young people and their whānau.

Community alcohol sales and opioid poisoning deaths: Alcohol serving space as a harm reduction opportunity

The concurrent use of opioids and alcohol is particularly dangerous for individuals. Alcohol is commonly seen in opioid overdose death toxicology reports and, concurrent use of alcohol and opioids is often reported by individuals across a diverse range of opioid use profiles. This study investigates whether there is a community-level relationship between alcohol sales and opioid-related overdose deaths to inform the situating of harm reduction efforts in spaces most likely to reduce substance-related harms. Using an ecological design, zip code-level data for New Hampshire were combined from the US Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (sociodemographics), the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association (alcohol retail sales), and the NH Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (zip code level opioid poisoning deaths) to investigate the relationship between alcohol sales and opioid-related poisoning deaths at a community level in a state with the third highest rate of opioid poisoning deaths for the year the current study represents. Using a spatial error regression model approach, opioid-related poisoning deaths were higher in zip codes with greater population density and on-premise alcohol sales and were lower in zip codes with greater off-premise alcohol sales and area disadvantage. The findings here co-locate higher levels of on-premise alcohol sales and opioid-related poisoning deaths at a community-level, mirroring individual-level findings on the danger of mixing these two substances. Results inform harm reduction approaches by identifying substance use spaces where overdose prevention messaging or policy change may be most effective.

Alcohol and cannabis use in daily lives of college-attending young adults: Does co-use correspond to greater reported pleasure?

Co-use of alcohol and cannabis is prevalent and linked with heightened risk for substance-related harms. The current study investigated the role of substance-related pleasure as a reinforcing factor for co-use relative to alcohol or cannabis use. Specifically, we used data from a 21-day diary study of college students to examine day-level associations between co-use and self-reported substance-related pleasure (any, level of pleasure). Participants were 237 college students (65 % female sex at birth, ages 18–24) who reported 1+ alcohol and cannabis co-use occasion. Participants completed daily surveys across 21 consecutive days about yesterday’s substance use and experiences of pleasure, yielding 2,086 daily surveys involving alcohol and/or cannabis use. Multilevel models indicated that odds of substance-related pleasure were higher on days with co-use relative to days with single-substance use, and level of pleasure was higher on co-use days relative to cannabis but not alcohol use days. Pleasure may serve as a reinforcing property of co-use that may be related to continued use despite experience of negative consequences. Intensity of pleasure related to co-use appears to be largely driven by use of alcohol. However, given mixed findings concerning level of pleasure, individuals may report co-use increases feelings of pleasure but do not actually experience more pleasure. Pleasure may serve as a viable target in future prevention and intervention programming targeting co-use.

Sensitivity, specificity, and discordance with self-report of nail sample testing for alcohol and cannabis

BackgroundNails accumulate the alcohol metabolite, ethyl glucuronide (ETG), and the cannabis metabolite, carboxy- delta-9-THC over 3–6 months. Few studies have examined nail toxicology testing’s sensitivity and specificity and the agreement between nail testing and self-reported alcohol and marijuana use. MethodsIn an ongoing clinical trial, 1101 veterans completed initial telephone questionnaires and were then asked to mail nail clippings for substance use analysis. We examined sensitivity and specificity of ETG and carboxy- delta-9-THC in nails compared to self-report of alcohol use patterns (the AUDIT-C) and substance-related harms (alcohol and THC subscales of the ASSIST). We then examined factors associated with discordance between nails and self-report. ResultsAlmost two-thirds (707/1101) of respondents mailed in nail clippings. Those with returned nails were disproportionately married, white race, older, and less depressed. At a threshold of 8pg/mg, sensitivity was only.50 to detect risky alcohol use and.49 to detect alcohol-related issues. Sensitivity for marijuana issues was only.61. Specificity was greater than.77 for all measures.Factors associated with positive nails/negative self-report (i.e. false positives) for risky alcohol use on the Audit-C included more pain and being unmarried; false positive nails for alcohol-related issues on the ASSIST were associated with being unmarried and non-Hispanic ethnicity. False positive nails for THC-related issues on the ASSIST were associated with being African American, Hispanic, and having had legal issues. ConclusionsAt standard cut-offs, nail measures had low sensitivity and higher specificity. The groups who disproportionately submit positive nails/negative self-report could have substance use patterns not adequately captured by self-report, inaccurate self-report due to social pressures, or distinct drug metabolism.

Harm Reduction Behavioral Activation Teletherapy for People Who Inject Drugs: Development, Feasibility, and Acceptability

People who inject drugs (PWID) experience severe substance-related harms and yet have low rates of engagement in substance use disorder treatment. Low-barrier and telepsychology interventions represent promising strategies for engaging PWID in treatment, but few studies have tested the feasibility of these approaches among non-treatment-seeking PWID. A behavioral activation (BA) treatment for substance use was adapted through a harm reduction lens to assist PWID in working toward healthy, meaningful lives and achieving their goals. This study aims to: (a) describe the development and harm reduction–focused adaptation of the BA intervention, and (b) examine the feasibility and acceptability of administering a telepsychology BA treatment for substance use among non-treatment-seeking PWID. We recruited N = 23 PWID (65.2% White; 52.2% women; mean age 35.4 ± 7.8 years) from syringe services programs into an open trial and n = 19 received up to eight sessions of BA over 4 weeks. Qualitative treatment feedback interviews occurred at posttreatment. Among those who attended ≥1 session of treatment, 84% attended a second assessment, and 58% attended ≥7 intervention sessions. Feasibility challenges were primarily related to participant vulnerabilities (e.g., hospitalization, incarceration, loss of access to technology). Participants indicated high acceptance of the intervention and its telepsychology format. In conclusion, while PWID face significant barriers to engaging in treatment, some also demonstrate a desire, willingness, and capacity for psychological intervention. Remote interventions may help increase feasibility of treatment participation. Future studies should examine longer harm reduction-focused treatments for PWID that balance barriers to initial engagement with the need to reinforce treatment gains and improve long-term outcomes.

Substance-related poisoning hospitalizations and homelessness in Canada: a descriptive study.

The objective of this analysis is to describe patient demographics, the context, characteristics and outcomes of a substance-related poisoning, and the recorded mental disorder of people with housing and those experiencing homelessness. Hospitalization data for Canada (except Quebec) from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020 were retrieved from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Abstract Database using ICD-10-CA codes for up to 25 diagnoses for substance-related poisonings, homelessness status and other characteristics relevant to the patient's hospitalization. We compared the characteristics of people experiencing homelessness with those of people who were housed, and their substance-related poisoning hospitalizations, using chi-square, t tests and Fisher exact test. There was a higher proportion of males, younger individuals and people with recorded mental disorders among people experiencing homelessness hospitalized for a substance-related poisoning than among their housed counterparts. Substance-related poisonings among people experiencing homelessness were more likely to be accidental, involve opioids and stimulants (most frequently fentanyl and its analogues and heroin), result in lengthier hospitalizations and end with leaving the hospital against medical advice. These findings can be used to strengthen strategies and interventions to reduce substance-related harms in priority populations, particularly those experiencing homelessness.

Effectiveness of substance use disorder treatment as an alternative to imprisonment

IntroductionDrug courts are criminal justice programs to divert people with substance use disorders from incarceration into treatment. Drug courts have become increasingly popular in the US and other countries. However, their effectiveness in reducing important public health outcomes such as recidivism and substance-related health harms remains ambiguous and contested. We used nationwide register data from Sweden to evaluate the effectiveness of contract treatment sanction, the Swedish version of drug court, in reducing substance misuse, adverse somatic and mental health outcomes, and recidivism.MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, two quasi-experimental designs were used: difference-in-differences and the within-individual design. In the latter, we compared the risk of outcomes during time on contract treatment to, 1) parole after imprisonment and, 2) probation.ResultsThe cohort included 11,893 individuals (13% women) who underwent contract treatment. Contract treatment was associated with a reduction of 7 percentage points (95% CI: -.088, -.055) in substance misuse, 5 percentage points (-.064, -.034) in adverse mental health events, 9 percentage points (-.113, -.076) in adverse somatic health events, and 3 fewer charges (-3.16, -2.85) for crime in difference-in-differences analyses. Within-individual associations suggested that the same individual had longer times-to-event for all outcomes during contract treatment than on parole or on probation.ConclusionsContract treatment is an effective intervention from both public health and criminal justice perspective. Our findings suggest that it is a superior alternative to incarceration in its target group. Further, we find that an implementation approach that is less punitive and more inclusive than what is typical in the US can be successful.

Global perspectives on substance use treatment: A review of cross-cultural approaches and conceptual solutions for public health

Substance use disorders represent a significant public health challenge worldwide, necessitating a nuanced understanding of cultural variations in treatment approaches. This review examines global perspectives on substance use treatment, focusing on cross-cultural approaches and conceptual solutions aimed at enhancing public health outcomes. Cross-cultural perspectives underscore the importance of recognizing diverse cultural beliefs, values, and practices in addressing substance use disorders. Cultural factors such as stigma, religious beliefs, and societal norms profoundly influence individuals' perceptions of substance use and treatment-seeking behaviors. Understanding these cultural nuances is crucial for developing effective interventions tailored to specific populations. Moreover, this review explores various treatment modalities that have been implemented across different cultural contexts. From traditional healing practices rooted in indigenous knowledge to evidence-based interventions adapted for cultural relevance, a spectrum of approaches exists to address substance use disorders globally. Integrating traditional healing methods with modern evidence-based treatments showcases promising outcomes in promoting recovery and reducing substance-related harm. Furthermore, conceptual solutions for enhancing public health outcomes emphasize the importance of a comprehensive and holistic approach. This includes addressing social determinants of health, promoting community engagement, and fostering collaboration between diverse stakeholders, including governments, healthcare providers, and community organizations. This review highlights the necessity of adopting culturally sensitive approaches to substance use treatment to effectively address the complex interplay between culture, health beliefs, and treatment outcomes. By recognizing and respecting cultural diversity, we can develop more inclusive and effective strategies to mitigate the impact of substance use disorders on individuals and communities worldwide.

Trends in opioid toxicities among people with and without opioid use disorder and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada: A population-based analysis

BackgroundAcross Canada, the COVID-19 pandemic occurred amidst an ongoing drug toxicity crisis. Although elevated rates of substance-related harms have been observed nationally, it remains unknown if the pandemic state of emergency led to disproportionate increases in opioid toxicities among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) compared to those without. MethodsWe conducted a population-based repeated cross-sectional time series analysis of fatal and non-fatal opioid toxicities between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021, in Ontario, Canada. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to examine the impact of the pandemic on monthly rates of opioid toxicities per 100,000 Ontario residents stratified by people with and without OUD. ResultsWe identified 80,296 opioid toxicities of which 53.5 % occurred among people with OUD. Among 52,052 unique individuals, 60.5 % were male and 46.2 % were 25–44 years old. Between January 2014 and December 2021, the rate of opioid toxicities increased from 2.6 to 10.5 per 100,000 (rate ratio [RR]=4.07). The magnitude of this increase differed among people with OUD (0.8 to 7.4 per 100,000; RR=9.35) and without OUD (1.8 to 3.1 per 100,000; RR=1.74). We observed a significant ramp increase in the overall rate of opioid toxicities following the declaration of the pandemic emergency in March 2020 (+0.19 per 100,000 monthly, 95 % CI: 0.029, 0.36, p = 0.021). In a stratified analysis, we found a similar ramp increase among people with OUD (+0.19 per 100,000 monthly, 95 % CI: 0.10, 0.28, p < 0.001); however, this was not observed among people without OUD (p = 0.95). ConclusionsThe rate of opioid toxicities accelerated across Ontario following the pandemic-related state of emergency, with the majority of this increase among people with OUD. The important differences observed among people with OUD compared with those without, highlights the critical need for improved access to harm reduction and treatment interventions among this population.

Commentary: Similarities and Differences Between Harm-Reduction and Substitute Addiction-- Implications for the Health Professions.

"Substitute addiction" refers to the process of achieving abstinence or resolution of one addictive behavior and subsequently engaging in one or more additional addictive behaviors in its place. Substitute addiction, a concept in the abstinence-based recovery field for decades, is viewed as a cause for concern because resolving one addictive behavior might not fully remove harm or ensure recovery. Conversely, "harm-reduction treatment" refers to a counseling orientation that focuses on helping service users reduce substance-related harm and improve their quality of life without necessarily requiring abstinence or use reduction. Harm-reduction treatment assesses a constellation of addictive behaviors in the larger context of a person's life to holistically reduce harm in that constellation. In this commentary, we define and compare both constructs and point out their implications for addictions treatment.

“We don’t even know where it’s kept”: exploring perspectives on naloxone administration by provincial correctional workers in Manitoba, Canada

PurposePrisonersare at disproportionate risk of suffering substance-related harms. The administration of naloxone is essential to reversing opioid overdose and minimizing substance-related harms in prison and the community. The purpose of this study is to examine how naloxone administration is practiced and perceived in prison settings.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted surveys with correctional workers in Manitoba, Canada (n = 257) to examine how they understand and feel about the need for and practice of administering naloxone in their everyday work with criminalized populations.FindingsRespondents reported feeling a great need to administer naloxone, but most did not feel adequately trained to administer naloxone, creating the perception that criminalized populations remain at enhanced risk.Originality/valueFindings provide emerging evidence of the need for training and accompanying policies and procedures for correctional workers on how to access and administer naloxone.

An environmental scan of residential treatment service provision in Ontario

BackgroundOntario has one of the highest rates of substance-related harms in Canada. Residential treatment programs in the province provide a variety of in-house treatment services to support the needs of individuals with substance use disorders (SUD). However, these programs are not standardized, often varying in the type, quality, and availability of services offered, including evidence-based interventions such as Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT). Local treatment systems are also rather fragmented and complex to navigate, creating barriers for potential services users to identify and make informed choices on available treatment options.MethodsBetween May to August 2023, we conducted an environmental scan to capture available information on all publicly-funded residential treatment programs in Ontario using the ConnexOntario service portal, a government-funded, health services information platform. Data were captured on organization name, geographical location, program description, program type (residential addictions treatment or supportive recovery programs), eligibility criteria, target population, the program’s OAT policies, number of available beds, minimum and maximum length of stay, projected wait times, funding source, and associated fees for program admission. Data were extracted and organized by geographic region, and findings were presented descriptively.ResultsA total of 102 residential addiction treatment programs and 36 residential supportive recovery programs in Ontario were identified. The scan noted substantial regional variations in program availability and wait times, along with a lack of programs tailored to unique populations such as women, youth, and Indigenous peoples. There is also a paucity of publicly-available information on program offerings, including detailed specifics on OAT policies within residential treatment programs that are crucial to ensuring that the services being offered are safe and grounded in evidence-based practice.ConclusionsFindings from the scan highlight notable gaps in program types, offerings, and availability among residential treatment programs in the province, including a lack of standardization on OAT policies across programs. Efforts should be made to ensure access to treatment-specific program information relevant to potential service users and to enhance coordinated access to residential treatment services in the province.

Bridging the gap: building and sustaining recovery capital in the transition from prison to recovery residences

The transition from jail to community is a high-risk time for individuals experiencing substance use disorders (SUD), with elevated risks of overdose and other substance-related harms, as well as high recidivism rates and re-incarceration. Gains made from successful treatment in prison are often lost in this transition. The current paper evaluates this process for one justice programme, Chesterfield HARP, a Therapeutic Community based in the Chesterfield County jail that continues supporting former inmates through their release by examining engagement and retention rates and changes in recovery capital among incarcerated individuals before incarceration and after transition to recovery housing in the community. Adult prisoners (both male and female) who engaged in the Chesterfield HARP programme completed an assessment of recovery capital (REC-CAP instrument) while in prison and following their transitions to one of a number of local recovery residences with strong links to the prison programme (ensuring continuity of care and support). The results suggest successful bridging with positive growth across multiple recovery capital domains. The study provides further evidence for the importance of continuity of care and integrated models of strength-building and recovery-focused interventions in successfully bridging the transition from prison to the community for offenders with a SUD history.

Resilience Through Harm Reduction? Protective Behavioral Strategies as a Factor of Resilience Among Polish Young Adults Using Various Psychoactive Substances

ABSTRACT Resiliency theory might provide a conceptual framework for understanding why adverse substance-related consequences vary considerably among young adults using psychoactive substances. Protective behavioral strategies (PBS) are behaviors that reduce substance use and related consequences. Despite such suggestions, to date no research has explicitly treated PBS as resilience factors. The purpose of this study was to examine compensatory and protective models of resilience among young adults using various substances. Data were obtained from an online questionnaire distributed through online social networks. Participants were Polish young adults (18–30 years old; M = 22, SD = 3.6; about 30% female and 1.3% non-binary; N = 7253), who reported using substances, other than alcohol or nicotine, in the last 12 months. After controlling for sociodemographics, hierarchical regression analyses of both substance-related harms and SUDs indicated the main effects of risk and protective factors, and the interaction between substance use and PBS. The models explained about 50% and 52% of the dependent variables variance, respectively. The results of this cross-sectional study provide support for both compensatory and protective models of resilience. This presents a rationale for recognizing PBS use as resilience factors that help young adults reduce substance-related harms. Theoretical discussion and practical implications are provided.

Moral injury and substance use among United States healthcare workers.

Moral injury (i.e., perpetrating, witnessing, failing to prevent, or being a victim of acts that transgress one's moral beliefs, values, or ethics) has largely been studied in military-connected populations and is associated with a range of adverse psychological sequelae. Emerging literature suggests that healthcare workers also experience moral injury, particularly in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is not known if moral injury contributes to substance use among healthcare workers or whether these effects might differ by gender, race/ethnicity, or occupational level. In March 2022, we collected self-reported pilot data from a diverse sample of US healthcare workers (N=200) We examined the cross-sectional relationships between moral injury and several measures of substance use (i.e., current non-medical use of prescription drugs [NMUPD], current cannabis use, current use of other illicit drugs, and hazardous drinking) using separate logistic regression models. Next, we used separate interaction models to examine if any of these relations differed by gender, race/ethnicity, or occupational level. In main effects models, healthcare workers reporting greater moral injury had greater odds of current NMUPD (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.07; p<0.001), current use of other illicit drugs (aOR=1.09; p<0.01), and hazardous drinking (aOR=1.07; p<0.01). These relations did not differ by race/ethnicity or occupational level (ps>0.05); however, men were more likely to report current NMUPD and hazardous drinking (ps<0.05) in the presence of high moral injury than women healthcare workers. Our findings suggest that healthcare workers experience substantial distress related to morally injurious events, which may affect their likelihood of NMUPD, cannabis use, use of other illicit drugs, and hazardous drinking, and that men in healthcare may be particularly at risk. Healthcare organizations should address systemic issues driving moral injury (e.g., resource shortages, lack of psychosocial support) to prevent substance-related harms among healthcare workers.

Development and validation of the Substance Use Protective Strategies Scale (SUPSS) among Polish young adults using various psychoactive substances.

Research supports protective behavioral strategies (PBS) as effective in reducing substance use, intoxication, and/or related risks/harms. However, despite the predominance of polysubstance use and common co-occurrence of different substance use disorders (SUDs), previous PBS research has been limited in terms of substance-specific measurement. This study sought to develop and validate a measure of PBS that is not substance-specific. Building from initial pilot work, we tested the psychometric properties of the Substance Use Protective Strategies Scale (SUPSS) in a large sample of young adults (N=7325, aged 18-30), who reported using multiple psychoactive substances (other than alcohol and nicotine), recruited via social media in Poland. By splitting the sample, we conducted exploratory (n=3709) and confirmatory factor analysis (n=3614), which supported a 4-factor structure with 19 items (7 items dropped): Preparation for use (α=0.66), Manner of use (α=0.85), Additional concerns (α=0.74), and Setting (α=0.62). Configural, metric and scalar invariance were supported across sex, age, and user status for most substance types (cannabis, dissociatives, etc.). Further, the SUPSS factors were strongly associated with substance-related harms (R-squared=0.495) and SUD symptoms (DUDIT, R-squared=0.570). Our model fit was adequate (but not excellent), and two subscales had low internal consistency, highlighting the need for further improvement of the SUPSS. Despite its limitations, we found the SUPSS to have strong psychometric properties and it holds promise to enhance PBS research and harm reduction-oriented interventions.

Long-Acting Buprenorphine Formulations as a New Strategy for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

Long-acting buprenorphine formulations have been recently marketed for the Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) of opioid use disorder (OUD) associated with medical, social, and psychological support. Their duration of action ranges from one week up to 6 months. The non-medical use of opioids is increasing with a parallel rise in lethal overdoses. Methadone and buprenorphine are the standard treatment for opioid dependence. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing the risks of overdose, crime, and transmission of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) in people who use opioids; however, its effectiveness has been hindered by low rates of uptake and retention in treatment. Furthermore, both methadone and buprenorphine are widely diverted and misused. Thus, a crucial aspect of treating OUD is facilitating patients' access to treatment while minimizing substance-related harm and improving quality of life. The newly developed long-acting buprenorphine formulations represent a significant change in the paradigm of OUD treatment, allowing an approach individualized to patients' needs. Strengths of this individualized approach are improved adherence (lack of peaks and troughs in blood concentrations) and a reduced stigma since the patient doesn't need to attend their clinic daily or nearly daily, thus facilitating social and occupational integrations as the quality of life. However, less frequent attendance at the clinic should not affect the patient-physician relationship. Therefore, teleconsulting or digital therapeutic services should be developed in parallel. In addition, diversion and intravenous misuse of buprenorphine are unlikely due to the characteristics of these formulations. These features make this approach of interest for treating OUD in particular settings, such as subjects staying or when released from prison or those receiving long-term residential treatment for OUD in the therapeutic communities. The long-lasting formulations of buprenorphine can positively impact the OUD treatment and suggest future medical and logistic developments to maximize their personalized management and impact.

Trends in Opioid Toxicity–Related Deaths in the US Before and After the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2011-2021

Opioid-related harms constitute a major public health crisis in the US, and this crisis has worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. To characterize the societal burden of unintentional opioid-related deaths in the US and describe changing mortality patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. A serial cross-sectional study examined all unintentional opioid-related deaths in the US, evaluated annually from calendar years 2011 to 2021. The public health burden of opioid toxicity-related deaths was estimated in 2 ways. First, the proportion of all deaths that were attributable to unintentional opioid toxicity by year (2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2019, and 2021) and age group (15-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-74 years) were calculated, using age-specific estimates of all-cause mortality as the denominator. Second, the total years of life lost (YLL) due to unintentional opioid toxicity was estimated, overall and by sex and age group, for each year studied. Among the 422 605 unintentional deaths due to opioid toxicity between 2011 and 2021, the median age of the individuals was 39 (IQR, 30-51) years, and 69.7% were male. The number of unintentional deaths due to opioid toxicity increased 289% over the study period, from 19 395 (2011) to 75 477 (2021). Similarly, the percentage of all deaths that were attributed to opioid toxicity increased from 1.8% in 2011 to 4.5% in 2021. By 2021, opioid toxicity was responsible for 10.2% of all deaths among those aged 15 to 19 years, 21.7% of deaths among those aged 20 to 29 years, and 21.0% of deaths among those aged 30 to 39 years. The YLL due to opioid toxicity increased 276% over the study period, from 777 597 in 2011 to 2 922 497 in 2021. While YLL plateaued between 2017 (7.0 YLL per 1000) and 2019 (7.2 YLL per 1000), it increased by 62.9% between 2019 and 2021 coincident with the COVID-19 pandemic, reaching 11.7 YLL per 1000 population. This relative increase was similar across all age groups and sexes with the exception of those aged 15 to 19 years, in whom the YLL nearly tripled, from 1.5 to 3.9 YLL per 1000 population. In this cross-sectional study, deaths due to opioid toxicity increased substantially during the COVID-19 pandemic. By 2021, 1 of every 22 deaths in the US was attributable to unintentional opioid toxicity, underscoring the urgent need to support people at risk of substance-related harm, particularly men, younger adults, and adolescents.

Reduction in Substance-Related Composite Harm Scores Through Street Soccer.

Introduction Street soccer makes the sport accessible to people affected by homelessness or precarious housing. There is overwhelming evidence that exercise improves physical and mental health. In addition, sport facilitates positive peer pressure that leads to beneficial life changes. Method To examine participants' accounts of the effects of street soccer in a sample of socially disadvantaged players from Western Canada, we collected 73 cross-sectional self-reports of life changes via a questionnaire. The questionnaire included questions on social, mental, and physical health, including substance use. This allowed the calculation of a modified composite harm score. Results Participants reported improved physical (46% of participants) and mental (43% of participants) health, reduced cigarette (50% of smokers), alcohol (45% of users), cannabis (42% of users), and other non-prescribed drug use, increased number of friends (88% of participants), improved housing (60% of participants), increased income (19% of participants), increased community medical supports (40% of participants), and decreased conflicts with police (47% of those with prior recent conflict). Perceived reductions in substance use were supported by significant changes in composite harm score. Conclusion Street soccer appears to promote improved physical, mental, and social health among people affected by homelessness or precarious housing,with reduction in substance use likely to be a key factor. This work builds upon past qualitative research showing thebenefits of street soccer and supports future research which may help elucidate the mechanisms by which street soccer has beneficial effects.