Sir: We appreciate Dr. Freshwater’s comments. Thumb replantation is a technically difficult procedure. Comments and discussion about this procedure should benefit us all. The intent of the article was to present a different technique for revascularization of an amputated thumb. The technique combines a vein transposition from the dorsum of the index metacarpal to the thumb, providing venous outflow with one anastomosis. An arterial conduit, rather than a venous conduit, is used to re-establish arterial inflow. As cited, others have described these techniques for different circumstances. We combined these techniques to provide blood supply to the replanted thumb. Our data do not allow us to claim that this technique is better than another. Rather, it is a suitable alternative. Arterial grafts have advantages and disadvantages over vein grafts. The article discusses these elements. Having used both arterial and venous grafts, we prefer arterial grafts, but we cannot prove that they are better. To our knowledge, to date, the use of an arterial graft has not impaired subsequent medical care to a patient. Our patients have had no local vascular issues following arterial graft harvest. Our cardiac surgeons do use radial artery for coronary bypass but have not progressed to using the deep inferior epigastric artery. In that regard, our patients have been fortunate. Are arterial grafts more than is needed? We cannot say. Have we used a free flap for reconstruction when a less invasive technique would have allowed healing of a wound? Yes. But in the end, the sum total of the advantages and disadvantages of the free flap outweighed that of the less involved alternatives. We believe the same is true of arterial grafts in this instance. We appreciate the reviewer’s insightful comments on our article and will incorporate them into future medical decisions. W. Bradford Rockwell, M.D. Jaime Haidenberg, M.D. K. Bo Foreman, Ph.D. Plastic Surgery University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah