Rotavirus gastroenteritis is responsible for substantial childhood morbidity worldwide, and is a leading cause of mortality among infants and young children in resource-limited environments. A new generation of rotavirus vaccines offers the promise of saving lives, reducing suffering, and decreasing healthcare resource utilization for this nearly universal early childhood infection. Two efficacious and well-tolerated rotavirus vaccines have been developed based on very different strategies. We recently reported the results of the large, international, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled Rotavirus Efficacy and Safety Trial (REST), which studied the safety and efficacy of an oral pentavalent human–bovine reassortant rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) in healthy infants given the first of 3 doses between 6 and 12 weeks of age. Because the incidence of natural intussusception peaks in children between 4 and 9 months old, younger infants were enrolled to maximize the ability to detect any increased risk of vaccine-related intussusception. The rotavirus serotypes included in the vaccine were selected because they cause the large majority of rotavirus infections in both the developing and developed world. The rationale for including multiple serotypes in the vaccine derives from natural history studies showing that primary rotavirus infection provides immunity against subsequent illness of any severity from the same serotype and protection against severe disease from any serotype (N Engl J Med 1996;335:1022–1028). Although partial protection can be achieved with 2 doses of the pentavalent vaccine, 3 doses are required for optimally broad immune responses (Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:577–583). Bovine-rotavirus reassortants replicate less efficiently than the simian-rotavirus reassortants (J Infect Dis 2001;183:1108–1111) used in the previously licensed and subsequently withdrawn rhesus rotavirus vaccine—tetravalent (RRV-TV; RotaShield) associated with an increased risk of intussusception during the 2 weeks following vaccination. REST did not demonstrate a higher rate of intussusception in vaccine compared to placebo recipients. Furthermore, unlike RRV-TV (Pediatrics 2004;113:e353–359), the incidence of fever and gastrointestinal complications were generally comparable among recipients of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine and placebo. In light of its rarity, formal post-licensure surveillance for intussusception is continuing. Further analysis of the REST database suggests that the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine will be effective in premature and breastfed infants. Subgroup analyses of Navajo and Jamaican subjects indicate that the pentavalent vaccine can be effective in resource-restrained settings. Because conditions affecting infant health differ around the world, confirmatory clinical trials are being initiated in developing regions of Africa and Asia. Pentavalent rotavirus vaccine can be administered concurrently with the parenteral pediatric vaccines licensed in the United States; concomitant use with oral poliovirus vaccine is currently under study. Given the inclusion criteria established for REST, available safety and efficacy data presently can only support a recommendation for administering the first dose of the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine at 2–3 months of age and completing the full series by age 6–8 months. However, an unintended consequence of age restrictions may be preventable morbidity from rotavirus gastroenteritis among unvaccinated older children. The potential impact of a safe and effective rotavirus vaccine program on global infant health cannot be overstated. We agree with Drs Kamal-Uddin and Croft that “the wheel has turned” for rotavirus vaccines, and look forward to a future when rotavirus no longer poses a major threat to the well-being of children anywhere in the world. The authors may own stock or stock options in Merck & Co., which markets RotaTeq. Rotavirus vaccines: The wheel has turnedGastroenterologyVol. 131Issue 4PreviewRuiz-Palacios GM, Perez-Scchael I, Velazquez FR, Abate H, Breuer T, Clemens SC, Cheuvart B, Espinoza F, Gillard P, Innis BL, Cervantes Y, Linhares AC, Lopez P, Macias-Parra M, Ortega-Barria E, Richardson V, Rivera-Medina DM, Rivera L, Salinas B, Pavia-Ruz N, Salmeron J, Ruttimann R, Tinoco JC, Rubio P, Nunez E, Guerrero ML, Yarzabal JP, Damaso S, Tornieporth N, Saez-Llorens X, Vergara RF, Vesikari T, Bouckenooghe A, Clemens R, De Vos B, O’Ryan M; the Human Rotavirus Vaccine Study Group. (Instituto Nacional de Ciencas Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico Distrito Federal, Mexico). Full-Text PDF