P99 Aims: Introduction: The aging donor (D) and recipient (R) population has led to new challenges in kidney transplantation (KT). Controversy exists regarding the optimal approach to the elderly D or R. A number of strategies have been proposed including matching by age, medical risk, serology, HLA, size, or nephron mass. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our single center experience in deceased donor (DD) KT with respect to age. Methods: From 10/1/01 through 11/15/03, we performed a total of 129 DD KTs, including 33 (26%) in Rs ≥60 years and 96 (74%) in Rs 19-59 years of age. The DD pool included 51 expanded criteria donors (ECD; defined and allocated according to UNOS policy) and 78 standard criteria donors (SCD; defined as non-ECD). ECD kidneys were utilized by matching estimated renal functional mass to recipient size (BMI <25 kg/m2), including the use of dual KTs (N=8). ECD kidney Rs were further selected based on age >40 and low immunologic risk. Rs received rATG or alemtuzumab induction in combination with tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids; those ≥60 had lower tacrolimus targets and MMF doses. Results: The mean age differed significantly between R groups (65 vs 46 years, p<.001), including 7 patients >70. In Rs ≥60, 22 (67%) received KTs from ECDs compared to 29 from ECDs (30%, p<.001) in Rs <60. Other demographic and transplant characteristics were similar among groups. Patient survival is 97% in Rs ≥60 compared to 99% in Rs <60 (p=NS) with a mean follow-up of 12 months. Kidney graft survival rates are 94% in Rs ≥60 vs 89% in Rs <60, p=NS. Initial and subsequent graft function, rejection, infection, re-operations, length of stay, re-admissions, and resource utilization were similar among groups. Nine patients had opportunistic viral infections (5 CMV, 3 polyomavirus nephropathy, 1 EBV-associated PTLD), including 4 (12.5%) in Rs ≥60 compared to 5 (5%, p=NS) in Rs <60. However, all 9 cases occurred in ECD Rs (18% ECD vs 0 SCD Rs, p<.001). Conclusions: By matching nephron mass with R size and avoiding the use of ECD kidneys in high immunologic risk Rs, short-term outcomes that are comparable to SCD kidneys in younger patients can be achieved with either older Ds or Rs, regardless of age. However, the risk of viral infection is higher in ECD Rs, and long-term follow-up is needed to ultimately determine the risks and benefits of KT in this setting.