AbstractExtratropical intraseasonal oscillations (EISO), which is akin to the tropical ISO, significantly influence mid‐high‐latitude intraseasonal variability. Previous studies have shown that biases in the dynamical prediction of EISOs reduce the accuracy of subseasonal forecasts for extreme events, particularly in extratropical regions. However, the current dynamical prediction skills of EISO and associated dependence remain unclarified. Based on the recently proposed EISO metrics, which represent three dominant zonally propagating EISO modes traveling along the westerly jets, this study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of the EISOs' prediction skill in 13 state‐of‐the‐art subseasonal‐to‐seasonal (S2S) prediction project models. Firstly, the S2S models display skill to predict the EISOs out to a range of 9–20 days, which demonstrates higher predictability compared to other conventional circulation modes in the extratropics. In the subseasonal prediction, EISOs' amplitudes are underestimated, and their propagating speeds feature large random errors in all S2S models. Secondly, the EISOs' prediction skill depends on their initial/target amplitude, particularly for strong target amplitudes, which showcase higher skill than weak‐amplitude EISOs. Thirdly, although the EISOs' prediction skill is sensitive to the EISOs' phase, it is not locked to any fixed phase, indicating that EISOs do not have an inherent prediction barrier like the tropical ISO. This study also discusses how the humidity initialization and ensemble sizes influence the EISOs' prediction skill, suggesting that increasing the ensemble members in the saturation range is an effective way of improving the prediction for extratropical subseasonal variation and related extreme events.
Read full abstract