Submuscular Transposition Research Articles

Treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome with ulnar nerve anterior submuscular transposition and medial epicondyle muscle group in situ reconstruction via a bone tunnel

Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of treating moderate to severe cubital tunnel syndrome with ulnar nerve decompression,anterior submuscular transposition and medial epicondyle muscle group in situ reconstruction via a bone tunnel.Methods The clinical data of 45 cases of moderate to severe cubital tunnel syndrome diagnosed between January 2005 and October 2012 were analyzed.The ulnar nerve was decompressed and its perfnsion by the superior ulnar collateral artery was observed under the surgical microscope intraoperatively.After ulnar nerve was transposed anteriorly,the detached medial epicondyle muscle group was reconstructed in situ through a bone tuunel under direct view.The size of the new ulnar nerve tunnel and mobility of the ulnar nerve were observed.Postoperative recovery was follow-up including pain,sensation,muscular atrophy recovery,claw hand,grip strength,wrist flexion and forearm pronation.Results All 45 cases were follow-up for 6 to 18 months.Intraoperative microscopic observation showed good ulnar nerve perfusion by the superior ulnar collateral artery.Reattachment of the medial epicondyle muscle group was secure.The newly formed cubital tunnel could allow an 8 mm dilator without tension in elbow full extension position.Ulnar nerve could glide freely upon elbow flexion and extension.According to the cubital tunnel syndrome function evaluation standard suggested by Gu Yudong,the results were graded as excellent in 20 cases,good in 17 cases,and fair in 8 cases.The overall excellent and good rate was 82.22％.Wrist flexion and forearm pronation force recovered to preoperative level in all the patients 3 months after the operation.Conclusion Including superior ulnar collateral artery in the anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve provides good blood supply to the nerve and benefits nerve recovery.In situ reconstruction of the medial epicondyle muscle group through a bone tunnel puts the ulnar nerve anderneath flexor carpi ulnaris and pronator teres.The new tunnel is big enough to avoid compression of the nerve.The surrounding tissues are loose so there will be neither ulnar nerve compression around the elbow nor nerve stretch upon elbow flexion.Muscle reattachment via a bone tunnel is secure.No postoperative elbow immobilization with a cast is needed.This allows early protected movement and early return to normal life and work. Key words: Cubital tunnel syndrome; Humerus; Anterior submuscular transposition; Bone tunnel; Reconstruction in situ

Revision Decompression and Collagen Nerve Wrap for Recurrent and Persistent Compression Neuropathies of the Upper Extremity

Recurrent or persistent compression neuropathies of the upper extremity, including carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome, present a difficult treatment challenge to the hand or peripheral nerve surgeon. Collagen conduits have been used successfully for decades in nerve injury repair, but have not been studied in the treatment of compression neuropathy. Patients with recurrent or persistent compression neuropathies treated with a repeat decompression and collagen wrap from a 5-year period were retrieved from the Computerized Patient Record System database and 15 patient records were identified. A systematic review was performed for all articles from 1946 to 2012 on secondary carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. The mean age of the 15 patients treated was 63.3 years and ranged from 35 to 86 years. The patients with revision carpal tunnel decompression had an 89% subjective response rate, whereas those with revision cubital tunnel decompression had an 83% resolution or improvement of symptoms. Visual analog scale decreased from a preoperative mean 2.47 to 0.47 postoperatively and the mean number of opiate medications decreased from 0.67 to 0.40. We identified 32 papers using various treatment strategies for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome with success rates ranging from 53% to 100%. We identified 18 papers on recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome, with success rates ranging from 33% to 100%, with a weighted success of 78.1% overall but 71.7% in the submuscular transposition group. Here we report on the novel technique of using a collagen matrix wrap in recurrent compression neuropathies with good success. The collagen wrap allows nerve gliding, protection from perineural scar formation, and a favorable microenvironment. Submuscular transposition seems to be no better than other methods of decompression for recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome in contrary to traditional teaching.

Cubital tunnel syndrome: Comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92 months

BackgroundCubital tunnel syndrome is the second most frequent entrapment syndrome. Physiopathology is mixed, and treatment options are multiple, none having yet proved superior efficacy. ObjectivesThe present retrospective multicenter study compared results and rates of complications and recurrence between the 4 main cubital tunnel syndrome treatments, to identify trends and optimize outcome. Materialand methodsPatients presenting with primary clinical cubital tunnel syndrome diagnosed on electroneuromyography were included and operated on using 1 of the following 4 techniques: open or endoscopic in situ decompression, or subcutaneous or submuscular anterior transposition. Four specialized upper-limb surgery centers participated, each systematically performing 1 of the above procedures. Subjective and objective results and rates of complications and recurrence were compared at end of follow-up. ResultsFive hundred and two patients were included and 375 followed up for a mean 92months (range, 9–144months); 103 were lost to follow-up and 24 died. Whichever the procedure, more than 90% of patients were cured or showed improvement. There was a single case of scar pain at end of follow-up, managed by endoscopic decompression; there were no other long-term complications. None of the 4 techniques aggravated symptoms. There were 6 recurrences by end of follow-up: 1 associated with open in situ decompression and 5 with submuscular transposition. ConclusionSurgery was effective in treating cubital tunnel syndrome. Submuscular anterior transposition was associated with recurrence. In contrast to literature reports, subcutaneous anterior transposition, which is a reliable and valid technique, was not associated with a higher complication rate than in situ decompression. Level of evidenceLevel IV. Multicenter retrospective.

Minimum 6-Year Follow-Up After Ulnar Nerve Decompression and Submuscular Transposition for Primary Entrapment

To retrospectively evaluate patients with 6-year minimum follow-up after submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for primary entrapment. From 1992 to 2005, 142 patients were treated surgically for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow by 2 senior surgeons using a technique that preserved nerve vascularity. A total of 99 cases were eligible, and 82 elbows in 76 patients, average age 48 years, were followed for at least 6 years (average, 8.3 y). Thirty-two (42%) were male, and the dominant limb was involved in 49 (64%). The average duration of symptoms before surgery was 25 months. Clinical records were reviewed, and sensory (S0-2) and motor (M0-5) testing was performed. Dellon scores were determined, and visual analog scale and modified questionnaires from Novak et al and Kleinman and Bishop were completed. Preoperatively, 48 elbows were Dellon grade III, 33 were grade II, and one was grade I. There were clinically and statistically significant improvements in patient and surgeon-reported data regardless of the preoperative disease severity. Visual analog scale questionnaires, sensory scale, and motor strength all improved, with at least antigravity strength in all subjects. Dellon scores also improved, and 38 elbows had normalized to Dellon 0. Of the 33 preoperative elbows that were grade III, 15 improved to grade II, 13 to grade I, and 5 normalized. Of the 48 preoperative elbows that were grade II, 16 improved to grade I and 32 normalized. Preoperative Dellon III elbows had more residual symptoms than grade II elbows. A total of 73 elbows (89%) had a good or excellent outcome. There were no reoperations or infections. Submuscular transposition is a safe and durable option for primary ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Overall, good or excellent results were achieved in 89% of patients with a low complication rate. Therapeutic IV.

Surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a comparative analysis of outcome using four different techniques

Background Various options exist for the surgical management of cubital tunnel syndrome. The goals of this study were to compare the outcome of four different surgical techniques: (1) simple decompression, (2) endoscopic decompression, (3) anterior subcutaneous transposition, and (4) anterior sub-muscular transposition for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.

Treatment of Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: Cost–Utility Analysis

The choice of surgical treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) remains controversial. A cost-utility analysis was performed for 4 surgical UNE treatment options. We hypothesized that simple decompression would emerge as the most cost-effective strategy. A cost-utility analysis was performed from the societal perspective. A decision analytic model was designed comparing 4 strategies: (1) simple decompression followed by a salvage surgery (anterior submuscular transposition) for a poor outcome, (2) anterior subcutaneous transposition followed by a salvage surgery for a poor outcome, (3) medial epicondylectomy followed by a salvage surgery for a poor outcome, and (4) anterior submuscular transposition. A poor outcome when anterior submuscular transposition was the initial surgery was considered an end point in the model. Preference values for temporary health states for UNE, the surgical procedures, and the complications were obtained through a time trade-off survey administered to family members and friends who accompanied patients to physician visits. Probabilities of clinical outcomes were derived from a Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis and a systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE search of the literature. Medical care costs (in 2009 U.S. dollars) were derived from Medicare reimbursement rates. The model estimated quality-adjusted life-years and costs for a 3-year time horizon. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated, and sensitivity analyses performed. Simple decompression as an initial procedure was the most cost-effective treatment strategy. A multi-way sensitivity analysis varying the preference values for the surgeries and a model structure sensitivity analysis varying the model assumptions did not change the conclusion. Under all evaluated scenarios, simple decompression yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios less than US$2,027 per quality-adjusted life-year. Simple decompression as an initial treatment option is cost-effective for UNE according to commonly used cost-effectiveness thresholds. Economic and Decision Analysis III.

Bilateral snapping ulnar nerve syndrome in a professional decathlete—a rare case report and review of the literature

We highlight a case of bilateral ulnar nerve instability in a young, competitive decathlete. The symptoms proved disabling to the athlete’s daily training routine and required operative measures in the form of an anterior submuscular transposition without epicondylectomy. The procedure proved effective with complete resolution of troublesome symptoms. Within 6 months post-operatively, the patient returned to train and perform at an elite national standard in his sport.

Comparative Study of Different Surgical Transposition Methods for Ulnar Nerve Entrapment at the Elbow

This study compared the therapeutic effects of two techniques for surgical decompression treatment for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: subcutaneous transposition and modified submuscular transposition with Z-lengthening of the pronator teres origin. A total of 278 patients with ulnar nerve entrapment (McGowan grades I - III) were randomly assigned to undergo one of these techniques. All patients were followed-up for 2 years. The effects were assessed by preoperative and postoperative cross-sectional area, motor conduction velocity, sensory conduction velocity and nerve action potential. All of these parameters improved after surgery in both groups. For patients with grade I disease, there were no significant differences between the two techniques. For patients with grade II and III disease, modified submuscular transposition was associated with significantly greater improvements compared with subcutaneous transposition. In conclusion, subcutaneous ulnar nerve transposition is recommended for grade I patients and modified submuscular ulnar nerve transposition for grade II and III patients.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome – A Review and Management Guidelines

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is the second most common peripheral nerve compression syndrome. In German-speaking countries, cubital tunnel syndrome is often referred to as sulcus ulnaris syndrome (retrocondylar groove syndrome). This term is anatomically incorrect, since the site of compression comprises not only the retrocondylar groove but the cubital tunnel, which consists of 3 parts: the retrocondylar groove, partially covered by the cubital tunnel retinaculum (lig. arcuatum or Osborne ligament), the humeroulnar arcade, and the deep flexor/pronator aponeurosis. According to Sunderland , cubital tunnel syndrome can be differentiated into a primary form (including anterior subluxation of the ulnar nerve and compression secondary to the presence of an anconeus epitrochlearis muscle) and a secondary form caused by deformation or other processes of the elbow joint. The clinical diagnosis is usually confirmed by nerve conduction studies. Recently, the use of ultrasound and MRI have become useful diagnostic tools by showing morphological changes in the nerve within the cubital tunnel. A differential diagnosis is essential in atypical cases, and should include such conditions as C8 radiculopathy, Pancoast tumor, and pressure palsy. Conservative treatment (avoiding exposure to external noxes and applying of night splints) may be considered in the early stages of cubital tunnel syndrome. When nonoperative treatment fails, or in patients who present with more advanced clinical findings, such as motor weakness, muscle atrophy, or fixed sensory changes, surgical treatment should be recommended. According to actual randomized controlled studies, the treatment of choice in primary cubital tunnel syndrome is simple in situ decompression, which has to be extended at least 5-6 cm distal to the medial epicondyle and can be performed by an open or endoscopic technique, both under local anesthesia. Simple decompression is also the therapy of choice in uncomplicated ulnar luxation and in most post-traumatic cases and other secondary forms. When the luxation is painful, or when the ulnar nerve actually "snaps" back and forth over the medial epicondyle of the humerus, subcutaneous anterior transposition may be performed. In cases of severe bone or tissue changes of the elbow (especially with cubitus valgus), the anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve may again be indicated. In cases of scarring, submuscular transposition may be preferred as it provides a healthy vascular bed for the nerve as well as soft tissue protection. Risks resulting from transposition include compromise in blood flow to the nerve as well as kinking of the nerve caused by insufficient proximal or distal mobilization. In these cases, revision surgery is necessary. Epicondylectomy is not common, at least in Germany. Recurrence of compression on the ulnar nerve at the elbow may occur. This review is based on the German Guideline "Diagnose und Therapie des Kubitaltunnelsyndroms" ( www.leitlinien.net ).

Hypertrichosis after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome

A 37-year-old male was seen for medial elbow pain and paresthesia on the medial side of his left forearm. He denied having any weakness or pain in the neck and the left shoulder. There was no antecedent trauma, and his medical history was unremarkable except for Graves’ disease and urolithiasis. The neurological examination disclosed a positive Tinel’s sign over the cubital tunnel, hypoesthesia in the forth and fifth fingers and mild weakness of the ulnar nerve innervated intrinsic hand muscles on the left upper extremity. There was no hypothenar or intrinsic muscle atrophy. Nerve conduction studies were consistent with entrapment of the left ulnar nerve at the level of the cubital tunnel (normal on the right side). Likewise, sonographic imaging revealed focal mild enlargement of the left ulnar nerve immediately proximal to the cubital tunnel. Initially, the patient was followed conservatively with a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, a static elbow splint and physical therapy for 2 months. However, as the patient’s symptoms did not improve, he underwent surgery where decompression and anterior submuscular transposition of the left ulnar nerve were performed via medial approach to the cubital tunnel. Postoperatively, the patient used a long arm–forearm cast was for 3 weeks. Thereafter, he noticed increased hair growth on the distribution of the ulnar nerve over the left forearm and hand (Fig. 1). He was called for a control visit with a diagnosis of local hypertrichosis. Increased growth of hair on nonandrogen-dependent parts of the body is called hypertrichosis. It is generally classified based on the time of onset (congenital or acquired) and distribution (localized or generalized) [1]. The etiologies for acquired localized hypertrichosis include inflammation involving the skin, such as produced by infection, recent surgery, trauma, radiation, burns, insect bites, dermatologic disorders, and medication, scleroderma, vascular conditions, cast application, and reflex sympathetic dystrophy [2–4]. It has been reported that hypertrichosis might even ensue in reflex sympathetic dystrophy secondary to lumbar disk herniation [4]. In our case, although surgery and cast use seemed to be the two possible contributors, our patient was interesting since hypertrichosis was present not only in one area but along the ulnar nerve dermatome. Therefore, keeping in mind the fact that increased blood supply is one of the main underlying mechanisms of hypertrichosis, we believe that altered sympathetic innervations (provided by the ulnar nerve) after release surgery might have played role in our patient. Accordingly, presenting this rare clinical scenario of hypertrichosis after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome, we imply that similar complaints may occur not only due to the neural injury itself but also during the period of neural recovery.

Anteromedial Elbow Arthroscopy Portals in Patients With Prior Ulnar Nerve Transposition or Subluxation

The purpose of this study was to document management strategies and complications relating to the use of anteromedial portals for elbow arthroscopy in a series of patients with subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerves. A review of 913 elbow arthroscopies showed that 59 elbows with a subluxating or previously transposed ulnar nerve required anterior compartment arthroscopic surgery. The patients with subluxating nerves had proximal anteromedial portals established by reducing and holding the nerve behind the epicondyle with a thumb while establishing or entering the portal. In cases of prior nerve transposition, the following techniques were used if, by palpation, localization of the ulnar nerve was considered to be (1) unequivocal, (2) equivocal, or (3) impossible: In group 1 (unequivocal) the proximal anteromedial portal was established in the normal antegrade fashion. In group 2 (equivocal) a 1-cm incision was made at the planned proximal anteromedial portal site and blunt dissection down to the capsule was performed without identification of the nerve. In group 3 (impossible) a 2- to 4-cm skin incision was made and the nerve was identified before placement of the portal. We found that 59 elbows in 56 patients had a subluxating ulnar nerve (31 elbows) or previous ulnar nerve transposition (28 elbows). The transposition had been subcutaneous in 21 and submuscular in 7. The proximal anteromedial portal was used in all but 3 cases (2 patients) of submuscular transposition that were early in the series. In those cases only 2 lateral portals were used for anterior compartment surgery. There were no operative ulnar nerve injuries related to the use of the proximal anteromedial portal. Neither elbow arthroscopy nor specifically the use of the proximal anteromedial portal is contraindicated in patients with prior transposition or subluxation of the ulnar nerve. The management of the nerve can be based on the degree of certainty with which the nerve can be localized by palpation in the region of the planned portal. Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Endoscopic Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve at the Elbow

Recently, several studies suggested that simple decompression is as effective as anterior transposition in ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome. Simple decompression might be performed with minimally invasive techniques. The authors present their technique and results with endoscopic decompression in ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome. Between January 2005 and March 2008, 24 patients (mean age, 45.5 years; range, 26-67 years) underwent surgery for 26 ulnar nerve entrapment syndromes (2 bilateral). All patients presented with typical clinical signs and neurophysiologic studies. Intraoperatively, the ulnar nerve was localized directly at the sulcus, and subsequently under endoscopic view, the decompression was completed approximately 10 cm proximal as well as distal. In 26 cases, a significant compression of the nerve was found directly at and distal to the sulcus. In 1 case, a subluxation of the nerve was observed, the endoscopic technique was abandoned, and open anterior submuscular transposition followed. The procedure was successful in 19 of 22 cases (86%). Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were observed. Nevertheless, the identification of the nerve directly at the sulcus, where severe nerve compression was often found, seemed to be difficult and potentially risky, particularly in obese patients. The endoscopic technique for ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome seems to be safe and effective. However, particularly in patients with a thick subcutaneous fat layer, identification of the nerve at the sulcus is difficult and possible more risky than in open simple decompression. A randomized prospective study should be performed to further evaluate the value of this new technique in the treatment of ulnar nerve entrapment syndrome.

Outcomes Measures Used to Assess Results After Surgery for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature

The primary objective of this systematic review was to identify and analyze the outcomes measures that have been used to evaluate postoperative results following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome. The secondary objective was to compare the postoperative results among patients evaluated using patient-satisfaction instruments to those evaluated using surgeon-reported scales. Computerized database searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and MEDLINE In-Process were performed. Studies involving adults with cubital tunnel syndrome in whom the surgical intervention was simple decompression, anterior transposition (subcutaneous, submuscular or intramuscular), endoscopic decompression, or medial epicondylectomy were included. A systematic review was performed that included randomized controlled trials, comparative observational studies, noncomparative observational studies, and case series. This systematic review of the literature identified 42 studies that satisfied the inclusion criteria. The authors identified 21 health outcomes measures used in cubital tunnel studies. These consisted of 2 generic instruments; 10 symptom-specific, author-reported instruments; 3 symptom-specific, patient-reported instruments; and 6 patient questionnaires. No measure demonstrated adequate development or validation for use in its target population. Available data revealed a consistently high level of patient satisfaction following simple decompression or submuscular transposition (65% to 92%). The results of the author-reported, symptom-specific scales varied widely and showed no obvious association with patient satisfaction. The variation in reporting of results prevented statistical comparisons between author-reported results and patient-reported results. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to delineate the outcomes measures used to evaluate the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Our results show that reliable, reproducible, and valid outcomes measures are lacking from the surgical literature. A standardized assessment protocol for ulnar neuropathy is required for future comparison trials. Therapeutic III.

Cubital Tunnel Syndrome-Surgical Treatment Techniques

Cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common nerve compression in the upper extremity after carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). There are multiple surgical options to treat cubital tunnel syndrome with no one treatment proving superior. The options include in situ decompression with or without medial epicondylectomy, endoscopic decompression, and subcutaneous, intramuscular, or submuscular transposition. The surgical techniques as well as specific pearls and pitfalls, relevant anatomy, diagnosis, and conservative treatment will be reviewed.

Scratch Collapse Test Localizes Osborne's Band as the Point of Maximal Nerve Compression in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the utility of the scratch collapse test (SCT) in localizing the point of maximal compression in cubital tunnel syndrome. From January 1, 2004 to December 1, 2005, 64 adult patients with cubital tunnel syndrome were evaluated by a single surgeon. Cubital tunnel syndrome was diagnosed based upon symptoms of numbness, tingling, and/or pain in the ulnar nerve distribution or by the presence of weakness or wasting of the ulnar-innervated intrinsic hand muscles. All diagnoses were confirmed with electrodiagnostic studies. As part of the physical examination, the SCT was performed along three subdivided segments in the region of the cubital tunnel. Results of the SCT were recorded and correlated with intraoperative findings. Of the 64 patients evaluated, 44 had a positive SCT that was either more profound or solely present a few centimeters distal to the medial epicondyle in the region of Osborne's band. All of these patients subsequently underwent anterior submuscular transposition and were found to have a tight compression point at Osborne's band corresponding to their preoperative SCT. This study suggests that the scratch collapse test may be a reliable physical examination technique for localizing the point of maximal nerve compression in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. That point, in this series, corresponded with Osborne's band.

Endoscopically Assisted Ulnar Neurolysis for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Controversy remains regarding the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. Similar outcomes with ulnar nerve transposition, both subcutaneous and submuscular, and simple decompression have recently been reported. We describe an endoscopically assisted cubital tunnel release through a 2-cm incision using readily available standard equipment. Seventeen of 21 procedures successfully alleviated symptoms of cubital tunnel syndrome in these patients. Four patients who developed ulnar nerve subluxation intraoperatively who were treated with medial epicondylectomy failed to experience relief of symptoms and were successfully treated with anterior submuscular transposition. Patients with more profound motor weakness and/or electrodiagnostic studies had less complete relief of symptoms.

Subcutaneous vs Submuscular Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Moderate Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

Background:The surgical treatment of Cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS) is still a matter of debate. No consensus exists about the necessity of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve after decompression. However, this technique is fairly common in clinical practice. Material and Methodology:In the present study we compared the operative technique (incision length, operative time), postoperative care (postoperative pain and complications) and the outcome between subcutaneous transposition and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve as two surgical modalities in treating moderate CubTS.Between March 2004 and March 2007, twenty six patients with moderate CubTS (according to Dellon’s grading system) were stratified according to age and gender into these two surgical techniques. The two groups were prospectively followed up 2 weeks, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively by the same observer and the operation outcome was assessed using the Bishop rating system.Results:We found that the subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve was associated with shorter incision, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, less postoperative complication and better outcome compared with the submuscular transposition.Conclusion:The authors recommend the subcutaneous technique when considering anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve in treating moderate CubTS.

Comparative Clinical Outcomes of Submuscular and Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome

To determine retrospectively whether the technique of ulnar nerve transposition (subcutaneous versus submuscular) is associated with clinical sensory and motor recovery in cubital tunnel syndrome, and whether recovery is influenced by prognostic factors such as preoperative McGowan stage, age, and duration of symptoms. Twenty-five patients (average age, 53 years; follow-up, 7 years) with cubital tunnel syndrome had submuscular transposition, and 24 patients (average age, 46 years; follow-up, 3 years) were treated by subcutaneous transposition. There were 11 McGowan stage II and 14 stage III patients in the submuscular group and 14 stage II and 10 stage III patients in the subcutaneous group. Preoperatively, all patients presented with diminished 2-point discrimination. Postoperative sensory and motor recovery was evaluated clinically. There was no significant difference between subjective results in the submuscular and subcutaneous groups: 20 of 25 patients in the submuscular group versus 17 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group were clearly improved, and 3 of 25 patients in the submuscular group versus 6 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group partially improved. The logistic multivariate regression analysis indicated that sensory and motor function were both significantly improved following both surgical techniques. Sensory function recovered (2-point discrimination <6 mm) in 17 of 25 patients in the submuscular group and in 17 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group, and motor function recovered (intrinsic strength grade 5) in 19 of 25 patients in the submuscular group and in 19 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group. Symptoms lasting more than 6 months were associated with a poor prognosis. Sensory and motor recovery for patients with McGowan stages II and III of cubital tunnel syndrome were similar following submuscular and subcutaneous transposition techniques, and patients with symptoms lasting longer than 6 months had a worse prognosis regardless of surgical technique.

Arthrodesis in a neuropathic elbow after posttubercular spine syrinx

A 46-year-old man, who was left-hand dominant with knownparaplegia due to tuberculosis spondylitis, presented withcomplaints of progressively increasing weakness and instability ofthe left upper limb for the past 2 years. The patient had difficultyusing his left upper limb for activities of daily living such aseating, combing his hair, and maneuvering his wheelchair. Onexamination, the left elbow was swollen, but not warm, and wasnot tender. Range of motion was 25 to 100 , with palpable andaudible crepitation. There was grade 3 weakness of the inteross-eous muscles and digital flexors of the ipsilateral hand. A sensoryexamination revealed sensory loss in the ulnar nerve distribution.Examination showed the median, radial, and musculocutaneousnerves were normal.Radiographs of the left elbow showed severe destruction of thedistal humerus and proximal radioulnar joint with dislocation, andsevere erosion into the intercondylar area left both condyles in aninverted U-shape. The proximal radioulnar joint was dislocatedposterolaterally but no dissociation was noted in the proximalradioulnar bones. Diffuse soft-tissue swelling, especially in theposterior elbow and heterotopic ossification, was noted in theadjacent soft tissue (Figure 1).The patient gave a history of tuberculosis of the thoracic spineinvolving the second, third, and fourth thoracic vertebrae, whichwas treated with anterolateral decompression and antituberculardrugs 4 years previously. He remained paraplegic and wheelchair-bound, but bladder and bowel functions were spared. Previousmagnetic resonance imaging of his cervicothoracic spine revealeda cervicodorsal syrinx extending from C6 to T4, which wasdiagnosed 3 years previously (Figure 2). The patient had refusedany surgical intervention for syrinx at that time.Results of blood investigations of patient were within normallimits. Computed tomography (CT)-guided aspiration of fluidfrom the elbow joint was investigated for gram stain and acid-fastbacilli stain as well as culture and polymerase chain reaction testfor tuberculosis. All the results were negative. We discussed thetreatment options, both conservative and surgical, including thehigh risks of failure in the latter with patient. Our patient insistedon having a stable elbow.Through a posterior approach, we performed ulnar nervedecompression and anterior transposition with arthrodesis of theelbow joint. Intraoperatively, the ulnar nerve was markedly dis-placed to the radial side (Figure 3). The radial head was excised.The articular margins of the humerus and ulna were freshened,and a prebent 12-hole locking plate (AO, Synthes Inc, WestChester, PA) was applied with the elbow in a functional position at70 flexion. An anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnarnerve was performed. Results of gram stains, acid-fast bacillistain, and culture of removed tissue were negative.Postoperatively, the limb was supported in an above elbowsplint for 4 weeks. The patient was followed up at monthly

Incidence of Re-Operation and Subjective Outcome Following in Situ Decompression of the Ulnar Nerve at the Cubital Tunnel

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the failure rate of in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome as determined by the need for additional surgery. We performed a comprehensive chart review of 56 adult patients who had undergone in situ decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome in 69 extremities with more than 1 year follow-up. The patients completed a comprehensive questionnaire concerning preoperative and postoperative pain, numbness, and weakness. After decompression, symptoms were improved substantially or resolved. Five limbs (7%) with persistent symptoms postoperatively were treated successfully with anterior submuscular transposition. These data suggest that in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve is a reliable treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome and has a low failure rate. The uncommon patient with continued symptoms after decompression can be treated effectively with transposition of the ulnar nerve.