The rates of growth of two common intertidal gastropods, Nerita atramentosa Reeve and Bembicium nanum (Lamarck), were measured during ≈ 3 months in cages at four heights on a shore at Cape Banks, New South Wales. Replicate cages at each level were used to keep snails at constant densities throughout the experiments. Amounts of food on the substratum in each cage were measured as the concentration of chlorophyll in samples of the rock, which is known to be a reliable estimator of number of algal cells present. Rates of feeding were measured as the number of radular scrapes per min in snails removed to the laboratory, and the sizes of radulae were measured at the end of the experiments. Nerita did not increase in shell-length at the two higher levels on the shore, but grew at the two lower levels. Rate of growth was positively correlated with the amount of chlorophyll in the substratum, and was not apparently affected by the greater period of submersion (and concomitant time available for feeding) towards the lower levels on the shore. There was no difference in rates of feeding at the four heights. Radulae of snails from the lower levels were longer than those from higher on the shore, but this was attributable to the greater overall size of snails from lower levels (i.e. there was no significant difference in relative size of radula from one height on the shore to another). Bembicium increased in width of shell at all levels on the shore, but grew more quickly at all three lower levels than at the top of the shore. There was no difference in rate of feeding, nor in relative size of the radula from one level to another on the shore. Rate of growth was not significantly correlated with the amount of food available, nor with the period of submersion, nor the product of these two variables. The simplest explanation for these results was that sufficient food was available for maximal growth of Bembicium at the three lower levels, but not at the highest level. Thus, only where the amount of food was inadequate, at the highest level, was rate of growth reduced. These results are discussed with reference to the difficulties of determining the relative importance of influences on the growth of intertidal snails, because of inherent confounding of the period of submersion with different amounts of food at different heights on the shore.