Sublingual Immunotherapy Group Research Articles

Evaluation of the preventive effect of sublingual immunotherapy for pediatric bronchial asthma

ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in preventing the exacerbation of asthma. MethodsThis retrospective study investigated the changes in the rate of continuous steroid inhalation introduced over three years due to SLIT in 328 patients aged 5–15 years who were diagnosed with allergic rhinitis between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. These patients were not initially prescribed with continuous steroid inhalation. SLIT and symptomatic treatment groups were compared over 3 years using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, controlling for age with multiple regression analysis. The SLIT subgroups and factors contributing to asthma exacerbation were examined as secondary endpoints. ResultsThe study comprised 151 patients in the SLIT group and 177 patients in the symptomatic treatment group, with higher average age and IgE levels in the SLIT group. High continuation rates for SLIT were observed over 3 years. Asthma exacerbation within 3 years was notably lower in the SLIT group, particularly in the cedar-only and combined SLIT groups. Multiple regression analysis confirmed the duration of SLIT as a significant factor in preventing asthma exacerbation. Additionally, Fisher's exact test supported these findings. ConclusionThis study demonstrated the effectiveness of SLIT in reducing the exacerbation of asthma in children with allergic rhinitis. SLIT was associated with lower rates of asthma exacerbation over a three-year period compared to symptomatic treatment.

Direct Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Undergoing Sublingual Versus Subcutaneous Immunotherapy.

Background/Objectives: Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are commonly used for allergic rhinitis (AR), yet limited research has directly compared their effects on quality of life (QoL). We aimed to assess QoL differences between SLIT and SCIT recipients. As both forms of immunotherapy have reported benefits, we hypothesize that patients undergoing SLIT and SCIT will have comparable QoL improvements. Methods: A cohort study included patients with AR treated with immunotherapy from 2018 to 2022. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea, primary ciliary dyskinesia, cystic fibrosis, vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, or lupus were excluded. QoL was evaluated using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) at multiple time points. Demographics, additional therapies, and allergen sensitivities were recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics. Results: A total of 41 participants were eligible for inclusion. Both SLIT and SCIT groups exhibited reductions from baseline RQLQ scores. Within SLIT recipients, 5/7 RQLQ domains significantly improved. SCIT recipients showed significant QoL enhancement in 3/7 domains. The mean difference between SLIT and SCIT cohorts was -0.18 (p = 0.57, d = -0.18, 95% CI [-0.79, 0.43] at a mean treatment time of 18 months. Conclusions: SLIT and SCIT showed comparable RQLQ score reductions after 18 months of therapy, suggesting similar QoL benefits between the two treatment paradigms. Further investigation is needed to explore SLIT vs. SCIT differences in long-term QoL improvements beyond two years.

Enhancing quality of life with 3-year course of sublingual immunotherapy for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis: An observational prospective study in real-life settings

PurposeThis prospective study aims to provide further supportive evidence by assessing the sustained effectiveness and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using a vaccine containing house dust mite (HDM) extracts in patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (AR) with/without conjunctivitis (AR/C). Materials and methodsAR/C patients (n = 111, SLIT group: 57, control group: 54) allergic to HDM were treated with standardized SLIT drops or symptomatic drugs from October to December in 2020. The patients were directed by the investigators to attend annual hospital visits for the assessment of various parameters including the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), visual analog scale (VAS), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), total ocular symptom score (TOSS) and total medication score (TMS). During the study period, all participants were mandated to maintain comprehensive records of any adverse events (AEs) on diary cards, which were then communicated to the investigators via telephone. ResultsAt baseline (2020), TNSS, TOSS, TMS, VAS, and RQLQ scores were comparable between SLIT and control groups (P > 0.05). After one year of treatment (2021), significant reduction in all scores compared to the baseline for both groups (P < 0.001). At the end of the second year of treatment (2022), TNSS and RQLQ score in the SLIT group continued to decrease significantly compared to 2021 (P < 0.05). In the third year (2023), the control group showed a rebound in TNSS, TOSS, TMS, and RQLQ scores, significant differences compared to 2022 or 2021 (P < 0.05). Besides, the SLIT group had significantly lower scores across all domains of RQLQ compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Symptomatic treatment influenced the scores of Nasal Symptoms, Eye Symptoms, Practical Problems, and Emotions domains significantly in 2023 compared to 2021 or 2022 (P < 0.05). Within the SLIT group, no significant differences in TNSS, TMS, VAS, and RQLQ scores were observed between monosensitized and polysensitized patients throughout the three years of treatment (P > 0.05). All AEs were mild to moderate. ConclusionThe 3-year course of HDM-SLIT has shown significant therapeutic efficacy and a favorable safety profile in patients with AR/C. Importantly, our study presents initial evidence suggesting that the greater impact of AR/C on quality of life (QoL) may primarily stem from nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, practical issues, and emotional well-being.

Effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy with house dust mite extract for pediatric bronchial asthma.

Aim: We compared the effectiveness of rush subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using standardized house dust mite (HDM) extract for pediatric bronchial asthma (BA). Methods: We followed the pediatric BA treatment score during 3 years of treatment. We assessed the median time to no longer requiring long-term control pharmacotherapy (LTCP) for BA (LTCP-free). We compared the outcomes after adjustment for confounding factors and propensity score matching. Results: Patients in the HDM SCIT group achieved the LTCP-free status significantly earlier than those in the HDM SLIT group after adjustment for confounding factors and propensity score matching. Conclusion: Patients treated for pediatric BA with rush HDM SCIT had earlier onset of therapeutic effects than those with HDM SLIT.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Sublingual Immunotherapy After Septomeatoplasty.

The efficacy of adjuvant sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in correcting structural problems in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) caused by mite who have undergone septomeatoplasty (SMP) has not been studied. This non-randomized controlled study recruited patients with AR (caused by mite) and concurrent septal deviation and inferior turbinate hypertrophy, at a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. SMP was performed on all patients as a surgical intervention. The patients were then divided into two groups: the control group, which underwent surgery only, and the experimental group, which received SLIT as an adjuvant treatment. Demographic data and rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) results were analyzed. A total of 96 patients were enrolled in the study (SMP + SLIT group, n = 52; SMP only group, n = 44). No significant differences were observed in any of the variables between the two groups before and one month after surgery. However, during evaluations at the third and sixth month, the SMP + SLIT group showed significant improvement in the total RCAT scores compared to the SMP only group (28.6 ± 1.56 vs. 24.5 ± 3.66, p < 0.001; 27.1 ± 2.87 vs. 19.9 ± 5.56, p < 0.001). In addition, significantly better control of all RCAT sub-categories was observed in the SMP + SLIT group at the third and sixth month evaluations. SLIT may serve as an ideal adjuvant therapy after SMP in patients with AR. 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3073-3079, 2024.

Effect of sublingual immunotherapy on clinical and laboratory autoimmunity.

Background: There still are few data on the long-term safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). The aim of this study was to assess the appearance of autoimmune diseases in patients before and after SLIT. Materials & methods: New cases of autoimmune diseases were monitored. Patients in the SLIT group (n=816) were compared with controls (n=1096). Results: The new incidences of autoimmune diseases in the SLIT group were lower compared with the control group: 18 (2.2%) versus 58 (5.3%);p<0.05. Systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis and Hashimoto appeared much more often in the control group. Conclusion: SLIT had no significant effect on the induction of autoimmune diseases.

Long-term efficacy of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy on clinical and pulmonary function in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis

BackgroundA previous study reported that house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for 48 weeks was effective as add on treatment for allergic asthma; however, data regarding its long-term efficacy is scarce. ObjectiveThis open-label extension study aimed to evaluate the effect of HDM SLIT on asthma control, pulmonary function, airway inflammation and remodeling throughout the 5-year treatment period. MethodsA total of 140 patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis sensitized to HDM were randomized to receive either drugs alone or drugs plus SLIT for 5 years. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), spirometry, quantitative computed tomography, and type 2 biomarkers were assessed. ResultsAn improvement in the ACQ-5, AQLQ, and RQLQ scores was observed in the SLIT group compared with the control group. HDM SLIT increased lung function and reduced the percentage of airway wall area (WA/Ao). The levels of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil, serum specific IgE (s-IgE) for HDM, and total IgE decreased and were sustained during the 5 years. The change in type 2 biomarkers correlated with change in AQLQ score. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for predicting responders, the area under the ROC curve in FEV1% predicted, WA/Ao, FeNO, and s-IgE was high. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the strongest predictor of responders was FeNO. ConclusionsHDM SLIT continued to provide sustained efficacy, improve lung function, and prevent progression of airway inflammation and remodeling in asthma through to year 5.

Effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric cedar pollinosis: A real-world database study.

Pediatric allergic rhinitis (AR), including cedar pollinosis (CP), is increasing in Japan. We investigated the effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), which has limited studies of its effectiveness in real-world settings, on children with CP. This retrospective cohort study used a claim database in 2018-2021. Children aged ≤15 years with CP records in 2019 were eligible and were followed up through 2021. We included 2962 CP children undergoing SLIT and 547 who were not. The medication score was used to evaluate SLIT effectiveness in the cedar pollen dispersal season each year. Adverse events and the occurrence of allergic diseases were also evaluated. Medication score was higher in the SLIT group during the index period but lower in 2021 compared to the non-SLIT group (mean ± standard deviation: 5.17 ± 2.39 and 4.74 ± 2.38 in 2019, 3.13 ± 2.30 and 3.55 ± 2.48 in 2021, respectively). The adjusted mean difference between groups from 2019 to 2021 was -0.62 (95% confidence interval: -0.86 to -0.39, p < .0001), and the medication score was reduced in the SLIT group (risk ratio: 1.2: 1.1 to 1.3). The occurrence of adverse events involving abdominal disorders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.64: 0.51 to 0.81), asthma exacerbation (aOR: 0.37: 0.24 to 0.57), and allergic diseases involving hay fever unrelated to CP (aOR: 0.60: 0.45 to 0.80) or asthma (aOR: 0.71: 0.58 to 0.86) was lower in the SLIT group. In children with CP, SLIT is effective, well tolerated, and could decrease the occurrence of other allergic diseases.

Sublingual versus subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy in bronchial asthma: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Asthma affects 300 million individuals worldwide. It is a serious global health problem affecting all age groups. The significance of eosinophilic inflammation in asthma is well established. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) acts by increasing tolerance to specific antigens to which individuals demonstrate clinical sensitivity. Objectives Evaluate the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) versus subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) as regards clinical response, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and sputum eosinophil as well as adverse effects. Methods This randomized clinical trial included 100 patients with bronchial asthma who were randomly allocated into two groups: the SLIT group (n = 50) and the SCIT group (n = 50). Patients were given a full allergy history, symptoms, and medication scores; a skin prick test; total IgE for allergens, and a sputum eosinophil count. After the end of treatment, the efficacy, as well as side effects of both treatment arms, were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months. Results Both SLIT and SCIT were equally effective. Success rates have been demonstrated to be as high as 86–88%. There was a statistically significant decrease in symptom and medication scores, Total IgE levels, and sputum eosinophil results after treatment (P &lt; 0.001). However, no difference was found between groups regarding the efficacy of treatment. SLIT was significantly safer than SCIT (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Both treatment modalities were equally effective in treating asthma, but SLIT had a higher safety profile than SCIT.

Efficacy and safety of sublingual versus subcutaneous immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in children with allergic rhinitis (AR). PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 2, 2023. Outcomes included symptom scores (SSs), medication scores (MSs), symptom and medication scores (SMSs), new sensitizations, development of asthma, improvement, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The quality of the included studies was assessed by the modified Jadad scale and Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Meta-regression was carried out to explore the source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was further conducted in terms of study design [randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies], allergen [house dust mites (HDMs), grass pollen], treatment duration (≥ 24, 12-23 or < 12 months), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) modality (drops or tablets), and AIT protocol [continuous, pre-seasonal, co-seasonal, or after the grass pollen season (GPS)]. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for all outcomes. A Bayesian framework and a Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) model were developed for indirect comparison. Totally 50 studies with 10813 AR children were included, with 4122 treated with SLIT, 1852 treated with SCIT, and 4839 treated with non-SLIT or non-SCIT therapy. For direct comparison, the SLIT group had a similar SS to the SCIT group [pooled standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.46, 1.28, P = 0.353]. Comparable MSs were observed in the SLIT and SCIT groups (pooled SMD: 0.82, 95%CI: -0.88, 2.53, P = 0.344). For indirect comparison, no significant differences were found in SSs (pooled SMD: 1.20, 95% credibility interval (CrI): -1.70, 4.10), MSs (pooled SMD: 0.57, 95%CrI: -1.20, 2.30), SMSs (pooled SMD: 1.80, 95%CrI: -0.005, 3.60), new sensitizations [pooled relative risk (RR): 0.34, 95%CrI: 0.03, 3.58], and development of asthma (pooled RR: 0.68, 95%CrI: 0.01, 26.33) between the SLIT and SCIT groups; the SLIT group illustrated a significantly lower incidence of TRAEs than the SCIT group (pooled RR: 0.17, 95%CrI: 0.11, 0.26). Considering both efficacy and safety, SLIT might be a more favorable AIT than SCIT in the treatment of pediatric AR, which may serve as a decision-making reference for clinicians. PROSPERO (CRD42023460693).

Nasal microbes in allergic rhinitis children with or without sublingual immunotherapy.

The mechanism of allergic rhinitis (AR) remains unclear. Most researchers believe that AR is the result of a combination of environmental and genetic factors. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a treatment that can change the natural course of AR through immunomodulatory mechanism and maintain efficacy after the treatment. Nasal cavity is the main site where AR patients contact with external allergens, produce inflammatory reactions and nasal symptoms. Therefore, in this study, we investigate the nasal microbiome in AR patients, and the changes after SLIT. In this cross-sectional study, nasal swabs for microbiome analysis were collected from 3 groups: SLIT-naïve AR patients (AR group), AR patients undergoing SLIT treatment over 2 years (SLIT group) and a control group (CG). The characteristics of nasal microbiome of each groups were produced by 16s-rDNA sequencing technology. The Simpson index of AR group was significantly higher than that of CG and SLIT groups, but not different between SLIT group and CG group. The abundance of Bacteroidete and Firmicutes remarkably increased in the AR group, but Bacteroidete reduced to CG level after SLIT. AR patients have different nasal microbiome composition, but we do not know how it happened and whether the AR condition affected nasal microbiome composition or nasal microbiome affected AR.

Efficacy and Safety of Sublingual Immunotherapy using a Combination of Dermatophagoides Pteronyssinus and Blomia Tropicalis Extracts in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with extracts of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis in patients with moderate/severe persistent allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of SLIT for the treatment of house dust mite-induced AR. A total of 65 patients, aged between 12 and 60 years, were treated for 12 months and randomized into two groups: SLIT and placebo. The SLIT group received a combination of extracts containing Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis allergens. All had their sensitization confirmed by skin prick test or serum-specific IgE. Total Nasal Symptom Score, RQLQ quality of life questionnaire, current treatment, and need for medication to control symptoms were recorded during the study. Total serum IgE, serum specific IgE, and IgG4 levels to Der p 1 and Blo t were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results: There was no significant difference in the number of adverse events between groups. The SLIT group showed a significant reduction in the consumption of antihistamines to control symptoms (p &lt; 0.0001) when compared to placebo. There was no significant change in serum total IgE, serum specific IgE, and IgG4 to both allergens when comparing the SLIT and placebo groups. Conclusion: After one year, SLIT using a dose of 1 mcg of Der p 1/day and 753 UBE of Blo t/day proved to be effective and safe in controlling AR exacerbations.

Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been widely applied to treat patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). However, meta-analyses on the efficacy of SLIT in AR patients with asthma are still limited. Literature without language limitation published before October 28, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. STATA 16.0 software was used for the meta-analysis of the extracted data. The results reported were symptom scores, drug scores, adverse effects rates, and cost of treatment. Ten studies involving 1722 patients met the inclusion criteria. The total rhinitis score (TRSS) (weighted mean difference [WMD] = -1.23, 95% CI: -1.39--1.06, P < .001) and total asthma symptom score (TASS) (WMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.12-0.89, P < .001) were significantly lower in the SLIT group than the placebo group. The SLIT group had higher rates of treatment-related adverse events (relative risk [RR] = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.77-4.48, P < .001) and total costs of treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.45-0.97, P < .001). There was no significant difference in inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) dose (P = .195), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (P = .158), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (P = .237), and direct costs of treatment (P = .630) between the SLIT and placebo groups. SLIT may be a therapeutic method for improving rhinitis symptoms and asthma symptoms in AR patients with asthma. However, as there was significant heterogeneity in results, more high-quality and well-designed studies are needed in the future to elucidate the efficacy of SLIT.

The relationship between sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and the risk of symptoms in patients with COVID-19 infection

ABSTRACT To evaluated the risk ratio of Allergic rhinitis (AR) people on the symptoms after COVID-19 infection, and explored the relationship between AR and the symptoms after COVID-19 infection. An observational study was performed of people from outpatient department of the Hospital of Chengdu University of Chinese Medicine. Participants completed an electronic survey and between January 10 to January 20, 2023. We divided the participants into three groups according to the disease information of the population: non-AR people group (AR-N), AR patients with sublingual immunotherapy group (AR-S), and AR patients with conventional therapy group (AR-C). A total of 1116 participants were included in the study, with an average age of 21.76 ± 8.713, women accounted for 62.5%, men accounted for 37.5%. The final results showed that the risk of most symptoms after AR-C infection was not different from that of AR-N, except for sore throat, dry and itchy, chest distress, shortness of breath, and dyspnea. AR-S could effectively reduce the risk of post-infection symptoms including: dry and itchy (OR = 0.484, 95%CI: 0.335–0.698), pain (OR = 0.513, 95%CI:0.362–0.728), cough (OR = 0.506, 95% CI:0.341–0.749), expectoration (OR = 0.349, 95% CI:0.244–0.498), fever (OR = 0.569, 95% CI:0.379–0.853), head and body pain (OR = 0.456, 95% CI:0.323–0.644), fatigue (OR = 0.256, 95% CI:0.177–0.371), cold limbs (OR = 0.325, 95%CI:0.227–0.465), diarrhea (OR = 0.246, 95% CI:0.132–0.457), constipation (OR = 0.227, 95%CI:0.100–0.513), hyposmia (OR = 0.456, 95% CI:0.296–0.701), hypogeusia (OR = 0.397, 95% CI:0.259–0.607), chest distress (OR = 0.534, 95% CI:0.343–0.829), shortness of breath (OR = 0.622, 95% CI:0.398–0.974), palpitations (OR = 0.355, 95% CI:0.206–0.613). The risk of symptoms after COVID-19 infection in allergic rhinitis population receiving sublingual immunotherapy is lower.

Efficacy and safety of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis over two pollen seasons.

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with A. annua allergens in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis over two pollen seasons. Seventy patients with moderate-severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were divided evenly into the SLIT and control groups. The SLIT last from 3months before the summer-autumn pollen season in 2021 till the end of the summer-autumn pollen season in 2022. The daily individual symptom score, total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (dTRSS), total medication score (dTMS), combined score of medication and rhinoconjunctivitis symptom (dCSMRS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated. The average pollen concentration in 2022 was twice that previous two-year during the pollen season. Fifty-six patients completed treatments (SLIT group: 29, control group: 27). Compared with baseline, the individual symptoms, dTRSS, dTMS, dCSMRS, and VAS scores of SLIT group declined in 2021. After 16months of SLIT, all efficacy indexes in 2022 were still lower than baseline and equivalent to those in 2021. In control group, the efficacy indexes in 2022 were higher than that in 2020 and 2021. The efficacy indexes of SLIT group were lower than those of control group in 2021 and 2022. SLIT is effective for both mono- and poly-sensitized patients. AEs incidence in SLIT group was 82.7% without severe AEs. The A. annua-SLIT can obtain efficacy and safety over two pollen seasons for patients with moderate-severe seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.

Clinical efficacy and safety of coseasonal initiation of Artemisia annua sublingual immunotherapy on patients with Artemisia-induced rhinoconjunctivitis

PurposePatients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC) might seek evaluation and treatment when symptoms appear during the pollen season. It is unclear whether coseasonal-initiated sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) would be effective and safe for SARC. This study aims to identify the feasibility of initiating Artemisia annua SLIT during the pollen season. Materials and methodsSixty patients with Artemisia-induced SARC were equally recruited into the SLIT and control groups during the pollen season in 2021. The SLIT group was treated with standardized Artemisia annua SLIT drops using a modified dosing schedule combined with pharmacotherapy, while the control group only received pharmacotherapy. Diary cards for clinical symptoms, rescue medication use, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded during the pollen seasons. Objective measures, including average daily combined scores of medication and rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (CSMRS), total rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (TRSS), total medication score (TMS), and the score of visual analog scale (VAS) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT. Safety was assessed through the occurrence and severity of AEs. ResultsIn total, 80.0 % (24/30) patients in the SLIT group and 86.67 % (26/30) patients in the control group completed the study. The severity of SARC, which was assessed by objective measures including CSMRS, TRSS, TMS, and VAS of the SLIT group and the control group, was generally at the same level during the 2021 pollen season, except for the medical consumption, which the score of TMS was slightly higher in the SLIT group. After one year of treatment, the scores of CSMRS, TRSS, and VAS in the SLIT group were significantly improved compared with the control group (all P < 0.001), and the difference in the TMS between the two groups disappeared (P > 0.05). Moreover, clinical improvement of the four objective measures was also observed in the SLIT group compared with the baseline value (P < 0.001). Overall, 9/24 patients in the SLIT group experienced mild local AEs, and two patients experienced mild systemic AEs during the SLIT period. ConclusionsThis controlled preliminary study identified that coseasonal-initiated Artemisia annua SLIT treatment for one year was generally safe and effective in improving the symptoms of SARC patients induced by Artemisia annua pollen.

Comparison of rush-subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract for pediatric allergic rhinitis: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundWe aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with standardized house dust mite (HDM) extract for allergic rhinitis. MethodsParticipants with allergic rhinitis selected their treatment between HDM SCIT or HDM SLIT, according to their wishes. We prospectively followed symptoms of allergic rhinitis using the allergic rhinitis symptom medication score (ARSMS), along with adverse reactions, during the dose escalation and maintenance phases for two years. We compared the outcomes between propensity score-matched groups to adjust the confounding factors. ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 88 patients in the HDM SCIT (n = 44) and HDM SLIT groups (n = 44) remained for analysis. The HDM SCIT group showed significantly earlier effectiveness than the HDM SLIT group (median time to decrease in ARSMS [≥2 points]: 5.5 vs. 18.0 months, p < 0.001). The incidence of systemic reactions was not significantly different between the two groups in the dose escalation phase (68.2% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.379). In the maintenance phase, the incidence of systemic reactions was higher in the HDM SCIT group than in the HDM SLIT group (18.2% vs. 0%, p < 0.006). All 44 patients in the HDM SCIT group completed two years of treatment, while nine patients in the HDM SLIT group discontinued treatment. ConclusionsThe HDM SCIT group showed an earlier onset of therapeutic effect and a lower discontinuation rate than the HDM SLIT group, although more severe systemic reactions were observed during the maintenance phase.

Changes in type 2 innate lymphoid cells and serum cytokines in sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis

BackgroundType 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) are upregulated in childhood allergic rhinitis (AR) and are associated with AR severity. This study aimed to investigate changes in the ILC2 milieu in pediatric patients with AR after sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT).MethodsForty- pediatric patients with AR received house dust mite (HDM) allergen extract for SLIT group and thirty pediatric patients received placebo in the study, respectively. The levels of ILC2, ILC2-related cytokines (IL-5/IL-13) and their transcription factors (GATA binding protein 3, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor α) in the circulation were assessed after 1- and 2-year SLIT. Moreover, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in patients were prepared and stimulated by recombinant thymic stromal lymphopoietin, IL-25, and IL-33 after 2-year SLIT. Subsequently, the levels of ILC2, IL-5, and IL-13 were tested.ResultsThe frequency of ILC2 and the levels of their transcription factors in the circulation were significantly decreased after SLIT in the SLIT group. The levels of ILC2-related cytokines in the SLIT group showed the same trend. The frequency of ILC2 was positively correlated with transcription factors and cytokines after SLIT. SLIT was observed to reduce the ability of HDM sensitization to generate the ILC2 milieu in PBMCs.ConclusionsChanges in the ILC2 milieu may be correlated with the curative effect and immune regulation function of SLIT. Our results suggested that the regulatory effect on ILC2 is part of the therapeutic mechanism of SLIT.

Аналіз ефективності дворічного курсу алерген-специфічної імунотерапії в дітей з атопічним дерматитом та сенсибілізацією до кліщів домашнього пилу

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that affects 15% to 30% of children and 2% to 10% of adults worldwide. Some observations suggest that allergens may be an important cause of atopic dermatitis. Allergen-specific immunotherapy can reduce symptoms in people with atopic dermatitis by suppressing abnormal immune responses to allergens. Purpose - to evaluate the role of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children with sensitization to house dust mite, by conducting a randomized 24-month clinical trial with house dust mite extract. Materials and methods. The study included 26 children with atopic dermatitis, sensitized to house dust mites. 12 patients received sublingual immunotherapy and 14 patients received only symptomatic treatment (the control group). The disease activity of atopic dermatitis was evaluated using the dynamics of SCORAD indicators and the CDLQI questionnaire. Results. After 24 months from the start of treatment, the decrease in SCORAD was 52.1% in the sublingual immunotherapy group (Wilcoxon T-test, T-W=78.0; p&lt;0.001) and 20.2% in the control group. The decrease in CDLQI after 24 months was 40% in the sublingual immunotherapy group (T-W=66.0; p&lt;0.001), in the control group no improvement was found. We have not found influence of age and degree of severity on the effectiveness of therapy. Conclusions. This randomized 2-year study showed that sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract can provide significant clinical efficacy according to SCORAD and CDLQI questionnaire in children with atopic dermatitis. The research was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the participating institution. The informed consent of the patient was obtained for conducting the studies. No conflict of interests was declared by the author.

Single-cell immunoprofiling after immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis reveals functional suppression of pathogenic TH2 cells and clonal conversion

Allergic rhinitis is a growing problem worldwide. Currently the only treatment that can modify the disease is antigen-specific immunotherapy, but its mechanism of action is not fully understood. We comprehensively investigated the role and changes of antigen-specific T cells before and after sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis. We cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained both before and 1 year after initiating SLIT and used a combination of single-cell RNA sequencing and repertoire sequencing. To investigate biomarkers, we used cells from patients participating a phase 2/3 trial of SLIT tablets for Japanese cedar pollinosis and cells from outpatients with good and poor response. Antigen-stimulated culturing after SLIT led to clonal expansion of TH2 and regulatory T cells, and most of these CD4+ T cells retained their CDR3 regions before and after treatment, indicating antigen-specific clonal responses and differentiation resulting from SLIT. However, SLIT reduced the number of clonal functional TH2 cells but increased the trans-type TH2 cell population that expresses musculin (MSC), TGF-β, and IL-2. Trajectory analysis suggested that SLIT induced clonal differentiation of the trans-type TH2 cells differentiated into regulatory T cells. Using real-time PCR, we found that the MSC levels increased in the active SLIT group and those with good response after 1 year of treatment. The combination of single-cell RNA sequencing and repertoire analysis helped reveal part of the underlying mechanism: SLIT promotes the expression of MSC on pathogenic TH2 cells and suppresses their function. MSC may be a potential biomarker of SLIT for allergic rhinitis.