The perspicacity and innovativeness of Professor Foulkes' article' on the German department as an endangered species deserves a response from colleagues who are concerned, together with him, about the problems of the study of German at a large and influential university rather than from someone who is not even a member of a German department, but of an amorphous (and small) Department of Foreign Languages.2 However, it has seemed to me that Professor Foulkes' provocative remarks have a subliminal effect, involving each reader personally, outside of his professional situation. The hidden question which impinges on a consciousness easily convinced by the rationality of the case presented to it in the article is an emotional one: Why am I a German teacher; what do I think I am doing in the classroom? The egocentricity of this approach finds its justification in an argument which pertains a priori, certainly not on the basis of assembled statistics (inevitably ambivalent and boring), namely that education is a relationship which exists between a student and a teachera real live one, in each case. I am a German teacher because I want to teach German. Although this kind of raison d'dtre might appear to be the primary force in the dynamics of education, it is, of course, the student's part in the encounter which predominates; the student is the instigator of the partnership which is the educational process, and he is its product. Accordingly, what I do in the classroom consists of convincing the student both of the importance, on a personal level, of the activity to which I am devoted and of the conscientiousness with which I engage in it. Perhaps as a footnote to this concept the clich6 should appear that languages cannot be learned through a process of osmosis.
Read full abstract