You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Pelvic Prolapse1 Apr 20122139 PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND PESSARY USE: IS IT A VIABLE LONG TERM TREATMENT OPTION? Sophie Ramsay, Frederick Bouchard, and Le Mai Tu Sophie RamsaySophie Ramsay Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author , Frederick BouchardFrederick Bouchard Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author , and Le Mai TuLe Mai Tu Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2310AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The main objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate whether long-term use of vaginal pessaries is an appropriate conservative treatment for women with pelvic organ prolapses (POP). METHODS From 1998 to 2010, 429 women with POP had a pessary trial. Vaginal atrophy and constipation were addressed prior to the trial. Patients were encouraged to use topical estrogen and mucolytic cream at home. A follow-up appointment was scheduled at one month where a pessary maintenance regime was chosen. Additional follow-up visits were then scheduled yearly, or before as patient needs. Data collected included specific information concerning pessary use, incidence of vaginal erosions or other associated morbidities, and subjective satisfaction rate. RESULTS Average age at presentation was 71.1 ± 9.7 years old. 50% of patients had had hysterectomy and 22% had had a prior prolapse surgery. 62% (n = 258) of women had a successful pessary trial, defined as a one-month use of the pessary with subjective improvement of symptoms and no significant complication. Median duration of pessary use was 35 months (1-136). 96% of women were satisfied or very satisfied with their pessaries. 66% (n = 170) of patients could handle pessary by self-maintenance, while 23% (n = 59) needed assistance from a regional nurse, and 11% (n = 28) necessitated maintenance by our clinic nurses. Pessary self-maintenance regime was associated with a prolonged pessary use (38 months vs 30 months for the nurse group vs 27 months for the clinic group, p = 0.021). The overall erosion rate was 16%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that erosions are associated with older age (p = 0.011), constipation (p = 0.018), and use of topical estrogen cream (p = 0.001). The severity of vaginal atrophy increased with older age (p < 0.001) and older patients were therefore more likely to use topical estrogen cream (p < 0.001). Both the severity of vaginal atrophy and intensive estrogen treatment before pessary trial were associated with a higher rate of erosions (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04). There was no major complication. 66% (n = 170) of women who underwent a successful pessary trial are still using a pessary. CONCLUSIONS Vaginal pessaries appear to be an appropriate treatment option for women with troublesome POP. These long-term results show that patient's satisfaction is excellent and most women who underwent a successful pessary trial continue to use pessary through time. Regular maintenance and follow-up are essential, especially as the occurrence of vaginal erosions is difficult to predict. Erosions do not seem totally preventable by the use of topical estrogen. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e864 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Sophie Ramsay Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author Frederick Bouchard Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author Le Mai Tu Sherbrooke, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract