Subjective Premature Ejaculation Research Articles

(262) Grumpy Young Men? Factors Associated with Bother in Men with Peyronie’s Disease

Abstract Introduction Age is often correlated with various medical conditions, including bother with the condition itself. Peyronie’s disease (PD) is a condition which is most often associated with men in their 50-60’s, however, it does affect younger men as well. Anecdotally, younger men with PD appear to be more bothered by their condition compared to older men. We therefore sought to evaluate whether there is a difference among older vs younger men as to the degree of bother linked to PD. Objective To evaluate age as a potential predictor of bother associated with PD. Methods A prospective database has been maintained of men seeking treatment for PD. Beginning in Feb 2020, we began implementing men routinely completed standardized intake questionnaires relating to PD, including the Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ). The PDQ consists of 15 questions broken down into three key subdomains: psychological and physical, penile pain, and symptom bother. Men who had completed the PDQ questionnaire were evaluated to determine the correlation between various clinicopathologic variables and the PDQ-bother domain. Results A total of 645 men were seen for symptoms of PD and had PDQ questionnaire data available for review. Baseline demographics included a mean age was 51.8 years (SD 17.6), mean PD symptom duration 31.3 months (SD 65.3), estimated curve of 40.9 degrees (SD 26.8), and mean PDQ-Bother score 8.9 (SD 3.1 – Note: lower is better). Several clinicopathology variables were found to be associated with increased PDQ-bother scores, including age (younger = less bothered, parameter estimate -.0.03, p=0.03), the presence of indentation or hourglass (yes 9.4, no 8.4, p<0.05), pain (yes 9.3, no 8.5, p=0.16), PD preventing penetrative intercourse (yes 9.5, no 8.7, p=0.07), penile shortening (yes 9.3, no 8.7, p=0.10), subjective erectile dysfunction (yes 9.6, no 8.5, p<0.01), and subjective premature ejaculation (yes 9.8, no 8.4, p<0.01). Interestingly, several variables did not correlate, including the duration of relationship, frequency of intercourse, duration of symptoms, direction of curve, degree of curvature, partner pain with intercourse, or libido. Conclusions Several notable factors are associated with PD bother (as assessed by the PDQ-bother domain), and equally importantly, several factors are surprisingly not associated (e.g. curvature degree and direction). These factors provide useful information to the practicing clinician to help better identify men who may be at greater risk for bother associated with the condition. Disclosure No

Correlations between Personality Traits, Patient-Reported Outcome, and Chronic Prostatitis Symptoms in Men with Different Premature Ejaculation Syndromes.

Although the personality traits (PT), patient-reported outcome (PRO), and chronic prostatitis (CP) symptoms in premature ejaculation (PE) have been evaluated, there was no study to assess their correlations in men with different PE syndromes. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlations between the PT, PRO, and CP symptoms in men with different PE syndromes. Between January 2019 and January 2021, a cross-sectional field study was conducted in our andrology clinic. Men with the complaints of PE were divided into lifelong PE (LPE), acquired PE (APE), variable PE (VPE), and subjective PE (SPE). All subjects were required to complete a verbal questionnaire with the PRO, National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), and Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI-R). Finally, 479 men with the complaints of PE and 365 without the complaints of PE were enrolled. The incidence of PE syndromes in PE complaint group was as follows: LPE 16.70%, APE 48.85%, VPE 11.27%, and SPE 23.17%. Mean ages in PE complaint group were 42.53 ± 12.25 years. In the PE complaint group, the novelty seeking (NS) scores were strongest correlated with the personal distress and quality of life (QOL). The harm avoidance (HA) scores were strongest correlated with the severity of PE and pain syndromes. The self-transcendence (ST) scores were strongest correlated with the satisfaction with sexual intercourse and QOL. In addition, strongest association between the total scores of NIH-CPSI and the NS or ST scores was also found in the APE group. The HA scores were also strongest correlated with the total scores of NIH-CPSI in SPE. Strongest association between the total scores of NIH-CPSI and the NS/TI or ST/CI scores was also found in the APE group. The HA/TI scores were also strongest correlated with the total scores of NIH-CPSI in SPE.

Men with subjective premature ejaculation have a similar lognormal IELT distribution as men in the general male population and differ mathematically from males with lifelong premature ejaculation after an IELT of 1.5 minutes (Part 2).

Men with Subjective premature ejaculation (PE) have complaints of PE but have normal intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) durations. We found two previously published large epidemiological stopwatch-mediated IELT studies to encompass IELT details of men with Subjective PE, albeit this term was not mentioned in both studies or in reviews of them. In the current study we developed the mathematical formula of the IELT distribution of men with complaints of PE, as diagnosed by a clinician on basis of the DSM-IV-TR definition of PE, as reported in the two studies performed in the USA and Europe, respectively. The formula was calculated by investigation of the fitness of various well-known mathematical Probability Density distributions into the IELT distribution of the PE men and non-PE men of the two studies. The better the fitness the lower is the Goodnes of Fit (GOF). Another aim of the study was to investigate whether the IELT distribution of men with "complaints" of PE (Subjective PE) differs mathematically from the IELT distribution of the general male population and that of Lifelong PE. The overlap of the area under the curve (AUC) of the IELT distribution of the men with PE complaints and that of the general male population was calculated together with the cut-off point at which the AUC equals 10%. We found that the IELT distributions of the PE men in both studies were Lognormal distributions and that at the cut-off point at which the AUC is equal to 10% (p = 0.10) the IELT is 1.5 min, indicating that after 1.5 min the IELT distribution of males with complaints of PE becomes mathematically identical to that of the general male population. In conclusion, there is hard mathematical evidence that the IELT distribution of men with complaints of PE with normal IELT values (e.g., the Lognormal IELT distribution of Subjective PE) and the IELT distribution of men with Lifelong PE (e.g. the Gumbel Max IELT distribution) belong to two independent populations. According to the applied mathematical calculations Subjective PE starts after an IELT of 1.5 min and encompasses all higher IELT values. It may imply that the current IELT cut-off point in Lifelong PE should be 1.5 min instead of the approximate 1 min, as has previously been stated by ISSM and DSM 5.

Method and design of drug treatment research of subjective premature ejaculation in men differs from that of lifelong premature ejaculation in males: proposal for a new objective measure (part 1).

As lifelong premature ejaculation (PE) and subjective PE are two different PE subtypes, the measurement of their characteristic features requires different objective measures. In this article, we address the differences between lifelong PE and subjective PE, in terms of the extent of variation of sexual performance and propose a new objective measure for research of subjective PE. By considering lifelong PE as a mainly "male" sex disorder and subjective PE as a mainly "man" sex disorder, we show that stopwatch-mediated intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) measurement is most adequate for research of lifelong PE, but inadequate for research of subjective PE. Subjective PE needs another objective measure to capture its key characteristics. Arguments are provided to show that the characteristics of subjective PE are different from the key features of lifelong PE. The core issue in lifelong PE is the very short IELT with a very small variation in sexual performance. Subjective PE is characterized by a higher variation of sexual performance. Stopwatch-mediated IELT measurement is essential in case of small variation of sexual performance. In contrast, measurement of various parameters of penile intravaginal thrusting is suggested to be more appropriate in case of high variation of sexual performance observed in subjective PE. In conclusion, research of lifelong PE should be performed by stopwatch measurement of the IELT whereas research of subjective PE should be performed by movement tracker devices, designed to be bound to the males body and/or inserted into the women's vagina with robust software to measure intravaginal thrusting variation performance. Future studies are warranted to provide scientific data to support this hypothesis.

Event-level impact of Promescent on quality of sexual experience in men with subjective premature ejaculation.

Promescent is a lidocaine-based ejaculation delaying spray that absorbs into the skin of the penis prior to sexual activity. This article aimed to evaluate the effect of Promescent on the experience of orgasm, ejaculatory latency time and quality of sexual experience (QSE). Additionally, we assessed ease of application of Promescent and the extent to which it enhanced or interrupted the sexual experience. The analytic sample consisted of 91 men with self-reported subjective premature ejaculation who were sent a sample of Promescent and completed a 14-day internet-based prospective daily electronic report. Average ejaculatory latency time was 11.16 min during product use events, compared with 6.81 min during product non-use events. Both members of the couple had an orgasm 65.6% of the time when they used the product, compared with 44.1% when they did not use the product. QSE was significantly improved on product use days (P<0.05). Quality also significantly improved each subsequent time the product was used (P<0.01). The product was reported as easy to use and did not interrupt the sexual experience. Findings suggest that the use of this topical spray significantly improves QSE and perception of partner experience, and that these improve with longer duration of use.

Pharmacotherapy for premature ejaculation.

As there are various drugs and different treatment strategies to delay ejaculation, a review of the current drug treatments for premature ejaculation is relevant for daily clinical practice. There are four premature ejaculation subtypes: lifelong premature ejaculation, acquired premature ejaculation, variable premature ejaculation and subjective premature ejaculation. These premature ejaculation subtypes vary in the duration of the intravaginal ejaculation latency time, their course in life and frequency of early ejaculations. Drug treatment is mainly required for lifelong and acquired premature ejaculation. On the other hand, counseling, psychoeducation and local anesthetics are particularly indicated for variable premature ejaculation and subjective premature ejaculation. Apart from the efficacy of various drugs, drugs against premature ejaculation can be taken on-demand or on a daily basis. However, apart from the on-demand use of dapoxetine, all other premature ejaculation treatments are off-label. Drug treatment is the first choice of treatment for lifelong premature ejaculation and may also be indicated for acquired premature ejaculation. Together with the patient, the clinician can choose which drug and which treatment strategy is most suitable for the patient and his partner.