AbstractOne of the major topics of debate in ophiolite geology is the original tectonic setting of ophiolites. New studies show that most ophiolites are formed more frequently in a supra‐subduction zone (SSZ) environment and that only a very small number of ophiolites have formed in an oceanic range (MOR). The Masirah ophiolite is one of the few oceanic ridge ophiolites that have been preserved, and the evidence that was formed in a subduction environment is missing (Moseley and Abbotts 1979, Dilek and Furnes, 2011; Rollinson, 2017). Masirah Island, the Batain and Ras Madrah areas of eastern Oman are almost entirely composed of a well‐developed ophiolite, known as the Masirah ophiolite (Fig. 1), which is, however, completely unrelated to the nearby Semail Ophiolite in the northern Oman Mountains (Fig. 2). The Masirah ophiolite is Jurassic in age and represents oceanic lithosphere derived from the Indian Ocean, but is about 15–20 Myr later than emplacement of mid‐Cretaceous Semail ophiolite in northern Oman. The presence of basaltic to rhyolitic lavas of calc‐alkaline affinity and boninites in the lava sequence of the Semail ophiolite led several researchers to propose a back‐arc basin model for this ophiolite (e.g. Tamura and Arai, 2006; Godard et al., 2008; Rollinson and Adetunji, 2015).The Masirah Ophiolite shows close affinities with MORB peridotites in general. Most of the olivine from the Masirah harzburgites show Fo contents that are similar to those of olivine from MORB. Both pyroxenes in these harzburgites have similar Mg# values, Al2O3 and Cr2O3 contents to those of pyroxenes from MORB peridotites. The observed primitive mantle‐normalized REE patterns showing enrichment in LREEs indicate that the Masirah peridotites have been modified by fluids or melts enriched in LREEs in a MORB environment.Podiform chromitites housed in ophiolites today interpreted as magmatic deposits formed during the reaction of molten rock in environments spike in the middle of the ocean (MOR) or suprasubduccion zone (SSZ) (Arai and Matsukage, 1998; Rollinson and Adetunji, 2015). The Masirah chromitites has a mineral chemistry similar to the mineral chemistry of chromite crystallized from MOR magmas. The Cr# values of chromite in the Masirah chromatite are similar to those of MOR peridotites. These findings suggest that the ultramafic and mafic cumulate rock assemblages overlying the upper mantle peridotites in the Masirah ophiolite represent the products of magma evolution in a MOR initiation stage within the proto Indian Ocean.Coexisting high‐ and low‐Cr# associations of chromitite and dunite have been found in the Semail ophiolite, which illustrates the common situation of ophiolites having both SSZ and MOR geochemical signatures. Cr# varies from 40–60 for shallow chromite bodies, and over the range 70–80 for the deep locations. This diversity of chromitite types suggests two stages of magmatic activity were responsible for the chromitite genesis, in response to a switch of tectonic setting. The first is residual from lower degree, partial melting of peridotite, which produced low‐Cr# chromitites at the Moho transition zone, possibly in a mid‐ocean‐ridge setting. The second chromitite‐forming event involves higher degree partial melting, which produced high‐Cr# discordant chromitite in the upper mantle, possibly in a supra‐subduction zone setting.Assemblages of mono‐ and poly‐phase silicate inclusions (including olivine, orthopyroxene, clinopyroxene, amphibole, phlogopite, serpentine, native Fe, FeO, alloy, sulfide, calcite, laurite, celestine and halite) within chromite have been observed in the low Cr# podiform chromitites from the Semail and Masirah ophiolites. The existence of hydrous silicate inclusions in the chromite calls for a role of hydration during chromite genesis. High‐T bright green hornblende–edenite included in the chromites is evidence of the introduction of water in the magma at the end of the chromite crystallization. Such paragenesis points to the presence of hydrous fluids during the activity of the shear bands.