Abstract Background In patients with unexplained dyspnea, exercise echocardiography with diastolic stress testing is recommended to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Combined cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with echocardiography (CPETecho) adds respiratory gas analysis and is thus able to characterize all physiologic abnormalities limiting exercise capacity including cardiac, pulmonary and peripheral causes. Purpose To evaluate the use of CPETecho in patients with unexplained dyspnea compared to exercise echocardiography alone. Methods In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated patients with unexplained dyspnea (normal resting echocardiography and normal lung function) who underwent CPETecho at two university hospitals between July 2021 and November 2023. CPETecho was conducted on a semi-supine bicycle ergometer. At rest, submaximal exercise (heart rate ±100 bpm) and peak exercise echocardiography was performed. Respiratory gases, heart rate, and electrocardiogram were recorded continuously. We evaluated limitations to exercise according to cutoffs in published literature, and compared them to diagnoses obtained via exercise echocardiography values alone with CPET values being blinded. Results We enrolled 124 patients (63% women, mean age 67 ± 12 years). Peak VO2 was 88 ± 19% of the predicted value. CPETecho identified causes for dyspnea in 101 patients (81%), compared to 121 patients (98%) with exercise echocardiography. However, only in 60 out of the 121 patients (50%) exercise echo could provide a ‘certain and complete’ diagnosis. In 37 patients (31%), the correct diagnosis was missed by exercise echo: peripheral or pulmonary limitations, hyperventilation or V/Q mismatch. Additionally, in 19 patients (15%) exercise echo incorrectly diagnosed chronotropic incompetence, left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, or impaired right ventricular (RV) reserve while actually patients had a submaximal performance. Finally, 4 patients (3%) had both missing and uncertain diagnoses. In contrast, CPETecho allowed immediate detection of a submaximal test, ensuring that the identified diagnoses can be considered ‘certain’ (101 patients, 81%). Nineteen patients (15%) had an ‘uncertain’ diagnosis due to a submaximal test, 1 patient (1%) had an uncertain diagnosis despite a maximal test performance, and 3 patients had missing data due to poor image quality (2%). Conclusions In patients with unexplained dyspnea, CPETecho led to more accurate diagnoses compared to exercise echocardiography alone. Exercise echocardiography alone misclassified several patients, primarily due to its incapacity to identify pulmonary or peripheral limitations, and the inability to detect a submaximal test.
Read full abstract