Sublobar Resection Research Articles

A Retrospective Study on the Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Sublobar Resection in Lung Cancer: Analysis From the Scottish Cancer Registry.

Acomparison between sublobar resection and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) inthe treatment of lung canceris a trending topic.However, there is still a lack of strongrandomized controlled trials on this subject. We believe that the National Cancer Registry can provide good insight into decision-making when comparing these twomodalities of treatment. TheScottish Cancer Network (SCAN) datawere assessedretrospectively.These data included 2000patients who had lung cancerbetween April 2013and December 2022.We included 67 patients who had SABR (group 1) for early-stage lung cancer (T1-T2 N0) between January 2017 and December 2019 and 114 patients who had sublobar resection (group 2) for lung cancer (all comers) between April 2013 and December 2019. The average age in the SABR group was 74 years vs. 69 years in the sublobar group (P = 0.002). The overall recurrence was similar in the SABR group (29 patients) and the sublobar resection group (19 patients) (28.3% vs. 25.4%, respectively, P = 0.667). The overall survival (primary endpoint) was significantly better with patients who were treated with surgery than SABR (85.15 vs. 60.14 months, P = 0.006). The sublobar resection group showed an upgrade in staging after surgery compared to the preoperative stage on PET scan in the T stage(31 patients, 27.2%) and in the N stage (five patients, 4.3%). Patientswho hadSABR needed more CT scans for follow-up compared to the sublobar resection group (seven vs. four scans, respectively). Sublobar lung resection should remain thepreferabletreatment for lung cancer in patients who are suitable for resection. Large randomized controlled trials are still needed to guidetreatmentin patients who aresuitablefor bothoptions of treatment.

A prospective 10-year follow-up study after sublobar resection for ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer

This single-arm multi-institutional prospective study aimed to evaluate the 10-year outcomes of sublobar resection for small-sized ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer. Among 73 patients prospectively enrolled from 13 institutions between November 2006 and April 2012, 53 ground-glass opacity-dominant lung cancer patients underwent sublobar resection with wedge resection as the first choice. The inclusion criteria were maximum tumor size of 8–20 mm; ≥ 80% ground-glass opacity ratio on high-resolution computed tomography; lower 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation than the mediastinum; intraoperative pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in situ; and no cancer cells on intraoperative cut margins. The primary endpoint was a 10-year disease-specific survival. The 53 eligible patients had a mean tumor size of 14 ± 3.4 mm and a mean ground-glass opacity ratio of 95.9 ± 7.2%. Wedge resection and segmentectomy were performed in 39 and 14 patients, respectively. The final pathological diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in situ in 47 patients (88.7%) and adenocarcinoma with mixed subtype in 6 patients (11.3%). The 10-year disease-specific survival and overall survival were 100% and 96.2%, respectively, during a median follow-up period of 120 months (range, 37–162 months). Ground-glass opacity-dominant small lung cancer is cured by sublobar resection when patients are strictly selected by the inclusion criteria of this study.

Comparison of survivals between sublobar resection and lobar resection for patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: a propensity score matching analysis.

Patients with early-stage lung cancer and interstitial lung disease have a poorer prognosis than those without interstitial lung disease. This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of lobar and sublobar resections in these patients. We retrospectively analyzed 138 consecutive patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease who underwent surgical treatment at two institutions between January 2010 and December 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. Thirty-six patients underwent sublobar resection and 102 underwent lobar resection. The median follow-up was 45.7 months. In all patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 33.2% and 73.2%, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 24.2% and 60.1% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p < 0.01, <0.01). Death due to lung cancer and locoregional recurrence were significantly more frequent in the sublobar resection group than in the lobar resection group (p = 0.034, <0.01, respectively). On propensity score matching analysis, the 5-year OS rates of the 19 matched pairs were 46.3% and 73.2%, and the RFS rates were 31.6% and 67.6% in the sublobar and lobar resection groups, respectively (p = 0.036, <0.01). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significant association between lobar resection and improved survival (p = 0.047). The patients in the lobar resection group had better survival rates than those in the sublobar resection group. In terms of long-term prognosis, deliberately limited surgery may not be necessary for patients who tolerate lobectomy.

The Role of Sublobar Resection in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

The results of a prospective, multi-institutional randomized trial developed to assess the equality of sublobar resection versus standard lobectomy were first published in 1995. They concluded that, compared with lobectomy, sublobar resections did not show any significant improvement either in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality nor in terms of late post-resectional cardiorespiratory function. Moreover, due to the higher mortality and local recurrence rate related to sublobar resection, lobectomy had to be judged as the best surgical option for patients diagnosed with peripheral early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Since then, lobectomy has been considered the best surgical option for fit patients suffering from early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. In 2022 and 2023, three non-inferiority randomized trials were published, comparing lobectomy with the sublobar resection in T1a N0 patients whose tumors were up to 2 cm in size. Although presenting some important differences, all three trials met their primary endpoints, disclosing the non-inferiority of sublobar resections in terms of overall and disease-free survival. This narrative review aims to compare the newly published results of these trials as well as to report results from recent non-randomized studies on this topic.

The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.

Minimally invasive thoracic surgery has advanced the treatment of lung cancer since its introduction in the 1990s. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offer the advantage of smaller incisions without compromising patient outcomes. These techniques have been shown to be safe and effective in standard pulmonary resections (lobectomy and sub-lobar resection) and in complex pulmonary resections (sleeve resection and pneumonectomy). Furthermore, several studies show these techniques enhance patient outcomes from early recovery to improved quality of life (QoL) and excellent oncologic results. The rise of RATS has yielded further operative benefits compared to thoracoscopic surgery. The wristed instruments, neutralization of tremor, dexterity, and magnification allow for more precise and delicate dissection of tissues and vessels. This review summarizes of the advancements in minimally invasive thoracic surgery and the positive impact on patient outcomes.

LungPath: artificial intelligence-driven histologic pattern recognition for improved diagnosis of early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma.

Early-stage invasive lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) characterized by a predominant micropapillary or solid pattern exhibit an elevated risk of recurrence following sub-lobar resection, thus determining histological subtype of early-stage invasive ADC prior surgery is important for formulating lobectomy or sub-lobar resection. This study aims to develop a deep learning algorithm and assess its clinical capability in distinguishing high-risk or low-risk histologic patterns in early-stage invasive ADC based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Two retrospective cohorts were included: development cohort 1 and external test cohort 2, comprising patients diagnosed with T1 stage invasive ADC. Electronic medical records and CT scans of all patients were documented. Patients were stratified into two risk groups. High-risk group: comprising cases with a micropapillary component ≥5% or a predominant solid pattern. Low-risk group: encompassing cases with a micropapillary component <5% and an absence of a predominant solid pattern. The overall segmentation model was modified based on Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask-RCNN), and Residual Network 50 (ResNet50)_3D was employed for image classification. A total of 432 patients participated in this study, with 385 cases in cohort 1 and 47 cases in cohort 2. The fine-outline results produced by the auto-segmentation model exhibited a high level of agreement with manual segmentation by human experts, yielding a mean dice coefficient of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-0.87] in cohort 1 and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.85) in cohort 2. Furthermore, the deep learning model effectively differentiated the high-risk group from the low-risk group, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.88-0.90) in cohort 1. In the external validation conducted in cohort 2, the deep learning model displayed an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.88) in distinguishing the high-risk group from the low-risk group. The average diagnostic time was 16.00±3.2 seconds, with an accuracy of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.81-0.83). We have developed a deep learning algorithm, LungPath, for the automated segmentation of pulmonary nodules and prediction of high-risk histological patterns in early-stage lung ADC based on CT scans.

ASO Author Reflections: Utility of Sublobar Resection for Small-Sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

ASO Author Reflections: Utility of Sublobar Resection for Small-Sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: outstanding contribution and entering a new phase.

The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group (LCSSG) of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) was organized in 1986 and initially included 26 collaborative institutions, which has increased to 52 institutions currently. JCOG-LCSSG includes thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, and radiotherapists. In the early period, the JCOG-LCSSG mainly focused on combined modality therapies for lung cancer. Since the 2000s, the JCOG-LCSSG has investigated adequate modes of surgical resection for small-sized and peripheral non-small cell lung cancer and based on the radiological findings of whole tumor size and ground-glass opacity. Trials, such as JCOG0802, JCOG0804, and JCOG1211, have shown the appropriateness of sublobar resection, which has significantly influenced routine clinical practice. With the introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, treatment strategies for lung cancer have changed significantly. Additionally, with the increasing aging population and medical costs, tailored medicine is strongly recommended to address medical issues. To ensure comprehensive treatment, strategies, including surgical and nonsurgical approaches, should be developed. Currently, the JCOG-LCSSG has conducted numerous clinical trials to adjust the diversity of lung cancer treatment strategies. This review highlights recent advancements in the surgical field, current status, and future direction of the JCOG-LCSSG.

Tumor spread through air spaces in lung cancer: prospective analysis of the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section examination.

To establish the accuracy of frozen section examination in identifying tumor spread through air spaces (STAS), as well as to propose a reproducible technical methodology for frozen section analysis. We also aim to propose a method to be incorporated into the decision making about the need for conversion to lobectomy during sublobar resection. This was a nonrandomized prospective study of 38 patients with lung cancer who underwent surgical resection. The findings regarding STAS in the frozen section were compared with the definitive histopathological study of paraffin-embedded sections. We calculated a confusion matrix to obtain the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. The intraoperative frozen section analysis identified 7 STAS-positive cases that were also positive in the histopathological examination, as well as 3 STAS-negative cases that were positive in the in the histopathological examination. Therefore, frozen section analysis was determined to have a sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 90.3%, and accuracy of 92% for identifying STAS. Frozen section analysis is capable of identifying STAS during resection in patients with lung cancer. The PPV, NPV, sensitivity, and specificity showed that the technique proposed could be incorporated at other centers and would allow advances directly linked to prognosis. In addition, given the high accuracy of the technique, it could inform intraoperative decisions regarding sublobar versus lobar resection.

Accurate Selection of Sublobar Resection for Small Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Although sublobar resection (wedge resection [Wed] or segmentectomy [Seg]) has become a standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan, the impact of this procedure on the prognosis and postoperative complications in real-world clinical practice is unknown. This study retrospectively analyzed risk factors for a poor prognosis and postoperative complications of 470 patients with clinical stage ≤ IA2 NSCLC who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2021. Among the patients with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) higher than 0.5, the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was significantly lower in the Wed group (72.1%) than in the Seg (85.8%) and Lob (86.8%) groups (p < 0.01), but the difference between the Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Among patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower, the 5-year RFS rate did not differ significantly among the three groups. Multivariable analysis of RFS showed that the prognosis was significantly worse in the Wed group than in the Lob group (hazard ratio, 2.83; p < 0.01), but the difference between the Wed and Seg groups or the between Seg and Lob groups was not significant. Multivariable analysis of postoperative complications showed a significantly lower risk in the Wed group than in the Seg group (odds ratio, 0.31; p < 0.01). Seg could become the standard operative procedure for clinical stages IA1 and IA2 NSCLC patients. Wed is suggested to be an option for patients with a CTR of 0.5 or lower and has the advantage of avoiding postoperative complications.

Analysis of postoperative weight loss associated with prognosis after sublobar resections for lung cancer.

Sublobar resections for lung cancer are increasing worldwide. However, the prognostic significance of weight loss after sublobar resection remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of weight loss after sublobar resection for lung cancer. Patients who underwent sublobar resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2016 and June 2021 were analysed. The percentage weight change at 3, 6, and 12months postoperatively was determined based on the preoperative weight. Patients were divided into two groups: those with or without weight loss ≥ 5%, referring to the diagnostic criteria for frailty, to assess prognosis. Subsequently, the prognosis-related timing of weight loss ≥ 5% and its risk factors were analyzed. We reviewed 147 patients; 39 (26.5%) showed weight loss ≥ 5% within 1-year post-surgery. A total of 32 patients (21.8%) died, 13 from primary lung cancer and 19 from non-lung cancer causes. Cancer recurrence occurred in 22 patients (15.0%). Weight loss ≥ 5% within 1-year post-surgery was a poor prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival (log-rank; p = 0.014 and 0.018, respectively). Additionally, weight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12months postoperatively was associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival (p < 0.05, both). In the multivariable analysis, an age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 4 was a predictive factor for weight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12months postoperatively (odds ratio, 3.920; p = 0.023). Weight loss ≥ 5% at 6-12months postoperatively was associated with poor prognosis. Long-term nutritional management is important in the treatment plan of sublobar resection in high-risk patients.

Recurrence of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer With Visceral Pleural Invasion

The randomized clinical trial Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503 showed that for patients with clinically staged T1N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; ≤2 cm), sublobar resections were associated with similar oncological outcomes to those after lobar resection. The association of the extent of parenchymal resection with recurrence and survival in patients with tumors pathologically upstaged to T2 based on visceral pleural invasion (VPI) is controversial. To determine survival and recurrence rates in patients with small peripheral pT2 NSCLC (≤2 cm) that was treated by either lobar or sublobar resection in CALGB 140503. CALGB 140503, a randomized multicenter noninferiority trial, included 697 patients with small peripheral NSCLC that was clinically staged as T1N0. Enrollment was from June 2007 through March 2017 at 83 participating institutions, and after a median follow-up of 7 years, the primary outcome of disease-free survival after sublobar resection was noninferior to that after lobar resection. Lobar or sublobar resection. Survival end points were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using stratified Cox proportional hazard models. Of 679 participants, 390 (57.4%) were female, and the median (range) age was 67.8 (37.8-89.7) years. Among 697 patients randomized, 566 (81.2%) had pT1 tumors (no VPI) and 113 (16.2%) had pT2 tumors (VPI). Five-year disease-free survival was 65.9% (95% CI, 61.9%-70.2%) in patients with pT1 compared with 53.3% (95% CI, 44.3%-64.1%) in patients with pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P = .02). Disease recurrence developed in 27.6% of patients with pT1 (locoregional only: 60 [10.8%]; distant only: 81 [14.6%]) and 41.6% of those with pT2 (locoregional only: 17 [15.0%]; distant only: 27 [23.9%]). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 73.1% (95% CI, 69.2%-77.1%) for pT1 tumors and 58.2% (95% CI, 49.2%-68.8%) for pT2 tumors (stratified log-rank: P = .01). There were no intergroup differences in disease-free or recurrence-free survival based on the extent of parenchymal resection. The results of this secondary analysis suggest that compared with patients with tumors without VPI, patients who had tumors with VPI had worse disease-free and recurrence-free survival and a higher rate of local and distant disease recurrence. These high rates of recurrence were independent of the extent of parenchymal resection, and these data support the inclusion of these patients in adjuvant therapy trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0049933.

The effects of surgical resection in the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.

This study aimed to examine the effects of surgical resection on the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer and identify patient characteristics that may indicate a benefit from surgical resection.We retrospectively reviewed medical data from patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer between January 2013 and December 2020 at three hospitals. A total of 478 patients were included in the study, 153 patients received surgery treatment and 325 patients received non-surgery treatment. Survival differences between the surgical resection group and the nonsurgical resection group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.The overall survival in the surgical resection group was significantly improved compared to that in the nonsurgical resection group (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.370-0.876, p = 0.0126). Surgical resection significantly improved overall survival compared to nonsurgical resection in stage I disease (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.94, p = 0.029) and stage IIA disease (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.92, p = 0.019). However, no significant differences in overall survival were found between surgical resection and nonsurgical resection in stage IIB disease (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57-1.29, p = 0.46) and stage III disease (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.71-1.39, p = 0.97). The overall survival of patients who underwent lobectomy was significantly better than that of patients who underwent sublobular resection (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.15-4.16, p = 0.021) and who underwent pneumonectomy (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.29-5.28, p = 0.009).Surgical resection should be recommended for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA SCLC. When deciding on the surgical type, it is preferable to choose lobectomy over sublobar resection or pneumonectomy.

Evaluation of radiofrequency identification tag accuracy using bronchoscopy with fluoroscopy and virtual navigation guidance before segmentectomy

BackgroundThe use of sublobar resection has increased with advances in imaging technologies. However, it is difficult for thoracic surgeons to identify small lung tumours intraoperatively. Radiofrequency identification (RFID) lung-marking systems are useful for overcoming this difficulty; however, accurate placement is essential for maximum effectiveness.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent RFID tag placement via fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) guidance before our institution’s sublobar resection of lung lesions. Thirty-one patients with 31 lung lesions underwent RFID lung-marking with fluoroscopic bronchoscopy under VBN guidance. Results: Of the 31 procedures, 26 tags were placed within 10 mm of the target site, 2 were placed more than 10 mm away from the target site, and 3 were placed in a different area from the target bronchus. No clinical complications were associated with RFID tag placement, such as pneumothorax or bleeding. The contribution of the RFID lung-marking system to surgery was high, particularly when the RFID tag was placed at the target site and tumour was located in the intermediate hilar zone.ConclusionsAn RFID tag can be placed near the target site using fluoroscopic bronchoscopy in combination with VBN guidance. RFID tag placement under fluoroscopic bronchoscopy with VBN guidance is useful for certain segmentectomies.

Sublobar Resection vs Lobectomy for High-Risk Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Sublobar Resection vs Lobectomy for High-Risk Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Segmentectomy and wedge resection are equivalent for the treatment of early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumors: A retrospective cohort study

Currently, there is no consensus regarding the extent of surgery for stage I pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors, which encompass typical carcinoid (TC) and atypical carcinoid (AC) tumors. Sublobar resection includes segmental resection and wedge resection; the former is regarded as a type of anatomical resection that is better suited for tumor treatment. Therefore, it needs to be further verified whether differences exist in the effects of the two surgical methods on the survival time of patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The primary endpoints were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) time. Survival differences were analyzed via the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. There was no significant difference in survival between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups after PSM in either the TC or AC tumor groups (all p > 0.05). A total of 1680 patients underwent pulmonary wedge resection (TC: n = 1547, AC: n = 133), and 398 patients underwent segmental resection (TC: n = 365, AC: n = 33). After PSM, there were no statistically significant differences in survival, regardless of whether OS or CSS was considered the primary endpoint (OS: p = 0.337; CSS: p = 0.470). Furthermore, segmental resection did not prolong patient survival time compared with wedge resection in different subgroup analyses on the basis of histology, age, and tumor size (all p > 0.05). Finally, the same results were obtained via multivariate Cox analysis (OS: p = 0.153; HR = 1.21; CSS: p = 0.351, HR = 1.32). Sublobar resection could be considered for patients with early-stage typical or atypical pulmonary carcinoid, provided that a rigorous lymph node evaluation is conducted. If the tumor is distant from the pulmonary hilum, either segmentectomy or wedge resection may be performed depending on the specific location of the tumor and the clinical condition of the patient.

Sublobar resection for lung adenocarcinoma less than 2 cm containing solid or micropapillary components radiologically presented as consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.25 [ground-glass opacity (GGO)

The suitability of sublobar resection as a surgical approach for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This study investigated the feasibility of sublobar resection in patients with pathological-stage IA adenocarcinoma less than 2 cm characterized by a high-risk pathological subtype but exhibiting radiologically noninvasive features. We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical intervention between 2013 and 2017. The inclusion criteria included a maximum tumor diameter of 2.0 cm or less, a consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) of 0.25 or less, and a histopathological confirmation of a solid or micropapillary component. Patients were categorized into sublobar resection and lobectomy groups, and propensity score matching was employed to mitigate potential confounders. The primary endpoints were lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS). The study comprised 149 patients, with 84 in the lobectomy group and 65 in the limited resection group. In the overall cohort, the 5-year LCSS was 100% for both groups, while the 5-year OS was 97.6% (95% CI: 94.41-100.00%) in the lobectomy group and 100% in the sublobar resection group (P=0.21). After propensity score matching, the LCSS remained at 100% for both groups, and the 5-year OS was 97.14% in the lobectomy group and 100% in the sublobar resection group (P=0.32). Based on our experience, for lung adenocarcinoma containing solid/micropapillary subtype, a size less than 2 cm, and a CTR ≤0.25, the oncological outcomes appeared to be comparable between sublobar resection and lobectomy, suggesting that sublobar resection might serve as an equivalent alternative to lobectomy for such lesions.

Lung adenocarcinoma manifested as ground-glass nodules in teenagers: characteristics, surgical outcomes and management strategies.

Ground-glass nodules-featured lung cancer have been identified in some teenagers in recent years. This study aims to investigate the characteristics and surgical outcomes of these patients and explore proper management strategy. Patients aged ≤20 with incidentally diagnosed lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed from February 2016 to March 2023. Based on lymph node evaluation status, these patients were divided into non-lymph node evaluation and lymph node evaluation groups. The clinical and pathological characteristics were analysed. A total of 139 teenage patients were included, with an obviously increased cases observed from 2019, corresponding to the COVID-19 pandemic. The median age of the 139 patients was 18 years (range 12-20). Eighty-five patients had pure ground-glass nodules, while others had mixed ground-glass nodules. The mean diameter of nodules was 8.87 ± 2.20 mm. Most of the patients underwent wedge resection (64%) or segmentectomy (31.7%). Fifty-two patients underwent lymph node sampling or dissection. None of these patients had lymph node metastasis. The majority of lesions were adenocarcinoma in situ (63 cases) and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (72 cases), while four lesions were invasive adenocarcinoma. The median follow-up time was 2.46 years, and none of these patients experienced recurrence or death during follow-up. The lymph node evaluation group had longer hospital stays (P < 0.001), longer surgery time (P < 0.001), and greater blood loss (P = 0.047) than the non-lymph node evaluation group. The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased the number of teenage patients incidentally diagnosed with lung cancer, presenting as ground-glass nodules on CT scans. These patients have favourable surgical outcomes. We propose a management strategy for teenage patients, and suggest that sub-lobar resection without lymph node dissection may be an acceptable surgical procedure for these patients.

No survival benefit of primary tumor resection for non-small cell lung cancer patients with unexpectedly detected pleural disseminated nodules in the era of targeted therapy.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pleural dissemination are generally contraindicated for surgery. This study aimed to investigate the survival benefits of primary tumor resection for NSCLC patients with unexpectedly detected pleural disseminated nodules during thoracotomy in the era of targeted therapy. Of the 4984 patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery without induction therapy between 2000 and 2021, we retrospectively evaluated 90 (1.8%) patients with unexpectedly detected pleural disseminated nodule. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Among the evaluated patients, 58 were male, the median age was 67, and 77 (86%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Exploratory thoracotomy was performed in 21 (23%), and primary tumor resection was performed in 69 (77%) patients, including pneumonectomy in four, lobectomy in 39, and sublobar resection in 26. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement were detected in 33 (37%) and 4 (4%) cases, respectively. Among them, 31 patients received targeted therapy. The overall survival (OS) was not significantly different between patients with primary tumor resection and exploratory thoracotomy (5-year OS rate: 30.2% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.81). Multivariable analysis revealed that sex (p = 0.02) and targeted therapy (p < 0.01) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Survival outcomes in patients who received targeted therapy were significantly better regardless of primary tumor resection. Primary tumor resection might not affect the survival in NSCLC patients with unexpectedly detected pleural disseminated nodules in the era of targeted therapy.

Salvage surgery and conversion surgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A narrative review.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. With the development of screening, patient selection and treatment strategies, patients' survival outcomes and living quality significantly improved. However, some patients still have local recurrence or residual tumors after receiving definitive therapies. Salvage surgery has been regarded as an effective option for recurrent or residual NSCLC, but its effectiveness remains undetermined. Furthermore, conversion surgery is a special type of salvage surgery for tumors converted from "initially unresectable" to "potentially resectable" status due to a favorable response to systemic treatments. Although conversion surgery is a promising curative procedure for advanced NSCLC, its concept and clinical value remain unfamiliar to clinicians. In this narrative review, we provided an overview of the safety and efficacy of salvage surgery, especially salvage surgery after sublobar resection in early-stage NSCLC. More importantly, we highlighted the concept and value of conversion surgery after systemic treatment in advanced NSCLC to gain some insights into its role in the treatment of lung cancer.