Background: During COVID-19 pandemic, online written theory exams were found to be essential for internal assessments. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of online exams on the following: (i) ability to motivate students to study for their upcoming summative exams, (ii) adoption of online mode of assessment by the students and (iii) educational outcomes with respect to the confidence that may be attached to the judgements. Methods: We conducted online assessments for two batches of postgraduate Medical Biochemistry students: nine second-year and eight third-year Master of Science (M.Sc.) students of our institute. Online feedback forms were administered to the students and the teachers after declaring the exam results. Results: The teachers were not fully convinced about the usefulness of online assessments. The teachers strongly prefer tests under supervision and were of the opinion that malpractices can be reduced by questions from higher levels of cognition during the online assessments. The students found online assessments highly useful in their learning process. The adoption of online assessment by the students and its impact on the educational outcomes were found to be inferior to the conventional exams. The scores of the students in online exams were comparable with their previous in-class internal assessment scores as well as with their scores in the final university exams. Conclusion: It is suggested that online assessment is a suitable tool for promoting the learning process. It can also serve as an effective tool for summative assessments; although its educational outcome and the readiness to adopt are inferior to conventional exams.
Read full abstract