In this work porous silicon (PSi) and silicon nanotubes (SiNTs) are presented as a platform for filling with FePt nanostructures which offer a hard magnetic behavior. The difference of the magnetic characteristics between the two systems is figured out.The porous silicon is produced by anodization of a highly doped n-type silicon wafer in a 10 wt% HF solution [1]. The morphology offers separated pores of about 60 nm and a mean distance between the pores of 50 nm. The SiNTs are fabricated in using an array of ZO wires as template, subsequent silicon deposition and finally etching off the ZO [2]. The inner diameter of the tubes and also the wall thickness can be tuned by the fabrication process. In this work SiNTs with comparable inner diameter to the PSi structure are used. FePt nanoparticles (NPs) are chemically grown inside the pores and the tubes, respectively whereat the molar ratio of Fe is varied (Pt:Fe 1:1, 1:3 and 1:6). For this purpose a 3 component solution consisting of H2PtCl6, Fe(NO3)3 and citric acid is used, whereas the ratio of the components is modified.Magnetic characterization of the samples is performed by VSM (Vibrating Sample Magnetometer), the structure is analyzed by SEM, TEM and EDX.The magnetic response of the two different composite systems is investigated. PSi/FePt shows a higher coercivity and remanence than SiNTs/FePt and thus a higher hard magnetic performance. The variation of the coercivities between SiNTs/FePt and PSi/FePt is about 57%.Considering the FePt deposits with different molar ratio of Fe the coercivities vary in a range of 5% in the case of both template types. Comparing FePt loaded samples with Co loaded samples in all cases an increase of the coercivity and of the remanence is observed for FePt, whereat in the case of PSi as template material the increase is significantly stronger than in the case of SiNTs samples. Figure 1 shows the comparison of the hysteresis of PSi and SiNTs filled with FePt NPs.Hard magnetic materials within nanostructured silicon give rise for on-chip applications using 3 dimensional arrays of nanomagnets.[1] K. Rumpf, P. Granitzer, H. Michor, NRL 11, 398 (2016).[2] X. Huang, R. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, R. Rich, Z. Gryczynski, J.L. Coffer, Chem. Comm. 49, 5760 (2013). Figure 1
Read full abstract