The study of structural phase transitions that occur as the result of the application of pressure is still in its long-drawn-out infancy. This is a direct result of the non-quenchability of structural phase transitions; their characterisation requires measurements of the material to be made in situ at high pressures. Although structural phase transitions could be detected by simple macroscopic compression measurements in piston-cylinder apparatus when the volume change arising from the transition was sufficiently large (e.g. calcite by Bridgman 1939, and spodumene by Vaidya et al. 1973) the limitations on sample access precluded their proper microscopic characterisation. The development in the 1970s of in situ diffraction methods, specifically the diamond-anvil cell (DAC) for X-ray diffraction and various clamp and gas-pressure cells for neutron diffraction, allowed both the structure of high-pressure phases and the evolution of the unit-cell parameters of both the high- and low-symmetry phases involved in a phase transition to be determined. Several classic studies of phase transitions at relatively low pressures were performed by high-pressure neutron diffraction methods in the 1970s and 1980s (e.g. Yelon et al. 1974, Decker et al. 1979), but the instrument time required for high-pressure studies (a result of limited sample access through, and attenuation by, the high-pressure cells as well as small sample sizes) limited the number of studies performed. In addition, until the advent of the Paris-Edinburgh pressure cell which can achieve pressures of up to 25 GPa (Besson et al. 1992, Klotz et al. 1998), pressure cells for neutron diffraction were limited to maximum pressures of the order of 2 to 4 GPa. In the past two decades the precision and accuracy of high-pressure X-ray diffraction methods has advanced considerably (see Hazen 2000). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction, which can be performed in the laboratory, is routine to pressures of …
Read full abstract