Structure Of GroEL Research Articles

A test-bed for optimizing high-resolution single particle reconstructions

It is becoming routine for cryoEM single particle reconstructions to result in 3D electron density maps with resolutions of approximately 10A, but maps with resolutions of 5A or better are still celebrated events. The electron microscope has a resolving power to better than 2A, and thus should not be a limiting factor; instead the practical limitations in resolution most likely arise from a combination of specimen preparation methods, data collection parameters, and data analysis procedures. With the aid of a highly automated system for acquiring images, coupled to a relational database to keep track of all processing parameters, we have taken a systematic approach to optimizing parameters affecting the resolution of single particle reconstructions. Using GroEL as a test-bed, we performed a series of 3D reconstructions where we systematically varied the number of particles used in computing the map, the accelerating voltage of the microscope, and the electron dose used to acquire the images. We also investigated methods for excluding unacceptable or "bad" particles from contributing to the final 3D map. Using relatively standard instrumentation (Tecnai F20, 4K x 4K CCD, side entry cold stage) and a completely automated approach, these approaches resulted in a map with a nominal resolution of 5.4A (FSC(0.5)) in which secondary structure is clearly discernable and the handedness of some of the alpha-helices in the GroEL structure can be determined.

Chaperonin GroEL: Structure and Reaction Cycle

The structure of Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL was studied using various experimental tools. Such studies produced information about its structure with increasing details. Moreover, remarkable advances in experimental methods provided a step forward in understanding the reaction cycle involved in GroEL-mediated protein folding. In the current review we summarize recent progress, focus on the structure of GroEL and understand the mechanism involved in GroEL-mediated protein folding. This review is divided into the following sections: (i) Section 1 provides basic understanding on protein folding, (ii) Section 2 not only describes various tools used to elucidate the structural aspects of GroEL but also provides details about its structure with particular emphasis, (iii) Section 3 describes allosteric transitions and the reaction cycle involved in GroEL-mediated protein folding, (iv) Section 4 explains iterative annealing and smoothing of the energy landscape model and finally (v) Section 5 discusses applications and recent progress.

Purification, crystallization and structure determination of native GroEL from Escherichia coli lacking bound potassium ions.

GroEL is a member of the ATP-dependent chaperonin family that promotes the proper folding of many cytosolic bacterial proteins. The structures of GroEL in a variety of different states have been determined using X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy. In this study, a 3.02 A crystal structure of the native GroEL complex from Escherichia coli is presented. The complex was purified and crystallized in the absence of potassium ions, which allowed evaluation of the structural changes that may occur in response to cognate potassium-ion binding by comparison to the previously determined wild-type GroEL structure (PDB code 1xck), in which potassium ions were observed in all 14 subunits. In general, the structure is similar to the previously determined wild-type GroEL crystal structure with some differences in regard to temperature-factor distribution.

Chaperonin GroEL Meets the Substrate Protein as a “Load” of the Rings

Chaperonin GroEL is an essential molecular chaperone that assists protein folding in the cell. With the aid of cochaperonin GroES and ATP, double ring-shaped GroEL encapsulates non-native substrate proteins inside the cavity of the GroEL-ES complex. Although extensive studies have revealed the outline of GroEL mechanism over the past decade, central questions remain: What are the in vivo substrate proteins? How does GroEL encapsulate the substrates inside the cavity in spite of an apparent entropic difficulty? Is the folding inside the GroEL-ES cavity the same as bulk spontaneous folding? In this review I summarize the recent progress on in vivo and in vitro aspects of GroEL. In particular, emerging evidence shows that the substrate protein itself influences the chaperonin GroEL structure and reaction cycle. Finally I propose the mechanistic similarity between GroEL and kinesin, a molecular motor that moves along a microtubule in an ATP-dependent manner.

The Intercellular Signaling Activity of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Chaperonin 60.1 Protein Resides in the Equatorial Domain

The major heat shock protein, chaperonin 60, has been established to have intercellular signaling activity in addition to its established protein-folding function. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is one of a small proportion of bacteria to encode two chaperonin 60 proteins. We have demonstrated that chaperonin 60.1 from this bacterium is a very active stimulator of human monocytes. To determine structure/function relationships of chaperonin 60.1 we have cloned and expressed the apical, equatorial, and intermediate domains of this protein. We have found that the signaling activity of M. tuberculosis chaperonin 60.1 resides in the equatorial domain. This activity of the recombinant equatorial domain was completely blocked by treating the protein with proteinase K, ruling out lipopolysaccharide contamination as the cause of the cell activation. Blockade of the activity of the equatorial domain by anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies reveals that this domain activates monocytes by binding to CD14. Looking at the oligomeric state of the active proteins, using native gel electrophoresis and protein cross-linking we found that recombinant M. tuberculosis chaperonin 60.1 fails to form the prototypic tetradecameric structure of chaperonin 60 proteins under the conditions tested and only forms dimers. It is therefore concluded that the monocyte-stimulating activity of M. tuberculosis Cpn60.1 resides in the monomeric subunit and within this subunit the biological activity is due to the equatorial domain.

The 13 Å Structure of a Chaperonin GroEL–Protein Substrate Complex by Cryo-electron Microscopy

The 13 angstroms resolution structures of GroEL bound to a single monomer of the protein substrate glutamine synthetase (GS(m)), as well as that of unliganded GroEL have been determined from a heterogeneous image population using cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) coupled with single-particle image classification and reconstruction techniques. We combined structural data from cryo-EM maps and dynamic modeling, taking advantage of the known X-ray crystallographic structure and normal mode flexible fitting (NMFF) analysis, to describe the changes that occur in GroEL structure induced by GS(m) binding. The NMFF analysis reveals that the molecular movements induced by GS(m) binding propagate throughout the GroEL structure. The modeled molecular motions show that some domains undergo en bloc movements, while others show more complex independent internal movements. Interestingly, the substrate-bound apical domains of both the cis (GS(m)-bound ring) and trans (the opposite substrate-free ring) show counterclockwise rotations, in the same direction (though not as dramatic) as those documented for the ATP-GroEL-induced structure changes. The structural changes from the allosteric substrate protein-induced negative cooperativity between the GroEL rings involves upward concerted movements of both cis and trans equatorial domains toward the GS(m)-bound ring, while the inter-ring distances between the heptamer contact residues are maintained. Furthermore, the NMFF analysis identifies the secondary structural elements that are involved in the observed approximately 5 angstroms reduction in the diameter of the cavity opening in the unbound trans ring. Understanding the molecular basis of these substrate protein-induced structural changes across the heptamer rings provides insight into the origins of the allosteric negative cooperative effects that are transmitted over long distances (approximately 140 angstroms).

Identification of a Major Inter-ring Coupling Step in the GroEL Reaction Cycle

It has been shown previously that the double-ring structure of GroEL can be converted to a single-ring species by site-directed amino acid replacements at the ring interface and that the resultant molecule retains many of the crucial chaperonin properties; it is structurally stable, hydrolytically active, and can bind both the co-chaperonin, GroES, and unfolded substrate proteins. By comparing the behavior of the double- and single-ring structures in response to nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, we elucidate steps in the ATP-driven reaction cycle at which there is conformational coupling between the rings. Remarkably, the parting of the rings has little effect either on the thermodynamic properties of ATP binding or on the ATP-induced conformational changes prior to hydrolysis. However, there is a marked effect on the rate-limiting process in the steady-state cycle; a step that is coincident with bond cleavage in ATP. The effect of the ring-ring interaction is to increase its activation enthalpy from 42.0 to 94.2 kJ/mol. These results show that the major conformational coupling step, where structural rearrangements in one ring are propagated to the other, is the slowest process the ATPase cycle of GroEL.

Seeing GroEL at 6 A resolution by single particle electron cryomicroscopy.

We present a reconstruction of native GroEL by electron cryomicroscopy (cryo-EM) and single particle analysis at 6 A resolution. alpha helices are clearly visible and beta sheet density is also visible at this resolution. While the overall conformation of this structure is quite consistent with the published X-ray data, a measurable shift in the positions of three alpha helices in the intermediate domain is observed, not consistent with any of the 7 monomeric structures in the Protein Data Bank model (1OEL). In addition, there is evidence for slight rearrangement or flexibility in parts of the apical domain. The 6 A resolution cryo-EM GroEL structure clearly demonstrates the veracity and expanding scope of cryo-EM and the single particle reconstruction technique for macromolecular machines.

Interaction of GroEL and GroEL/GroES complexes with a nonnative subtilisin variant: a small-angle neutron scattering study

Small-angle neutron scattering and contrast variation were used to study the solution structure of GroEL and GroEL/GroES chaperonins complexed with a nonnative variant of the polypeptide substrate, subtilisin (PJ9). The subtilisin was 86% deuterated (dPJ9) so that it contrasted sufficiently with the chaperonin, allowing the contrast variation technique to be used to separate the scattering from the two components bound in the complex. Both the native double-ring GroEL and a single-ring mutant were used with dPJ9 bound in a 1:1 stoichiometry per GroEL toroid. This allowed both the position and the shape of dPJ9 in the GroEL/dPJ9 complexes to be determined. A single-ring GroEL/GroES variant complexed with one dPJ9 molecule was used to study the structural changes of dPJ9 in GroEL/GroES/dPJ9 complexes formed with ADP and with ATP. It was found that both the shape and the position of the bound dPJ9 in the GroEL/GroES/dPJ9 complex with ADP were the same as those in the GroEL/dPJ9 complex. However, dPJ9 assumed a more symmetric shape when bound in the GroEL/GroES/dPJ9 complex with ATP. This important observation reflects the relative ability of ATP to promote refolding of protein substrates relative to that of ADP.

Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis

The Escherichia coli chaperonin system, GroEL–GroES, facilitates folding of substrate proteins (SPs) that are otherwise destined to aggregate. The iterative annealing mechanism suggests that the allostery-driven GroEL transitions leading to changes in the microenvironment of the SP constitutes the annealing action of chaperonins. To describe the molecular basis for the changes in the nature of SP–GroEL interactions we use the crystal structures of GroEL (T state), GroEL–ATP (R state) and the GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 (R″ state) complex to determine the residue-specific changes in the accessible surface area and the number of tertiary contacts as a result of the T→R→R″ transitions. We find large changes in the accessible area in many residues in the apical domain, but relatively smaller changes are associated with residues in the equatorial domain. In the course of the T→R transition the microenvironment of the SP changes which suggests that GroEL is an annealing machine even without GroES. This is reflected in the exposure of Glu386 which loses six contacts in the T→R transition. We also evaluate the conservation of residues that participate in the various chaperonin functions. Multiple sequence alignments and chemical sequence entropy calculations reveal that, to a large extent, only the chemical identities and not the residues themselves important for the nominal functions (peptide binding, nucleotide binding, GroES and substrate protein release) are strongly conserved. Using chemical sequence entropy, which is computed by classifying aminoacids into four types (hydrophobic, polar, positively charged and negatively charged) we make several new predictions that are relevant for peptide binding and annealing function of GroEL. We identify a number of conserved peptide binding sites in the apical domain which coincide with those found in the 1.7 Å crystal structure of ‘mini-chaperone’ complexed with the N-terminal tag. Correlated mutations in the HSP60 family, that might control allostery in GroEL, are also strongly conserved. Most importantly, we find that charged solvent-exposed residues in the T state (Lys 226, Glu 252 and Asp 253) are strongly conserved. This leads to the prediction that mutating these residues, that control the annealing function of the SP, can decrease the efficacy of the chaperonin function.

Crystal Structure of Chaperonin-60 from Paracoccus denitrificans

The crystal structure of chaperonin-60 from Paracoccus denitrificans (P.cpn60) has been determined at 3.2Å resolution by the molecular replacement method. Two heptameric rings of identical subunits of P.cpn60 in adjacent asymmetric units are stacked in a back-to-back manner and form a cylinder, as found in GroEL, cpn60 from Escherichia coli. With respect to the unliganded GroEL structure, each subunit of P.cpn60 tilts 2° outwards and the apical domain twists 4° counter-clockwise in the top view in a hinge-like manner, rendering the central hole 5Å wider. Despite the subunit tilts, both rings in P.cpn60 contact at two sites of the equatorial domain in the same way as in GroEL. Interactions between residues 434 and 434, and 463 and 463 observed in GroEL were not found in P.cpn60, and the interaction between 452 and 461 was weaker in P.cpn60 than in GroEL. The unique hydrogen bond between 468 and 471 was observed at the right site in P.cpn60, which could account for why the subunits tilt outwards. The contact surface area was reduced at the left site, which is similar to the observed changes in the GroEL structures induced by ATP binding. In general, inter-ring interactions in P.cpn60 were weakened, which is consistent with findings that P.cpn60 is observed in single-ring forms as well as in double-ring forms.

Application of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer to the GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Reaction

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a sensitive and flexible method for studying protein-protein interactions. Here it is applied to the GroEL-GroES chaperonin system to examine the ATP-driven dynamics that underlie protein folding by this chaperone. Relying on the known structures of GroEL and GroES, sites for attachment of fluorescent probes are designed into the sequence of both proteins. Because these sites are brought close in space when GroEL and GroES form a complex, excitation energy can pass from a donor to an acceptor chromophore by FRET. While in ideal circumstances FRET can be used to measure distances, significant population heterogeneity in the donor-to-acceptor distances in the GroEL-GroES complex makes distance determination difficult. This is due to incomplete labeling of these large, oligomeric proteins and to their rotational symmetry. It is shown, however, that FRET can still be used to follow protein-protein interaction dynamics even in a case such as this, where distance measurements are either not practical or not meaningful. In this way, the FRET signal is used as a simple proximity sensor to score the interaction between GroEL and GroES. Similarly, FRET can also be used to follow interactions between GroEL and a fluorescently labeled substrate polypeptide. Thus, while knowledge of molecular structure aids enormously in the design of FRET experiments, structural information is not necessarily required if the aim is to measure the thermodynamics or kinetics of a protein interaction event by following changes in the binding proximity of two components.

High Hydrostatic Pressure Can Probe the Effects of Functionally Related Ligands on the Quaternary Structures of the Chaperonins GroEL and GroES

We investigated the effects of high hydrostatic pressure in the range of 1--3 kilobars on tetradecameric GroEL, heptameric GroES, and the GroEL-GroES complex. Unlike GroEL monomers formed by urea dissociation, which can be reassembled back to the tetradecamer, the pressure-dissociated monomers do not reassemble readily. This indicates an alteration of their native structures, an example of conformational drift. Pressure versus time profiles and kinetics of the dissociation of both GroEL and GroES at fixed pressures were monitored by light scattering. Unlike GroEL, GroES monomers do reassociate readily. Reaction conditions were varied by adding ATP, Mg(2+), ADP, AMP-PNP, and KCl. At any individual pressure, the dissociation process is governed by both thermodynamics and kinetics. This leads to the decrease in the yield of monomers at lower pressures. In the presence of Mg(2+) and KCl, GroEL is stable up to 3 kilobars. The presence of either ATP or ADP but not AMP-PNP leads to GroEL dissociation at lower pressures. Interestingly, the GroEL-GroES complex is very stable in the range of 1--2.5 kilobars. However, the addition of ADP destabilizes the complex, which dissociates completely at 1.5 kilobars. The results are rationalized in terms of different degrees of cooperativity between individual monomers and heptameric rings in the GroEL tetradecamer. Such allosteric interactions leading to the alteration of quaternary structure of GroEL in the absence of chemical denaturants are important in understanding the mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding by the GroEL-GroES system.

Conformational Changes In GROEL Induced by a Protein Substrate

Abstract The GroEL/GroES chaperonin system of E. coli facilitates nucleotide dependent folding of select proteins. The structure of GroEL has been described by three-dimensional electron microscopy and at higher resolution by X-ray crystallography. The GroEL oligomer is a cylindrical tetradecamer composed of two heptameric rings of 57 kDa protein subunits, stacked back to back. Each subunit is comprised of two large domains, equatorial and apical, connected by a smaller intermediate domain. The intermediate “hinge” domain links the apical and equatorial domain and provides flexibility for en bloc rearrangement associated with nucleotide and GroES binding. Equatorial domains are responsible for interactions between the two heptamers and contain the ATPase activity of GroEL. Each ring of GroEL has a central cavity that is the binding site for denatured protein substrate. GroES and denatured substrate binding sites are located on the apical domains facing the central cavity.

Identifying the determinants in the equatorial domain of Buchnera GroEL implicated in binding Potato leafroll virus.

Luteoviruses avoid degradation in the hemolymph of their aphid vector by interacting with a GroEL homolog from the aphid's primary endosymbiotic bacterium (Buchnera sp.). Mutational analysis of GroEL from the primary endosymbiont of Myzus persicae (MpB GroEL) revealed that the amino acids mediating binding of Potato leafroll virus (PLRV; Luteoviridae) are located within residues 9 to 19 and 427 to 457 of the N-terminal and C-terminal regions, respectively, of the discontinuous equatorial domain. Virus overlay assays with a series of overlapping synthetic decameric peptides and their derivatives demonstrated that R13, K15, L17, and R18 of the N-terminal region and R441 and R445 of the C-terminal region of the equatorial domain of GroEL are critical for PLRV binding. Replacement of R441 and R445 by alanine in full-length MpB GroEL and in MpB GroEL deletion mutants reduced but did not abolish PLRV binding. Alanine substitution of either R13 or K15 eliminated the PLRV-binding capacity of the other and those of L17 and R18. In the predicted tertiary structure of GroEL, the determinants mediating virus binding are juxtaposed in the equatorial plain.

Chaperone Activity of a Chimeric GroEL Protein That Can Exist in a Single or Double Ring Form

The molecular chaperone GroEL is a protein complex consisting of two rings each of seven identical subunits. It is thought to act by providing a cavity in which a protein substrate can fold into a form that has no propensity to aggregate. Substrate proteins are sequestered in the cavity while they fold, and prevented from diffusion out of the cavity by the action of the GroES complex, that caps the open end of the cavity. A key step in the mechanism of action of GroEL is the transmission of a conformational change between the two rings, induced by the binding of nucleotides to the GroEL ring opposite to the one containing the polypeptide substrate. This conformational change then leads to the discharge of GroES from GroEL, enabling polypeptide release. Single ring forms of GroEL are thus predicted to be unable to chaperone the folding of GroES-dependent substrates efficiently, since they are unable to discharge the bound GroES and unable to release folded protein. We describe here a detailed functional analysis of a chimeric GroEL protein, which we show to exist in solution in equilibrium between single and double ring forms. We demonstrate that whereas the double ring form of the GroEL chimera functions effectively in refolding of a GroES-dependent substrate, the single ring form does not. The single ring form of the chimera, however, is able to chaperone the folding of a substrate that does not require GroES for its efficient folding. We further demonstrate that the double ring structure of GroEL is likely to be required for its activity in vivo.

Chaperonin Function: Folding by Forced Unfolding

The ability of the GroEL chaperonin to unfold a protein trapped in a misfolded condition was detected and studied by hydrogen exchange. The GroEL-induced unfolding of its substrate protein is only partial, requires the complete chaperonin system, and is accomplished within the 13 seconds required for a single system turnover. The binding of nucleoside triphosphate provides the energy for a single unfolding event; multiple turnovers require adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis. The substrate protein is released on each turnover even if it has not yet refolded to the native state. These results suggest that GroEL helps partly folded but blocked proteins to fold by causing them first to partially unfold. The structure of GroEL seems well suited to generate the nonspecific mechanical stretching force required for forceful protein unfolding.

In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones.

Fragments encompassing the apical domain of GroEL, called minichaperones, facilitate the refolding of several proteins in vitro without requiring GroES, ATP, or the cage-like structure of multimeric GroEL. We have identified the smallest minichaperone that is active in vitro in chaperoning the refolding of rhodanese and cyclophilin A: GroEL(193-335). This finding raises the question of whether the minichaperones are active under more stringent conditions in vivo. The smallest minichaperones complement two temperature-sensitive Escherichia coli groEL alleles, EL44 and EL673, at 43 degreesC. Although they cannot replace GroEL in cells in which the chromosomal groEL gene has been deleted by P1 transduction, GroEL(193-335) enhances the colony-forming ability of such cells when limiting amounts of GroEL are expressed from a tightly regulated plasmid. Surprisingly, we found that overexpression of GroEL prevents plaque formation by bacteriophage lambda and inhibits replication of the lambda origin-dependent plasmid, Lorist6. The minichaperones also inhibit Lorist6 replication, but less markedly. The complex quaternary structure of GroEL, its central cavity, and the structural allosteric changes that take place on the binding of nucleotides and GroES are not essential for all of its functions in vivo.

Divalent Cations Can Induce the Exposure of GroEL Hydrophobic Surfaces and Strengthen GroEL Hydrophobic Binding Interactions: NOVEL EFFECTS OF Zn2+ GroEL INTERACTIONS

Fluorescent and non-fluorescent probes have been used to show that divalent cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, and Zn2+) significantly increase hydrophobic exposure on GroEL, whereas monovalent cations (K+ and Na+) have little effect. Zn2+ always induced the largest amount of hydrophobic exposure on GroEL. By using a new method based on interactions of GroEL with octyl-Sepharose, it was demonstrated that Zn2+ binding strengthens GroEL hydrophobic binding interactions and increases the efficiency of substrate release upon the addition of MgATP and GroES. The binding of 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) to GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ has a Kd congruent with 1 microM, which is similar to that observed previously for the GroEL 4, 4'-bis(1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid) complex. Urea denaturation, sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation, and electron microscopy revealed that the quaternary structure of GroEL in the presence of Zn2+ had a stability and morphology equivalent to unliganded GroEL. In contrast, circular dichroism suggested some loss in both alpha-helical and beta-sheet secondary structure in the presence of Zn2+. These data suggest that divalent cations can modulate the amount of hydrophobic surface presented by GroEL. Furthermore, the influence of Zn2+ on GroEL hydrophobic surface exposure as well as substrate binding and release appears to be distinct from the stabilizing effects of Mg2+ on GroEL quaternary structure.

Structural Changes of theEscherichia coliGroEL–GroES Chaperonins upon Complex Formation in Solution: A Neutron Small Angle Scattering Study

We applied neutron scattering in conjunction with deuterium (D-) labeling in order to obtain information about the domain structure of GroEL and GroES isolated and in the complex. Each subunit of the heptameric GroES consists of two domains, a core domain (Met1 to Lys15 and Lys34 to Ala97) and an intervening loop region (Glu16 to Ala33). Neutron scattering shows that both regions change their conformation upon GroEL/GroES complex formation. The interdomain angle between the core regions of the heptameric GroES increases from 120 to 140°, leading to a less dome-like shape of GroES, and the loop regions turn inwards by 75°. The 23 C-terminal amino acids of the 14 GroEL subunits (Lys526 to Met548), which are unresolved in the crystal structure, are located either at the bottom of the cavity formed by the seven-membered GroEL ring or at the inner wall of the cavity. Upon complex formation the apical domains of GroEL move outwards, which facilitates binding of GroES at a GroEL–GroES center-to-center distance of (87 ± 8) Å. These structural changes may be important for the dissociation of the unfolded protein bound to the central cavity upon GroES binding. The overall structure determined by neutron scattering in solution tallies with the crystallographic model published after completion of this study. Differences in the conformation of GroES observed in the complex by the two methods support the view that the chaperonin complex is a flexible molecule which might switch in solution between different conformations.