Bone scaffolds are increasingly regarded as viable alternatives to autografts and allografts in clinical settings. However, their effectiveness can vary based on certain anatomical characteristics, highlighting the importance of image-based structural analysis. High-resolution imaging is crucial to accurately assess the performance of bone scaffolds. Despite this, the resolution of current clinical medical images is constrained by concerns regarding radiation exposure. The efficacy of these analyses can be improved by quantitatively evaluating the similarities and differences between low- and high-resolution images. This study quantitatively compared the structural behavior of bone scaffolds using both high- and low-resolution images. This study downscaled a high-resolution image, implanted a bone scaffold, and conducted finite element analysis. The findings suggest that the resolution needed for accurate structural analysis of skeletal images varies based on the implantation site of the scaffold. Additionally, it was found that the less influence the loading conditions have, the higher the resolution required to accurately assess the structural behavior.
Read full abstract