Fatigue damage is a progressive and permanent change in the internal material structure due to cyclic loading. The cyclic loads can be due to wind, waves, temperature variation, and traffic loads. Each cyclic load application introduces micro-damages that accumulate to induce failure. Detecting these micro-damages requires sensitive measuring techniques. Hence this research compares the sensitivity of different measuring techniques applied to fatigue experiments of concrete. The applied NDT are the passive acoustic emission technique (AET) and active ultrasonic measurements. In addition, linear variable differential transformers (LVDTs) are applied as a reference measurement. Accordingly in this research, cylindrical concrete samples are subjected to monotonic and cyclic Brazilian splitting tests. The cylinders are 100 mm in diameter and 150 mm in length. The cyclic load is applied to these samples with a loading frequency of 5 Hz. During the tests, the damage evolution is monitored with AET, ultrasonic measurements and LVDTs. There are eight AE sensors attached to the sample. The two LVDTs are positioned at the center of the sample's front and back side. Besides passively monitoring the acoustic emissions, the AET sensors are also used to do active ultrasonic measurements. The research reports the comparison conducted on the deformations and cracks measured with the LVDTs, the damage growth identified with the AET, and the change in the ultrasonic pulse velocity measurements. In addition, the study also presents the damage analysis capacity of the methods across different types of loading: monotonic, constant amplitude, and stepped fatigue loading. The comparison shows that combination of AET and ultrasonic velocity measurement is a sensitive indicator for damage growth.