The chromatic gap is the difference between the chromatic number and the clique number of a graph. Here we investigate gap(n), the maximum chromatic gap over graphs on n vertices. Can the extremal graphs be explored? While computational problems related to the chromatic gap are hopeless, an interplay between Ramsey-theory and matching theory leads to a simple and (almost) exact formula for gap(n) in terms of Ramsey-numbers. For our purposes it is more convenient to work with the covering gap, the difference between the clique cover number and stability number of a graph and this is what we call the gap of a graph. Notice that the well-studied family of perfect graphs are the graphs whose induced subgraphs have gap zero. The maximum of the (covering) gap and the chromatic gap running on all induced subgraphs will be called perfectness gap.Using α(G) for the cardinality of a largest stable (independent) set of a graph G, we define α(n)=minα(G) where the minimum is taken over triangle-free graphs on n vertices. It is easy to observe that α(n) is essentially an inverse Ramsey function, defined by the relation R(3,α(n))⩽n<R(3,α(n)+1). Our main result is that gap(n)=⌈n/2⌉−α(n), possibly with the exception of small intervals (of length at most 15) around the Ramsey-numbers R(3,m), where the error is at most 3.The central notions in our investigations are the gap-critical and the gap-extremal graphs. A graph G is gap-critical if for every proper induced subgraph H⊂G, gap(H)<gap(G) and gap-extremal if it is gap-critical with as few vertices as possible (among gap-critical graphs of the same gap). The strong perfect graph theorem, solving a long standing conjecture of Berge that stimulated a broad area of research, states that gap-critical graphs with gap 1 are the holes (chordless odd cycles of length at least five) and antiholes (complements of holes). The next step, the complete description of gap-critical graphs with gap 2 would probably be a very difficult task. As a very first step, we prove that there is a unique 2-extremal graph, 2C5, the union of two disjoint (chordless) cycles of length five.In general, for t⩾0, we denote by s(t) the smallest order of a graph with gap t and we call a graph is t-extremal if it has gap t and order s(t). Equivalently, s(t) is the smallest order of a graph with perfectness gap equal to t. It is tempting to conjecture that s(t)=5t with equality for the graph tC5. However, for t⩾3 the graph tC5 has gap t but it is not gap-extremal (although gap-critical). We shall prove that s(3)=13, s(4)=17 and s(5)∈{20,21}. Somewhat surprisingly, after the uncertain values s(6)∈{23,24,25}, s(7)∈{26,27,28}, s(8)∈{29,30,31}, s(9)∈{32,33} we can show that s(10)=35. On the other hand we can easily show that s(t) is asymptotically equal to 2t, that is, gap(n) is asymptotic to n/2. According to our main result the gap is actually equal to ⌈n/2⌉−α(n), unless n is in an interval [R,R+14] where R is a Ramsey-number, and if this exception occurs the gap may be larger than this value by only a small constant (at most 3).Our study provides some new properties of Ramsey graphs them selves: it shows that triangle-free Ramsey graphs have high matchability and connectivity properties, leading possibly to new bounds on Ramsey-numbers.
Read full abstract