Prescription Of Strong Opioids Research Articles

Ten-year analgesic utilization patterns and economic implications in Portugal.

This study evaluated the 10-year consumption and economic patterns of classical analgesics, adjuvants and opioids in Portugal (2012-2022), and conducted a comparative analysis between Portugal, Spain and Denmark to explore the consumption patterns among these countries for 2022. Data on sales and national health service (NHS) costs were obtained from the Portuguese National Authority of Medicines and Health Products. Sales data were converted to defined daily dose (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants per day according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification/DDD methodology, while comparisons between Spain and Denmark were evaluated with the chi-square test, when appropriate. The findings reveal that classical analgesics use in Portugal remained stable during the period 2012-2022, with ibuprofen being the most consumed. Adjuvants, specifically gabapentinoids, experienced an 84% increase in use, primarily attributed to pregabalin. Weak opioids, led by tramadol, witnessed a 117% rise in use, while strong opioid use, led by tapentadol, increased by 618%. Portugal presented the lowest overall opioid consumption when compared to Denmark and Spain in 2022. Economic trends indicated a heightened NHS expenditure on analgesics, primarily driven by increased opioid use. Notwithstanding, there was no significant burden on relative expenditure over the 10-year period. Portugal presented a major increase in both weak and strong opioid prescriptions, aligning with the trends for Spain and Denmark. The development and approval of generic medicines and vigilant market monitoring are imperative strategies for managing the escalated costs resulting from heightened consumption, particularly concerning opioids.

Optimizing Opioid Prescriptions in Geriatric Populations at Nottingham University Hospitals Foundation Trust (NUH)

Abstract Background Severe pain is associated with adverse outcomes in the geriatric populations (Ref -Pain and Mortality in Older Adults: The Influence of Pain Phenotype - PubMed (nih.gov)). Currently it is recommended in local and national guidelines (Ref -Guidance on the management of pain in older people | Age and Ageing | Oxford Academic (oup.com), Clinical Guidelines Policy (koha-ptfs.co.uk)) that the following be implemented to geriatric patients being prescribed strong opioid medication Methods A multi-disciplinary team involving doctors, pharmacists, nurses and the NUH quality improvement team was involved in all aspects of this project. Initial data collection was done between 1st August 2023 to 1st March 2024. We intend to carry out further data collection between April and August 2024 after our proposed interventions. Data collection was carried out using the EPMA prescribing platform. Results Data collected from 1st August 2023 to 1st March 2024 only 70% of patients in health care of the elderly (HCOE) wards had correctly prescribed oxycodone as their strong opioid analgesia. It was noted that 37% of HCOE patients have had morphine incorrectly prescribed at least once during their admission. Only 11% of strong opioid prescriptions on HCOE wards in NUH had a review scheduled. A. Whilst 73% of patients had laxatives co-prescribed only 25% had anti-emetics co-prescribed. Conclusion From our initial results there is an obvious need for improvement in terms of guideline adherence. We will aim to collect further data and we will put into place interventions in a ‘PDSA’ manner to improve this.

Changes in analgesic prescriptions in Dutch general practice

Background Increases in opioid prescriptions have been described; however, recent trends and prescribing patterns of analgesics in Dutch general practice are largely unknown. Objective To investigate recent changes in the number of analgesic prescriptions, and the indications for prescribing strong opioids. Furthermore, we aim to identify risk factors for chronic opioid use in Dutch general practice. Design and setting A retrospective cohort study from 1 July 2013 to 31 June 2022, using a primary care practice based research network. Subjects Patients with ≥1 prescription for analgesics during the study period were included. Main outcome measure Changes in the number of prescriptions for paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids in Dutch general practice during the 9-year study period. Moreover, we analyzed indications for prescribing strong opioids by the general practitioner (GP). Results A total of 18,433 analgesic users were identified. Over time, prescriptions for paracetamol, NSAIDs and weak opioids decreased, while the number of strong opioid prescriptions increased. General practitioners prescribed more strong opioids for non-malignant pain, whereas prescriptions for malignant pain remained stable over time. Risk factors for chronic opioid use (≥90 days) included older age, lower educational level, smoking status and having a history of a musculoskeletal or psychological disorder, a malignancy or sexual, physical or psychological abuse. Conclusions Considering the increase in strong opioid prescriptions for benign conditions, GPs need to be vigilant for patients who are at risk for chronic use. Regular monitoring and awareness for psychosocial factors in treatment of chronic pain may be key in preventing harms associated with persistent opioid use.

Changes in analgesic prescribing among older adults hospitalised for osteoarthritis or joint replacements

Abstract Introduction Osteoarthritis is a chronic, progressive joint disease, associated with frequent pain, and functional decline. The primary risk factor for developing osteoarthritis is advanced age. Older patients are more susceptible to the adverse effects of commonly prescribed analgesics such as opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), owing to a greater prevalence of comorbidities and age-related changes in this cohort. The analgesic burden and prescribing trends in this cohort are largely unknown in the Irish context despite their increased susceptibility to adverse effects. Aim This study aims to evaluate analgesic prescribing patterns before and after an osteoarthritis or joint arthroplasty related hospital admission in patients aged ≥65 years and to identify factors associated with long-term prescribing of opioids and oral NSAIDs post-discharge. Methods This was an observational study of older adults with an osteoarthritis or joint arthroplasty hospitalisation. Data were collected for a larger study from 44 general practices in Ireland from 2012-2018 and included general practice records (12 months pre/post-index hospitalisation) and hospital discharge summaries, which was extracted as anonymous data from the practice software system. The analysis described prevalence of use of analgesics in the 12 months pre and post their hospitalisation. To assess long-term prescribing, multivariable analysis assessed discharge prescription and patient characteristics associated with opioid and oral NSAID use 3-12 months post-discharge. Results Overall, 738 individuals were included (52.9% female, mean age 78.1 years). Compared to 12 months pre-hospitalisation, patients were less likely to be prescribed a weak opioid or oral NSAID from discharge to 3 months post-discharge, or in the 3-12 months post-discharge. For strong opioids, prescribing was significantly less likely in the 3-12 months post-discharge compared to pre-discharge (odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95%CI 0.40-0.74). Female sex (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.10-2.36), strong opioid prescribing at discharge (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.56-3.90) and pregabalin discharge prescribing (OR 2.21, 95%CI 1.12-4.33) were significantly associated with long-term strong opioid prescribing 3-12 months post-discharge. For oral NSAID prescribing, lower age (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.95-1.00), female sex (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.08-2.25), and discharge prescribing of strong opioids (OR 1.94, 95%CI 1.23-3.04) were significantly associated. Conclusion The use of opioids and oral NSAIDs is typically reduced for patients post-discharge from an osteoarthritis or joint arthroplasty hospitalisation. Female sex and strong opioids at discharge are associated with the prescribing of strong opioids and oral NSAIDs. Although our study was limited by use of prescription records which may not accurately represent what was dispensed or utilised by patients, it is the first to examine changing patterns of analgesic prescribing among osteoarthritis/joint arthroplasty patients. This contributes knowledge on modifiable characteristics which could reduce long-term use of these medications where appropriate.

Naldemedine and Magnesium Oxide as First-Line Medications for Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Comparative Database Study in Japanese Patients With Cancer Pain.

Introduction Naldemedine and magnesium oxide are common first-line early laxative medications used in the real-world scenario in Japan, for patients with cancer pain who receive opioid prescriptions, as per a nationwide hospital claims database study. However, the real-world prescription patterns and associated outcomes are unknown. Methods In this retrospective, cohort study using the Medical Data Vision (MDV) database (January 2018 to December 2020), data were collected from eligible patients (who had a long-term prescription of strong opioids, for >30 days) in Japan with naldemedine or magnesium oxide as the first-line laxative prescription, for a long-term opioid prescription for cancer pain with ≥6 months post-opioid observation period. A laxative prescription within three days after the opioid prescription date was termed an "early" prescription. The composite incidence of dose increase or addition/change of laxatives at three months after the start of the opioid prescription was the primary endpoint after adjusting baseline characteristics between the treatment arms by propensity score matching. Results After propensity score matching, 1717 and 544 patients who were prescribed naldemedine and magnesium oxide each were included in the early prescription and non-early prescription groups, respectively. Even after matching, the incidence of death was not adjusted enough and was significantly higher in the naldemedine arm than in the magnesium oxide arm in the non-early group but comparable in the early group. The incidence of addition, change, or dose increase was significantly higher in the naldemedine arm than in the magnesium oxide arm of the early prescription group (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.08 (1.00, 1.17); p=0.0402); the incidence was comparable between the arms of the non-early group. Conclusion These findings may provide valuable insights into real-world clinical treatment patterns and preliminary evidence for the selection of first-line medications to mitigate opioid-induced constipation in Japanese patients with cancer pain.

Opioid analgesics prescribing trends 2010-2019 in Slovenia: National database study.

Significant increases in global opioid use have been reported in recent decades. This study analyzed opioid utilization in outpatient care in Slovenia between 2010 and 2019. This retrospective cross-sectional study performed a nationwide database analysis of all outpatient opioid analgesic prescriptions based on Slovenian health insurance claims data. Prevalence was defined as the number of recipients prescribed at least one opioid per 1000 inhabitants. Opioid consumption was presented as the total number of dispensed prescriptions per 1000 inhabitants and dispensed defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 inhabitants for each year analyzed. The age-standardized prevalence of opioid recipients decreased by 21.5% during the study period. Total opioid consumption decreased both in the number of prescriptions (-9.2%) and DDD (-5.4%). Tramadol consumption decreased in terms of the number of prescriptions (-12.2%) and DDD (-2.7%), whereas prescriptions for strong opioids increased (10.2%) and DDDs decreased (-16.2%). The results suggest less intensive prescribing of strong opioids and more intensive prescribing for tramadol. The most frequently used strong opioids were fentanyl and oxycodone/naloxone. The prevalence of opioid recipients and opioid consumption is decreasing in Slovenia. Further research is needed to understand whether this finding reflects safe use or underuse of these important analgesics.

Factors Associated With New Analgesic Requirements Following Critical Illness.

Chronic opioid use represents a significant burden to global healthcare with adverse long-term outcomes. Elevated patient reported pain levels and analgesic prescriptions have been reported following discharge from critical care. We describe analgesic requirements following discharge from hospital and identify if a critical care admission is a significant factor for stronger analgesic prescriptions. This retrospective observational cohort study identified patients in the UK Biobank with a registered admission to any UK hospital between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015 and information on prescriptions drawn both prior to and following hospital discharge. Two matched cohorts were created from the dataset: critical care patients and hospital patients admitted without a critical care encounter. Outcomes were analgesic requirements following hospital discharge and factors associated with increased analgesic prescriptions. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with prescriptions from higher steps on the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder. In total, 660 formed the total study population. Strong opioid prescriptions following discharge were significantly higher in the critical care cohort (P value <.001). Critical care admission (OR = 1.45) and increasing Townsend deprivation (OR = 1.04) index were significantly associated with increasing strength of analgesic prescriptions following discharge. Critical care patients require stronger analgesic prescriptions in the 12 months following hospital discharge. Patients from areas of high socioeconomic deprivation may also be associated with increased analgesic requirements. Multidisciplinary support is required for patients who may be at risk of chronic opioid use and could be delivered within critical care recovery programs.

Older Adult-Onset of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Is Associated With Higher Utilization of Analgesics: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) commonly require analgesic medications to treat pain, which may be associated with complications. We examined trends of analgesic use according to age at IBD onset. This nationwide cohort study included adults diagnosed with IBD between 1996 and 2021 in Denmark. Patients were stratified according to their age at IBD onset: 18-39 years (young adult), 40-59 years (adult), and older than 60 years (older adult). We examined the proportion of patients who received prescriptions for analgesic medications within 1 year after IBD diagnosis: strong opioids, tramadol, codeine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and paracetamol. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the association between age at IBD onset and strong opioid prescriptions and the composite of strong opioid/tramadol/codeine prescriptions. We identified 54,216 adults with IBD. Among them, 25,184 (46.5%) were young adults, 16,106 (29.7%) were adults, and 12,926 (23.8%) were older adults at IBD onset. Older adults most commonly received analgesic prescriptions of every class. Between 1996 and 2021, strong opioid, tramadol, and codeine prescriptions were stable, while paracetamol prescriptions increased and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescriptions decreased. After multivariable logistic regression analysis, older adults had higher adjusted odds of receiving strong opioid prescriptions (adjusted odds ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval 1.77-2.15) and the composite of strong opioid/tramadol/codeine prescriptions (adjusted odds ratio 1.93, 95% confidence interval 1.81-2.06) within 1 year after IBD diagnosis compared with adults. In this nationwide cohort, older adults most commonly received analgesic prescriptions within 1 year after IBD diagnosis. Additional research is needed to examine the etiology and sequelae of increased analgesic prescribing to this demographic.

Association of strong opioids and antibiotics prescribing with GP burnout: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Prescribing of strong opioids and antibiotics impacts patient safety, yet little is known about the effects GP wellness has on overprescribing of both medications in primary care. To examine associations between strong opioid and antibiotic prescribing and practice- weighted GP burnout and wellness. A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken using prescription data on strong opioids and antibiotics from the Oxford- Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre linking to a GP wellbeing survey overlaying the same 4-month period from December 2019 to April 2020. Patients prescribed strong opioids and antibiotics were the outcomes of interest. Data for 40 227 patients (13 483 strong opioids and 26 744 antibiotics) were linked to 57 practices and 351 GPs. Greater strong opioid prescribing was associated with increased emotional exhaustion (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10 to 1.24), depersonalisation (IRR 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.16), job dissatisfaction (IRR 1.25, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.32), diagnostic uncertainty (IRR 1.12, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.19), and turnover intention (IRR 1.32, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.37) in GPs. Greater antibiotic prescribing was associated with increased emotional exhaustion (IRR 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.37), depersonalisation (IRR 1.24, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.49), job dissatisfaction (IRR 1.11, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.19), sickness-presenteeism (IRR 1.18, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.25), and turnover intention (IRR 1.38, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.45) in GPs. Increased strong opioid and antibiotic prescribing was also found in GPs working longer hours (IRR 3.95, 95% CI = 3.39 to 4.61; IRR 5.02, 95% CI = 4.07 to 6.19, respectively) and in practices in the north of England (1.96, 95% CI = 1.61 to 2.33; 1.56, 95% CI = 1.12 to 3.70, respectively). This study found higher rates of prescribing of strong opioids and antibiotics in practices with GPs with more burnout symptoms, greater job dissatisfaction, and turnover intentions; working longer hours; and in practices in the north of England serving more deprived populations.

Assessing the impact of a national clinical guideline for the management of chronic pain on opioid prescribing rates: a controlled interrupted time series analysis

BackgroundOpioids can be effective analgesics, but long-term use may be associated with harms. In 2013, the first national, comprehensive, evidence-based pain management guideline was published, from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN 136: Management of Chronic Pain) with key recommendations on analgesic prescribing. This study aimed to examine the potential impact on national opioid prescribing rates in Scotland.MethodsTrends in national and regional community opioid prescribing data for Scotland were analysed from quarter one (Q1) 2005 to Q2 2020. Interrupted time series regression examined the association of SIGN 136 publication with prescribing rates for opioid-containing drugs. Gabapentinoid prescribing was used as a comparison drug.ResultsAfter a positive prescribing trend pre-publication, the timing of SIGN 136 publication was associated with a negative change in the trend of opioid prescribing rates (−2.82 items per 1000 population per quarter [PTPPQ]; P < 0.01). By Q2 2020, the relative reduction in the opioid prescribing rate was −20.67% (95% CI: −23.61, −17.76). This persisted after correcting for gabapentinoid prescribing and was mainly driven by the reduction in weak opioids, whereas strong opioid prescribing rates continued to rise. Gabapentinoid prescribing showed a significant rise in level (8.00 items per 1000 population; P = 0.01) and trend (0.27 items PTPPQ; P = 0.01) following SIGN 136 publication.ConclusionsThe publication of SIGN 136 was associated with a reduction in opioid prescribing rates. This suggests that changes in clinical policy through evidence-based national clinical guidelines may affect community opioid prescribing, though this may be partially replaced by gabapentinoids, and other factors may also contribute.

Differences in opioid prescription rates between patients with musculoskeletal disorders enrolled in coordinated ambulatory healthcare and patients receiving usual care: a retrospective observational cohort study

ObjectivesTo compare opioid prescription rates between patients enrolled in coordinated ambulatory care and patients receiving usual care.DesignIn this retrospective cohort study, we analysed claims data for insured patients with non-specific/specific...

Trends in strong opioid prescription for cancer patients in Japan from 2010 to 2019: an analysis with large medical claims data

Consumption of opioids, essential drugs for pain relief, has seen rapid growth worldwide. In Japan, where total opioid consumption still remains low among developed countries, little is known about trends in the clinical patterns of opioids in terminally ill cancer patients. Patients who died of cancer from 2010 to 2019 were included in this study. Morphine, oxycodone, fentanyl, tapentadol, methadone and hydromorphone were examined as opioids for cancer pain. We calculated the prevalence of prescribed opioids prior to death by year and age group and the average opioid dose 30days before death. The total number of patients was 221 598. We found that the prescription prevalence of opioids increased from 60.8 to 65.9% (5.1%). Morphine was most prescribed in 2010 but had decreased prevalence (-9.0%) during the 10-year period. Oxycodone had the highest increase in prescription prevalence (13.7%), and fentanyl prevalence decreased (-4.9%). In the subgroup comparison, the prescription prevalence of opioids in the elderly was lower than that in the younger group; however, the increasing trend in the elderly was greater than that in the younger group. The percentage of patients prescribed low-dose opioids (<60mg/day) during the 30days before death increased by 4.9% and was the highest throughout the study period. The prevalence of opioid prescriptions for terminally ill cancer patients has increased from 2010 to 2019 in Japan. The opioid-specific trends were similar to the global trend but differed by palliative care specialty.

Self-Reported Practices and Emotions in Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study of German Physicians.

Background: The pressure on physicians when a patient seeks pain relief and their own desire to be self-effective may lead to the prescription of strong opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). This study, via physician self-reporting, aims to identify and measure (i) physician adherence to national opioid prescribing guidelines and (ii) physician emotions when a patient seeks a dosage increase of the opioid. Methods: Within a cross-sectional survey—conducted as part of a randomized controlled online intervention trial (ERONA)—600 German physicians were queried on their opioid prescribing behavior (choice and formulation of opioid, indications) for CNCP patients and their emotions to a case vignette describing a patient seeking an opioid dosage increase without signs of objective deterioration. Results: The prescription of strong opioids in this study was not always in accordance with current guidelines. When presented with a scenario in which a patient sought to have their opioid dose increased, some physicians reported negative feelings, such as either pressure (25%), helplessness (25%), anger (23%) or a combination. The risk of non-guideline-compliant prescribing behavior using the example of ultrafast-acting fentanyl for CNCP was increased when negative emotions were present (OR: 1.7; 95%-CI: 1.2–2.6; p = 0.007) or when sublingual buprenorphine was prescribed (OR: 15.4; 95%-CI: 10.1–23.3; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Physicians’ emotional self-awareness represents the first step to identify such direct reactions to patient requests and to ensure a responsible, guideline-based opioid prescription approach for the long-term well-being of the patient.

Opioid prescribing in out-of-hours primary care in Flanders and the Netherlands: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Increased opioid prescribing has raised concern, as the benefits of pain relief not always outweigh the risks. Acute and chronic pain is often treated in a primary care out-of-hours (OOH) setting. This setting may be a driver of opioid use but the extent to which opioids are prescribed OOH is unknown. We aimed to investigate weak and strong opioid prescribing at OOH primary care services (PCS) in Flanders (Northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) and the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019. We performed a retrospective cross sectional study using data from routine electronic health records of OOH-PCSs in Flanders and the Netherlands (2015-2019). Our primary outcome was the opioid prescribing rate per 1000 OOH-contacts per year, in total and for strong (morphine, hydromorphone, oxycodone, oxycodone and naloxone, fentanyl, tapentadol, and buprenorphine and weak opioids (codeine combinations and tramadol and combinations) and type of opioids separately. Opioids were prescriped in approximately 2.5% of OOH-contacts in both Flanders and the Netherlands. In Flanders, OOH opioid prescribing went from 2.4% in 2015 to 2.1% in 2017 and then increased to 2.3% in 2019. In the Netherlands, opioid prescribing increased from 1.9% of OOH-contacts in 2015 to 2.4% in 2017 and slightly decreased thereafter to 2.1% of OOH-contacts. In 2019, in Flanders, strong opioids were prescribed in 8% of the OOH-contacts with an opioid prescription. In the Netherlands a strong opioid was prescribed in 57% of these OOH-contacts. Two thirds of strong opioids prescriptions in Flanders OOH were issued for patients over 75, in the Netherlands one third was prescribed to this age group. We observed large differences in strong opioid prescribing at OOH-PCSs between Flanders and the Netherlands that are likely to be caused by differences in accessibility of secondary care, and possibly existing opioid prescribing habits. Measures to ensure judicious and evidence-based opioid prescribing need to be tailored to the organisation of the healthcare system.

756 ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS CAN PRESCRIBE LAXATIVES &amp; ANALGESICS TOO - A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SPANNING 7 YEARS

Abstract Background Patients admitted with age 60 years and over with a hip fracture admitted to a District General Hospital. Introduction The aim was to improve the prescribing of regular laxatives and analgesia at the time of admission to hospital. Methods There were repeated PDSA cycles. Data was collected on consecutive patients (by admission date) identified from the National Hip Fracture Database. Data was collected at baseline (10 patients in November 2013) and after Phase 1 intervention (20 patients, December 2013—January 2014), after Phase 2 (20 patients, February 2014), after Phase 3 (39 patients, April—June 2017) and after Phase 4 (September—October 2020). The interventions were as follows: Phase 1: Prompts at new doctor induction (‘Induction’) + prompts in hip fracture admission document. Phase2: Phase 1 intervention + flow diagram in fracture admission document. Phase 3: Prompts at Induction + electronic prescribing protocol (including laxatives and analgesics) + removal of flow diagram from admission document. Phase 4: Phase 3 intervention + more effort to explain to new locum doctors. Results Laxative prescribing: Baseline = 40%, Phase 1 = 80%, Phase 2 = 80%, Phase 3 = 56%, Phase 4 = 74% (24 hours post-admission = 90%). Paracetamol prescribing: Baseline 100%, Phase 1,100%, Phase 2,100%, Phase 3 64%, Phase 4 82% (24 h post-admission = 90%). Regular strong opioid prescribing: Admission: Baseline 60%, Phase 1 90%, Phase 2,100%, Phase 3 44%, Phase 4 80% (24 h post-admission = 90%). Conclusion 1. Orthopaedic Surgeons can prescribe laxatives and analgesia well—given sufficient prompts 2. The electronic solution is not always sufficient—locum doctors may not be aware of it. 3. Do not assume continued success Future Plans Re-introduce flow diagram to admission document. Acknowledgements Many people have helped with previous phases &amp; will be acknowledged.

Prevalence of long-term opioid use after radiotherapy for cervical cancer in a Brazilian cancer center.

This study aimed to describe the clinical and demographic profile of cervical cancer patients exploring risk factors for prolonged use of opioids. The database of the Brazilian National Cancer Institute was queried out and 214 women with cervical cancer diagnosed between January 2014 and December 2015 who underwent isolated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with complete response were included. Patients who no longer used opioids 6months after completion of radiation therapy were classified as stoppers; patients who continued using opioids were non-stoppers. Variables were comparatively evaluated as risk factors for prolonged use of opioids. The median age was 49.4years. Most women were non-white (64.5%) and had ECOG Performance Status (PS) ≥ 1 (76.6%), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-III (84.1%), and squamous cell carcinoma (82.7%). Smoking and alcohol consumption rates were, respectively, 44.9% and 39.7%. The median time from diagnosis to the onset of EBRT was 111days (interquartile range 66.2). Most patients underwent CRT (88.8%). The rate of non-stoppers was 65.0%. By multivariate analysis, prescription of strong opioids (p = 0.005) and disease recurrence (p < 0.001) were suggested as independent factors for prolonged use of opioids. The rate of prolonged use of opioids after radiotherapy is alarming. Prescription of strong opioids and disease recurrence might be independent risk factors for its persistent use. These results reveal an unmet and urgent need to implement public multiprofessional support programs with well-established protocols for dependence withdrawal, as well as stricter national measures of control in opioid prescription.

Patterns of opioid analgesic prescribing in cancer outpatients during the last year of life in France: A pharmacoepidemiological cohort study based on the French health insurance database

Cancer pain management with adequate analgesics for cancer outpatients can be particularly challenging. This representative retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the prevalence and timing of weak and strong opioid analgesic prescriptions in cancer outpatients during their last year of life, with a focus on factors associated to potential late strong opioid initiation. Factors associated with late strong opioid initiation were investigated through multivariate logistic regression analyses stratified by place of death. A retrospective cohort of cancer outpatients, who died between 2014 and 2016, was identified from the general sample of beneficiaries. Among N=4704 cancer patients (median age 76 years, 42.7% women), 3002 (63.8%) were prescribed and dispensed ≥1 weak or strong opioid analgesic during their last year of life; of whom, 2458 (52.3%) received ≥1 weak opioid analgesic (tramadol as single-ingredient accounting for 25.9%) and 1733 (36.8%) ≥1 strong opioid analgesic dispensation (fentanyl 21.6%). Median interval between the first prescription for any strong opioid and death was 18 weeks (interquartile range: 8-38), and for weak opioids 33 weeks (interquartile range: 20-47). Among weak opioid users, 1229 (50.0%) patients had received ≥1 weak opioid analgesic dispensation during the year n-2 before death. Among strong opioid users, 986 (56.9%) patients had received ≥1 weak opioid analgesic dispensation during the year n-2 before death and 381 (21.9%) patients ≥1 strong opioid analgesic dispensation. Patients with an outpatient death were more likely to have a late strong opioid initiation compared to patients with an inpatient death. Late strong opioid initiation (<18 weeks before death) was significantly associated with a lower number of hospitalization days and prior weak opioid exposure for patients with an inpatient death and, with older age, social, prior weak opioid exposure, and a prescription initiation by general practitioner for patients with an outpatient death. Our gained knowledge of opioid prescribing patterns in cancer patients during the last year of life might help to progress opioid analgesic treatment and to improve patient outcomes.

Risk Prescriptions of Strong Opioids in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain by Primary Care Physicians in Catalonia: Opicat Padris Project.

The prescription of strong opioids (SO) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is steadily increasing. This entails a high risk of adverse effects, a risk that increases with the concomitant prescription of SO with central nervous system depressant drugs and with the use of SO for non-recommended indications. In order to examine this concomitant risk prescription, we designed a descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective population-based study. Patients aged ≥15 years with a continued SO prescription for ≥3 months during 2013–2017 for CNCP were included. Of these, patients who had received concomitant prescriptions of SO and risk drugs (gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines and antidepressants) and those who had received immediate-release fentanyl (IRF) were selected. The study included 22,691 patients; 20,354 (89.7%) patients received concomitant risk prescriptions. Men and subjects with a higher socioeconomic status received fewer concomitant risk prescriptions. Benzodiazepines or Z-drugs were prescribed concomitantly with SO in 15,883 (70%) patients, antidepressants in 14,932 (65%) and gabapentinoids in 11,267 (49%), while 483 (21.32%) patients received IRF (2266 prescriptions in total) without a baseline SO. In conclusion, our study shows that a high percentage of patients prescribed SO for CNCP received concomitant prescriptions with known risks, as well as IRF for unauthorized indications.

Trends in the Prescription of Strong Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Primary Care in Catalonia: Opicat-Padris-Project.

In chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), evidence of the effectiveness of strong opioids (SO) is very limited. Despite this, their use is increasingly common. To examine SO prescriptions, we designed a descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective population-based study, including patients aged ≥15 years prescribed SO for ≥3 months continuously in 2013–2017 for CNCP in primary care in Catalonia. Of the 22,691 patients included, 17,509 (77.2%) were women, 10,585 (46.6%) were aged >80 years, and most had incomes of <€18,000 per year. The most common diagnoses were musculoskeletal diseases and psychiatric disorders. There was a predominance of transdermal fentanyl in the defined daily dose (DDD) per thousand inhabitants/day, with the greatest increase for tapentadol (312% increase). There was an increase of 66.89% in total DDD per thousand inhabitants/day for SO between 2013 (0.737) and 2017 (1.230). The mean daily oral morphine equivalent dose/day dispensed for all drugs was 83.09 mg. Transdermal fentanyl and immediate transmucosal release were the largest cost components. In conclusion, there was a sustained increase in the prescription of SO for CNCP, at high doses, and in mainly elderly patients, predominantly low-income women. The new SO are displacing other drugs.

Effectiveness of Oxycodone Hydrochloride (Strong Opioid) vs Combination Acetaminophen and Codeine (Mild Opioid) for Subacute Pain After Fractures Managed Surgically

Patients with a surgically managed fracture are commonly discharged from the hospital with a strong opioid prescription, but limited evidence exists to support this practice. To test the hypothesis that strong opioids provide greater analgesia than mild opioids over the first week postdischarge from hospital after fracture surgical treatment. This double-blind, superiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single-center, major trauma hospital in Sydney, Australia. Participants were inpatients who had sustained an acute nonpathological facture of a long bone or the pelvis, patella, calcaneus, or talus who were treated with surgical fixation and enrolled from July 27, 2016, to August 22, 2017. Data were analyzed from June through October 2018. Initiation at discharge of oxycodone hydrochloride 5 mg of 10 mg (ie, 1 or 2 tablets) or combination acetaminophen and codeine 500 mg and 8 mg or 1000 mg and 16 mg (ie, 1 or 2 tablets) 4 times daily for a maximum duration of 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the mean of daily pain scores collected during week 1 of treatment measured using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS). Participants were asked to rate their mean pain over the previous 24 hours daily using an NRS score from 0 to 10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. The key secondary outcomes were EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) responses, worst pain, medication adverse events, global perceived effect, and return to work. A total of 120 patients with 1 or more acute orthopedic fractures requiring surgical fixation were randomized, including 59 patients in the strong-opioid group (43 [72.9%] men; mean [SD] age, 36.0 [14.1] years; mean oral morphine equivalent for days 1-7 of 32.9 mg) and 61 patients in the mild opioid group (47 [77.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 38.2 [13.5] years; mean oral morphine equivalent for days 1-7 of 5.5 mg). From days 1 to 7 postdischarge, the mean daily NRS mean pain score was 4.04 (95% Cl, 3.67 to 4.41) in the strong opioid group and 4.54 (95% Cl, 4.17 to 4.90) in the mild opioid group. The between-group difference of the primary outcome was not statistically significant (-0.50 [95% Cl, -1.11 to 0.12]; P = .11) despite a 6-fold increased dose of opioids being delivered in the strong opioid group. This study found that treatment with strong opioid medication subacutely was not superior to treatment with milder medication for treatment of pain among patients with surgically managed orthopedic fractures. These findings suggest that ongoing first-line strong opioid use after discharge from the hospital should not be supported. Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry No.: ACTRN12616000941460.