Stroke Volume Variation Group Research Articles

Comparison of two techniques of goal directed fluid therapy in elective neurosurgical patients – a randomized controlled study

Background Goal directed fluid therapy (GDFT) may be a rational approach to adopt in neurosurgical patients, in whom intravascular volume optimization is of utmost importance. Most of the parameters used to guide GDFT are derived invasively. We postulated that the total volume of intraoperative intravenous fluid administered during elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours would be comparable between two groups receiving GDFT guided either by the non-invasively derived plethysmography variability index (PVI) or by stroke volume variation (SVV). Methods 60 ASA category 1, 2 and 3 patients between 18 and 70 years of age were randomized to receive intraoperative fluid guided either by SVV (SVV group; n = 31) or PVI (PVI group; n = 29). The total volume of fluid administered intraoperatively was recorded. Serum creatinine was measured before the surgery, at the end of the surgery, 24 h after surgery and on the fifth post-operative day. Arterial cannulation was performed before induction in all patients. Serum lactate was measured before induction, once in 2 h intraoperatively, at the end of the surgery and 24 h after the surgery. Brain relaxation score was assessed by the surgeon during dural opening and dural closure. Patients were followed up till discharge or death. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the duration of hospital stay was noted for all patients. Results The volume of fluid given intraoperatively was significantly higher in the SVV group (p = 0.005). The two groups were comparable with respect to serum lactate and serum creatinine measured at pre-determined time intervals. Brain relaxation score was also comparable between the groups. SVV and PVI displayed moderate to strong correlation intraoperatively. The duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of the hospital stay were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions PVI and SVV are equally effective in guiding GDFT in adults undergoing elective craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumours.

The Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management According to Stroke Volume Variation on Postoperative Bowel Function Recovery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Stroke volume variation (SVV) has been used to predict fluid responsiveness; however, it remains unclear whether goal-directed fluid therapy using SVV contributes to bowel function recovery in abdominal surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to compare bowel movement recovery in patients undergoing colon resection surgery between groups using traditional or SVV-based methods for intravenous fluid management. We collected data between March 2015 and July 2017. Bowel function recovery was analyzed based on the gas-passing time, sips of water time, and soft diet (SD) time. Finally, we analyzed data from 60 patients. There was no significant between-group difference in the patients’ characteristics. Compared with the control group (n = 30), the SVV group (n = 30) had a significantly higher colloid volume and lower crystalloid volume. Moreover, the gas-passing time (77.8 vs. 85.3 h, p = 0.034) and SD time (67.6 vs. 85.1 h, p < 0.001) were significantly faster in the SVV group than in the control group. Compared with the control group, the SVV group showed significantly lower scores of pain on a numeric rating scale and morphine equivalent doses during post-anesthetic care, at 24 postoperative hours, and at 48 postoperative hours. Our findings suggested that, compared with the control group, the SVV group showed a faster postoperative SD time, reduced acute postoperative pain intensity, and lower rescue analgesics. Therefore, SVV-based optimal fluid management is expected to potentially contribute to postoperative bowel function recovery in patients undergoing colon resection surgery.

Intraoperative fluid management in hepato-biliary-pancreatic operation using stroke volume variation monitoring: A single-center, open-label, randomized pilot study.

Trial design:This investigator-initiated, single-center, open-label, parallel-group, randomized-controlled pilot study was designed to compare the intraoperative fluid balance and perioperative complications in patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery with or without stroke volume variation (SVV)-guided fluid management.Methods:Patients who were aged >18 years and underwent elective major hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery between June 30, 2015, and August 31, 2016 at our center were randomly assigned to receive SVV-guided or conventional fluid therapy. The intervention group used SVV to determine the patients’ volume status. The primary outcome was the total fluid balance per body weight per operation time, and the secondary outcomes were the total amount of intravenous infusion per body weight per operation time and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on postoperative day 1. Patients were randomized by a two-block computer-generated assignment sequence. Masking of patients and assessors was conducted. The patients and assessors were each blinded to the details of the trial; however, the clinicians were not.Results:Of the 69 patients who were initially eligible, 60 provided informed consent for participation in the study. After randomization, three patients dropped out of the study because of deviations from the protocol or unexpected hypotension, leaving 28 and 29 patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Patients in both groups had similar characteristics at baseline. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) intraoperative fluid balance in the control and SVV groups was 6.2 (IQR, 4.9–7.9) and 8.1 (IQR, 5.7–10.5) ml/kg/h, respectively (P = .103). The administered intravenous infusion was significantly higher in the SVV group (median, 10.9; IQR, 8.3–15.3 ml/kg/h) than in the control group (median, 9.5; IQR, 7.7–10.3 ml/kg/h) (P = .011). On postoperative day 1, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio was lower in the SVV group (median, 266; IQR, 261–341) than in the control group (median, 346; IQR, 299–380) (P = .019).Conclusions:Use of the SVV-guided fluid management protocol did not reduce intraoperative fluid balance but increased the intraoperative fluid administration and might worsen postoperative oxygenation.Trial registration:UMIN000018111.

Changes in plasma volume before and after major abdominal surgery following stroke volume variation-guided fluid therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

The aim of intraoperative fluid therapy is to avoid both hypovolemia and hypervolemia; however, the patient's exact volume status is difficult to determine during surgery. Fluid optimization guided by stroke volume variation (SVV) has been widely used in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in plasma volume before and after surgery following SVV-guided fluid therapy. Patients were randomly allocated into one of two groups according to the SVV criteria for fluid administration during surgery. In the fixed SVV fluid strategy group, fluid was administered to maintain the SVV below 13%. In the individual SVV group, individual SVV values of each patient were maintained until the end of surgery. Plasma volume, body weight, and extracellular water (ECW) were measured before and after surgery. Plasma volume was estimated using the indocyanine green dilution technique. A total of 118 patients were included. Median (25-75%) plasma volumes in the preoperative and postoperative period were 2.46 (2.20-2.88) L and 2.69 (2.33-3.12) L for the fixed SVV group (N.=57, P=0.133), respectively, and 2.56 (2.23-2.90) L and 2.89 (2.48-3.19) L for the individual SVV group (N.=61, P<0.001), respectively. Fluid administration during surgery to maintain SVV below 13% was effective for maintaining the preoperative plasma volume until the end of surgery in patients undergoing major open stomach or colorectal surgery. This result supports the validity of SVV-guided fluid therapy, which maintains the SVV value below 13%, in terms of maintaining patient volume status.

Influence of stroke volume variation on fluid treatment and postoperative complications in thoracic surgery.

BackgroundFluid management in critically ill patients usually relies on increasing preload to augment cardiac output. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate whether stroke volume variation (SVV) can guide fluid therapy and reduce complications.Patients and methodsIn this retrospective study, a total of 88 patients who underwent lobectomy were divided into two groups: group 1 (SVV, n=43) and group 2 (conventional or central venous pressure [CVP], n=45). Heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, SVV (only group 1), CVP (all patients), urea, creatinine, and hemoglobin levels before and after surgery, use of fluid, blood and inotropic agents, and postoperative complications were recorded retrospectively.ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 56.9±14.4 years and 75% of the patients were male. SVV was used in fluid therapy in 48.9% of the patients. The use of SVV resulted in an increased use of crystalloids and colloids with increased urine output per hour (p<0.05). Of patients in the SVV group and the CVP group, 44.1% and 51.1% developed at least one complication, respectively (p=0.531). The rate of respiratory complications including atelectasis, pneumonia, hypoxemia, and an increased production of secretions was 21% in the SVV group and 37.7% in the CVP group (p=0.104). The rate of complications and the length of hospital stay were comparable between the groups (p>0.05).ConclusionOur study results showed that the use of SVV increased the use of crystalloids and colloids and favorably affected urine output per hour but did not reduce complications in thoracic surgery.

A Comparative Study of Intraoperative Fluid Management Using Stroke Volume Variation in Liver Resection

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine whether intraoperative fluid management with stroke volume variation (SVV) can achieve safe intravenous fluid restriction and contribute to decreasing intraoperative blood loss in liver surgery. Background: In liver surgery, maintaining the central venous pressure (CVP) at a low level is effective in decreasing intraoperative blood loss. Recently, several studies have suggested that SVV obtained using the FloTrac system demonstrated a better fluid responsiveness than CVP. Methods: We enrolled 30 patients undergoing liver resection since May 2015 in this prospective observational study, and we set the SVV target during liver transection at 13%–20% (SVV group). Forty-three cases of liver resection that we performed between January 2014 and March 2015 without using CVP or SVV were used as the Control group. We compared the 2 groups by using intraoperative blood loss as the primary endpoint. Results: There was no significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The mean SVV during liver transection in the SVV group was 15.6 ± 4.4%. The infusion volume until completion of liver transection in the Control group was 9.4 mL/kg/h, whereas that of the SVV group was 3.3 mL/kg/h, a significantly lower volume (P &amp;lt; 0.001). The median intraoperative blood loss was significantly decreased in the SVV group compared with the Control group (391 versus 1068 mL; P &amp;lt; 0.001). The intraoperative transfusion rate was also significantly decreased in the SVV group. Conclusion: We demonstrated that intraoperative management with SVV can achieve safe intravenous fluid restriction and is useful for decrease intraoperative blood loss in liver surgery.

Comparison of two stroke volume variation-based goal-directed fluid therapies for supratentorial brain tumour resection: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe optimal volume status for neurosurgery has yet to be determined. We compared two fluid protocols based on different stroke volume variation (SVV) cut-offs for goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) during supratentorial brain tumour resection. MethodsA randomized, single-blind, open-label trial was conducted. Eighty adult patients undergoing elective supratentorial brain tumour resection were randomly divided into a low SVV and a high SVV group. The SVV cut-offs were used to determine when to initiate colloid infusion. Clinical outcomes and perioperative changes in serum neuronal biomarkers, including S100β, neurone-specific enolase (NSE) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), were compared. ResultsPatients in the low SVV group received a higher volume of colloid [869 (SD 404) vs 569 (453) ml; P=0.0025], had a higher urine output [3.4 (2.4) vs 2.5 (1.7) ml kg−1 h−1; P=0.0416] and a higher average cardiac index [3.2 (0.7) vs 2.8 (0.6) litres min−1 m−2; P=0.0204]. Patients in the low SVV group also had a shorter intensive care unit stay [1.4 (0.7) vs 2.6 (3.3) days, P=0.0326], fewer postoperative neurological events (17.5 vs 40%, P=0.0469), attenuated changes in the NSE and GFAP levels, lower intraoperative serum lactate and a higher Barthel index at discharge (all P<0.05). ConclusionsDuring GDFT for supratentorial brain tumour resection, fluid boluses targeting a lower SVV are more beneficial than a restrictive protocol. Clinical trial registrationNCT02113358.

Relationship between Stroke Volume Variation and Blood Transfusion during Liver Transplantation

Background. Intraoperative blood transfusion increases the risk for perioperative mortality and morbidity in liver transplant recipients. A high stroke volume variation (SVV) method has been proposed to reduce blood loss during living donor hepatectomy. Herein, we investigated whether maintaining high SVV could reduce the need for blood transfusion and also evaluated the effect of the high SVV method on postoperative outcomes in liver transplant recipients.Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 332 patients who underwent liver transplantation, divided into control (maintaining <10% of SVV during surgery) and high SVV (maintaining 10-20% of SVV during surgery) groups. We evaluated the blood transfusion requirement and hemodynamic parameters, including SVV, as well as postoperative outcomes, such as incidences of acute kidney injury, durations of postoperative intensive care unit and hospital stay, and rates of 1-year mortality.Results. Mean SVV values were 7.0% ± 1.3% in the control group (n = 288) and 11.2% ± 1.8% in the high SVV group (n = 44). The median numbers of transfused packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasmas in the high SVV group were significantly lower than those in control group (0 vs. 2 units, P = 0.003; and 0 vs. 3 units, P = 0.033, respectively). No significant between-group differences were observed for postoperative outcomes.Conclusions. Maintaining high SVV can reduce the blood transfusion requirement during liver transplantation without worsening postoperative outcomes. These findings provide insights into improving perioperative management in liver transplant recipients.

Intraoperative monitoring of stroke volume variation versus central venous pressure in laparoscopic liver surgery: a randomized prospective comparative trial

BackgroundCentral venous pressure (CVP) is used as a marker of cardiac preload to control intraoperative blood loss in open hepatectomies, while its reliability in laparoscopy is less certain. The aim of this randomized prospective trial was to evaluate the outcome of laparoscopic resections performed with stroke volume variation (SVV) or CVP monitoring. MethodsAll candidates for laparoscopic liver resection were assigned randomly to SVV or to CVP groups. Outcome was evaluated included conversion rate, cause of conversion, intraoperative blood loss, need for transfusions, length of surgery and postoperative results. ResultsNinety consecutive patients were enrolled: both SVV and CVP groups included 45 patients each and were comparable in terms of patient and disease characteristics. A reduced rate of conversion was recorded in the SVV compared to the CVP group (6.7% and 17.8% respectively, p = 0.02). Blood loss was lower in the SVV group (150 mL), compared to the CVP group (300 mL, p = 0.04). Morbidity, mortality, length of stay and functional recovery were comparable. On multivariate analysis, lesion location, extent of hepatectomy and type of cardiac preload monitoring were associated significantly to risk of conversion. ConclusionSVV monitoring in laparoscopic liver surgery improves intraoperative outcome, thus enhancing the benefits of the minimally-invasive approach and fast-track protocols.

Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients

Background Few studies have reported the effect of different volume responsiveness evaluation methods on volume therapy results and prognosis. This study was carried out to investigate the effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods, stroke volume variation (SVV) and stroke volume changes before and after passive leg raising (PLR-ΔSV), on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients. Methods Septic shock patients admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of Zhejiang Hospital, China, from March 2011 to March 2013, who were under controlled ventilation and without arrhythmia, were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to the SVV group or the PLR-ΔSV group. The SVV group used the Pulse Indication Continuous Cardiac Output monitoring of SVV, and responsiveness was defined as SVV ≥12%. The PLR-ΔSV group used ΔSV before and after PLR as the indicator, and responsiveness was defined as ΔSV ≥15%. Six hours after fluid resuscitation, changes in tissue perfusion indicators (lactate, lactate clearance rate, central venous oxygen saturation (SCVO2), base excess (BE)), organ function indicators (white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, platelet count, total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, total and direct bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, serum creatine kinase, oxygenation index), fluid balance (6- and 24-hour fluid input) and the use of cardiotonic drugs (dobutamine), prognostic indicators (the time and rate of achieving early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) standards, duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay, and 28- day mortality) were observed. Results Six hours after fluid resuscitation, there were no significant differences in temperature, heart rate, blood pressure, SpO2, organ function indicators, or tissue perfusion indicators between the two groups (P &gt;0.05). The 6- and 24-hour fluid input was slightly less in the SVV group than in the PLR-ΔSV group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P &gt;0.05). The SVV group used significantly more dobutamine than the PLR-ΔSV group (33.3% vs. 10.7%, P =0.039). There were no significant differences in the time ((4.8±1.4) h vs. (4.3±1.3) h, P=0.142) and rate of achieving EGDT standards (90.0% vs. 92.9%, P = 0.698), or in the length of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. The 28-day mortality in the SVV group (16.7% (5/30)) was slightly higher than the PLR-ΔSV group (14.3% (4/28)), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.788). Conclusions In septic shock patients under controlled ventilation and without arrhythmia, using SVV or PLR-ΔSV methods to evaluate volume responsiveness has a similar effect on volume therapy results and prognosis. The evaluation and dynamic monitoring of volume responsiveness is more important for fluid resuscitation than the evaluation methods themselves. Choosing different methods to evaluate volume responsiveness has no significant influence on the effect of volume therapy and prognosis.

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Based on Stroke Volume Variations Improves Fluid Management and Gastrointestinal Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery

Objective: To evaluate the influence of stroke volume variation (SVV)-based goal-directed therapy (GDT) on splanchnic organ functions and postoperative complications in orthopedic patients. Subjects and Methods: Eighty patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two equal groups to receive either intraoperative volume therapy guided by SVV (GDT) or standard fluid management (control). In the SVV group, patients received colloid boluses of 4 ml/kg to maintain an SVV <10% when in the supine position or an SVV <14% if prone. In the control group, fluids were given to maintain a mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg, a heart rate <100 bpm, a central venous pressure of 8-14 mm Hg, and a urine output >0.5 ml/kg/h. Intraoperative organ perfusion, hemodynamic data, hospitalization, postoperative complications, and mortality were recorded. Results: The heart rate at the end of surgery was significantly lower (p < 0.05), there were fewer hypotensive episodes (p < 0.05), the arterial and gastric intramucosal pH were higher (p < 0.05 for both), the gastric intramucosal PCO₂ was lower (p < 0.05), the intraoperative infused colloids and the total infused volume were lower (p < 0.05 for both), and the postoperative time to flatus was shorter (p < 0.05) in the GDT group than in the control group. No differences in the length of hospital stay, complications, or mortality were found between the groups. Conclusion: SVV-based GDT during major orthopedic surgery reduced the volume of the required intraoperative infused fluids, maintained intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and improved the perioperative gastrointestinal function.

Stroke Volume Variation for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background: Stroke volume variation (SVV) has been shown to be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness. However, the predictive role of SVV measured by FloTrac/Vigileo system in prediction of fluid responsiveness was unproven in patients undergoing ventilation with low tidal volume. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery were randomly divided into two groups: Group C [n1=20, tidal volume (Vt) = 8 ml/kg, frequency (F) = 12/min] and Group L [n2=30, Vt= 6 ml/kg, F=16/min]. After anesthesia induction, 6% hydroxyethyl starch130/0.4 solution (7 ml/kg) was intravenously transfused. Besides standard haemodynamic monitoring, SVV, cardiac output, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke volume index (SVI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were determined with the FloTrac/Vigileo system before and after fluid loading. Results: After fluid loading, the MAP, CVP, SVI and CI increased significantly, whereas the SVV and SVR decreased markedly in both groups. SVI was significantly correlated to the SVV, CVP but not the HR, MAP and SVR. SVI was significantly correlated to the SVV before fluid loading (Group C: r = 0.909; Group L: r = 0.758) but not the HR, MAP, CVP and SVR before fluid loading. The largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) was found for SVV (Group C, 0.852; Group L, 0.814), and the AUC for other preloading indices in two groups ranged from 0.324 to 0.460. Conclusion: SVV measured by FloTrac/Vigileo system can predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing ventilation with low tidal volumes during gastrointestinal surgery.