April 1932, Nikolai Shvernik, the head of the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions, informed Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich that Soviet workers were rebelling against starvation rations implemented on the first of the month. Shvernik did not offer details about the most serious episode of unrest-a wave of strikes by over sixteen thousand textile workers in the Ivanovo Industrial Region (IPO)-because Kaganovich himself orchestrated the suppression of the protests. Although Stalin already knew from OGPU (secret police) reports that his policies had alienated the working class, Shvernik emphasized that the recent unrest was marked by political overtones: In all the cases cited, counterrevolutionary and Trotskyite attempted to exploit the temporary difficulties in worker supply.' Although the IPO strikes were never publicized, they served as the subtext of speeches at the national trade union congress that met that month in Moscow. During appearances before delegates, Shvernik ridiculed officials from the towns where the strikes occurred, Ian Rudzutak, the head of the party's Central Control Commission, admitted that workers were steeped in foul moods, and Kaganovich attributed the crisis of morale to the petty-bourgeois attitudes of new workers, the persistence of bourgeois influences among experienced workers, and the subversive work of class-alien elements who allegedly had infiltrated Soviet enterprises.2 Meanwhile, rumors of unrest stoked the flames of opposition within the party. Circulated surreptitiously among Communists in 1932, Riutin's platform argued that the regime
Read full abstract