There is a growing need for strong methods to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of data due to the widespread use of next-generation AI in automated processes. This research delves into new approaches to rethink AI system quality checks, with a focus on context-aware, adaptable, and dynamic validation. Modern artificial intelligence ecosystems are notoriously difficult for traditional data integrity frameworks to manage due to the sheer volume and variety of data streams and continuous learning paradigms used therein. A proactive and scalable quality assurance methodology is proposed by this study by combining state-of-the-art methods including feedback loops, explainable AI, and anomaly detection. Research shows that using these methods greatly improves AI-driven processes in terms of accuracy and dependability while decreasing the likelihood of bias, mistakes, and inefficiencies. Findings from this research highlight the need of continuously improving quality assurance procedures for sustaining credibility and efficiency in the age of intelligent automation. This paper delves into the changing landscape of quality assurance in AI-driven processes, with a focus on how automated workflows must prioritise data integrity. With their reliance on varied, high-volume information and complicated algorithms, next-generation AI systems are dynamic and complex, making traditional quality checks inadequate. In order to guarantee strong data integrity, this study suggests a new AI quality assurance system that combines adaptive mistake detection, predictive analytics, and sophisticated validation techniques. The framework reimagines quality standards in AI operations by using state-of-the-art technologies such as blockchain for traceability and federated learning for decentralised validation. There are noticeable gains in efficiency, accuracy of decisions, and reduction of errors in empirical assessments. The results highlight the need to reconsider quality standards in order to build trustworthy and reliable AI ecosystems, which will allow for their ethical and scalable implementation. Organisations striving to align AI systems with strict quality and integrity requirements in increasingly automated settings might look to our work as a benchmark.
Read full abstract